The next step is remove the police and army and replace with AI controlled drones. People are incredibly stupid. All you need is to get them hooked to vaccines and digital currency and you can take them out at will. Have a look at the masked zombies at 12 minutes.
La Palma volcano update: First quake above magnitude 5 https://bit.ly/3GxL2Lj Red-Hot ‘Lava Bomb’ Careening Down Volcanic Slope Looks Like It Came Straight From Hell https://bit.ly/3pR3RCZ Latest quakes near La Palma volcano: past 24 hours https://bit.ly/3hLpMXk La Palma Quakes vs Depth Chart https://bit.ly/2XseTTk 🌎 LIVE: La Palma Volcano Eruption, the Canary Islands https://bit.ly/3vFWrDM
Today’s Featured Links:
Macro Magnetic Holes: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10… IMF/HCS every 7-10 days: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10… IMF & Mars Aurora: https://baas.aas.org/pub/2021n7i206p0… North Atlantic Cooling: https://link.springer.com/article/10…. The Sun and Mortality: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/f…
Version 1.3 refresh browser
This article will be regularly updated over the next few days and therefore you will need to refresh your browser to get the latest version because I intend to add new material and links over the next few days. I have ripped the audio and transcribed it using word online but it is rather messy and unstructured and is 94 pages long! This is therefore a work in progress. The first timestamps are just rough indicators (my own) before I used the automatic transcribe. I am hoping that I will get some input from the “Racoon” Discord. You should be able to download the transcript here: gig2.docx
This is the debate between Dr Jonathan Jay Couey the neurobiologist and the molecular biologist Dr Daniel Wilson from Debunk the Funk.
Pre- Show talk (starts at 00:06:38) In the Pre-show talk Jonathan was critical of Dr Kevin McCairn and remarked that pointing out the contamination in the vaccines and the blood work was a distraction. I beg to differ and think Jonathan is wrong. We are at the point of the mass vaccination of children and not everyone has the time or the mental capacity to engage in an academic discussion about immunology. Science has thrown sand in their eyes. Most people need a simple message to focus on and contaminated vaccine is a good starting point. We know there is contamination as people died in Japan and batches were withdrawn. We simply no longer have the luxury of the cut and thrust of academic debate and most people are simply bamboozled or find it overly complex. Setting the academic niceties aside the message must be simple and clear. When in the trenches you are forced to fight dirty, and it is time to go for the jugular. They have a huge propaganda machine and the medical establishment and pharma behind them. The demonstration of how the vaccine reacted with blood was powerful and simple to understand and with the help of Dr Fleming Kevin was able to reach a huge audience. We need to support each other otherwise we will go down the DRASTIC route. We all need to focus on our strengths and focus all our efforts on the enemy. Hold the line. Play to your strengths. You are all doing a great job keep the pressure up.
10:00 Ribosomes Dr Wilson’s doctorate?
19:00 Dr Wilson introduction
21:00 Natural antibodies and IgG and IgM
Dr Wilson: ( 00:21:55) What I think Geert got wrong was this idea that natural antibodies can neutralize and clear Sars-CoV-2 infection all on their own. We have antibodies in our body that could theoretically recognize any epitope to any pathogen….we have antibodies that can recognize any epitope from any pathogen that is due (22:42) to hypersomatic gene shuffling…… but those antibodies are not from class-switch mature antibodies so they are typically really low in abundance, and they are not going to be really good at binding…so you can detect them in cell assays…so they exist…they are a thing…but they are not good at binding…..the B cells making the antibodies that might bind Sars-CoV-2 need to undergo class switching and further hypersomatic mutation to create better antibodies IgM is typically not going to do much against a virus.
JC: 24:00 …when T cells are responding early to infection, they are not responding to spike protein epitopes, they are responding to the earliest expressed epitopes in viral infection….and when they then activate apoptosis in those infected cells there are viral particles and fragments of these digested cells and the viral particles that get digested by the macrophages that are there, that are then processed, and those need to be cleaned up. That is what the antibodies do in a natural “well done” infection…the antibodies are cleaning up the viral debris, they are not the primary way the body is stopping the virus from infecting cells. How would any antibody that is in your blood stop a virus infecting the epithelial cells of your lungs? It won’t. That is what T cells do and when they fight the infection they create debris which the body has to clean up, and that debris is often times very much the same from infection to infection and that is the reason why those IgM antibodies work at low concentrations and low affinity. And the only reason why you need to enrich antibodies for specific antibodies is for when the viral load reaches a level where it is systemic and that does not happen with every infection because T cells take care of that…and I think most of the TV biology ignores the fact that asymptomatic infection in a healthy person is T cells responding to the first genes expressed in viral infection and that is not the spike protein.
Dr Wilson. 26:00 The spike Protein is the first thing the body sees. JC: That is not true- the first thing the body sees is are the proteins presented on the HLA receptors when the cells are infected, and those proteins are viral proteins and that is how it works. Dr Wilson interjection: Including spike. J.C. (26:27) No, it is the first proteins that are expressed the spike comes afterwards, you first have to express the proteins that hijack the cellular machinery of the epithelium, and those proteins must also be expressed on the outside and they are the first T cell epitopes available. There is no other way to debate that, those are the first and most prolific T cell epitopes, they are identified in at least 10 different papers as the most immunogenic epitopes in the genome and that is because T cells respond to the earliest proteins.[i]
27:00 Dr Wilson….Geert is saying antibodies alone can clear an infection JC response…you are parsing things out (semantics) because Geert is a vaccinolgist with 20 years’ experience (of course he knows about T cells) but….vaccinologists have to look at antibodies because it is the only read out that they have got. Dr Wilson interjection: No, you can measure T cells
JC response: You can, but not all of them…because the memory T cells resides in the lungs and anyone who works on the immune system of a mouse knows that because you have to sacrifice the mouse to get the memory T cells you can’t measure them in a human, you have to get them when they are migrating. Dr Wilson interjection. No, you can get them from germinal centers JC…but they are not the memory cells, they are not the ones residing in the lungs, you can’t…it is not possible and there are no papers except for in mice. Dr Wilson refers to a longitudinal memory [ii] and they measured T and B cell responses. JC. Right, they are stimulated memory B cell responses…they are not the same thing….as the ones residing in the lungs…there are memory cells that migrate back and memory cells that stay from colonial expansion and from antigen affinity enrichment and there are also memory cells that reside at the site of infection. Wilson: And in germinal centers which you can assay. JC: Right, but you can’t assay the ones that matter the most…the ones which they only understand from mouse experiments and monkey experiments because they can remove the lungs. They can sample from the lungs…you are arguing against nothing though…because you are still not admitting that T cells do the job. What other cells are getting rid of the infected cells? Wilson: Macrophages. JC response: NO Macrophages cannot get rid of infected cells the way that CD8 positive cells can because they cannot target…(macrophages) they clean up. The primary response to any infection is CD8 and CD4 positive cells. It is not antibodies DUDE (30:18)
00:30:19 Wilson Antibodies are a frontline defense. JC They are not…..
Wilson If the titer is high enough, they are. If the titer is high Enough, yes, they are.
J.C. That’s that’s exactly why the titer does not stay very high in a healthy person because they are cleaning up. Wilson 00:30:28 They neutralize them, neutralize. If antibody titers are high, the virus will not be able to infect or spread very well. 00:30:38 JC Oh, is that is that, is that what you see in the data now that that that antibody titers correlate with people who can get? That’s ridiculous.
You know, that’s not true. Wilson 00:30:47 Well, we know that neutralizing antibody titers correlate with outcome and with infection and everything so. JC But but you you know that you know that I’ve done like six months worth of streaming to show that that’s not true. There are paper after paper………… 00:31:28 JC But they’re not as important as you think they are. Would you like to hear a virologist? 00:31:32 Wilson Admit that like? ……. JC 00:31:38 That they don’t know what antibodies mean. Would you like? They don’t, they don’t. JC 00:31:43 They don’t know what antibodies mean. They do not know whether antibodies are a correlate of protection or not, and that’s because that’s because….
@jjcouey @w_mccairn @risemelbourne @Valkyrie20201 @YonSolitary @sweettalkin1970 @CoachNinah @Fynnderella1 @TonyHinton2016
1./ Antibodies are not a correlate of protection. pic.twitter.com/TdIltlAi8G— Moses Eleftheria (@EleftheriaMoses) October 28, 2021
Wilson 00:31:52 So so, so there’s a difference there. OK, a correlate of protection has not been determined for SARS-CoV-2 so. That means that if you have really high antibodies from, say, a natural immune infection and also really high but lower titers of antibodies from a vaccine. From that difference. Is it we don’t know the significance of it. We don’t know the immune correlate of protection, but we do know that higher antibody titers do correlate with better outcomes for patients…..
David LV Bauer ADMITS to viewers how the Pfizer jab WEAKENS your natural immune system.pic.twitter.com/wjS80ivCNu
— Lisa (@lisaf15021) October 3, 2021
——————————————————————————————————————-
1.2
Dr Wilson adds the following papers under the video (on his Debunk the Funk website). I have taken the time to add citations from those very papers:
Wilson Heading: Most neutralizing antibodies elicited from SCV2 infections target spike:
Convergent antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in convalescent individuals“Affinity measurements and mapping of naturally occurring and in vitro-selected spike mutants in 3D provided insight into the potential for SARS-CoV-2 to escape from antibodies elicited during infection or delivered therapeutically”.
SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody structures inform therapeutic strategies“Antibody sequencing revealed the expansion of clones of RBD-specific memory B cells that expressed closely related antibodies in different individuals…..Although there is currently no vaccine, it is likely that antibodies will be essential for protection. However, little is known about the human antibody response to SARS-CoV-2……In conclusion, most convalescent plasma samples obtained from individuals who recover from COVID-19 do not contain high levels of neutralizing activity”.
Wilson Heading: Presence of neutralizing antibodies is predictive of patient outcome:
Neutralizing Antibodies Correlate with Protection from SARS-CoV-2 in Humans during a Fishery Vessel Outbreak with a High Attack Rate“In addition, our study shows only that neutralizing antibodies are a correlate of protection: we cannot be sure that protection comes from neutralizing antibodies per se rather than some other immune response with which they correlate, such as T cells”.
Wilson heading: Multiple antibodies recognize several sites on the spike protein post-vaccination:
Convergent antibody responses to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in convalescent and vaccinated individuals“While these clones initially offer protection, this property could be lost as widespread selective pressure on the virus is exerted on a region with genetic and structural plasticity”.
——————————————————–
JC 00:33:19 And it’s never, it’s never seen a coronavirus before? Wilson 00:33:23 Not Sars-CoV-2 JC Oh, I see. And so what’s so different about SARS Co V2 from the rest of the coronavirus is is it all the proteins or just a few? ………. JC 00:33:35 How different it’s 61% different in what’s that? 61 percent? Is it all spread out evenly, or is it found in certain proteins that are highly conserved across all coronaviruses? Or don’t you know that answer? Wilson 00:33:47 I know that it’s a 60% a 60% a 60% difference in the genome is huge. JC Yeah, it’s huge unless it’s not, unless it’s not all spread equally. My friend and it’s not, it’s not, it’s spread, it does because the immune system remembers the genes that don’t change. ……[iii]
Wilson 00:34:10 No. but it Doesn’t, it’s it’s clearly not able to recognize unclear source code B2 value though, when millions of people have died. JC 00:34:14 So how come 50% of the people who get infected don’t even get sick, don’t even know they’re infected. How do you explain that? That doesn’t happen with flu?……….
————————————————————————————————————
1.3
Does Influenza Transmission Occur from Asymptomatic Infection or Prior to Symptom Onset? (2009)
"Based on the available literature, we found that there is scant, if any, evidence that asymptomatic or presymptomatic individuals play an important role in influenza transmission. As such, recent articles concerning pandemic planning, some using transmission modeling, may have overestimated the effect of presymptomatic or asymptomatic influenza transmission. More definitive transmission studies are sorely needed".
Estimates of the asymptomatic fraction are affected by the study design, and the definitions of infection and symptomatic illness. Considerable differences between the asymptomatic fraction of infections confirmed by virologic versus serologic testing may indicate fundamental differences in the interpretation of these two indicators.
00:34:22 JC: Do you get high viral loads of flu and not show symptoms? You do not. Sorry, but you don’t. That’s complete baloney. Wilson: Yeah, in some cases we do you do. It’s it’s it’s. Very common to have an asymptomatic carrier of something that happens. It does happen. JC AGREES: Yes, it does happen, but it’s much more likely to happen now that we have these silly transfections going around. Wilson: TRANSFECTIONS? JC: Yeah, transfections, you know the…..Wilson: The yeah, no transfection is it’s a choice. 00:34:59 Wilson: It’s a choice to call the M RNA vaccine in a transfection but… JC: It’s not, it’s what it is. JC: It’s not a vaccine, it’s a transfection. Vaccines, have an adjuvant and a pathogen in them…… 00:35:12 Wilson [They] Have an adjuvant…It’s the mRNA….the adjuvant is the mRNA. They designed it specifically not to be immunogenic. Did you not read about how they did it? JC: I don’t know. 00:35:20 Wilson: Oh, I read about how they did it and it does act as an adjuvant because they’re able to purify it with HPLC that increases recruitment of dendritic cells to the site. They also pseudo-urodilate = (Pseudouridine) it, which also increases dendritic recruitment to the site that acts as an adjuvant.
00:35:36 JC: Oh my gosh, you are actually totally wrong. You know that, right? It’s actually the opposite.00:35:42 Wilson: You’re just saying I’m wrong, that’s. 00:35:43 JC: No, but I …. Wilson: That’s what happens. JC: I’ve interviewed, I’ve interviewed both Robert Malone and Luigi Warren. Luigi Warren is one of the guys who invented this. He’s the guy who came up with the pseudo you’re the idea of using this alternative. Wow man, you are shocking me right now. 00:36:02 Wilson: I mean, that’s literally how it works. pseudo-urodilation and HPLC purification increases dendritic cell recruitment. 00:36:09 JC Of what? where at? Do you mean at the site of injection? Wilson: yes JC: Because the mRNA acts as an adjuvant. I would love for you to give me a reference for that. I would love for you to give me a reference for that because it’s my understanding that the reason why they needed to use this alternative basis so that it would not be immunogenic because RNA is one of the most immunogenic things in the body. 00:36:46 Y Wilson: Yeah , yeah they went through a lot of trial and error to get this right. JC: To get it not to be immunogenic and now you’re telling me it’s the adjuvant and it’s completely wrong. Wilson: Oh, it’s that that’s definitely how it works. 00:36:58 JC: I’ve heard other people tell me it’s the lipid nanoparticle that is the adjuvant. You guys are crazy. Wilson: No, no. JC: There is no adjuvant. That’s the whole point of this. If the mRNA was the adjuvant, you would have such a problem. 00:37:09 Wilson: It is an adjuvant…OK, let me just get this reference for you. 00:37:19 JC: Is it from Moderna or Pfizer? Are you giving me a scientific reference from Pre con? 00:37:23 Wilson: No, this is a review of mRNA vaccines before COVID existed. JC: Cool, cool, cool. Send it to me please. Do they talk at all about the fact that they had to reduce the immunogenicity of the mRNA? Or how do they? Wilson: Oh, yeah, they had to try to figure out how to make it stable enough that the immune system wouldn’t totally just chew it up right away then. 00:37:48 JC: But the immune system doesn’t chew up mRNA dude. You’re a molecular biologist. You know that that’s not the immune systems job. There are just RNase that do that. Wilson: It’s passive immunity. JC: OK yeah OK. Well, I mean just don’t say that’s like the immune system, that’s that’s silly. Wilson: It’s, it’s a defense against foreign invaders that is part of the immune system. 00:38:14 JC: I’m so confused as to how this could be the adjuvant and also not immunogenic. I don’t get it. Wilson: It’s a balancing act. JC: It’s it’s not. Wilson: The immunostimulatory properties of mRNA conversely, can be increased by the inclusion of adjuvant…… blah blah blah blah blah.
Wilson was quoting this:
“The immunostimulatory properties of mRNA can conversely be increased by the inclusion of an adjuvant to increase the potency of some mRNA vaccine formats. These include traditional adjuvants as well as novel approaches that take advantage of the intrinsic immunogenicity of mRNA or its ability to encode immune-modulatory proteins”. mRNA vaccines — a new era in vaccinology
Three decades of messenger RNA vaccine development "Finally, we discuss the mRNA self-adjuvant effect as a critical, but dichotomous parameter that determines the safety, efficacy and strength of the evoked immune response. Notwithstanding, the potency of this self-adjuvant effect of mRNA must be weighed against the risk of any adverse reaction inherent to it, including inflammation reactions and auto-immune event".
00:38:31 JC: inclusion of an adjuvant…you just said the words you dope. Are you reading Oh my God, you just read the words and you’re telling me I’m wrong? Wilson: I’m leaving, I’m finding it hard. JC: Find another paper dude. Holy **** I mean. Wilson: Chill out, chill out. JC: Dude, you’re starting to bother me because nothing you’re talking about is right. It’s the opposite. ……. 00:39:20 J.C. You cannot, but you can’t have it be not an adjuvant and an adjuvant or not immunogenic and immunogenic…..It’s like you just read the article today. 00:39:35 Wilson: It’s a balancing. 00:39:35 JC: You just read the text that said mRNA can be added with an adjuvant and then you stopped reading it because you knew you were putting your foot in your mouth.…00:39:50 JC: You should know it already because I’m talking about general principles of immunology and that is that mRNA is immunogenic and you’re telling me that this is the adjuvant. That can’t be true because otherwise the vaccine would not work like it’s supposed to, which is expressing a ton of spike protein so that the body will build antibodies to the spike protein. It’s one or the other. Dude, it’s crazy. It’s like you work for Moderna and you’re tripping over yourself to give us a stock portfolio presentation. 00:40:24 Wilson: Uh-huh sure. Yeah, so that’s that’s exactly what they do. HPLC and pseudouridilation recruit strength dendritic cells. JC: What there…you’re just said the same thing you said before. You’re not explaining to the biology of it. 00:40:46 Wilson: Yeah, it’s it’s in… it’s in this paper. JC: What is the biology behind it though? You explain that to me. How does that work that the mRNA gets in disguised in the lipid nanoparticle? So, then it doesn’t attract the immune system and it expresses spike protein and then it attracts the immune system.
How? What’s happening. Can you explain that? Because when a virus does it, a virus hijacks your cells and your cell’s machinery and the cells then signal out saying that I’m hijacked both by presenting the proteins that they have to express, and by sending out signals what?
What happens here, does it send out similar signals? 00:41:26 Wilson: It’s there by your body reacting to the foreign RNA. JC: I thought it was to the spike protein? 00:41:32 Wilson: No, that’s the recruitment of dendritic cells. JC: What is the recruitment of dendritic cells? The mRNA? 00:41:38 Wilson: They’re reacting to the mRNA, yes. JC: But the mRNA is in the cells. I thought the M RNA was in the cells, so then how is the? 00:41:47 Wilson: It’s foreign mRNA, not all of it is going to be encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles. Some of it’s going to be free floating some of its…. 00:41:53 JC: Oh wow, oh, this is all kinds of crazy **** that I didn’t know about the vaccine, yeah. 00:41:59 Wilson: Well, that’s what happens in a tube.
The mRNA question has been treated in a separate blog article which can be found here:
[i] SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls
Airway Memory CD4+ T Cells Mediate Protective Immunity against Emerging Respiratory Coronaviruses
[ii] Longitudinal analysis shows durable and broad immune memory after SARS-CoV-2 infection with persisting antibody responses and memory B and T cells
[iii] Even though it could be argued that 60% similarity still means that 40% of the virus is “unknown” one cannot argue for a “novel” virus. It depends how that 60% is distributed. It depends on the importance of that 60% (structural, functionality etc of the proteins). One cannot argue that the immune system has never encountered it before. Would you be able to identify a car if only 60% was photographed? Probably. Especially if you photographed the badge. And why would you repurpose other coronavirus drugs unless you knew they could be effective? Genetic comparison among various coronavirus strains for the identification of potential vaccine targets of SARS-CoV2 “The whole-genome sequence alignment of CoV revealed 54% identity among varying CoV strains, whereas, the genome sequence alignment of the nsp-coding region alone of CoV shows 58% similarity and that of the structural protein-coding region shows 43% similarity, suggesting that nsps (non-structural proteins) form the conserved region of the genome with high percent identity, contrarily, structural proteins in need of adaptation to new hosts are more diverse” (Chen et al., 2020). In the conclusion they state: “So, drug/vaccine repurposing is the current hot research area and researchers are aiming for the use of potential target antigen sequences of previously known coronavirus strains to come up with a suitable vaccine for novel SARS-CoV2 strain”.
Tweet and spread everywhere…..Flood the Zone
Reminder: this conference happened before the pandemic. It is almost as if they knew what was coming (lolz). People wake up. Avril Haines is Chabad. Flood the Zone. Get the truth out everywhere.
Director of National Intelligence, Avril Haines at Event 2👁1 Pandemic Simulation in 2019.
Who was sitting next to China’s CDC director George Gao whos says,
-Some people may say the v1rus was man-made & cites example about ebola
Who sat next to Jane Halton.
And some other interesting coincidences!
Why are the large accounts never taken down on FB etc.
It is well known that Mossad employed Chabad as an intelligence gathering source inside Russia. Chabad is now headquartered in New York and has expanded mission outreach all over the world. Chabad is proposing Noahide laws and is influential on both the left and right of politics. Jared Kushner and his wife are Chabad but as we can see even the Biden administration is influenced by Chabad. Chabad is looking for the Messiah to return so that they can rule the gentile nations. The bankers (Rothschild) could not care less about such messianic fervor many of them are either atheist, satanists or Masonic (some believe that the higher degrees are initiated into satanist theology). In any case the Rothschild bankers (and their “mission” outreach Mossad) are not adverse to funding both sides of any operation. They will fund both the left and the right (proud boys and antifa), messianic movements and satanists. It is how they roll. Divide and rule and the Hegelian Dialectic have always worked for them. Order out of Chaos. Unfortunately the dumb goyim fall for their deceptions every single time.
The development of binary code computer technology and computer viruses runs parallel with the development of the human genome project and human viruses (Special Virus Cancer Program). They have a materialistic view of the world and think we are all mere DNA code. All they have to do is change our operating system. Viruses are not always malign- they are a method for delivering new information (mRNA) into the cell. So bio-technology is dual use…it can be used for good (gene therapy) or bad (bioweapon) like nuclear energy. However, in order to achieve their goals they need thousands of man hours of experimental data and they need to feed the data into Artificial Intelligence (AI) to work out which epitopes are important.
The hackers left their signature in their virus malware. Hackers always sign their malware. They messed up. They thought no one would find out.
I created the long overdue tag bioweapons for this article. Covid 19 is a bioweapon and the vaccine is dual use technology.
Wicked Game: https://youtu.be/zY85rhQHdNk US Army Walter Reed Institute of Research: https://youtu.be/Ig16gl8iMOo
My comment: Thanks must have missed that episode will place it on my blog. I already knew about the spraying in San Fran but you back it up with the actual reports etc. Interesting that the Newspaper report was published 42 days after 911 on something that happened in the 50’s. The bio-warfare operation ties in with Mark Kulacz from Housatonic’s theory that we are dealing with two deep state factions one that wanted to use bioweapons and the others wanted to maintain the status quo with conventional weapons. Their bio-freak plans were interrupted by 911 but now they are back on track. Have a look at these articles:
Another excellent show by dot connector extraordinaire Mark from Housetonic linking the winter Olympics in Salt Lake city 2002 with the Human Genome Project. The networks are extensive and linked to viral and bio-weapon research dual technologies. I believe that Mark is correct in detecting two different deep state factions vying for supremacy. On the one hand we have the proponents of conventional warfare and the arms industry and on the other had we have the technocrats with dual use bio-warfare technology. It looks like some sort of biological attack (similar to Covid19) was being prepared and that it was preempted by 911. Just after 911 there was an anthrax incident and the propaganda against bio-terror was ramped up but fell on deaf ears because the public was bracing for conventional war against the (so called) perpetrators of 911. The 911 terror attacks preempted any bio-warfare attack and the technocrats missed their opportunity until their successful attempt with Covid19.
Another excellent Show by Mark and I have used his findings in my own videos but I offer a counter point to his comment on Israel.
To paraphrase Mark at about 59 minutes:
“Greater Israel - Bunting Clover Leaf map-shipping routes Israel not in the middle- I don't know if a billion people are going to subject themselves to 7 million old people in Israel. I don't care...if China and Israel....I don't care what people in other countries think. I just ask for my own govt not to kill me. This is not a channel where I blame other countries. You must fix the local problems. If 8 million Jews are so smart maybe they are the chosen people.... maybe we need to serve them. All I ask if for my govt not to break up families and kill people. You are saying that people in Israel wrote a computer program to control you. The problem is at home and in the community...this is a huge ideological difference that I have with others”.
Disappointed that Mark is so dismissive of the wider Geo-political picture and so parochial in his outlook. If you can’t identify the problem, how can you ever hope to fix it? “You must fix the local problems” ….and…. “…all I ask is for my govt not to break up families and kill people”. Really? Where did all the anti-family and weaponized social justice warrior rhetoric come from? Racism, homophobia, gender-ism…all the isms? Where did all the cultural Marxism, CRT etc. come from? Perhaps we should investigate the Frankfurt School and join the dots back to Critical Theory of Berkley University California. Perhaps we need to have a look at the book (The Culture of Critique) by the evolutionary psychologist Kevin MacDonald (although he has obviously been blacklisted as antisemitic).
So, the USA and most of the world has already been subverted. They already control you because they control the fiat money supply. They don’t need to control you through a computer program. The private Jewish bank the Federal Reserve (1913) is about to hyper-inflate the dollar. The Central Banks across the world are controlled by the Rothschilds. The biggest hedge funds Blackrock and Vanguard are Jewish, and they have a virtual monopoly in corporate shareholdings. Social Media and MSM is Jewish. Pharma is Jewish. Your Congress and government are already captured. They already own you. They control you through debt, through the medical establishment, they feed you and they tell you what to think through the media. You already know this because so much of your “dot connecting” highlights prominent Ashkenazim. Their control is about to become even tighter with digital currencies and medical tyranny.
As to the Bunting Clover Leaf Map that places Israel at the center of the Continent we need to be thinking in terms of the Mackinder world Island The Geographical Pivot of History rather than trade routes. With the coming natural (not man made) rapid climate change the Sahel in Africa and the Middle East will form the next grow zones. The Midwest plains of the USA will no longer be the food bowl of the world.
Israel should be thought of as a Rothschild banker project. It is their forward fire base. It was the bankers who dragged the USA into World War One so that the Ottoman Empire could be dissolved. They made a deal with the Old East India Company, and it is the Anglo-Zionist trading and banking establishment that destroyed colonial Germany and prevented her becoming a world power. The pay off was the Balfour Declaration. It was the bankers behind the October Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, and it was the bankers behind the opening of China in 1971.
The USA was used as a tool for building Greater Israel and clearing out the Middle East ready for the SMART cities and the Belt and Road. The bankers will own the oil reserves and they will own the Lithium (Afghanistan) meanwhile they have persuaded the West to go green (lolz). American technology and know-how were deliberately transferred to Russia and China. Israel is now a high-tech computer and medical hub. It will be the center of Artificial Intelligence and quantum computing. Microsoft is already in Israel, and they have a backdoor into all chips.
“The problem is at home and in the community...this is a huge ideological difference that I have with others”.
What you say is true…but only partly true. You are ignoring the elephant in the room. Your work has been invaluable to seeing the big picture and for that I am grateful as you have demonstrated a coordinated long-term agenda. Your country (and indeed the western world) has been subverted. Just looking “at home” and “locally” will not solve the problem. Their plans are global, and their institutions and reach are global (WEF, WHO, GAVI, Open Society etc., etc.). The USA will not solve the problem by becoming isolationist. We will soon see communitarianism rolled out globally. Israel is a Rothschild agent and Russia, and China are their golems employed to scare the West. Nevertheless, not all Israelis and not all Jews are complicit. Many Israelis are suffering because the oligarchy is willing to sacrifice fellow Jews to achieve their ambitions. It was ever so.
We are in a spiritual war. The desire to become transhuman and change the image of God is the Causi Sui of original sin. This is in essence a war on Christianity. There is a Jewish element that believes that the world belongs to them, was promised to them, and that their rightful place has been usurped by white gentiles. The forces against us are not just local and they are extremely powerful. Who can make war against the Beast?
Another masterclass. Looking forward to his next show where he will debate the FUNKSTER (lolz). As Jonathan notes at roughly the 1 hour mark, the only rapid changes (mutations) are in the S-protein and that is the very protein that they are transfecting everyone with.
Previous show with review and links:
This video was recommended by Brendon on his Patreon thread and he invited people to place their comments underneath. I have added one of the comments as well as my own observations. An important video because it shows you how they use science to muddy the waters. Interesting how they flip the narrative right at the end.
First Comment: This video ended up being about how the battle of science against science to being used to change narratives. By *systematically* funding special research projects, some even completely "absurd," one is able to use the so-called results as a "distraction" to undermine the science considered undesirable. The idea is to say there are all kinds of causes. It's an effort to "spread ignorance by clouding the issue with a multitude of data." And "it's an effective strategy" because "it then becomes almost impossible to determine the true guilty party, and that's the point." A 1969 internal Big Tobacco memo spelled the whole plan out: "Doubt is our product since it is the best means of competing with the 'body of fact' that exists in the minds of the general public. It is also the means of establishing a controversy." A professor of psychology calls it the "designed playbook" for "science denial," and claims this is "extremely well-understood" because the Big Tobacco scandal inspired its own field of academic study known as Agnotology. Wikipedia says "it's the study of deliberate, culturally-induced ignorance or doubt, typically to sell a product or win favor, particularly through the publication of inaccurate or misleading scientific data." A science historian claims this strategy has been used "over and over and over again" for 70+ years with acid rain, the ozone hole, pesticides, climate change, neonicotinoids (class of insecticides), Bisphenol A (BPA), and contraceptive pills. And the guilty parties continue to profit year after year because there are two types of science: established and on-going. With established science, we no longer question. But, with ongoing science, there is still doubt. "Doubt is an essential driver of ongoing science" because with this type, we're still proposing hypotheses or doubt that the existing explanation is adequate. The tobacco industry's strategy of turning the "virtue of doubt into a vice" pushed the new idea that "established, accepted science is still subject to doubt." Sound like the Science Is Never Settled narrative? So ultimately THEY are using science against science to change the narrative, to "manufacture ignorance," or as the Agnotologists call it, "strategic ignorance." With the constant stream of innovations, so-called science now focuses studies on how these innovative products influence our health, asking, "Is this a threat to our health, and what are the safe levels?" Goes on to discuss the regulatory toxicology scandal around BPA, and how the plastic industry utilized the "skepticism through disinformation" playbook to design studies that purposely would conclude there were no negative effects of this chemical. 27:49 Apparently there's an entire industry for breeding lab animals with specific biological parameters, allowing "illusionists of science" (study authors) to deliberately select and test on animals they know will manipulate their study results. There's an online catalog to order from and they ship the live animals direct. Reminds me of the aborted fetal body parts catalog; it shouldn't exist, but it does. 31:00 An overview of how we're fueling our own ignorance by participating in limited hangouts on the internet (cue clip of Robert David Steele), which is the "new court of opinion." Whoever can push the stronger narrative wins, as science is replaced with the acceptance of "to each their own truth." Video then accuses climate change deniers and anti-vaxxers of ignoring scientific truth in favor of their opinions and not "reality." Says ultimately the truth does prevail—but I call bullshit. Data and AI, anyone? Ha! Spoke too soon. The video next discusses how researchers have to generate money and find it, and so "science has turned into a marketplace where everyone is trying to attract attention." In 2000, the buzzward "genomics" would score you millions in funding. In 2010, it was nanotechnology. And in 2020, the money-maker is artificial intelligence. "The market economy frames science in a way that values and privileges science that can be monetized—that's lucrative." Says competition is pushing science in a specific direction, and whole fields of science have been deserted, known as "undone science," simply because there's no financial benefit to further study or we prefer not to know. I'd say the classic Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated study-that-never-was definitely fits in this category. Concludes with the (fear-mongering?) claim that "science is under threat," and this is stated alongside video clips of Covid "science deniers" protesting against masks and arguing that "it's not that lethal." 41:36 Thankfully "we have scientists beating back the tide of ignorance." It shows clips of people speaking, but I don't recognize them. Maybe they're Agnotologists?
My Comment: About halfway the doco mentions metabolic disorders,obesity and diabetes hormone-sensitive cancers neurobehavioral disorders and infertility caused by Endoccrine disruptors BPA. BPA stands for bisphenol A, Bisphenol chemicals are endocrine disruptors and xenoestrogens. As a Senior Chemist (industrial) I used to produce (among other things) waste water treatment Liquid Dispersion Polymers in an oil-aqueous phase that required an activator (soap) to allow the polymer to disperse and floculate the waste. We used nonylphenol ethoxolate for years until banned in the EU. The production and use of nonylphenol and nonylphenol ethoxylates is prohibited in the European Union due to its effects on health and the environment. Before that it was used extensively in waste water treatment. Does this explain the huge uptick in tranny life? This was a good documentary but the culprits are the corporations and the governments planting the false information. The sting in the tail is that this documentary turns right at the end to debunk climate skepticism. So that was the clue as far as I am concerned. The banks want the carbon trading and green washing so there is a huge conflict of interest. A very clever documentary that turns everything on its head right at the end. You want to know how to determine the true science from the false? Look at the funding and the conflicts of interest. By the way climate change is real and will happen very rapidly but it is natural (not man made) and we will see crop failures and changing jet streams as well as increased seismic and volcanic activity due to the magnetic excursion. Of course they will blame humans. We need to be in permanent lockdown because we cannot be trusted in nature (we spread disease because of population pressure on the environment) and we have destroyed the climate (lolz). So we will be shoved into SMART cities for dumb people. The same people who made this mess are going to save us. Clown world.
This is the world they are building for you. They want to lock you away in a SMART city within a virtual reality. You are nothing but code and they will control you and update your software with their mRNA “vaccines” as required. Zuckerberg is already a robot.
At Facebook Connect, Mark Zuckerberg revealed a new company name, Meta, plus new VR and AR technologies the company is developing for the future.
Facebook’s new name doesn’t bode well for its future, at least in Israel https://t.co/K47AlduCLs
— The Daily Beast (@thedailybeast) October 30, 2021
G3 (Strong) Geomagnetic Storm Watch for October 30 http://bit.ly/30cI8GV Solar flare headed for Earth could trigger Northern Lights this weekend – and disrupt power grid https://bit.ly/3GCzKVR GOES X-Ray Flux https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/go… Geomagnetic Storms and Human Health https://bit.ly/38DKHat Aroura Potential Map https://bit.ly/3nFe3fk Solar Wind Prediction (Enlil Spiral) https://bit.ly/3rIEYrV The duration of solar flares https://www.stce.be/news/332/welcome….
Today’s Featured Links:
Geomagnetic Model: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/11/11/… Jupiter Storms: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasas-j… CW Leonis: https://hubblesite.org/contents/news-… NASA to Study Solar Storms: https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/… Sep2017 Solar Storm: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10… https://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.14130.pdf