Are you listening to a pied piper?

Are you listening to a pied piper?

This video is a rebuttal of the after analysis of the debate with Christopher Bjerkness moderated by Dr Kevin McCairn.   I was rather disappointed at the assessment with phrases like “Christopher won the debate” and “Paul was trounced” and the charge that I was not polite.  I believe that whereas Christopher resented  John Brisson sarcastic tone he actually thanked me and said he would look into some of the things I suggested because they were interesting.

Do I sometimes go on?   Yes, because that is necessary when people make sweeping claims about things they do not understand.  Kevin complained about the back and forth over the academic  minutiae because it is about pointing out who is the enemy and who is the useful idiots. Well you can’t do that unless you understand the the academic  minutiae otherwise you are at a disadvantage when false claims are made. If the foundation is built on sand the house collapses.

Christopher presents a deluge of information that he strings together but they come from different sources and different contexts on which he places equal weight.  How can you place the same weight on the Old Testament as on the Zohar that appeared in 13th century Spain?  He makes sweeping claims (without evidence) that the Greek Bible (LXX) is not a translation but that it is the original Old Testament (which they presumably translated back into Hebrew scrolls some even written in paleo-Hebrew and scattered around everywhere.)   He even points to the Massoretic Text (MT)  being written about 1000 AD as a “gotcha” moment (lolz).

This demonstrates to me that he has no understanding of textual transmission and his Biblical knowledge (inter-textual hermeneutics) is poor.  I think I remained very polite and I had to bite my tongue and show restraint on numerous occasions.   The problem is that there is some truth to what he is saying and it needs to be honestly examined but we cannot throw the baby out with the bath water.

I do not have to answer for other Christians nor do I carry the same burdens.  Just because Tertullian and Origen misunderstood the typology of the scapegoat does not mean that I do.  Just because some Christians may believe in Ransom theory and a bet with the devil does not mean that I carry that burden and it does not mean that Scripture even teaches it.  As to burning in hell Christians would do well to remember that Jesus went to hell and came back on the third day.  Moreover, who are we to judge another man’s servant?  The Lord makes one vessel to honor and another to dishonor.   The clay cannot cry out to the potter..why have you made me thus?   Understand the meaning of the Lord’s name:

"And he said, I will make all my goodness pass before thee, and I will proclaim the name of the LORD before thee; and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will shew mercy on whom I will shew mercy" (Exodus 33:19).

Some men’s hearts will be hardened, other will fall by the wayside and yet others will bring forth tares. Some will die in ignorance and some will be as if they had never existed.  Your lot is not to judge but to do what is right towards your neighbor and love the Lord they God with all they heart, soul and mind. Amen.

Are you listening to a pied piper? (1:10)

Resources:

Psalm 82 in the Fourth Gospel

Soteriology and Atonement Theory

The Language of Atonement

See the original debate for more links:

Are You Being Punked?

Pooh goes hyper Brandon goes poo

Pooh goes hyper Brandon goes poo

So many questions.

  • How did Russia and China get the technology?
  • Is it really as dangerous as they say or is it theater?
  • Who wipes Biden’s butt?

First video 6 mins then two short videos.

 

Why China cannot abandon communism (13 min)

Great video.

 

How Europe Colonized Asia – Pacific War #0.1 DOCUMENTARY (16 min)

Very interesting. No wonder China flooded the USA with opiates (fentanyl)

Jamie McIntyre

Jamie McIntyre

Best-selling author,”What I Didn’t Learn At School But Wish I Had” Coach and activist and Speaker at www.21stcenturyu.com Founder of www.australiannationalreview.com

I find myself in agreement with his analysis and the solution he offers. Pack your car and just leave. I would say that you should claim refugee status. Of course people will not do this.  They will stay where they are and things will just get worse and worse.  Warning if you are squeamish about swearing don’t watch but if there was ever a time for a few choice words…..

One thing though….Jamie calls it communism……however it is not communism or socialism.  It is a hybrid between crony capitalism and communism.  It is called technocracy…..the world will be run by experts.   You know the old joke….what is an ex-spurt…..a drip who is no longer under pressure.  Anyway, this technical elite will run the world based on science (lol) – science has served us well with regards to climate change and covid (lol).    If people do not take action we face slavery and oppression.

 

Why Melbourne was the Chosen City in Australia

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=390374738816126

 

 

Mammon as King

Mammon as King

Update=1.0 refresh browser

Karl Marx (a Jew) called his fellow Jews “hucksters” and said that money was their god. He probably had the Rothschild dynasty in mind. It turns out that Marx was Rothschilds’ Third Cousin and some say working as their agent with the intention to subvert democracy and corrupt the Socialist movement. In other words replace it with the more extreme and unpalatable Communism. There might be something in this seeing as the “Revolution” was funded by certain Wall Street luminaries. In that case we have been well and truly conned.  It is the Hegelian Dialectic coming to fruition:

 

The problem back then was Communism and the solution was Anglo-Zionism with its Neo-liberal capitalism (crony capitalism) and Imperialism.    The problem now is climate, enormous wealth disparity, wars (virus) etc – utter chaos – the solutions are (once again) communism or fascism.  There is really little difference between the ideologies because it is about empowering a plutocratic, technocratic oligarchy.  Whatever happens you end up with a powerful ruling elite and a disenfranchised populace.  In the end it matters little who wins, or what “ideology” because the outcome is similar and the same people rule over you. It is a confidence trick.  A game to distract you while they imprison you.  Both the Central Banks and the Anglo-Zionists want a digital currency because it gives them complete control in a surveillance state.

 

The “bankers” are now posing as saviors with their Green Agenda.  Nothing could be further from the truth. They are Rothschild minions and they do not have your best interest at heart. Bankers have brought nothing but war and misery to this world.  This is what the policies of the Federal Reserve (another Jewish bank) have done (p.s. the bank is not Federal and has no Reserve):

 

Central Banks

Read the following PDF about Central Banks (blue hyperlink):

 

Update=1.0