Medical Cover Up in Australia

Medical Cover Up in Australia

Utter disgrace. This is what they are trying to cover up (official stats) they will just stop reporting or massage the numbers (it is already happening) but soon it will no longer be possible. Even the dumb masses will wake up.

Medical Cover Up in Australia – Albany Doctor Speaks Out (14 MIN)

Post-marketing

Post-marketing

I think it is perhaps time to look at Pfizer’s post marketing report again especially as it is now penetrating the public consciousness.  The context is that Pfizer was forced to release  documents under a FOIA judgement and we can be sure they released the least damaging documents first.

5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021

The argument is that the 42,000 odd cases have been picked from among millions of people who were jabbed. Apparently they collected data from existing data bases (like VAERS etc?) and added them to their own database:

Among adverse event reports received into the Pfizer safety database during the cumulative period, only those having a complete workflow cycle in the safety database (meaning they progressed to Distribution or Closed workflow status) are included in the 
monthly SMSR. This approach prevents the inclusion of cases that are not fully processed hence not accurately reflecting final information.  (page 6)

Pfizer had to employ more people to process the information – “Pfizer has also taken a multiple actions to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports”. However, they don’t tell us how many?

To date, Pfizer has onboarded approximately (b)(4) additional full-time employees (FTEs). More are joining each month with an expected total of more than additional resources by the end of June 2021.
3.RESULTS
3.1. Safety Database
3.1.1. General Overview
It is estimated that approximately (b)(4) doses of BNT162b2 were shipped worldwide from the receipt of the first temporary authorisation for emergency supply on 01 December 2020 through 28 February 2021. Cumulatively, through 28 February 2021, there was a total of 42,086 case reports (25,379 medically confirmed and 16,707 non-medically confirmed) containing 158,893 events. Most cases (34,762) were received from United States (13,739), United Kingdom (13,404) Italy (2,578), Germany (1913), France (1506), Portugal (866) and Spain (756); the remaining 7,324 were distributed among 56 other countries.  [page 6]

The enigmatic (b) (4)

Nowhere in the document does it tell us what (b)(4) represents.   This is then used as an argument to place the 42,000 odd cases within the context of millions jabbed within the 3 month period of Dec 1 to Feb28 2021.

There are lies, damn lies and statistics (as the saying goes) but even a cursory glance at the above comparison shows anomalies.  For example the US and the UK have the same number of adverse case reports even though only 11 million doses were (supposedly) delivered to the UK at this time.  Was the UK vaccine more deadly?  Was UK reporting better?  Who knows.  If we scale the Portuguese cases up to 38 million doses that would be the equivalent 41,568 cases in the USA. So we see that the “fix” of applying a typical reporting rate is nonsense.  There is no typical rate and there were no typical batches.

However, taking these figures as correct (and we are really just dealing with estimates) then a total of 88.1 million doses = 1,200 deaths = 1,200/88.1 m x 100 =0.0013% died = 102,156 deaths when scaled up to a population of 7.5 billion.  According to the WHO the cumulative deaths by 23 Feb 2021 from covid was 2.4 million.  Therefore 0.032% died from covid globally = 0.032% x 7.5 billion = 2.4 million died.  On the face of it the vaccines when projected globally only cause 100k deaths (over 3 months) verses 2.4 million deaths from covid  (over a year).

We can already see that we are not comparing like with like and we know the covid death numbers were initially exaggerated to induce fear and panic.  We also know that any deaths within 14 days of receiving the first dose is ambiguous because it is often reckoned as unvaccinated and there has been under-reporting and in some instances active discouragement of reporting adverse events.  Finally (as we shall see) a three month reporting period is far too short for longer term adverse events and deaths.  This report from Pfizer is disingenuous and alarming.

Baby deaths

Baby deaths

We are already seeing a disproportionate amount of miscarriages.  And I know what this doctor is saying about the BMJ and Lancet and New England Journal are true.   The BMJ did call out the Lancet for publishing falsified data on HCQ and regarding the safety of these vaccines (transfections) for children the ABOG member on the FDA approval team did say  “we won’t know until we roll it out”.  In others words let us try it out and see what happens.  These people are disgusting.

FETAL RISK WHISTLEBLOWER OBGYN DOCTOR “THE VACCINE INCREASED THE DEATH RATE 25 FOLD IN 10 MONTHS”  (54 mins)

 

Coincidence Theorists

Coincidence Theorists

The current waves of deaths in old peoples homes after receiving the vaccination are just “coincidences” according to MSM.  If you question the timing you are just a “conspiracy theorist” because those poor people happened to catch the new variant at exactly the same time as they were injected. Old people die anyway.  So why the fuss?

It is time to start Fighting back and labeling everyone who spouts the MSM line as “coincidence theorists”.   It is long overdue that adopt our own pejoratives.  This is after all a war of words which have been weaponized (Jews are good at Pilpul).  So the debate needs taking back with our own words and phrases.  We will use words like “Coincidence Theorist”  and “Realism denier” and “anti-parasitic” etc.  We need our own vocabulary.

 It is all one big coincidence

23 Deaths In Norway 10 In Germany

Nursing Homes Deaths Surge After Vaccination

Front-line Doctors

Coincidence Theory Cult – How a Bat Infected the Whole World

I don’t have time for INFO WARS or Alex Jones because it is Zionist controlled opposition….never the less this short clip is factually true…

…..an awful lot of coincidences.

 

Listen to the Doctors

Listen to the Doctors

Very good…..listen to Dr Simone…..

Listen to Dr Vernon…..

Listen to the Professor…

Listen to Dr Mike…..

(Michael Yeadon, ex Vice-President of Pfizer, says COVID IS FINISHED)

Hello?  Hello?  Anyone out there?   knock knock…..anyone home?

I can post videos like this all day as there are

thousands of doctors who are pointing out that this is a scam.  

Wake up.

 

 

 

 

Side effects

Side effects

 

So far (at the time of writing) there have been 33 deaths in Norway related to the Covid vaccine. Experts are saying this isn’t a big deal. And neither is the mysterious blood disorder a perfectly healthy Miami doctor died from two weeks after getting the Covid vaccine. Same with a nurse in Portugal (dead), a personal service worker in Canada (severe anaphylaxis), another doctor in Boston (serious allergic reaction) or the 100+ Israelis who all contracted Covid after getting the vaccine. This is all fine. On this episode of Objective:Health we run through these and more reports of what seems to be happening to people when they’re getting the different types of Covid vaccinations. Common, rare, deadly, crippling or mild – what’s the real deal with the reactions being reported in the press? How safe are these shots? Join us for another scintillating discussion! For other health-related news and more, you can find us on: ♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth ♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/ ♥Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channel/obj… ♥LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@objectivehealth:f And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here: ♥https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/…

 

Mandated Workplace vaccines

Mandated Workplace vaccines

What do you do if your boss tells you that unless you get the covid vaccine you will be dismissed?  What are your options?  I offer some suggestions below; they are for educational purposes only.  They should not be considered legal advice. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

Firstly, we have a dilemma because governments in different countries have subverted due process, judiciary, and parliamentary-legislative scrutiny by invoking Emergency Laws. In the USA this is known as PREP Act (The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act provides immunity from liability to certain individuals and entities, including manufacturers, distributors, program planners and those who prescribe, administer, and dispense medical countermeasures that constitute a qualified pandemic or epidemic product during a Public Health Emergency (“Covered Countermeasures”), including FDA-authorized vaccines. This immunity is granted against all claims for any type of loss, including death, physical or mental injury, fear of injury, and property damage, excluding claims involving “wilful misconduct.”[1]  So, although you might not gain immunity, (in fact you might be paralysed or die) they have (legal) immunity. 

National constitutions and international human rights treaties often contain clauses that allow governments to temporarily suspend their obligations in a time of crisis. They can invoke special powers that would normally be considered infringements on liberty.[2]

So, every country has its own version of ……you must do as you are told because it is an emergency.    In other words, they are telling you that you have no rights not even over your own body.  They can do whatever they like because collective safety is under threat.   This is very clever but that means they must offer independent scientific proof to a court of law that we are in a pandemic.  We cannot live under “emergency” laws indefinitely.  At some point they must legally and scientifically justify their emergency provisions.  The situation is dynamic and now that more data is available former hasty decisions should be re-evaluated.    However, the WHO has changed the definition of pandemic and changed the definition of herd immunity.  Governments have also moved the goalposts (two weeks to flatten the curve) and the public has faced an onslaught of propaganda and “behavioral science”.  There is therefore ample evidence of wilful misconduct which invalidates legal immunity because it constitutes criminal behavior.  They are not acting in good faith. The law cannot be used as a cloak to cover malign misdeeds perpetrated by corporations and governments.    Then there is the question of the origin and timing of the virus at the very point when the world faced economic collapse (signified by inter-bank lending; REPO).   There is enough prima facie evidence to raise suspicions and for any reasonable individual to question the use of emergency laws that justify force (mandatory vaccines), loss of liberty (lockdown) and proscribed quasi-medical (social) interventions (masks and distancing).  There are numerous court challenges underway in different jurisdictions, but they are fighting an uphill battle against a global judicial system that has been corrupted and captured.

Health and Safety laws

It is difficult to make sweeping assertions because every country is different but Western “democracies” have similar legal frameworks so here follows some general observations. For example, if an employer asks you to operate a machine or engage in a process, they must do a Risk Assessment and a Cost Benefit Analysis.  Just because we are under “emergency laws” an employer cannot ask you to operate a machine without safety guards that he knows will kill you. Neither can they terminate you for refusing to engage in something that will harm you. The health and safety laws provide offenses for engaging in discriminatory conduct for prohibited reasons.  In some countries discriminatory conduct can lead to civil proceedings being brought by the persons affected for compensation (or injunctive relief).

Moreover, the employer must provide a Risk Assessment.  You have a right to ask to see the Risk Assessment. It must include all the relevant information such as side effects and morbidity including long term effects (which are at this time unknown).[3] However, that is a complex issue, and your employer is unlikely to be able to provide you with an unbiased, transparent evaluation of the risks. Even the EU is struggling to define the risks:

“Evaluating benefits and risks is however, a complex exercise. It involves the integration of data and information from different sources, typically associated with different levels of uncertainty. In addition, measuring the benefit-risk balance is to a certain extent subjective as it involves value judgements for gaining certain benefits versus avoiding certain risks”.[4]

The Risk Assessment must examine the cost benefits of all options.  For example, what sort of safety guards are available on the cutting machine and how efficient are they?   Can we automate the process completely to avoid injury?  If we apply this to vaccines that means that we must examine the merits of each vaccine and we must also examine the benefits of alternative treatments.  In India they are having success with Ivermectin and large doses of Vitamin D and C with zinc and antibiotics.  Cheap and effective. There are also other cheap and less dangerous treatments. Why are these not mandatory?  The vaccines do not provide guaranteed protection from catching covid or even from spreading the diseaseSo, what benefit do these emergency vaccines provide?  It seems that the costs outweigh the benefits. Moreover, the risks are not uniform as underlying medical conditions or pregnancy can amplify risk.  Even the WHO admits the need to balance vaccine efficacy and vaccine safety by conducting risk/benefit assessments and to consider contextual issues (economics, availability of alternative vaccines, sociopolitical and cultural factors). But note that although they mention “alternative vaccines” they do not mention alternative treatments.[5]

Strategy

A legal statement/contract needs to be drafted that allows that vaccination will be considered if certain conditions are forthcoming.

  1. A full Risk Analysis and Cost Benefit is done by your employer. All the data backing up the risk analysis (including pharmaceutical trials) must be transparent and fully available, and you have the right to have the data evaluated by independent professionals.
  2. The employer must sign a statement accepting liability for adverse events and acknowledging that manslaughter charges could be forthcoming when the temporary Emergency Laws are revoked or repealed. A liability scheme does not excuse the government or a private/public enterprise/employer/institute from criminal charges if wilful misconduct is involved nor does it exclude or limit further tort of negligence, nor will it prevent civil suits against individuals administering said interventions.
  3. It is the onus of the employer (not the victim) to establish that any adverse reactions are not the result of medical intervention. They must provide the burden of proof that their intervention did not cause harm. There is no time limit on claiming liability for long term damages (for example sterility or cancers) if causal links are established with the vaccination.  Once again, the onus is on the employer (not the victim) to prove that they did no harm.

Conclusion

Consult a lawyer or solicitor in your country to draw up a legal document and make sure that your employer knows that they have skin in the game.  The document needs to be acknowledged, witnessed and signed. If you have a Union get them involved and your Health and Safety Executive. Remind them that they could be personally sued or charged if something goes wrong. The Nuremberg defense will not stand. If anyone can come up with a good document drafted by a legal professional let me know (DM on twitter).  If you allow the Government/employer to dictate medical intervention, then you will have established a precedent. This will be the first of many such vaccines. You will have lost sovereignty over your body. Your body your choice but the choice should not be between your health or your job.

[1] Overview of Legal and Practical Considerations for Employers Concerning COVID-19 Vaccination Policies

https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad663a10-e124-4706-afd3-bcc32f8c0958

[2] State of emergency: how different countries are invoking extra powers to stop the coronavirus https://theconversation.com/state-of-emergency-how-different-countries-are-invoking-extra-powers-to-stop-the-coronavirus-134495

[3] Sterility and cancers. Not only acute effects, but vaccination (as any intervention) can shorten long-term life expectancy. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40264-020-00984-7  One potential adverse event is antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), a type of immune reaction where vaccination makes subsequent exposure to the virus more dangerous. The condition – which has been observed with vaccines for measles, respiratory syncytial virus and dengue virus, as well as in animal models for the original Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (Sars) virus – occurs when the body, primed by a vaccine, generates antibodies that don’t sufficiently neutralise the virus when later exposed to it and instead encourage the virus into cells to replicate, exacerbating the disease.

[4] Accelerated Development of Vaccine benefit-risk Collaboration in Europe.

https://vac4eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/ADVANCE_D4.3appraisal_benefit_risk-methods.pdf

[5] WHO Vaccine Safety Basics e-learning course

https://vaccine-safety-training.org/risk-benefit-assessment.html

 

Your Future

Your Future

This is the future that they have planned for you.  The pandemics are never going away and they are going to continue experimenting on you.  They always run scenarios and do “table top” exercises before they implement the next stage.  They did the same with food in a Rockefeller document Resetting the Table  (hint there will be synthetic GMO crap on the table and no meat).  They did the same with Covid-19 in the Rockefeller Lockstep scenario and Event 201.   They are already getting ready for the next five years.  This has been planned for a long time.  They are going to take everything from you including your life. And you just stand by and suck up the lies and let them do whatever they want.  All it takes is some spine – say no to tyranny and get on with normal life.  In Italy hundreds of Restaurants have joined together and are opening up in defiance of the government.  They will not obey and they will support each other.   Civil disobedience or slavery. The choice is yours.  And turn off your damn TV.

DIANA LENSKA: THE SPARS PANDEMIC 2025-2028 JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY

On FaceBook (before they take it down…better quality):

https://www.facebook.com/diana.lenska.9/posts/1481910562011346

 

The Spars Pandemic 2025-2028

The link to the  John Hopkins document is  here: PDF