Tag: Defense Medical Epidemiology Database

Gigaohm Biological (8 Feb)

Posted on

Gigaohm Biological (8 Feb)

This video is only 1:19 but well worth watching because Jonathan interviews Sasha Latypova a retired pharmaceutical industry executive with 20 years of relevant experience. She is not a virologist or geneticist but an industry executive with experience in how these products are made and distributed.  I have mentioned before that I was a Senior Chemist (industrial) manufacturing polymers.  Some of those polymers were used in face creams and required stringent quality controls and equipment “clean down” between product runs.

Suffice to say that when you are injecting material the quality control should be even more stringent, the product needs to be sterile and product quality needs to be consistent.  This got me wondering about problems of scaling.  I know from experience that it is not easy to scale something from a lab environment up to reactor size.  A one liter glass pot has different dynamics than a 12 Te steel reactor.   In a similar fashion making soup for two people is different from making a gigantic pot for 100 people.    What about scaling to make (at warp speed) vaccines for 8 billion people?   As someone involved in Quality Control I know this is going to give problems even if your product is 100% safe.   What quality control regime is used?  Why is it not transparent?  Is anyone doing independent testing?  Our lab required quality certification.  I suppose none of that is necessary….because….because…it is an emergency.

Latypova demonstrates from Pfizer’s own data huge batch variability in the range from 55% to 80% regarding integrety of the mRNA.  The remainder is broken down mRNA in lipid nanoparticles floating around in the bloodstream… the body doesn’t like loose RNA outside the cell, that’s exactly why they have to encapsulate it so it gets inside the cell.  So, the junk mRNA etc will probably be degraded (eaten up by macrophages etc) Ironically, it seems to be the purer batches (with more pure mRNA) that are causing the damage. That means the Spike protein itself is cytotoxic.  Latapova runs the website How bad is my batch which we have featured before: https://www.howbad.info/

Jonathan also points out that  the data presented by Thomas Renz on vaccine injuries given to him by whistleblowers from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) has been challenged. They compared 2021 with the prior 5 year average. The comparison showed that 2021 was off the chart for adverse effects. The DOD responded, saying the 5 year average data was wrong. And then, they increased it. So now it is about the same as the 2021 data.

There are a number of ways of looking at this:

  • The data was wrong (honest mistake) and has been corrected
  • The data is correct and this is a cover up
  • This is a psyop deliberately releasing wrong data to discredit opponents

Here is an article that attempts to debunk the huge increase in adverse effects:

 

The guy who wrote this hit piece is a cancer specialist and he says:

"The cancer numbers alone made me seriously question whether there was a problem with the database Cancer is the culmination of a process that, in general, takes years, from the initial insult that resulted in cellular transformation to the development of a cancerous tumor detectable by symptoms, physical exam, or screening tests......    A far more probable explanation is some sort of underreporting in the years prior to 2021".

O.K., got that…it is just the DOD and their bad record keeping. And VAERS reporting is just anti-vaxxers reporting made up illnesses.  So any information that shows vaccines in a bad light is either wrong or made up.  But what then of Pfizer’s own trial data which was released after a Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) court order?   It showed a nearly 3 % increase in deaths and thousands of injuries (some of them permanent).  This was their data.  This was not made up or wrong. This was their data.   Why did Pfizer not do a long term follow-up?  Moreover, the article in the above tweet references Gorski who was involved with Epstein. The speed with which the cancers appear is apparently evidence that this cannot be true….however…if the mRNA suppresses or down regulates expression of P53/54 genes and knocks out interferon that is exactly what you would expect.   Doctors are reporting a huge increase in cancers (anecdotal I know…but I would rather believe them).

Gigaohm Biological (8 Feb) 1:19

 

We are facing serious problems: