Charles Rixey is a WMD instructor and an ex marine. His job was to train the military in the area of biological and chemical weapons. He has been more or less dismissed by JC who asserts that the initial virus spread was a psy-op, buttressed by abuse of PCR testing and falsely assigning the cause of death (COD). The pandemic was (according to JC) seeded by spraying synthetic clones (gain of purity) but according to JC these synthetic clones quickly become harmless and cannot “sustain a pandemic for three years” as they de-attenuate and revert to harmless non-functional (non-replication competent) viruses within the “quasi-species-swarm” .
Rixey does not deny the iatrogenic contribution but finds in his data a clear indication of a younger cohort that died because of covid (not because of the vaccine). Furthermore, just because a virus or a virus-like particle is not replication competent does not mean that it is harmless. While it is true that the body can clear RNA fragments and foreign proteins an onslaught of alien proteins must make the immune system more vulnerable to a viral assault and certainly prepares fertile ground and building blocks. Neither does Rixey deny the necessity of synthetic clones as they are used in the manufacturing process to amplify the virus. Therefore JC has not discovered some sort of new technique or exposed an earth shattering revelation. Just look at how they make insulin. Moreover JCs oft repeated mantra that you cannot sustain a pandemic for three years does not take into account that the constant vaccinations maintain evolutionary pressure on the “swarm” through the introduction of exosomes and Extra Cellular Vesicles (ESVs). The “swarm” is being fed new proteins, mRNA etc from millions of immune compromised people. Lastly, I believe that the initial attack which was “asymptomatic” for 99% of recipients laid the groundwork for accelerated senescence and “long covid” (including neuro-degeneration) which was amplified by constant vaccinations.
They were probably attempting to achieve multiple goals with the pandemic. Reducing population, reducing fertility, experimenting with different formulations. Trying to find the secret to longevity, determining epigenetic influences, destroying immunity so as to create dependence, launching the bio-industrial complex. The motives are myriad but one thing is certain they pulled the trigger on global bio-warfare.
So what does JC want us to say? That GOF is harmless? That it is only the vaccines that caused harm and JFK is going to sort that out when he is president along with his chief scientific advisor Scooby-Do? Seriously? What are you smoking man? Is that why you want the Defuse document dropped out of JFKs book? You cannot ignore decades of bio-warfare research starting with the SVCP that resulted in AIDS. Nor can you ignore decades of GOF research and hundreds of scientific papers. They Epsteinized the science and pulled the trigger on bio-warfare.
I know things are moving rapidly and everyone is suffering from information overload but it is crucially important that we do not become dogmatic and keep asking the right questions. Asking the right question is as important as finding the right answer. In fact you cannot find the correct answer unless you ask the right questions. It is also OK to admit that you don’t know something. As Scott Fitzgerald said (paraphrase) the sign of a first rate intellect is the ability to hold two opposing ideas in your mind at the same time. That is all good and well but unless some sort of synthesis is finally achieved it might drive you insane (lolz).
We are dealing with highly specialized science where people have carved out a niche within a militarized bio-weapon milieu protected by layers of disinfomation and narrative control. No wonder people gravitate to easy answers as such answers offer reassurance and comfort. However, I would rather know the truth than have false comfort.
So, this is intended as a summary in which I employ material from the Raccoon Discord and add my own thoughts and a simplified overview. I operate on the KISS principle (Keep It Simple Stupid) otherwise you drown in the minutiae. So here goes.
On discord five groups of people were differentiated:
Sars-Cov-2 does not exist. The tests have been engineered to pick up something
Sars-Cov-2 exists and was spread but couldn’t cause or maintain pandemic
Sars-Cov-2 is rebranded flu and the picking up of it on tests doesn’t mean anything and it’s just something we find (i.e. not causative but incidental.. Cf. Duesberg re HIV).
Sars-Cov-2 exists, spreads, caused pandemic but is not that serious (99.7% recover).
Sars-Cov-2 exists, spreads, is serious and basically air borne HIV
Essentially Jonathan Couey falls into a crossover between Group 2 and 3 and rests his theory on “Gain of Purity” and the use of clones to amplify the virus. The use of clones is not an earth shattering revelation because it is technique that is regularly employed and was even in the Ecohealth proposal. Recently Jonathan engaged with a group of doctors and scientists were he was forced to adjust his hypothesis and apologize for coming across as hostile. He later removed the video from his website (https://t.wtyl.live/w/m1feQMxwRRD3KnHJQ17V5U). This is not about who is right or wrong. These are complex issues and we have to adjust our hypothesis as more data becomes available.
Sars-CoV-2 is not a rebranded flu but is a long term incapacitating agent. It has a supposed “recovery” rate of 99.7% but accelerates senescence activating vascular thrombotic pathways and neuropathy.[1] So although you may have had a largely asymptomatic infection it could be a dormant trigger waiting to be activated by other environmental factors (or by “vaccines”).
Furthermore, the picture is complicated by the constant administration of “vaccines” (sic) coding for the same Spike Protein and leading to similar pathologies which are difficult to distinguish from the original infection. How many people have died without proper autopsies? It is even likely that the vaccines amplify the effect of the original infection. So I would probably fall in group 5 (as many raccoons) with the added observation that the vaccines are causing viral shedding and they are a way of maintaining the pandemic “quasi-species” swarm and probably preventing it from attenuating into a harmless variant.
This from the Discord:
In JC's latest stream, he showed a video where David Martin read the following section of a paper from 2015 titled "SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence": [https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1762234304?t=28m49s, https://www.pnas.org/doi/epdf/10.1073/pnas.1517719113]
Using the SARS-CoV infectious clone as a template (7), we designed and synthesized a full-length infectious clone of WIV1-CoV consisting of six plasmids that could be enzymatically cut, ligated together, and electroporated into cells to rescue replication competent progeny virions (Fig. S14). In addition to the full-length clone, we also produced WIV1-CoV chimeric virus that replaced the SARS spike with the WIV1 spike within the mouse-adapted backbone (WIV1-MA15, Fig. S1B). WIV1-MA15 incorporates the original binding and entry capabilities of WIV1-CoV, but maintains the backbone changes to mouse-adapted SARS-CoV.
And then David Martin said: "Let's stop and get this really clear. The thing that killed Americans and continues to kill Americans was engineered from an infectious clone. It was not a naturally occurring phenomenon, it was in fact something that by their own admission was engineered, and not in China - it was engineered in the United States." [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMSz209wV8g?t=14m12s] However I don't know if David Martin is saying that regular RNA viruses can't sustain a pandemic or that COVID was caused by a release of infectious clones. But it's suspicious because David Martin was one of the four speakers that Jane Ruby booked to an event she held last year, and the other three speakers were Sasha Latypova, Karen Kingston, and Mike Yeadon, who have all said that COVID was not caused by a virus: (Henjin)
The question of Virus Isolation
The question of isolating the virus according to “Koch’s Principles” is not a new one and can be traced back to the AIDS/HIV controversy. Unfortunately isolating the virus has been conflated with understanding the virus as the cause of AIDS. As they like to repeat…correlation is not causation. Just because you find the presence of a HIV virus does not mean that it causes AIDS. Neither does the presence of amyloid protein mean that amyloid causes dementia. However, the presence of those markers is important. Both Mullis and Duesberg challenged the consensus and Dr. Luc Montagnier who won the Nobel prize for discovering HIV also adjusted his perception and focused on oxidative stress. There is no doubt in my mind that HIV/AIDS was the precursor to the Covid Pandemic and two suspect plane crashes confirm this.
Henjin comments: Duesberg said is that HIV exists and it has been isolated and sequenced, but that it’s a harmless passenger virus which is not pathogenic. That’s why I differentiate the neo-Duesbergians from the no-virusers. The neo-Duesbergians say that SARS 2 exists but it’s not that dangerous or it’s not capable of sustaining a pandemic, and that COVID was caused by a release of synthetic cDNA clones (JC), by nanoparticle bioweapons (Latypova and Kingston), by aerosolized bat vaccines (Kingston), or by some kind of a release of toxins (Latypova). For example in 1997 Duesberg sent a reply to Stefan Lanka and Eleni Papadopoulos-Eliopulos et al. where he wrote the following: [https://duesberg.com/papers/continu2.html]
I am honored by the profound and passionate reactions of Hodgkinson, Lanka, and Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al. to my letter on the existence or the non-existence of HIV (Hodgkinson, 1996; Lanka, 1996; Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., 1996) . However, I cannot surrender to the HIV-non-existentialists for the following two scientific reasons: > 1) The weakest point of the HIV-non-existentialists is their failure to explain the origin of "19 sequences encompassing the full-length, 10 kb-HIV-1 genome" (Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., 1996) and "19 full-length HIV genomes" (Hodgkinson, 1996) . Hence Papadopulos et als unanswered question: "Can one exclude the possibility that the 19 "full-length HIV genomes" described so far, even if they all had the same length of 9150 bp and identical sequences are nothing more than a chance finding among the many molecular species present in the cultures, or even the uncultured lymphocytesŠ?"(Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., 1996) , that were "...taken from AIDS patients and AIDS risk groups", as Hodgkinson points out (Hodgkinson, 1996) . - Yes, one can exclude that. Remember the odds of coming up with even one nucleotide sequence of 9150 bp by chance are astronomically low, namely 1 in 49150 which is very very close to 0 (see my letter in the July/August Continuum, (Duesberg, 1996) ). The chance of coming up 19-times with the same HIV-DNAs, even "from cultures treated with chemical or physical oxidants" (Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., 1996) are another 19 orders of magnitude lower than finding it once by chance. Indeed the odds are much much lower than finding 19 guys on this planet with the same phone numbers. Science offers but one rational origin for such sequences appearing "very occasionally" (Hodgkinson, 1996) in species, namely viruses or other infectious agents. Thus the virus hypothesis is not a "specious" (Hodgkinson, 1996) explanation for the origin of 9150 bp DNA that is "very occasionally" found in AIDS patients.
2) The HIV-non-existentialists also fail to realize that available isolation efforts have already adequately identified the 9150 bases as the genome of a virus. In order to "isolate" a given infectious agent, one needs no more than to isolate it from all other, possibly contaminating, infectious agents - this is in fact Koch's second postulate. Since viruses have an extracellular and intracellular existence, viruses can be isolated from two entirely different sources: > >
(i) Viruses have been traditionally isolated from extracellular fluids. Such viruses may be contaminated by extracellular proteins, nucleic acids and possibly other microbes. Montagnier's original isolate of HIV from extracellular fluids is an example. Indeed, Montagnier's isolate appears to meet functional standards of isolation adequately, because two of the world's leading retrovirologists, Robert Gallo of the NIH and Robin Weiss of the Chester Beatty have re-isolated only HIV from Montagnier's virus stock (Weiss, 1991; Cohen, 1993) . If Montagnier's virus had been grossly contaminated by other viruses or microbes, those would have been found by Gallo and Weiss.
(ii) Since the 1980s viruses can also be isolated as infectious nucleic acids from infected cells. Such infectious nucleic acids initiate replication of virus in uninfected cells from which new virus particles are subsequently released. In this case viral nucleic acid is contaminated by cellular nucleic acid, and possible other intracellular viruses. As I pointed out in my Missing Virus Reward claim in the July/August Continuum, infectious HIV DNA has been isolated from infected cells several times by molecular cloning (Duesberg, 1996) . This cloned, infectious HIV DNA of 9150 bases represents an almost theoretical isolation, as it is a 100,000 fold purification from all nucleic acids of the cell and its possible viruses. This is because the human cell contains 1 million kilobases of DNA and HIV only 10. Contrary to Papadopulos et al.'s slogan - "No isolation no cloning." - cloning is isolation, and is in fact the most rigorous isolation science has to offer for retroviruses. Thus the high standards of virus isolation from extracellular materials postulated by Papadopulos et al. and Hodgkinson may be relevant for crystallographers or chemists who want to analyze the structure of a virus, but are not relevant for functional isolation. In view of this I hope to liberate the minds of HIV dissidents from HIV for the cause that unites us all - the solution of AIDS. It seems tragic that over 99% of AIDS researchers study a virus that does not cause AIDS and that the few who don't are now engaged in a debate over the existence of a virus that doesn't cause AIDS.
In a paper in 1988, Duesberg said that HIV can be isolated but that it's difficult to isolate: [http://duesberg.com/papers/ch3.html]
Due to Extremely Low Titers, HIV Can Be Isolated Only with Great Difficulty from AIDS Patients. Koch further postulated that it must be possible to isolate and propagate the etiological agent from all cases of the disease. However, virus isolation, although possible in up to 80% of AIDS cases, is technically very difficult and is perhaps best described as maieutic [2] (23, 69, 70, 81-84). It depends on reactivation of dormant proviruses from one or a few latently infected lymphocytes among millions of uninfected lymphocytes from AIDS patients. This is only possible by culturing these cells for several weeks in vitro, away from the suppressive, virus-neutralizing immune system of the host (23, 48-50). Even then success sometimes comes only after 15 (!) trials (85). These difficulties and the often over 20% failure rate (84) in isolation of HIV from AIDS patients are consistent with the extremely low titers of HIV in such patients. Thus, HIV does not meet Koch's second postulate.
AIDS pandemic at the root of the problem
We postulate then that the AIDS pandemic lies at the root of the problem and was the precursor event and the outcome of the Special Virus Cancer Program (SVCP). In other words they were messing with viruses under the guise of finding a “cure for cancer” all the while developing techniques that were dual purpose. They could be used for good or bad. Guess which they chose (sic).
Emerging viruses : AIDS and Ebola : nature, accident, or intentional?
Charles Rixey
This brings us back to the live-stream and the fact that Charles Rixey has highlighted that when they tried to make a vaccine for HIV they removed the FCS. Why then did they include it in the “vaccine” And why does the Spike Protein contain the GP120HIV-1 epitope?
Why did they keep the FCS in the Covid Vaccine? (7 min)
Partial transcript:
In every study that I have found from 2006 to 2019 from the WIV or the NIH or whoever they have always taken out that Furin Cleavage site. ALWAYS. So why? What they are trying to say now is that it is natural which is bullshit. It is obviously from HIV. They don't keep it in the HIV vaccine, so why would...why would.. (they leave it in the vaccine spike)
J.C. We need...we need... and independent molecular biologist to confirm this (good luck finding one)we need somebody who is not naive but say, could be asked to do this alignment without being told why it is being done...Oh, that is interesting ...I am not being a shithead..just saying that if this is true and I can over the weekend...over this week teach myself how to verify this somehow using BLAST. That would be a stark revelation that up until now no one knows...if this unique insert
We are getting to the heart of it. I said from the beginning that they are making us focus on these four amino acids, because those four amino acids are what they want us to attention to ..when in reality what you have identified is a larger fragment that other people have identified different parts of as well and a lot of different searches have cued off as an alarm bell and if you have made this connection where the various designs of these HIV vaccines have omitted a sequence of HIV which contains a FCS...
Plasmids and cloning (it gets worse)
There is also the question of Plasmid which we looked at previously:
In my view the presence of plasmid demonstrates that they used E. Coli to clone the Spike Protein. Is it contamination or is something else going on? There is also a SV40 promoter present. Many of these viruses originated in chimpanzees including HIV and RSV and SV40 among other viruses. So something untoward is going on.
Dr. Garth L. Nicolson : Weaponized Mycoplasmas (Non-lethal Biological Warfare) -58 min
Last but not Least
Last but not least, they have been doing this for decades. Aids started when the SVCP (Special Virus Cancer Program) ended at the start of the 80s. The Israel Cancer Research Fund was already using recombinant DNA in 1979 [3] The AIDS pandemic was followed quickly by BSE (mad Cow) a prion disease. The earliest suspicions of BSE in the UK were on a farm in Sussex in December 1984. The farm was 66 km distance away from the renowned bio-lab at Portondown. Before that they were looking at scrapie in sheep (also a prion disease) also at the relationship between bovine viruses and and human immunodeficiency virus. So this has been ongoing for decades.
[2] The meaning of MAIEUTIC is relating to or resembling the Socratic method of eliciting new ideas from another. Maieutics ( Template:Pron-en) is a procedure of pedagogy. It is based on the idea that the truth is latent in the mind of every human being due to his innate reason but has to be “given birth” by answering questions (or problems) intelligently proposed. The word is derived from the Greek “μαιευτικός”, pertaining to midwifery .
[3] For the ICRF Annual Report, 1979: II. Retroviruses as Mutagens: Isolation of Revertants with Deletions and/or Insertions in the ASV Provirus in B31 Cells after Superinfection with MuLV, 1979 For the ICRF Annual Report, 1979: III. Co-Transfection with Papovavirus and Retrovirus DNA Using Recombinant DNA Prepared In vitro, 1979 Language: English
I thought this was an excellent stream by Dr Kevin McCairn. Not too long and very informative with Nick as a guest speaker. I have called this World War Womb because a war is being waged against fertility and women in particular are being targeted. In many countries global populations are in free-fall and we are seeing population collapse which will become a self-fulfilling prophecy. This is not by accident but by design and not just due to Covid or the vaccines (they are just the icing on the cake). Glyphosate, endocrine mimickers, GMOs, sugars and carbs, herbicides and pesticides etc., all impact fertility. Male fertility is also dropping precipitously. The simple fact is that they no longer need us as they have robots and AI to do the work. You are obsolete and therefore you will be phased out. Useless mouth breather (lolz). Hence the big transgender push. They want sterile, barren, infertile humans.
The show starts at about 12 min and some of the main topics are @22min Perth gold mint @29 min Israel, Jews , (Tishbite mentioned) @33 min St Nick @35 min Births and deaths @47 min the Security Memorandum 1974. @1:12 The Harvard Department of Population Studies
Johnathan Jay Couey
You can safely skip this as a distraction if you are not interested but I record it here for the sake of keeping a historical record.
The show starts by discussing the situation with Johnathan Jay Couey who is now employed by Robert Francis Kennedy Jr. of Children’s Health Defense and has significantly shifted his position on the existence of GOF techniques and their pathogenicity. He occupies a half -way position between “virus don’t exist” and “they do exist but can’t cause pandemics”. In other words semantics and sophistry as a cover for data and science. In order to do this he replaces GOF with something he calls “Gain of Purity” and cloning. He believes that we have all been “Scooby-Doo’d” into following breadcrumbs and that we have been given clues to solve the mystery of who is behind the the lab leak and GOF.
Now cloning is an amplification technique that has been used for many years in order to multiply a component.Often viruses are cloned using bacteria like E. Coli (because they multiply so rapidly) and then the cDNA is purified. Viral genomes can be cloned from chemically synthesized DNA if the availability of virus isolates is limited, but established approaches using Escherichia coli are often inadequate to accommodate the large genomes of RNA viruses such as coronaviruses (family Coronaviridae). In any case what Johnathan says is a distraction because the Defuse proposal by Peter Daszak mentions cloning as well as GOF. Logic says that if you make a synthetic organism using GOF then you need a method to rapidly multiply the pathogen.
The main point is that Johnathan minimizes the threat of Covid and finds it impossible that a so called “Gain of Function” virus could be dangerous. It is not the changes to the virus that make it dangerous but the fact that it was purified and (presumably) released in large quantities. In his theory the pathogen cloud (quasispecies) reverts quickly back to the wild type and many of the viruses are replication incompetent. A quasispecies is a large group or “cloud” of related genotypes that exist in an environment of high mutation rate.
So, the pandemic was mostly the result of a psy-op. The death figures (COD) and PCR testing were manipulated (this is true but to what extent?) and many deaths were iatrogenic (also true for treatments like Remdisivir or the withholding of medications like IVM and HCQ).
JC believes that the subsequent Covid variants are all part of the psy-op. We have all been “Scooby Doo’d” with talk about “lab leak” and “GOF” . Now there is no denying that a psy-op was run and used to frighten people into compliance but there is also no denying that some people got very sick and died with a disease that cannot be written off as a rebranded flu. They had unusual vascular-thrombotic symptoms and visceral reactions such as cytokine storms. This was no ordinary influenza.
There is some truth in what Johnathan is saying but the one thing I have a problem with is that he dismisses bio-warfare (GOF) and is trying to neutralize Charles Rixey who is a WMD trainer and ex-marine. According to JC we have been all “Scooby-Doo’d” and JC was instrumental in having Rixey removed as advisor to JFK, apparently because of Rixey’s links to McCairn. Here we see JC trolling everyone while wearing a Mossad T-shirt (which might not be far from the truth).
I am glad that Rixey was removed as an advisor to JFK because I believe that JFK is controlled opposition. JFK was involved with Epstein (on this see John Brisson) and has thrown his hat in the ring as Democrat Presidential candidate for the upcoming election. I think JFK is damage control to keep people focused on vaccines rather than biowarfare. They will probably throw the Children’s Health Defense organization a bone to make it look like we are “winning”. Meanwhile GOF work will continue unabated. Moreover JC was at Erasmus University in 2012-2016 where Ron Fouchier the deputy head of the Erasmus Medical Center Department of Viroscience was writing articles about GOF in Nature (lolz). A false story got spread about work being done on the non-existent (not yet built?) 26 floor. That was in my view a planted story to deflect investigation. All very suspicious especially for someone shouting that GOF is not a problem. Someone who is unwilling to debate (See here for a deconstruction of some of the critiques and a time-line taken from discord comments).
Moreover, JC discredited the warning (subsequently proven correct) by Dr Kevin McCairn the systems neuroscientist about the increase in neuro-degenerative diseases just as he poo-pooed the warnings and data presented by Nobel Prize winning virologist Luc Montagnier. To characterize the symptoms as biting, spitting zombies is a misrepresentation (even though we are seeing impulse control disorders) when the data clearly shows increases in dementia, Parkinsons and other priongenic/amyloidogenic diseases. Enough said, but the fact that he feels the need to dredge through older videos trying to justify himself and slander everyone speaks of a psy-op.
Moreover, I am off the opinion that the weapon is binary. It is both Covid and the vaccine. I believe that Covid19 was meant to “prime” the subject and lay the ground work for the “vaccines”. Even if you were asymptomatic they were preparing you for the gift that keeps on giving (lolz). Otherwise, why did they still use the original Wuhan strain (mRNA code) in bivalent booster shots two years after it had disappeared? How does that make sense? It seems to me that they have a program that they want to work through and each strain and each vaccine builds on the previous “work”. But what the hell would I know?
J.C. is doing the work of a spoiler. Distracting and blowing smoke. He is not striving to hold anyone to account. He has sold out.
Population Collapse
Some very important points got mentioned in this stream. They have our genetic data – from ancestry websites and by swabbing for covid, from blood samples, bowel samples (cancer monitoring) etc. By now they have built one of the most comprehensive global genetic data bases in history including the reactions to their experiments. I guarantee you that not everyone got the same vaccines (leaving aside contamination and degradation issues) they will have tried out different formulations and probed human physiology in a way not possible with animal experiments. I guarantee that different formulations ( “vaccines”) were pushed out “on the fly” (in small exclusive numbers) to test certain theories. I guarantee that was done. These people have no scruples and will justify their actions as for the greater good. Sacrifices need to be made. The end justifies the means.
The discussion around the memorandum is very good. They have been poisoning us for years. This is monstrous.
Johnathan has a lot to say in this video that makes sense and in some way I am glad that he keeps challenging all of the narratives before they get set in concrete. The fact is that with the exception of very few people no one knows the whole truth. Rest assured that everything about Covid was compartmentalized. From their reactions I believe that many of the politicians were shocked and some (like Trump and Boris) initially attempted to resist. Jay has simplified it to four scenarios:
Natural (Zoonosis)
No virus (Psych war)
Scooby-Do (DRASTIC)
Biology (Jay)
In Jay’s view, if only we understood the biology we would be OK (one presentation to save them all). Jay rejects 1 and 2 although he admits that the no virus crew have some valid points (true) but laments that they might have been integrated into the wider resistance if treated with more respect. Of course, that ignores the fact that many are just con-men (grifters) and others are undoubtedly IIA operations run (or at least signal boosted) by the intelligence services and the supranational institutes who are the players at the top. Their job is to sow discord and confusion to muddy the waters and discredit legitimate opposition.
Then there is 3. which is meant to be the “great reveal” where DRASTIC et al unmask the villains and solve the mystery. According to this narrative the virus originated in a lab (either leaked or was released). In this view all the FOIA emails and the DEFUSE document are part of an operational plan B to fool us into thinking that we are dealing with bio-warfare. In other words they deliberately left bread crumbs for us to find. According to Jay figuring out that it is bio-warfare makes us more likely to accept the jab. It is difficult to know how he reached this conclusion because by the time the bio-warfare story was breaking millions had already been vaccinated and were suffering side effects. Trust in governments and institutions is falling everywhere and a belief that they engaged in bio-warfare has made people even more wary of vaccines. Moreover, as pointed out in a previous article, Covid 19 is the legacy of decades of bio-warfare research which includes the HIV/AIDS pandemic that emerged at the end of the Special Virus Cancer Program (SVCP). Covid 19 did not happen in a vacuum. In the past experiments were conducted using ticks as viral vectors.
I am glad to see that Jay has reconsidered his stance on sequencing and the fidelity of the reads. Jonathan is however correct in pointing out that it is impossible that a viral particle propagated itself globally for three years. That is true. Not unless the virus had help from further releases or from the “vaccines”. I believe that cloning as a method of amplification makes sense but only if combined with GOF. One again I find myself in agreement that many of the deaths were iatrogenic but they cannot all be written off as pneumonia or influenza. There was definitely a unique symptomatology on display in certain hot-spots that had connections with China. Jay noted two interesting things which I want to come back too later, namely that there may have been an “early release” in 2018 (accidental??) that then triggered the “clonal” release later on in 2019 and he mentioned that Northern Italy had a vaccination program before the outbreak (something that I also noted at the time).
As to Jays references to the racial targeting element of the vaccines I pointed out very early on in the pandemic the coincidences surrounding the gematrial encoding of the FCS (See: https://www.biblaridion.info/blog/clone-world-or-clown-world/). Moreover, a number of scientific papers have appeared showing that Ashkenazim have advantageous polymorphism. It was known that Ashkenazim suffer less from respiratory diseases but have a number of unique genetic diseases caused by consanguineous marriage. Surprisingly the Amish whose timeline crosses with the Jews of Eastern Europe share some of the same genetic traits and similar isolationist -religious world views (even though they are Christian).
Finally, Jay’s comments on amyloidosis and priongenic impact are lacking. We know that there has been an uptick in these diseases but they take time to manifest. Even cancers can be triggered by these mechanisms. I am disappointed that Jay misrepresents the bio-weapon narrative without any nuance as a “Scooby-Do” straw-man argument.
Scooby Doo Narrative
1. Novel GOF Virus (For sure lab leak super China Virus)
2. No previous immunity (Most infectious ever?)
3. Everyone vulnerable (maybe ethnically tuned?)
4. Constantly changing
5.Transfections questionable (maybe also a bioweapon?)
6. Millions have died as a result of the virus
7. PCR works, sequencing is cool, and data is awesome
8.Vaccines work,just maybe not these? (Huff has had 38)
9. Amyloidosis,GOF disease,etc Bioweapon? Built in?
This is definitely not my narrative, but it does contain elements that are half-truths. I think there are still too many unknowns. I suggest that Jay takes another look at the measles outbreak in Samoa which I believe was used as a dry run (see here: https://www.biblaridion.info/blog/horror-in-paradise/). This is about the measles outbreak in 2019 just before the global SARS outbreak. It has it all a mutant measles-SARS chimera, lockdowns, mandates, Chinese troops, WHO…the horror…Mutant Measles morbillivirus strain MeVvac2-SARS2-S(H). They already had vaccination programs. Why did a measles outbreak occur in 3 neighboring islands at the same time, just weeks after a delivery of UNICEF vaccines to those very islands? There was a new strain of measles introduced that was not covered by the vaccines. Now comes the insidious bit. The bit that links the fact that there is emerging evidence that SARS-CoV-2 appeared before December 2019.
My hypothesis
What if quasi-species swarms of virus related to SARS-CoV-1(2003) and MERS (2012) were already recombining into a deadly strain that gave us the very bad influenza and pneumonia seasons of 2017/18? All cause mortality was already ramping up before SARS-Cov-2 (Covid 19) appeared. I note that there was a big push for flu vaccines in the years leading up to the 2019 pandemic. The fact that many places had undergone vaccine campaigns for flu (Northern-Italy) before the outbreak is suspicious (same as Samoa with measles). Are we dealing with a binary weapon whereby asymptomatic infection primes the system for the “vaccine” or for administering the “nasal swab” against the bbb (who knows?). Putting my tin-foil hat firmly on my head I note that Spanish flu (American military flu) was proceeded by a vaccination campaign, AIDS was proceeded by a vaccination campaign, measles in Samoa was proceeded by a vaccination campaign. I think they have perfected the technique of making pandemics. Perhaps you need a small external stimuli (a pathogen release) followed by a vaccination campaign in order to trigger a self perpetuating “swarm” caused by shedding?? But what would I know I am just a bucket chemist.
And lastly, I do not trust Huff or Malone etc but I see the necessity for them. It is like having a pet snake that you have trained to catch rats. Perhaps they are genuine in the sense that the military is practicing damage control. I just don’t trust them because even if they are in the same trench firing in the right direction they might be phoning through the coordinates for an air strike later on when they excuse themselves to go for a dump (lolz). Finally, where is Jay going with his? You need evidence to prosecute cases and convince people. The acronym KISS -Keep It Simple Stupid applies. Even for judges and prosecutors. Especially for judges and prosecutors. You need bad guys. You need evidence. You need to be able to trace it and document it. All these institutions need reforming and saying that people died because of bad advice or medical malpractice is just not going to do it. Once these people start getting prosecuted they will turn on each other. The pressure now must be unrelenting.
National Immunomythology Update: Gigaohm Biological High Resistance Low Noise Information Brief (2:06)
Israel is lauded as a “start up nation” recently caught boasting that both Moderna and Pfizier are run by Jews and are going to “Heal the World” which is known as Tikun Olam. It is a good thing the goyim do not understand what the Talmudic version of “Heal the World” really means.
Many Christians have fallen for the “start up nation” and “heal the world” spiel. Especially the Christian-Zionists, but then they believe anything that they are told. Israel leads the world in science alright – Franken-science and I would not call it a “start up nation” but rather an Abomi -Nation who steals technology.
Abomi -Nation
Two men (or two women) can now have a baby. They don’t even need a womb anymore.
In Jacob Hanna’s lab at the Weizmann Institute, for the first time in the world, scientists succeeded in growing a mammal embryo outside the womb…. to creating an infant whose biological parents are two men. No less
According to a scientific group in Israel, which took the picture, the researchers have grown mice in an artificial womb for as long as 11 or 12 days, about half the animal’s natural gestation period. pic.twitter.com/Ekor3lNGS2
