Blot out Amalek

Blot out Amalek

You shall blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven..


South Africa Shocks the World ! Humiliates Israeli At ICJ! (39 min)

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: Israel begins bombing “Safe Zone” (2 min)

So much of what you know and what you think you know is lie:

Israel/Palestine: Answering Questions No One Else Does | #GrandTheftWorld 183 (Clip)-10min

MUST WATCH: Max Blumenthal : The Occupation Comes Home (40 min)

Kyle Anzalone : Lindsay Graham Wants to Nuke Gaza (26 min)

 

 

 

Red Cow Apocalypse

Red Cow Apocalypse

Apparently the red cow was secretly sacrificed in Jerusalem and yet we have all survived.   Whether or not it has been sacrificed is moot because at some point in the future they do intend to sacrifice the red cow and they may have already done it.  According to the video below  the arrival of the red heifer is “prophesied in Christianity”.  That is untrue and many of the statements in the video are tendentious and decontextualized and will be debunked anon.

 


Red Heifers Secretly SACRIFICED in JERUSALEM TODAY! – Is This The Ultimate Warning? (23 min)

 

The arrival of the red heifer is not “prophesied in Christianity”. The Christian “temple” is not one made with hands (Acts 7:48). In fact the saints are living temple stones (1 Pet 2:5) and Jesus is both the temple (John 2:19) and the sacrifice (Heb 10:10). There is no more any need for sacrifice. Any Christians who tell you otherwise for whatever reason are perverting the gospel. Not only are we explicitly told in the Apocalypse that there is no temple in the New Jerusalem (Rev 21:22) but David was told by God that he did not want a temple (see my article here) and instead God would build a house (dynasty) for David and he was given the Messianic promise (2 Sam 7:12-14) nevertheless, God conceded and allowed David’s son Solomon to build a temple. As such Solomon became the initial fulfillment (placeholder) of the prophecy but he soon apostatized and as a consequence the kingdom was divided in the days of his son.

The video offers Matthew 24:14-16 and 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4 as “proof” of an end time temple with scant effort to contextualize the quotes within the history of the period as the citations refer to the first and second Roman Wars. The First Jewish–Roman War was in 66–73 AD and resulted in the destruction of Herod’s Temple the Second Jewish-Roman war (132–136 AD) was the Bar Kokhba revolt. Both wars were nationalist rebellions, striving to restore an independent Judean state. In Matthew Jesus draws on the seventy weeks prophecy by Daniel, which among other things describes the defilement of the temple by Antiochus Epiphenes in the Hasmonean period. This is a complex prophecy poorly understood by Christians, moreover, the Rabbi’s deliberately omitted about 166 years from the Persian period in their Seder Olam Calendar to ensure a period of exactly 490 years between the first and second Temple destruction (586BC+70AD=656 years not 490 years) thus making it impossible of any application of the prophecy to Christ. The end of the temple and animal sacrifice occurred in 70 AD and before that happens the apostles and Paul had already preached the gospel to all the nations of the ancient world. The second Jewish-Roman war saw the chief Rabbi Akiva declare Bar Kochba as the Messiah which he said fulfilled Numbers 24:17. There can be no doubt that Kochba erected a place for sacrifice and worship (if only temporary) on the Temple Mount. Kochba was therefore the initial prototype of the “man of lawlessness” even though he saw himself as the embodiment of the law (cf. the law made flesh). On his coins he depicted himself as a star rising above the Torah Ark.

He persecuted Christians who refused to buy and sell with his coins and his soldiers took a test of loyalty by cutting of their little finger and wearing tefillin on the forehead (Rev 13:16-17). The destruction of the temple in 70 occurred after 3.5 years of desecration as did the Kochba rebellion (the Seleucid desecration under Antiochus also lasted 3.5 years) moreover the first temple and second temple fell on the 9th Ab and Kochba’s fortress of Betar fell on the same date. History does not repeat but it rhymes and the first and second century outworking of the prophesy form eschatological patterns (but not blueprints) of future events.

Therefore the two citations in this video speak of the destruction of the temple in AD 70 and the annihilation and dispersion of the nation in AD136 which both form a pattern of the final 3.5 year tribulation and witnessing in Rev 11: 1-3 which also speaks of a temple (though not literal).

Suffice to say that God told Abraham that He would provide the sacrifice (Gen 22:14) and He told David that He did not want a temple. Although the ashes of the heifer could make the priestly recipient ritually pure , the ashes could not purge the conscience of dead works (Heb 9:13-14). The Jews do not tell you that the reason behind the necessity of the red heifer ritual is because the priests had been struck down dead by God in the Tabernacle (Lev 10:1-2) thus making the tent ritually impure. The Aaronic priesthood had effectively blocked access to God by introducing rebellion and death into the sanctuary. It was from its very instigation a flawed and rotten priesthood with Aaron making the golden calf and his sons being struck dead for burning strange incense (getting high while drunk) in the sanctuary. It was therefore necessary to introduce another way (work around) outside the camp (law) to reconsecrate the defiled priesthood. Most of the Rabbis don’t understand their own Torah because they spend all their time debating and pilpulling ways to get around the commands and pontificating in the Talmud (which Jesus calls the traditions of men). The ritual of the red heifer is closely associated with the Day Of Atonement (DOA) Scapegoat ritual which is also connected with this incident.

The Scapegoat and the Jews

The video cites Amos (9:14-15) as a proof that they would return to the land and that they would never be uprooted, but again that vision is clearly utopian and eschatological as both the Old and New Testaments speak of further trouble and even exile (Ezek 21:27, Zech 14:2, Rev 17:16)

The indwelling of Yahweh among his people is not in the form of a building but in his son, who could say that whoever had seen him had seen the Father (John 14:9). The Jews understand the presence (Shakan Exod 25:8) of God as happening through the “Shekhinah” a word not found in the Bible. It appears in the Mishnah, the Talmud, and Midrash. Kabbalah associates the shekhinah with the divine feminine as Gnosticism does with Sophia (wisdom) with the roots of these unscriptural ideas tracing back to Canaanite gods having a female consort (Asherah). The practice of Jewish male worshipers rocking back and forth and thrusting the hips is thought to linked to engaging with the divine feminine. These ideas should be rejected by Christians because the tabernacling or indwelling (skenoo) presence of God is Jesus Christ (John 1:14).

All the references to Ezekiel’s visionary temple should be understood as allegorical and/or an attempt to stimulate the people to action by making them ashamed of their apathy (Ezek 43:10-11). The temple when it was built was nothing like the vision vouched safe to Ezekiel and was so disappointing that the old men who had known the glory of the former temple wept when they saw the foundation was laid (Ezra 3: 12). The temple vision of Ezekiel was never meant to be understood literally and any attempt to regard it as such creates many problems.

Finally, it is quite obvious that many Jews as well as many Christians do not understand Scripture and that Christian-Zionists are the result of subversion by the Synagogue of Satan forming an unholy alliance with the British Empire and its Commonwealth resulting in such strange phenomenon as British Israelitism and the demonizing of Russia (Gog) as the end time enemy. They are running a “controlled opposition” play against God himself by using the eschatology of the Apocalypse as a game plan. The Gnostics and Kabbalists are attempting to wrestle God to a halt and claim the victory for themselves. God will not be mocked. This will not end well as no one can force the hand of the Almighty.

 

Extra resources:

Anglo-Zionist Temple Mount Plot

Bless Israel

Amalek Propaganda

The Return of the Jews to Israel

 

My Commentary on the Apocalypse PRITA and on Daniel  GIJ

Bronze Age Religion

Bronze Age Religion

I must be doing something right because I am taking flak from all sides (lolz). On the Sunday I had grief from fellow Christians at a gathering for speaking up about Israel, I have been derided by Jews, ridiculed by historians and dissidents, and berated by those who believe the world would be a better place without “bronze age” Abrahamic religions. Apparently, everything can be explained without recourse to the supernatural.  So, like the apostle Paul (but in a different sense) I can say that “I am all things to all men” (lolz). If only we can shake the dogma and treat metaphysics as a consciousness problem. However, I am afraid that the fundamental problem is ontological because the causa sui is human nature itself.  Unless you cure the underlying condition, your problem remains.  Consciousness mediated through our human nature is therefore the result of our cognitive and perceptual systems, a combination of our inherent biological, psychological, and social characteristics including our morality and ethics, however, to regard consciousness as merely an emergent property is an oversimplification.  Even if the death of ego were possible (it is not) and even if the material world is the collapse of higher-dimensional states into three-dimensional space it is still a reductionist projection like tensor space, and there is no established framework that definitively connects consciousness to tensor spaces. Nor can a quantum interaction with field dynamics (plasma or otherwise) explain the concept of free will. There is much to be explored here and much of merit, but we must be careful that it does not become a deus ex machina like dark matter or quantum entanglement.   The spirit of life is in the wheels (double helix) but where does that spirit come from?

Japanese Idealized

 Holding the Japanese up as an idyllic society is an oversimplification. Pre-Christian Japan was marked by a decentralized political structure with various clans and tribal groups, each vying for power. This led to frequent conflicts and warfare. Battles and skirmishes were common, and violence was an integral part of the political and territorial struggles (Buddhism and Violence in Premodern Japan). For the peasant class life under the samurai was often cruel and short. In more modern times we have Unit 731, a covert biological and chemical warfare research and development unit of the Imperial Japanese Army that that engaged in lethal human experimentation and biological weapons manufacturing during the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945) and World War II killed an estimated 200,000 to 300,000 people. Add to that the rape of Nanking and perhaps we can begin to understand that no race or religion has a monopoly on barbarity (we won’t relate how the Japanese crucified hundreds of Christan converts). The problem is not one of religion or even consciousness, it is one of human nature itself.  As to modern Japan, they have been psychologically subdued by two Anglo-Zionist atom bombs and an Anglo-Zionist banking cartel (it was Rothschild who funded the Russo-Japanese war).  The Japanese are now facing demographic collapse as are the Chinese (and the West).  I wonder who is behind that? (lolz).  It is not that the Japanese are “more peaceful” and have “a better religion” it is because adherents of a certain “bronze age” religion are better at violence and deception (lolz).  The Japanese are not more peaceful they are just more demoralized and have therefore become more isolationist and who can blame them?

Even if all religions were abolished it would not stop the carnage.  Between them non-religious communist countries the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia, and North Korea killed millions.  The “Black Book of Communism,” written by several European scholars, estimated that communism was responsible for approximately 94 million deaths worldwide, including those caused by political repression, purges, and man-made famines. The historian and demographer R.J. Rummel’s estimates suggest that communist regimes were responsible for the deaths of around 110 million people in the 20th century, including democides (deaths caused by government actions).  The problem is not religion it is unreformed human nature.

No true Scotsman

 My experience over the last year is that the anti-Christian invective all follow the same script and often employ similar phraseology.  A favourite is “no true Scotsman” a phrase that I was unfamiliar with.  No true Scotsman, is an appeal to purity, is an informal fallacy in which one attempts to protect their generalized statement from a falsifying counterexample by excluding the counterexample improperly.  This is of course nonsense when we know for a fact that the early church was deliberately subverted by Jews who Paul calls “false brethren” (Gal 2:4) and he laments that all of Asia are turned away from him (2 Tim 1:15).  The historical context argument trumps the “No True Scotsman” fallacy which is not relevant or productive in cases of documented subversion or sabotage, as it oversimplifies a complex situation.  The same can be applied to subversion of Christianity into unqualified support of Zionism which is a political nationalist ideology as even many ultra-religious Jews (anti-Zionists) recognize.  Therefore, the No true Scotsman accusation is invalid. It is as ridiculous as saying that what is now happening in Scotland is not subversion.

Foolish Christians (1 Cor1:18)

It might be amusing to hold 2.3 billion Christians up to ad hominem ridicule and straw man arguments but all that does is alienate the audience and demonstrate ignorance. A historian (like Ryan Dawson) whose geopolitical analysis is well researched believes that it is fine to dumb-down complex theological issues and misrepresent them. As a historian he should know better than asserting things like Noah’s flood is a copy of the Gilgamesh epic and stating the absurdity of a global flood. Firstly, the biblical account does not claim to depict a “global flood” (straw man) and secondly if you make claims of dependence then show the evidence. As a historian you need to demonstrate the direction of literary influence and bring evidence (verification not just assertions). We know that there are multiple accounts from different cultures covering roughly the same period and they coincide with Heinrich-Bond events. Moreover, in the Noah story (and no other) the first thing Noah does is plant a vineyard and get drunk and the oldest vineyards in the world (8,000 years BC) are in Georgia, adjacent the Ararat landing spot. As a historian I would expect Dawson’s criticisms to be evidence based otherwise how can they be taken seriously? If he merely makes assertions and misrepresents material, then his opinion can be dismissed because that is exactly what it is. An opinion without substance. His material is not even original but a repeat of Adam Green and Albert Bishai (and others) talking points, that, in my view, makes the attack look coordinated and therefore suspect.

One more example should suffice (apologetics is tiresome) he reserves ridicule of Christians for believing the fairy tale of talking snakes in Eden. A historian like Dawson should know full well that he is dealing with complex mythology that contains hidden strata of allegory and metaphor, creating rich, multi-layered narratives that convey deeper meanings, philosophical insights, and cultural values. Furthermore, as a historian I suggest that he starts by looking at 7,000-Year-Old reptilian (ophidian) Ubaid Statuettes of Mesopotamia. Perhaps they represent an elite priesthood that practiced head binding and body modification but any chance of discovering any deeper relevance is curtailed by childishly dismissive and uncurious behaviour. He could starts by reading the 400 odd page Beyond the Ubaid from studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization from the oriental institute of the University of Chicago but I believe that he is too busy insulting all Christians as idiots (lolz).

Paranormal or Pythagorean?

Another contention is that the layer of meaning encoded in alphanumeric gematria is not evidence of the supernatural or paranormal, it is simply evidence of pre-Pythagorean mathematical genius, especially as we have evidence from 1,600 BC of the Babylonians calculating the square root out of two.  Be that as it may, it does not explain the mechanism whereby simultaneous development of language and numeric value occurred and further, as a Christian it neither confirms nor denies my faith (I find it fascinating but not essential) but the fact that the NT Greek also applies similar encoding demonstrates epistemological consistency even when crossing the language barrier.  I am confident that the text will reveal much more, and that we have only begun to unravel the mystery and complexity of the logos.

Beginnings and Endings

In Scripture God is called the Alpha and Omega as he is the first and the last of every cycle which generates both destruction and creative activity. Figuratively the redeemed in this cycle can be said to be created through Christ as they were created by him and for him (Col 1:16-17) and the Lamb of God was slain in type from the foundation of the world (1 Pet 1:20, Rev 13:8). In metaphorical paraphrase a new heaven and earth emerges as the former things are passed away (Rev 21:1). Biblical history has therefore been schematized to emphasize the recurrent cyclical nature of manifestation and evolving consciousness, we know little of what came before and nothing of what comes after the cycle except the fact that God will eventually be all in all (1 Cor 15:28). This is about manifestation of the I AM becoming the I WILL BE which begs the question what will God be? Is it possible for the ground of all being to evolve and for consciousness to expand? And yet we are invited to become part of the mystery of existence if only we humble ourselves and accept the means that are provided for us.  Christ consciousness is not achieved by transcendental meditation for to be “like minded” is recognizing our alienation and identifying with the death of sin and resurrection to new life in Christ a process depicted as being born again (or born from above) as flesh and blood (human nature) cannot inherit the Kingdom of God (John 3:5-6).

As to the cycles themselves, they are apparent in the geological proxy data. The influx of cosmic radiation and plasma causes extinctions but also the rapid emergence of new life.  Much of this has been hidden from us by the power elite who wish to leverage the chaos to their advantage. In fact, much of science is a deliberate (or incompetent?) misrepresentation of reality.

War with Amalek

Yhwh declared perpetual war against Amalek (a descendant of Esau) from “generation to generation” (Exod 17:16). Amalek represents unregenerate human nature, and no quarter was to be given because sin contaminates everything it touches and attacks and victimised the weak and the vulnerable (1 Sam 15:2).  The offerings of human sin and pride are rejected by God (1 Sam 15:22) as they were with Cain and with Saul who was instructed to utterly destroy Agag (=gag/gog) the King of the Amalekites (1 Sam 15:20) and who lost the monarchy because he failed in this singular task.  Agag (Gog) becomes archetypical for sin and resistance reflected in characters like Haman the Agagite (Esther 3:1).  A previous Agag had attempted to curse the people of God, however, they would triumph in the sign of Aquarius (Num 24:7) meanwhile Agag would be “exalted” by being hung high, hoist on his own petard, a prime example of peripeteia (Esther 7:9).  Gog or Agag (not Russia) becomes archetypically representative of the final rebellion against God when his hordes from the four quarters of the earth (this is not the same as Ezek 38) are destroyed thus ending the perpetual war against Amalek because mortal human nature with its propensity to sin has been destroyed.

God did not command Zionist Israel to genocide the Palestinians.  He commands every one of us to genocide our old nature.  The Zionists will answer for abusing the Torah and wresting scripture. The rabbis will answer for setting up their own base of lawlessness and wickedness in Babylon where they wrote their Talmud (Zech 5:11).

There can be no doubt that the Jews (Edomites) like Rothschild (Red shield) have planned to plunge the world into the abyss since the revelation of their messiah Sabbatai Zevi in 1666 and his “reincarnation” Jacob Frank (d.1791). This is the war against Agag the Amalekite and their dialectic of creating the chaos of sin so that they can offer us the “solution” of Tikkun Olam ingathering of the “sparks”.  Behold, all ye that kindle a fire, that compass yourselves about with sparks: walk in the light of your fire, and in the sparks that ye have kindled. This shall ye have of mine hand; ye shall lie down in sorrow (Isa 50:11).   God is able use your plans against you and turn them to his purpose.  You shall not prevail against the creator of heaven and earth.

The image of the beast that speaks (Rev 13:15)

The image of the beast that speaks is reminiscent of Nebuchadnezzar being turned into a beast because of pride or of his tyranny in forcing his subjects to worship the image he erected (see my commentary on this)   The one who was wounded to death and healed is obviously the nation of Israel and the “miracle” is the “resurrection” of temple worship but that may be synthesized with Artificial Intelligence in a bid to rule the nations.  In my view it is one or the other and likely both.  It sounds like fantasy, but we are on the cusp of both these earth changing events, and they are both centred on Israel.  Artificial Intelligence is being offered as the alternative to being created in the image of God.  We can direct our own evolutionary development, but this will not fundamentally reform human nature. It will create global serfdom and control presided over by a psychopathic elite class who consider themselves gods.  The conclusion is that without divine intervention we will destroy ourselves.

 Cacodemon and demiurge

To those who regard Yahweh as a cacodemon or demiurge, they will be judged by their own words and that is exactly as he will appear to them, as they have created their own reality (Luke 19:22) for God will not be mocked (Prov 19:29) and even divine patience and grace has limits (Amos 5:18).  God has made everything beautiful in his time (Ecc 3:11) and to denigrate and deconstruct the material creation is a sin, as is accusing the Highest of being unclean. (Gal 6:7).  We should be prepared to fight and if necessary, die for the truth but not kill for it. The world urges us not to look up which is contrary the word of Christ (Luke 21:28).

 

Smite Amalek

Smite Amalek

Behold the Man, Trump

Behold the Man, Trump

Recommended

This is must watch whether you are a Christian or not.  Adam Green is spot on in this video (credit where credit is due).   My beef with Adam Green is that he he makes no distinctions between Christians and treats Jesus as mythological.  It is all a Jewish plot.  Christianity is a Jewish plot. His criticism of Trump and Christian Zionism is correct but the pendulum has swung the other way. Every action has a reaction and Adam Green has thrown out the baby with the bath water.  So although his criticism is correct his take on Biblical Christianity is wrong.  I have placed two of my video responses underneath.

Trump Rising, ‘America Needs Israel’, Prophecy Unfolding, Chabad on Infowars | Know More News w/ Adam Green (1:58 min)

Response to Adam Green

Miracle

 

RED (Part 3)

RED (Part 3)

I finally got around to completing Part 3. The first two parts can be found here:

Wrestling God

I hope to get part 4 done soon.

Red (Part 3)     1:13 min

NOTES AND LINKS

Flavius Josephus & Flavian Rome, Daniel Schwarz (Chapter 3) “Herodians and Ioudaioi in Flavian Rome”

https://books.google.com.au/books/about/Flavius_Josephus_and_Flavian_Rome.html?id=hqkUDAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Herodian Marriage and the Construction of Identity, James Windsor Donaldson. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.864.27&rep=rep1&type=pdf

https://www.biblaridion.info/html/Last_Things.html

The Truth about Ashkenazi Jews | Unpacked (5 min)

https://youtu.be/cw0G9COpeMY

The time and place of European admixture in Ashkenazi Jewish history https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006644

Genetic markers cannot determine Jewish descent

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2014.00462/full

The Biggest Jewish Genetic Myths of All Time

https://momentmag.com/the-biggest-jewish-genetic-myths-of-all-time/

Khazars: History of the Jewish Turkic Nomads (20 min)

https://youtu.be/Xr2CtmpKU6A

The Radhanites or Radanites

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radhanite

O. Szemerényi, “Four Old Iranian Ethnic Names: Scythian – Skudra – Sogdian – Saka” (Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1980), p. 7 @ https://www.azargoshnasp.net/history/Scythians/fouroldiranianethnicnames.pdf

Guangzhou Massacre

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guangzhou_massacre

Frankfurt School

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School

A review: On Earth as it is in heaven

A review: On Earth as it is in heaven

This is a review of the video On Earth as it is in Heaven  which presents a postmillennial view of eschatology. The video is highly recommended whatever flavor of Christianity you profess. It is thoughtful, historically enlightening and will provoke you to examine eschatology critically which is something you should be doing anyway. This is the kind of definition that is usually given for postmillennialism:

In Christian eschatology (end-times theology), postmillennialism, or postmillenarianism, is an interpretation of chapter 20 of the Book of Revelation which sees Christ's second coming as occurring after (Latin post-) the "Millennium", a Golden Age in which Christian ethics prosper.

There are many beliefs held regarding the millennium, the rapture the tribulation etc. and supposedly they all come from the Bible (lolz).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Perspective

If anything, this should tell us to cast aside dogma and take a more nuanced approach and a systematic (holistic) approach. For example, the “Kingdom” was typologically portrayed in the OT as the nation of Israel. It was a theocracy with Yahweh as King and with a human monarch appointed as the earthly divine representative. In this Israel was the “same” as the surrounding nations like Egypt who had a divine (god)-king in the institution of the Pharaoh’s (elohim/ruler-judge). The people of Israel rejected Yahweh as King just as in the time of Christ when they declared “We have no King but Caesar” (John 19:15). They wanted to be like the other nations (1 Sam 8:20) and after a period that saw the rise of tribal Judges (Ruth 1:1), they selected a monarch with the divine warning ringing in their ears that this would result in the abuse of power (I Sam 8: 10-22). The establishment of dynastic aristocracies always leads to corruption. Monarchy is probably the oldest form of government on earth and all monarchs claim divine authority to rule in the name of their “god(s)”.

From its very beginnings in the wilderness the nation had rebelled and apostatized against the rule of God and his in-dwelling tabernacling presence among them (Exod 32:1-6). They rejected his Kingship and Yahweh compromised by allowing them a human monarch. The monarch chosen by God to reflect the people’s desires (1 Sam 9:1-2) was a failure and Saul was replaced by David in whom the covenant promises vouched safe to Abraham concerning a messianic heir were invested. David was promised not just a dynasty, but a son who would rule forever (2 Sam 7:12–17).

The Temple

David functioned as a king-priest in a Melchizedek role, and he wished to restore worship and centralize the cult in Jerusalem.  On his own initiative he decided to build a house (temple) for God because all the other gods of the nations had temples didn’t, they?   Why should the God of Israel live in a nomadic tent?   The answer that David received via the prophet Nathan was that God did not want a temple and was perfectly happy with a tent (2 Sam.7:6–7). A tent is a temporal dwelling place that can be deconstructed and erected once the destination is reached. [1]  Nevertheless, Yahweh conceded with David’s desire to build a temple (just like he compromised with the desire of the people to have a human monarch), however, Yahweh turned the temple building project on its head and basically told David….so, you are going to build a house for me?   Nope…I am going to build a house (temple/dynasty) for you. I will give you a son who will sit on the throne forever (2 Sam 7:13).  The Temple of God becomes an individual in which the Spirit of God dwells.  The Temple is Jesus Christ who referred to himself as the temple (John 2:19) and whatever your understanding of the millennium might be, the millennial temple is Jesus Christ the Davidide (Rev. 21:22).   The church becomes an extension of his body and therefore the saints become the building blocks and pillars of the temple (1 Cor. 3:16–17). John sees a temple-city (the New Jerusalem) consisting of people descending from heaven to earth (Rev.21:2).  A temple-city that not only has twelve apostolic foundations but twelve tribal gates (Rev 21:14-15).  It is the perfect merging of the old covenant and the new covenants.

When David’s son Solomon built the temple the stones where hewed and shaped to size away from the building location (1 kings 6:7).  When ready the stones were transported to the build location and slotted together in a perfect fit.  Likewise, the saints are being chipped and shaped off-site and prepared to slot together when the final temple-city is revealed.

A literal temple

To build a literal temple now and re-commence animal blood-sacrifice would be an abomination to God.  It would be like a dog going back to lick up its vomit (2 Pet.2:22). We already have a memorial (a better covenant, Heb.12:24).  To understand the vision of Ezekiel’s temple as a “millennial temple” is a complete misreading of temple theology.  The vision vouched safe to Ezekiel was meant to make them ashamed and spur them on to build a magnificent post-exile temple. Instead (after much cajoling) they built Zerubbabel’s temple (causing the old men to weep for the former glory, Ezra 3:12). Zerubbabel’s temple was later upgraded by the Edomite Herod and turned by the priestly sons of Zadok (Sadoc Ezek 48:11) of Ezekiel’s vision (the later Sadducee priests in Christ’s days) into a corrupt money-making machine.  So much for the faithful Zadokites and the Jewish (Edomite) temple.  Even so, Jesus still considered the temple as his Father’s house (John 2:16) while recognizing that he would replace the temple (John 4:21). To sum up, the video is correct.  There will be no reintroduction of temple-worship and animal sacrifice.

 

The Church

The Church triumphant consists of one fold and one shepherd (John 10:16) without distinction between Jew and Gentile for all who do the “works of Abraham” are his children (John 8:39). Abraham was able to keep the whole law before it even was given (Gen 26:5) because he believed that God would keep his covenant despite Yahweh asking him to do the one thing that would destroy the promise – kill the precious seed (Gen 22:2).  The works of Abraham are therefore not the keeping of the law (works of the law) they are the works of faith.  In other words, all the law and prophets are fulfilled by faith in Christ. Abraham had faith in the character, trustworthiness, and mercy of God.  He was willing to put everything on the line. He was obedient but it was not blind obedience.  His faithfulness was counted as righteousness (Gen 15:6).

There is then no replacement of Israel by the church because the Church Triumphant is and always was Israel.  There will be no more Zionist-state and there will be no more Jerusalem.  Instead, there is the New Jerusalem (the city of the Great King). The old things have passed away because God makes all things new (Rev. 21:5).  You do not put new wine in old skins (Matt 9:17).  Similarly, the New Covenant (Jer 31:33) had new wine (1 Cor 11:25) making the old obsolete (Heb 8:7-9).

You do not resurrect a failed, rebellious nation-sate and an obsolete system of worship (which was meant to fulfil a pedagogical function) which taught the Jews nothing but instead highlighted their carnality and self-righteousness. If animal-sacrifice did not bring them to Christ it was pointless.  Will there be a Jewish presence in the land?  Of course, there will be.  There will be a Jewish monarch and there will be descendants of natural descendants of Abraham and spiritual descendants of Abraham. Abraham becomes the father of the faithful (Rom 4:16). The video rightly points to Romans 11 and the relationship between Jew and Gentile and the conversion of the Jews being a pivotal moment.[2] However, before conversion comes repentance. When the threat becomes existential, some (not all) will recognize Christ as the Messiah.

Repeat Patterns

The mess that Christians make of eschatology is a failure to distinguish between the “already here/not yet”.   The kingdom of God is “already here” it is “among you” it is “within” it is a mustard seed that grows into a great tree (Matt 13:31-32), a stone that grows to fill the whole earth (Dan 2:35).   It is therefore a process.   However, the Kingdom of God is “not yet” because we are still awaiting the return of the King.  Does Jesus already reign?  Of course, he sits on the throne already, he already has been given the gentiles as his inheritance (Ps 2:8).   In the first century it was Jesus that opened the seals (Rev 5:2) which brought the persecutions, martyrdoms and fall of Jerusalem.  The assurance the the saints was that no matter what happened Jesus was in control.

So, the Kingdom of God should be considered punctuated equilibrium. The normal stasis is broken when the sovereignty of God shatters the course of history and is openly revealed as it was in the Christ event.  That was the in-breaking of the kingdom of God into the domain of man’s rule. It only lasted 3.5 years but was a world changing event.  The citizens of the kingdom are being selected and shaped in the present time. Chipped and polished as temple stones ready to be assembled when the trump sounds.

The Apocalypse, indeed, the whole of scripture is repeat patterns.  The Olivet prophecy is directed at the events of AD 70 and elements of Olivet are repeated in the Apocalyptic seals because they are foretelling the same event.  Does that mean that it is all already fulfilled?  Certainly not.  Once again interpreters fall into the “already/not yet” trap failing to distinguish between primary and secondary meanings and the recursive nature of the patterns.  The Apocalypse also had a fulfilment in the events of the Kochba rebellion and final realization will occur soon.  The prophetic clock started ticking when Israel returned to the land and God rejected their prayers for national atonement in 1973 (Yom Kippur War). The trumpet blowing on the Day of Atonement saw the commencement of the trumpets.[3]

The Great Commission

The gospel (Good news) was preached to Abraham (Gal 3:8), was vouched safe as a preaching commission to the disciples (Mark 16:15) and is associated with martyrdom and triumph by the angel that proclaims the preaching of the everlasting Gospel to the nations which leads to the inevitable fall of Babylon (Rev 14:6).

The fact that the Bible has been translated (at least one book) into 3,312 languages and the NT itself into 1,551 languages is witness to the spread of the message and the video shows that (in season or out of season) many devout Christians risked danger and hardship to preach.  Who are we to dismiss their efforts on the grounds of dogma? God is the judge and judgement begins first with the household, and we should not denigrate the efforts of fellow Christians for furthering the gospel however imperfect we might regard those efforts.  Any purity test will be applied by God (not us) and it is God who draws once the seed is planted. As the apostle says, “Some indeed preach Christ even of envy and strife; and some also of good will… What then? notwithstanding, every way, whether in pretence, or in truth, Christ is preached; and I therein do rejoice, yea, and will rejoice” (Philip 1:15-18).

Last things (eschatology)

We are approaching the end of an age and the start of something new.  With endings come new beginnings.  The earth and humanity will not be destroyed but civilization and the old way of doing things will be gone.  The question is what will it be replaced with?  There are those who want to replace it with Noahide laws and temple worship controlled from Jerusalem.  Nation states will still be allowed some autonomy if fealty is shown to the ruler (anti-Christ) but the gentiles will be subject nations and second class citizens with limited conditions under which they may practice their religion.  There are others who want a globalist transhumanist secular utopia (dystopia) and probably some sort of Luciferian or New Age Gaia cult.   The choice either way is bleak.

It seems to me that the end of things is known in certain circles and was probably carefully guarded knowledge passed down by a priestly class and or magician-astronomers in different cultures.  This knowledge is reflected in ancient mythology which often worshiped the stars and was aware of the of 25,920-year precession cycle.  Our lives are but a single day in the Babylonian 360-degree cycle of destruction and creation known as The Great Year.

Gog and Russia

Finally, Russia has been consigned the ultimate role of the end-time Gog bogeyman in eschatological prophecy by equating the Gog of Ezekiel with the Gog of Revelation.[4] However, the Gog of Revelation does not come from the north but from,”The nations in the four corners of the earth” (Rev 20:8).  It has become what G. B. Caird termed a “true myth” an eschatological rhetorical symbol of perpetual hostility against God.  In reciprocation the LORD will be at war against Amalek (Agag/Gog) from generation to generation” (Exod. 17:16).  In the first instance Amalek represents sin (hence the sign of the cross defeated Amalek in the wilderness) in the last instance Amalek (Agag/Gog) represents all human opposition (in the form of nation states) gathered against the Lord and his anointed.

 

 

 

 

Notes

[1] See: Why does God like camping?
[2] See: The Repentance of Israel and Turning away ungodliness from Jacob
[3] See my Commentary: Pattern Recognition in the Apocalypse (PRITA), Biblaridion Media, 2018, 695 pages or PRITA online
[4] See: Ezekiel 38-39, Inter-textual analysis (Part-I) and Ezekiel 38-39, Russia (Part-2) and Stylometric Analysis (Part 3)

Amalek

Amalek

Where to begin?  This is an important video to watch even if you are not a Christian.  Even if you do not believe the Bible. You might ask why is it important?   It is important because the Jews who believe these prophecies are doing their best to fulfil them. 

The video is from Adam Green and his Know More News website.  The thing that I like about this video is that it puts together several clips mostly featuring different Rabbi’s. So, you get the low down directly from the horse’s mouth so to speak. Towards the end of this video, you see a young Bibi kow-towing to Menachem Mendel Schneerson known to many as the Lubavitcher Rebbe.

I need to mention a few things so that you will be able to grasp the significance as you watch the video.  At one point a prophecy is mentioned that 6 million Jews need to be sacrificed before they can return to the land.  That is a “prophecy” from the Talmud and not from the Bible.  I have written on this before and will place links under the video.  Suffice to say that the video shows clips from newspapers in the 1930’s mentioning that 6 million Jews are suffering or are about to be murdered etc at least 15 years before it happened.  The “prophecy” was self-fulfilling.  Early in the 30’s the Nazis and Zionists cooperated in sending Jews back to Palestine.  They even struck commemorative medals to celebrate their friendship.  The war accelerated the process of the return and that was always the intention of the Zionists.  Did victims die from hunger and deprivation in the work camps?  Most certainly, but not six million.  The number has been revised constantly downwards and I believe it sits at 300,000 now.   That is a lot of people but palls into insignificance beside the 85 million (3% of global population) who died in WW2.     And the Nazis were not headshrinkers and did not make lampshades or soap bars out of the Jews.   To put it simply, they prophesied it and then made it happen.  They already had the Balfour Declaration of 1926 a promissory note from the British giving them a mandate in a land that was no longer theirs, now all they needed was a way to get reluctant Jews to return to the land. The second world war and Nazi persecution was serendipitous to say the least and so was the birth of the holocaust religion and perpetual victim-hood.  Both narratives were ideally suited to the return. This of course justifies anything bad that happens to the goyim because they tried to exterminate the Jewish people.  The Germans are then classed as Amelek the perpetual, implacable enemy of the Jews.  Of course, they simply ignore their own hand in shaping things (including the Bolshevik revolution). They are deceptive and practice double-think.

 Another thing that is mention is the defective Hebrew spelling of the word “return” or the Hebrew for teshuva (תשובה) which without the “v” has a gematria value of 708 which is then perceived as the year 5708 in the Hebrew calendar which is 1948. Do you begin to see how convoluted and goal seeking their “prophecy” regarding the “return” has become?  The state of Israel was declared in 1948 therefore it must be prophetic. Another self-fulfilling prophecy.

Of course, their whole designation of white Europeans as Esau, Edom or Amalek is palpable nonsense.  It is both genetically and theologically wrong.  Esau was Jacob’s brother and therefore a Semite. From a previous article that I wrote (suggest you read it in full);

Of course, we know little of the dispersal and absorption of the Amalekites), and therefore likely subjects of Assyria and subsequently of Persia. Nevertheless, Agag the Amalekite becomes an archetype in Jewish traditional writings, a sort of “bogeyman” bent on the destruction of Jews. Esau the brother of Jacob married two Hittite wives (Gen 26.34-35;36.1-2) as well as the daughter of Ishmael (Gen 28.9;36.3) his descendants formed the Edomites and the Amalekites (and other Semitic peoples through Ishmael’s daughter). All these people became implacable enemies of the Jews.

http://www.biblaridion.info/resources/Ezk1.pdf

The rabbis do not understand the significance of the Amalek incident (Ex:17-8:13) where Israel was attacked because they were tempted and contentious (v.7). Amalek attacked the weak and the stragglers (Deut 25:17-19).  Amalek represents sin which targets weakness and vulnerability.   That is why God swears that his war against Amalek is perpetual.  No quarter given in the battle against sin which takes advantage of human weakness. It is only when Moses raises his arms in the shape of the cross and is supported by Joshua (Yah saves) and Hur (freedom).[i]   Thus the defeat of sin is depicted by Moses sitting atop a hill on a stone (Christ) with outstretched arms. Afterwards he offers a sacrifice and calls the place Jehovahnissi: that is, the LORD my banner.  And so, the cross becomes the banner of Moses.

The rabbis take this incident as divine permission to commit genocide on white Europeans. In their view Amalek represents the wicked like the seven Canaanite nations that were removed because of their practices including child sacrifices, sacred prostitution, and idolatry.  And yet the Jews were condemned by the prophets for adopting those same practices.   The rabbis are adept at hypocrisy and double-think.

They also talk about Ishmael (= the Muslims) invading Europe and destroying Edom (Christianity) as being a fulfillment of prophecy.  One of them even mentioned the mixing of iron and clay from Daniels prophecy. No, it is not, it has nothing to do with that and everything to do with Israel’s Yinon Plan and the Balkanization of the Middle East. They have destroyed the surrounding nations and caused the refugee crisis. They have done this through their proxies (ISIS) and through using America who is under the influence of the Jewish neocons.   So, this is not a fulfilment of prophecy but rather a fulfillment of their Geo-political strategy.

One of the rabbis mentions how Jacob wrestled the angel to a halt because Jacob was so righteous. This is palpable nonsense and once again demonstrates that they fail to understand (or refuse to understand) their own scripture.[ii]   Jacob was a deceiver and a cheat and that is nothing to be proud of even if the Jews treat deception as a national virtue (especially when the goyim are cheated).

The Rabbis also mention the prophecy in Zechariah 14 where they relate to v.9 onward that describes the victory of the nation against all her enemies.  That is all good and well, but they neglect to mention that God gathers all nations against Jerusalem and that half the city is taken into captivity.  The chapter gives the impression that deliverance is instantaneous but there is no way of knowing how long the time is between the destruction and deliverance. It is the Judahite messiah who “fights” the enemy who is consumed on a very strange day (see the reference to light).  My view is that this speaks of a huge earthquake (Mount of Olives splitting) and a solar flare (Micro-nova) in which the enemies die of intense heat and radiation.   So, first the Jewish nation is punished and then the Gentile nations.

In the end both Jewish Christians and Gentile Christians will prophesy the truth to the nation.  As the saying goes, “no good deed goes unpunished”.   The two witnesses will be murdered (just like John the Baptist and Jesus). We are told that the Jews will celebrate when the two prophets are killed.  What is described is the feast of Purim in which people are joyous and send each other gifts. They are celebrating the death of their enemies.

 

 

 Revelation 11:7-12   7 And when they shall have finished their testimony, the beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them.  8 And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.  9 And they of the people and kindreds and tongues and nations shall see their dead bodies three days and an half, and shall not suffer their dead bodies to be put in graves.  10 And they that dwell upon the earth shall rejoice over them, and make merry, and shall send gifts one to another; because these two prophets tormented them that dwelt on the earth.  11 And after three days and an half the Spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood upon their feet; and great fear fell upon them which saw them.  12 And they heard a great voice from heaven saying unto them, Come up hither. And they ascended up to heaven in a cloud; and their enemies beheld them.

Kabbalah, Amalek, Purim, Holocaust, 9/11, & the Destruction of America

Click  the play below to take you to the 1 hour 20 min video on Odysee:

 

 

 

 

And there is this shorter 12 minute video:

Destroying The West

 

Holocaust or self-immolation?

 

Notes

[i] The unused verb חרר (harar II) means to be free in cognate languages, which is the opposite of being a slave. https://www.abarim-publications.com/Meaning/Hur.html

 

[ii] See the following article http://www.biblaridion.info/resources/jacob.pdf

Know More News

Know More News

This is worth viewing.  Adam Green has had his channel removed from YouTube.  He has his own website and alternative channels.  I have embedded the BitChute video below this tweet.

Forbidden to Mock the Sages