Deep Dive

Deep Dive

This is very good.  Tuned in towards the end  and listened to this LIVE.    Recommended. It is now finished.  It starts at about 15 min and is  3 hours long.

Jake Chansley Deep Dive with @CharlesRixey Into DEFUSE, Bio-Weapons & Corrupt Media (3:03)

This is about fighting back….. with the truth.    They are trying to ban supplements in Canada.  It is not just that they attacked us and seeded prions they want to stop any medication or natural remedy that can make us better.  We are under attack.  Our health and our fertility are under attack by by Malthusian eugenicists.  They flooded the zone with disinformation and censorship.

Jacob Chansley is the famous shaman from the Jan 6 protest.  Do I have my reservations about his connections?  Yes, but he talks sense.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canada’s Attempt To Ban Supplements (55 min)

 

Comments from the Discord:

PLANDEMIC TIMELINE

1980 – Georgia Guidestones – Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.

1999 – CDC Draft of The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA)

2003 – CDC Applied For Secret Coronavirus Patent In 2003

2005 – In 2005 deep state operatives had a meeting in the City of London and said “China will catch a cold”.

2008 – Why Was SARS-CoV-2 And Also SARS-CoV-3 Viruses Mentioned In Published Study In 2008 That Was Catalogued By U.S. NIH?

2009 – A Doctor Claimed The U.N. Would Release A Virus To Trigger Depopulation Through Vaccines!

2010 – The Rockefeller Foundation commissioned a blueprint for a pandemic which paper was published in 2010.

2012 – Bizarre EU-Funded Comic Book Predicted Pandemic, With Globalists As Saviours

2014 – Bill Gates offered a TED Talk in 2014 on the risk of a Global pandemic.

2015 – Bill Gates predicted in 2015 the event that today is proving catastrophic.

2017 – World leaders rehearse for a pandemic that will come ‘sooner than we expect’.

2017 – January 2017 – Fauci: ‘No doubt’ Trump will face surprise infectious disease outbreak.

2019 – Covid Vaccine Patent Warned of “Deliberate Coronavirus Release” 9 Month’s Before COVID-19.

2019 – The Naval War College ran a Pandemic War Game last September 2019.

2019 – In October 2019 there was a Pandemic exercise Event 201.

2019 – October Wuhan military games followed by Chinese new year festivities.

2019 – Italian And American Scientist Provide Evidence That SARS-CoV-2 Was Already Circulating in Europe As Early As September 2019.

2020 – In early 2020, China only locked down Hubei province while underreporting COVID burden in Wuhan by ~4x (according to urn stacks at crematoria).

================

Chansley has just admitted that he knows so little about DEFUSE/DRASTIC that he doesn’t even know that Congressmembers have already put the documents to Congress YEARS AGO.

So everything he’s saying about “information warfare blah blah” is childishness. He is not serious, and has a discernment and capability problem.

If I was less charitable, I would suggest that his Congressional aspirations are superficial opportunism, akin to DeSantis’ presidential run in a much smaller, lower scale.

Note:

Chansley can give you a high level narrative that sort of is right, but…

He hasn’t said…

“The EUA couldn’t have been issued in the presence of other possible treatments.”

The EUA is a key construct/mechanism in what he is talking about.

That he doesn’t specify the EUA means he lacks specificity and substance. He is operating on generalised narrative level stuff.

No thanks.

They know how to get hold of me. They would, without nagging by others, if it was of value to them.

I am saying the above here for all of you in order to alert you to the need to DISCERN, and to actually evaluate the myriad people in the “COVID noise space”.

Chansley has no intrinsic value, save for potential access to whatever audience follows along behind him.

But, remember this:

If Chansley is low quality, how high quality is his audience?

I don’t think he’s a bad actor, I suspect he’s very well meaning and decent. I just don’t think he’s “serious, professional and discerning.”

Sure, this means he and his style of chat will draw a following and in speaking to then you could educate that audience, if you can be bothered.

But listen to what’s happening now…

Charles hasn’t coherently finished his story, it’s just been interrupted and hijacked and wanderoff off, and now Chansley is onto his agenda.

Confusing as fuck, leads nowhere. Doesn’t empower anyone, doesn’t point then at specific, actionable items.

What will be the three key takeaways from this?

The audience won’t have any. Just meandering partial rambles.

I bet that again, the nurse’s story will get zero air time. This happened when she was on the stream with Kevin. Literally ignored. I felt sorry for her.

 

My Conclusion 

It is about waking up as many people as possible and capturing a large audience. It is about narrative. Chansley  is under the spotlight and possibly a distraction but a useful tool for expanding the audience. At this point there are very few that I trust.

Scooby -Do where are you?

Scooby-Do where are you?

Johnathan has a lot to say in this video that makes sense and in some way I am glad that he keeps challenging all of the narratives before they get set in concrete.  The fact is that with the exception of very few people no one knows the whole truth.  Rest assured that everything about Covid was compartmentalized.   From their reactions I believe that many of the politicians were shocked and some (like Trump and Boris) initially  attempted to resist.  Jay has simplified it to four scenarios:

  1. Natural (Zoonosis)
  2. No virus (Psych war)
  3. Scooby-Do (DRASTIC)
  4. Biology (Jay)

In Jay’s view, if only we understood the biology we would be OK (one presentation to save them all).  Jay rejects 1 and 2 although he admits that the no virus crew have some valid points (true) but laments that they might have been integrated into  the wider resistance if treated with more respect.  Of course, that ignores the fact that many are just con-men (grifters) and others are undoubtedly IIA operations run (or at least signal boosted) by the intelligence services and the supranational institutes who are the players at the top.  Their job is to sow discord and confusion to muddy the waters and discredit legitimate opposition.

Then there is 3. which is meant to be the “great reveal” where DRASTIC et al unmask the villains and solve the mystery.  According to this narrative the virus originated in a lab (either leaked or was released).  In this view all the FOIA emails and the DEFUSE document are part of an operational plan B to fool us into thinking that we are dealing with bio-warfare. In other words they deliberately left bread crumbs for us to find.  According to Jay figuring out that it is bio-warfare makes us more likely to accept the jab.  It is difficult to know how he reached this conclusion because by the time the bio-warfare story was breaking millions had already been vaccinated and were suffering side effects.  Trust in governments and institutions is falling everywhere and a belief that they engaged in bio-warfare has made people even more wary of vaccines.  Moreover, as pointed out in a previous article, Covid 19 is the legacy of decades of bio-warfare research which includes the HIV/AIDS pandemic that emerged at the end of the Special Virus Cancer Program (SVCP).  Covid 19 did not happen in a vacuum. In the past experiments were conducted using ticks as viral vectors.

I am glad to see that Jay has reconsidered his stance on sequencing and the fidelity of the reads.  Jonathan is however correct in pointing out that it is impossible that a viral particle propagated itself globally for three years.  That is true. Not unless the virus had help from further releases or from the “vaccines”.  I believe that cloning as a method of amplification makes sense but only if combined with GOF.  One again I find myself in agreement that many of the deaths were iatrogenic but they cannot all be written off as pneumonia or influenza. There was definitely a unique  symptomatology on display in certain hot-spots that had connections with China.  Jay noted two interesting things which I want to come back too later, namely that  there may have been an “early release” in 2018 (accidental??) that then triggered the “clonal” release later on in 2019 and he mentioned that Northern Italy had a vaccination program before the outbreak (something that I also noted at the time).

As to Jays references to the racial targeting  element of the vaccines I pointed out very early on in the pandemic the coincidences surrounding the gematrial encoding of the FCS (See: https://www.biblaridion.info/blog/clone-world-or-clown-world/).  Moreover,  a number of scientific papers have appeared showing that Ashkenazim have advantageous polymorphism. It was known that Ashkenazim suffer less from respiratory diseases but have a number of unique genetic diseases caused by consanguineous marriage. Surprisingly the Amish whose timeline crosses with the Jews of Eastern Europe share some of the same genetic traits and similar isolationist -religious world views (even though they are Christian).

Finally, Jay’s comments on amyloidosis and priongenic  impact are lacking. We know that there has been an uptick in these diseases but they take time to manifest. Even cancers can be triggered by these mechanisms.  I am disappointed that Jay misrepresents the bio-weapon narrative without any nuance as a  “Scooby-Do” straw-man argument.

Scooby Doo Narrative

1. Novel GOF Virus (For sure lab leak super China Virus)
2. No previous immunity (Most infectious ever?)
3. Everyone vulnerable (maybe ethnically tuned?)
4. Constantly changing
5.Transfections questionable (maybe also a bioweapon?)
6. Millions have died as a result of the virus
7. PCR works, sequencing is cool, and data is awesome
8.Vaccines work,just maybe not these? (Huff has had 38)
9. Amyloidosis,GOF disease,etc Bioweapon? Built in?

This is definitely not my narrative, but it does contain elements that are half-truths. I think there are still too many unknowns. I suggest that Jay takes another look at the measles outbreak in Samoa which I believe was used as a dry run (see here: https://www.biblaridion.info/blog/horror-in-paradise/). This is about the measles outbreak in 2019 just before the global SARS outbreak. It has it all a mutant measles-SARS chimera, lockdowns, mandates, Chinese troops, WHO…the horror…Mutant Measles morbillivirus strain MeVvac2-SARS2-S(H). They already had vaccination programs. Why did a measles outbreak occur in 3 neighboring islands at the same time, just weeks after a delivery of UNICEF vaccines to those very islands?  There was a new strain of measles introduced that was not covered by the vaccines. Now comes the insidious bit. The bit that links the fact that there is emerging evidence that SARS-CoV-2 appeared before December 2019.

My hypothesis

What if quasi-species swarms of virus related to SARS-CoV-1(2003) and MERS (2012) were already recombining into a deadly strain that gave us the very bad influenza and pneumonia seasons of 2017/18?   All cause mortality was already ramping up before SARS-Cov-2 (Covid 19) appeared.  I note that there was a big push for flu vaccines in the years leading up to the 2019 pandemic.  The fact that many places had undergone vaccine campaigns for flu (Northern-Italy) before the outbreak is suspicious (same as Samoa with measles).  Are we dealing with a binary weapon whereby asymptomatic infection primes the system for the “vaccine” or for administering the “nasal swab” against the bbb (who knows?).  Putting my tin-foil hat firmly on my head I note that Spanish flu (American military flu) was proceeded by a vaccination campaign, AIDS was proceeded by a vaccination campaign, measles in Samoa was proceeded by a vaccination campaign.  I think they have perfected the technique of making pandemics.   Perhaps you need a small external stimuli (a pathogen release) followed by a vaccination campaign in order to trigger a self perpetuating “swarm” caused by shedding??   But what would I know I am just a bucket chemist.

And lastly, I do not trust Huff or Malone etc but I see the necessity for them. It is like having a pet snake that you have trained to catch rats.  Perhaps they are genuine in the sense that the military is practicing damage control.  I just don’t trust them because even if they are in the same trench firing in the right direction they might be phoning through the coordinates for an air strike later on when they excuse themselves to go for a dump (lolz).  Finally, where is Jay going with his?  You need evidence to prosecute cases and convince people.  The acronym KISS -Keep It Simple Stupid applies.  Even for judges and prosecutors.    Especially for judges and prosecutors.  You need bad guys.  You need evidence. You need to be able to trace it and document it.  All these institutions need reforming and  saying that people died because of bad advice or medical malpractice is just not going to do it.  Once these people start getting prosecuted they will turn on each other.  The pressure now must be unrelenting.

National Immunomythology Update: Gigaohm Biological High Resistance Low Noise Information Brief (2:06)

Defuse the Bomb

Defuse the Bomb

This is an actual game and I think this is a great metaphor for what is happening. This one minute clip stresses Keep Talking and nobody Explodes and that is exactly what everyone should do.

The Freedom Movement is fracturing and that is exactly what (((they))) want but we must refuse to allow paranoia to dictate strategy.  Are we being gamed and psychologically targeted?  Yes, there can be no doubt that the “pandemic” has certain strategic and ideological goals and they are nudging us to accept. They want us to reach certain conclusions naturally even though they are steering us in the background. Initially I thought that Jonathan Couey’s proposal on synthetic clones explained many of the anomalies but the argument put forward as “gain of purity” has morphed into one of no excess deaths from Covid19 and sequencing does not work.  All the deaths are more or less iatrogenic or fabricated.  This argument is starting to look like a first cousin marriage of the retarded no virus and gain of purity cousins giving birth to retards (lolz). The argument turns on dismissing the Defuse document as unverifiable or a psychological operation. Discounting its validity as evidence of malfeasance and seeing it as a red herring. Here follows a very good (and long) discussion between Dr Kevin McCairn the systems neuroscientist and Charles Rixey who is a trained Weapons of Mass Destruction expert and a former Marine.  Recommended viewing. 

Charles has analyzed the excess deaths for different age cohorts and a definite signal can be seen prior to the vaccine rollout. Moreover,  asymptomatic infection could well negatively influence the effect of the “vaccine” which is exactly what you would want with a binary weapon.  Perhaps Covid19 was simply a matter of preparing the ground and making it receptive to the real seeding. Why did they insist on people who had already recovered from Covid to get a vaccine anyway?    That is in my view highly suspicious.   Also at at 1:15:40 regarding defuse, Rixey says “Congress already knows that [the documents] they’re not fake”.  Would congress not demand proof?

SARS Biowarfare With Charles Rixey (4:26)

Forensic Analysis

Mark Kulacz from Housatonic is somewhat of an expert  in data retrieval, tracking , storage and destruction (which is not as easy as it may seem…ask Hillary).  In this video he looks at the authenticity and verifiability of the Defuse Document which is a photocopy without metadata. However, it is unlikely that the photocopy distributed on the internet represents all the information available as any chain of custody will be obscured until it is required as evidence for legal proceedings. The grant was declined and that is very easy to establish as I imagine that as much of this material was conveyed by email the metadata is recoverable from the ISP and probably stored somewhere on a DHS database.  As Mark points out it was not classified information and the proposal was rejected by DARPA.   The fuss about the photocopy is in my view a distraction because as I was watching the video I commented that if I were spying I would take a picture with my phone and include the metadata on the file and also the time clock on the computer which would tie in with my own metadata.  Images can easily be converted using OCR.

All this is a moot point because I am sure that Rixey knows who leaked it and has verifiable evidence of authenticity.  It is possible that DARPA themselves deliberately leaked the document to distance themselves as it was becoming impossible  to deny GOF  biowarfare.  They needed plausible deniability.  Perhaps that is also the job of someone like Robert Malone.  We can only guess at motivation and it is a certainty that we are all being gamed.  What should we do?  Perhaps we are unconsciously still doing their bidding by exposing the GOF malfeasance.    We must be aware of what they want and that is relatively easy to answer. They want full spectrum dominance which is the surveillance state panopticon that will eventually reside under your skin  and they want mRNA to form the basis of their bio-revolution economy in order to fulfill their transhumanist agenda.  As long as we make sure that we are not duped into the new paradigm we should be OK.

Ep 182.1: EcoHealth Alliance DEFUSE proposal to DARPA PREEMPT grant, leaked to DRASTIC  (1:19)

 Sequencing Fidelity

Jonathan raised the question of sequencing fidelity and Quasi-species diversity and drift swarms this article provides some excellent answers and a rebuttal:

The Time Line

Last but not least the Defuse proposal fits within the larger context of Fauci’s pronouncements, Daszak’s own comments (both on video) and the wider DARPA PREEMPT PROGRAM who lavishly funded areas of pandemic preparedness, with EcoHealth, the Global Virome Project, USAID’s PREDICT, and more all giving and receiving tons of cash to go out and find new viruses.  This did not happen in a vacuum.     Moreover, it was run on the back of the very successful  Special Virus Cancer Program (sic) which resulted in HIV/AIDS.  Now I know that Kerry Mullis could not find anyone to point him to a source that connected AIDS with the virus (sounds familiar??).  Is there something weird going on?  I have no doubt and whatever it is it looks like they perfected it with the AIDS pandemic.  No wonder Mullis despised Fauci.  There is still much that is unknown and I still have many, many questions. Perhaps we should start with refusing all vaccines.  It seems that the Spanish Flu (American military flu) and HIV (and Covid) possibly all started with vaccination programs.  Are we not seeing the forest for the trees?   Is it that simple?   Have they figured out how to use vaccinations to trigger pandemics?  What a great way to reduce the population and make money.

Documents

Are we being played?

Probably, but the trick is to use their gaming tactics and their evidence and turn it against them until we get our outcome.  You work with what you have got and what you have been given.   The most important question in all this is what is the desired outcome?   What do you all want?

Rigs (not Rixey) Defuses the bomb.

Aren’t you going to miss all this good stuff when you retire? (lolz)

 

 

Synthesis

Synthesis

Jonathan Couey and Charles Rixey are approaching this from different angles and we need to synthesize their discoveries rather than dismiss or disregard.

Is the Defuse proposal and the FOIA requests theater? (Johnathan’s theory) then we have nothing with which to hold them accountable. What mitigates against this is that they were already working on these concepts long before any FOIA requests.

For this reason I post both videos on this page.  The interview between Kevin (now back from the USA) and Charles is excellent (been listening to it) and I am embedding it while it was still running live.

Latest SARS FOIA With Charles Rixey

Version on YT (https://youtu.be/Cna8mK8XZW4)

Some of Johnathan’s ideas have caused tensions but that is OK if it leads to new insights.  We will keep digging and exposing.  Here are some comments (from different people) on the Discord sever.

He just said at about 1:46:00 that ralph baric observes 20-30% recombinant virus gene mixing with natural swarms.
these systems can find more than one steady-state in the multivariate environment they live in.
jay still hasnt justified his assertion about interfering non-replication competent particles or the error rate of CoV genome replication, or the fidelity of CoV protein synthesis

Jay's new theory is this (please correct me if I've been unfair):
1) the process of replication of rna creates a lot of dud copies called "replication incompetents"
2) the imperfect copying process causes the original "alpha predominant" and infectious swarm to rapidly revert to the relatively harmless "normal" quasi species swarm of coronaviruses
3) therefore, since it is impossible for a viral swarm to long remain infectious, the only way to get a significant number of infected people is to have a huge intentional release of a clone-predominant swarm.
4) then a few hundred people die, and the rest of the damage is fabricated by the complicit media
5) probably 3 big initial releases - Wuhan, Teheran, Lombardi (Italy), and potentially some other smaller releases, to keep the narrative rolling until the vaccines came out.
1) a. I'll take him at his word that there are a certain number of replication incompetents. I was not able to find on his Twitch where he substantiated that, and I have not been able to come up with any numbers on the percent of replication error.
b. The cell machinery hijacked by RNA viruses is the same machinery for generating your body's proteins. How likely is it that this machinery is largely generating incompetent proteins?
c. Be careful listening to Jay and Mark - viruses don't reproduce sexually, and there is precious little recombination or mixing done amongst virions. Thus the mixing is mostly just mixing of populations, and the virus that causes the most coughing is going to get spread the most.
2) As Kevin said, clinical presentation of symptoms was stable for over a year. Implying the swarm was plenty infectious, all over the world.
3,4,5) Just listen to those guys hypothesize "gushers of infectious clone" and many intentional releases. The probability of a conspiracy theory being true is inversely proportional to the number of necessary silent conspirators.

I can't find the paper, but if I remember correctly PRRAR.S is meant to signify TMPRSS2 cleavage between R & S. However, there are other enzymes that would cleave at PRRA.RS which would leave the MSH3 class oncology gene for Hermansky Pulak Syndrome exposed

He is still trying to find a correlation to pathogenicity without spike. That limitation in his hypothesis is tainting his biological analysis
In essence he is only looking for confirmation and is trying to discount reality in order to prove it
The full spike protein is not as pathogenic as S1 by itself. That biological reality itself should give pause to the certainty of his analysis of transfection
The generalization of pathogenicity caused soley by peptide synthesis, irrespective of what is being synthesized is a novel hypothesis, unfortunately he really needs to get into the physics of biology in order to explain what LNPs are doing and how they mirror what is seen with S1

https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-020-01673-z

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7417663/

Medical Doctors for Covid Ethics International: Gigaohm Biological Presents (2:32)