When climate engineering hits the main stream media then you know it is no longer a “conspiracy”. Even Bill Gates is getting in on the act. Hang on a minute….don’t they always tell you what they plan to do after they have already been doing it or a while?
This guy is a one man wrecking ball. He wants to manipulate climate, wants to recycle our shit as food and wants to edit our genome. When does he start his Soylent Green factory? (P.S. Don’t ask him about breast feeding)https://t.co/9YBFg4jBZs— ElijahRedux (@ElijahRedux) January 4, 2021
This would be funny if it wasn’t so sad. Now they admit that they have been Geoengineering but it was a “accident”….it was “unintentional” (lol). We “accidental” used fuels full of aluminum. These fuels contain nano-particles that get adsorbed by plants and by humans. Now do you understand why vegetation fires burn so hot? Now do you understand the dramatic increase in Alzheimer and other neurological diseases? But it is all a “conspiracy theory” isn’t it? Go back to sleep.
It is complicated
These are the videos to watch if you want to inform yourself about Geo-engineering. It is real and it is happening. My problem is trying to work out the motive. They say it is getting warmer when it is getting colder. Are the clouds meant to manage the solar radiation (reflect it back into space) and keep the planet cooler? That makes no sense because the planet will cool anyway. Perhaps the clouds are meant to trap the heat and stop the cooling? It is difficult to know. For example in January 2020, it was announced that ozone depletion (not CO2) is responsible for half of the Arctic warming, which accounts for 1/3 of all the global warming on Earth.
In addition to the open question of how much is left to blame on CO2
after the broader role of the sun and ozone, we must remember that Earth’s magnetic field is weakening. It has been repeatedly shown that higher solar particle input destroys ozone (including in the paper shown below) which results in considerable heating of the planet. This
begs the question of how much ozone depletion is due to our chemicals vs the
weakening of the magnetosphere allowing more solar protons into the atmosphere?
This question has not been sufficiently studied; currently there are no answers, and
certainly no certainty.
It has been repeatedly shown that higher solar particle input destroys ozone (including in the paper shown below) which results in considerable heating of the planet. pic.twitter.com/xBlKfNI8r7— ElijahRedux (@ElijahRedux) January 4, 2021
If the stratosphere has aerosol nano-particles from aviation fuel this would increase electromagnetic conductivity…..but increased cosmic radiation will also increase crustal electromagnetic differentials. All I am trying to say is that it is complicated. When you have a hammer everything looks like a nail. For example Ozone depletion is probably caused through natural processes as well as anthropogenic substances. So, it is not either/or but most likely a combination. And therein lies the problem. Whether we are inadvertently or purposefully engineering the climate we no longer have a baseline against which to measure the changes. Who knows anymore what is natural and what is anthropogenic? This is Frankenstein science. No one can determine cause and effect until the natural cycle overwhelms the man-made junk science.
So, my next task will be to investigate cosmic rays and muons etc. To attempt to understand how natural (GSM) and anthropogenic forcing interact and especially the motivation behind the climate engineering approach.
If they know it is getting colder why tell us it is getting warmer? If they know we are facing a catastrophic magnetic reversal why not warn us and allow us to prepare? You would almost think that they want lots of us dead. There is something very strange going on, especially when you combine it with their vaccination program.
Soon we will have a closer look at cosmic rays and we will attempt to work out how the different narratives intersect. In the meantime watch the following three videos: