Post-marketing

I think it is perhaps time to look at Pfizer’s post marketing report again especially as it is now penetrating the public consciousness.  The context is that Pfizer was forced to release  documents under a FOIA judgement and we can be sure they released the least damaging documents first.

5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021

1./ Not good but what is the context? pic.twitter.com/5lBsvYVFPC

— The Tishbite (@Tishbite_redux) March 16, 2022

The argument is that the 42,000 odd cases have been picked from among millions of people who were jabbed. Apparently they collected data from existing data bases (like VAERS etc?) and added them to their own database:

Among adverse event reports received into the Pfizer safety database during the cumulative period, only those having a complete workflow cycle in the safety database (meaning they progressed to Distribution or Closed workflow status) are included in the 
monthly SMSR. This approach prevents the inclusion of cases that are not fully processed hence not accurately reflecting final information.  (page 6)

Pfizer had to employ more people to process the information – “Pfizer has also taken a multiple actions to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports”. However, they don’t tell us how many?

To date, Pfizer has onboarded approximately (b)(4) additional full-time employees (FTEs). More are joining each month with an expected total of more than additional resources by the end of June 2021.
3.RESULTS
3.1. Safety Database
3.1.1. General Overview
It is estimated that approximately (b)(4) doses of BNT162b2 were shipped worldwide from the receipt of the first temporary authorisation for emergency supply on 01 December 2020 through 28 February 2021. Cumulatively, through 28 February 2021, there was a total of 42,086 case reports (25,379 medically confirmed and 16,707 non-medically confirmed) containing 158,893 events. Most cases (34,762) were received from United States (13,739), United Kingdom (13,404) Italy (2,578), Germany (1913), France (1506), Portugal (866) and Spain (756); the remaining 7,324 were distributed among 56 other countries.  [page 6]

The enigmatic (b) (4)

Nowhere in the document does it tell us what (b)(4) represents.   This is then used as an argument to place the 42,000 odd cases within the context of millions jabbed within the 3 month period of Dec 1 to Feb28 2021.

*NB. 20 million doses for the rest of the world estimated by using reported reactions from those 56 countries [7,324 reports] and a typical reporting rate [358 case reports per million doses, based on USA]

≈ 20 million doses, rest of the world
≈ 98 million doses, total pic.twitter.com/sPBjd916rV

— James 💙 Neill – 😷 🇪🇺🇮🇪🇬🇧🔶 (@jneill) March 14, 2022

There are lies, damn lies and statistics (as the saying goes) but even a cursory glance at the above comparison shows anomalies.  For example the US and the UK have the same number of adverse case reports even though only 11 million doses were (supposedly) delivered to the UK at this time.  Was the UK vaccine more deadly?  Was UK reporting better?  Who knows.  If we scale the Portuguese cases up to 38 million doses that would be the equivalent 41,568 cases in the USA. So we see that the “fix” of applying a typical reporting rate is nonsense.  There is no typical rate and there were no typical batches.

However, taking these figures as correct (and we are really just dealing with estimates) then a total of 88.1 million doses = 1,200 deaths = 1,200/88.1 m x 100 =0.0013% died = 102,156 deaths when scaled up to a population of 7.5 billion.  According to the WHO the cumulative deaths by 23 Feb 2021 from covid was 2.4 million.  Therefore 0.032% died from covid globally = 0.032% x 7.5 billion = 2.4 million died.  On the face of it the vaccines when projected globally only cause 100k deaths (over 3 months) verses 2.4 million deaths from covid  (over a year).

We can already see that we are not comparing like with like and we know the covid death numbers were initially exaggerated to induce fear and panic.  We also know that any deaths within 14 days of receiving the first dose is ambiguous because it is often reckoned as unvaccinated and there has been under-reporting and in some instances active discouragement of reporting adverse events.  Finally (as we shall see) a three month reporting period is far too short for longer term adverse events and deaths.  This report from Pfizer is disingenuous and alarming.

Workflowhttps://t.co/Hwu7SACBtE

— The Tishbite (@Tishbite_redux) March 17, 2022

Bourla back-trackinghttps://t.co/601xhPYGzY

— The Tishbite (@Tishbite_redux) March 17, 2022