The Ideology of Putin’s Russia

The Ideology of Putin’s Russia

This is excellent and is recommended.

This website does not support the war in Ukraine and believes that Putin was deliberately provoked. That said, we are not “Putin fan boys” and know full well that Russia (although no longer Communist) has problems.  Would we want to live under a Russian-Chinese world hegemony?  No thank you.  That said, the West is a hypocritical warmonger under control of the Zionists.

This video examines the influence of three people on Putin’s ideology –Ivan Ilyin, Lev Gumilev and Carl Schmidt.  It is a fascinating video and very informative….however  all the elements that are said to influence Putin (and I have no doubt that they do) are exactly the same elements influencing the West.   Watch out for the use of the State of Emergency and the curbing of law (lawlessness) promulgated by Schmidt.  That is exactly what we have seen used by every Western Government.

And then there is Putin’s use of Christianity as a unifying force which we are starting to see in the West – a rise of Christian Nationalism (the two wolves) and calls for a theocratic state and a strong (messianic type) leader.  All the warnings in this video about Putin are already found in the West.  Fascism?  We already have fascism in the form of corporations running the show with the governments acting as window dressing.   In my view this video is projecting.

With Russia, the problem is that  it is difficult to tell what motivates the Government.  Fascism, Communism….and the same with China which is “one country two systems”.  We have a fusion of communism and fascism and we are seeing the same in the West.  I think the start of this video is correct when it speaks of gangsterism and organized crime.   That is what is happening. 

The difference is that in Russia, Putin has eliminated any oligarchs that oppose him.  You are allowed to be rich in Russia but not allowed political ambitions.  The same could be said about China. You go against the party you disappear no matter how rich you are.  In the West the oligarchs run the politics through the control of the banks, media and corporations.  So the ideology is gansterism but different types.

The battle is then between those who want strong nationalism and a multi-polar world with regional powers where the government is in control (not necessarily a “democratic” government) this is the Russia-China model run by autocrats or the Western model which wants a uni-polar world Hegemon ultimately run  by oligarchs and corporations through fronts like WEF/UN etc. Either way we will face more autocracy and dictatorship with inflexible authoritarian top-down control and masses of poor disenfranchised populations.

‘Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.…’

Winston S Churchill, 11 November 1947

Now, I am no Churchill “fan-boy” either because I realize he was a Zionist tool and a tool of Empire but he is correct especially in the case of the USA which was governed by a constitution and which divided govt  into executive, legislative, and judicial branches as a means of checks and balances.  However, that has been undermined by the capture of the monetary system (Federal Reserve) and the executive (lobbying and financial capture) and the judicial branch (appointing compromised judges).  We no longer have capitalism but corporatism.  A war has been declared against ordinary people and against the family. They don’t want democracy (they never did).

So the West is a hypocritical bunch of warmongers who overthrow governments and still practice a kind of soft colonialism and which is ultimately run by oligarchs and corporations and the East is run by “strong” governments and “strong” leaders.  No matter how you look at it we are headed for authoritarianism.  There is so much cross over between communism and fascism that I  am just going to call them all gangsters.  It is about the will to power (nothing more) and the little man  (you and me) are about to get crushed.

I am going to leave you with this reminder:  There are no good guys.

Trust the Lord.


The Ideology of Putin’s Russia (54 min)





I have been set some homework and I thought I would put it on this page so it easy for me to find. This material has been sent by Da Church of Eppie (Thanks).

In order to resist your enemy you need to know how they think. This is a spiritual war and I will be absorbing this material over the next two weeks. In Eppies understanding ordinary people will be chewed up and spat out, mentally and spiritually smashed killing liberalism leaving right wing reactionaries (fascists, essentially communists like Dugin) and left-wing globalist”communitarians” fighting about control of the New World Order. Whoever wins, you lose. On top of that I would add that they are using the Apocalypse (and Christianity) as a game plan:

  1. Plague
  2. Famine
  3. Natural Disasters
  4. Economic collapse

They are trying to run a number on God (lolz), next comes the great deception (Antichrist). Do not be deceived. We live in perilous times. Keep the faith.

Explaining Postmodernism by Stephen Hicks: Full Audiobook (6:15)

This audiobook edition of Explaining Postmodernism is read by the author.


  • 00:00:25 CHAPTER ONE: What Postmodernism Is
  • 00:02:22 The postmodern vanguard: Foucault, Lyotard, Derrida, Rorty
  • 00:09:22 Modern and postmodern
  • 00:12:22 Modernism and the Enlightenment
  • 00:22:50 Postmodernism versus the Enlightenment
  • 00:25:06 Postmodern academic themes
  • 00:29:51 Postmodern cultural themes
  • 00:33:17 Why postmodernism?
  • CHAPTER TWO: The Counter-Enlightenment Attack on Reason
  • 00:38:12 Enlightenment reason, liberalism, and science
  • 00:40:20 The beginnings of the Counter-Enlightenment
  • 00:47:05 Kant’s skeptical conclusion
  • 00:50:57 Kant’s problematic from empiricism and rationalism
  • 00:57:36 Kant’s essential argument
  • 01:05:27 Identifying Kant’s key assumptions
  • 01:10:55 Why Kant is the turning point
  • 01:17:37 After Kant: reality or reason but not both
  • 01:22:22 Metaphysical solutions to Kant: from Hegel to Nietzsche
  • 01:27:50 Dialectic and saving religion
  • 01:35:55 Hegel’s contribution to postmodernism
  • 01:37:28 Epistemological solutions to Kant: irrationalism from Kierkegaard to Nietzsche 01:48:50 Summary of irrationalist themes
  • CHAPTER THREE: The Twentieth-Century Collapse of Reason
  • 01:50:09 Heidegger’s synthesis of the Continental tradition
  • 01:55:56 Setting aside reason and logic
  • 01:59:44 Emotions as revelatory
  • 02:05:17 Heidegger and postmodernism
  • 02:09:21 Positivism and Analytic philosophy: from Europe to America
  • 02:15:15 From Positivism to Analysis
  • 02:18:55 Recasting philosophy’s function
  • 02:22:06 Perception, concepts, and logic
  • 02:29:37 From the collapse of Logical Positivism to Kuhn and Rorty
  • 02:31:27 Summary: A vacuum for postmodernism to fill
  • 02:34:35 First thesis: Postmodernism as the end result of Kantian epistemology CHAPTER FOUR: The Climate of Collectivism
  • 02:40:50 From postmodern epistemology to postmodern politics
  • 02:44:56 The argument of the next three chapters
  • 02:50:21 Responding to socialism’s crisis of theory and evidence
  • 02:55:26 Back to Rousseau
  • 02:57:27 Rousseau’s Counter-Enlightenment
  • 03:05:45 Rousseau’s collectivism and statism
  • 03:14:58 Rousseau and the French Revolution
  • 03:22:53 Counter-Enlightenment Politics: Right and Left collectivism
  • 03:27:13 Kant on collectivism and war
  • 03:34:45 Herder on multicultural relativism
  • 03:41:15 Fichte on education as socialization
  • 03:55:50 Hegel on worshipping the state
  • 04:04:25 From Hegel to the twentieth century
  • 04:07:16 Right versus Left collectivism in the twentieth century
  • 04:17:12 The Rise of National Socialism: Who are the real socialists?
  • CHAPTER FIVE: The Crisis of Socialism
  • 04:23:25 Marx and waiting for Godot
  • 04:25:33 Three failed predictions
  • 04:28:51 Socialism needs an aristocracy: Lenin, Mao, and the lesson of the German Social Democrats
  • 04:35:23 Good news for socialism: depression and war
  • 04:38:16 Bad news: liberal capitalism rebounds
  • 04:41:11 Worse news: Khrushchev’s revelations and Hungary
  • 04:49:42 Responding to the crisis: change socialism’s ethical standard
  • 04:51:47 From need to equality
  • 04:56:12 From ‘Wealth is good’ to ‘Wealth is bad’
  • 05:03:22 Responding to the crisis: change socialism’s epistemology
  • 05:09:30 Marcuse and the Frankfurt School: Marx plus Freud, or oppression plus repression
  • CHAPTER SIX: Postmodern Strategy
  • 05:20:53 Connecting epistemology to politics
  • 05:22:43 Masks and rhetoric in language
  • 05:30:16 When theory clashes with fact
  • 05:32:15 Kierkegaardian postmodernism
  • 05:38:13 Reversing Thrasymachus
  • 05:40:51 Using contradictory discourses as a political strategy
  • 05:44:50 Machiavellian postmodernism
  • 05:46:18 Machiavellian rhetorical discourses
  • 05:48:15 Deconstruction as an educational strategy
  • 05:54:41 Ressentiment postmodernism
  • 05:57:56 Nietzschean ressentiment
  • 06:02:11 Foucault and Derrida on the end of man
  • 06:09:25 Ressentiment strategy
  • 06:13:50 Post-postmodernism
  • Other links: Facebook: Twitter: Website: Instagram:…


And finally this from littleone:


Thank You

Thank you to my fellow raccoons for keeping me on target with what is happening.  I will watch it all over the next two weeks.  I think I need to apply for one of Musk’s neuralinks so that I can hook my brain up to a super computer (lolz).


Putin’s brain nearly blown up

Putin’s brain nearly blown up

Alexander Dugin’s daughter was assassinated in an attempt that targeted her father.  He is portrayed as a philosopher and called “Putin’s Brain” but in reality he is a right wing nationalist and trouble maker.

Putin’s “Brain” Alexander Dugin Escapes Car Bomb, Daughter Killed | Ukraine Says ‘Karmic Paybac (7 min)




Oh, East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet

Oh, East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet

Oh, East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet,
Till Earth and Sky stand presently at God's great Judgment Seat;
But there is neither East nor West, Border, nor Breed, nor Birth,
When two strong men stand face to face, though they come from the ends of the earth! Rudyard Kipling (1889)


As Mark Twain said, History doesn’t repeat but it rhymes. The Crimean War was a military conflict fought from October 1853 to February 1856 in which Russia lost to an alliance of France, the Ottoman Empire, the United Kingdom and Piedmont-Sardinia. The Charge of the Light Brigade was a failed military action involving the British light cavalry led by Lord Cardigan against Russian forces during the Battle of Balaclava on 25 October 1854 in the Crimean War.

The Great Game

The more things change the more they stay the same. The Great Game was a political and diplomatic confrontation that existed for most of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th century between the British Empire and the Russian Empire over Afghanistan and neighbouring territories in Central and South Asia. It also had direct consequences in Persia and British India.

India plays both sides with America and Russia (11 min)

The Mackinder World Island

“The Geographical Pivot of History” is an article submitted by Halford John Mackinder in 1904 to the Royal Geographical Society that advances his heartland theory. In Mackinder’s words, “Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland.”

 Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland;
who rules the Heartland commands the World-Island;
who rules the World-Island commands the world.
— Mackinder, Democratic Ideals and Reality, p. 150

The West European powers had combined, usually successfully, in the Great Game to prevent Russian expansion.  The Mackinder World Island is similar to the Political geography of Nineteen Eighty-Four (Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia are the three fictional superstates in George Orwell’s book written in 1949) and to Alexander Dugin’s Foundations of Geopolitics (   So this kind of Geo-strategic thinking has been going on for a long time.

A number of things occurred from 1900-1920, namely the establishment of the Federal Reserve in the USA, the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, World War 1 and the birth of Zionism (Balfour Declaration).  These events were linked and they resulted in the weakening of Germany and Russia and the dismantling of the Ottoman Empire. The benefactors of these events were the British Empire (East India Company) and the Jewish bankers (Rothschild).

Of  course the “roaring twenties” during which millions of people invested their savings or borrowed money to buy stocks, pushing prices to unsustainable levels was the main cause of the Wall Street crash of 1929 that led to the Great Depression. Mobilizing the economy for world war after the  finally cured the depression after the Pearl Harbor attack in 1941 brought the USA into WW2 and was the start of economic recovery.

World War 2 was the direct consequence of the onerous peace settlement (Treaty of Versailles) imposed on Germany. Just as the bankers and industrialist had been behind the Bolshevik revolution they were also behind the rise of Hitler who initially cooperated with the Zionists. However, Hitler absorbed the Zionist supremacist ideology and following his rise to power, Lebensraum became an ideological principle of Nazism and provided justification for the German territorial expansion into Central and Eastern Europe.  This could not be allowed to happen because according to the Mackinder doctrine, who rules the World-Island commands the world.   It is interesting that the Holdomor (terror famine) in Ukraine was probably the event that hardened the German attitude towards communism.

118. Why Russian Invaded Ukraine | How To Make NATO Great Again | Kissinger & The Great Game… (1:26)

Putin’s Brain meets Trump’s brain

Dugin has been called Putin’s brain and he has been hosted by Alex Jones who some would call Trumps brain (lolz).  Dugin published Foundations of Geopolitics in 1997; this work has been used as a textbook in the Academy of the General Staff of the Russian military  but to call him a close adviser to Putin is like saying Alex Jones is a close adviser to Trump.

Russian Philosopher Alexander Dugin: In Ukraine, Russia Is Fighting the Liberal World Order (5 min)

Dugin depicts Putin as Fighting the Liberal World Order and praises Trump:

"If Trump had been in power none of this would have happened. He was realistic and refrained from exerting power on us.He did not care too much about Ukraine or the spread of NATO".

The feeling seems to be mutual as Trump has praise for Putin:

“Putin declares a big portion of the Ukraine — of Ukraine — Putin declares it as independent. Oh, that’s wonderful. ‘I said, ‘How smart is that?’ And he’s gonna go in and be a peacekeeper. ... We could use that on our southern border. That’s the strongest peace force I’ve ever seen. There were more army tanks than I’ve ever seen. They’re gonna keep peace all right. No, but think of it. Here’s a guy who’s very savvy.”

Trump went on to rhapsodize about his relationship with Putin — “He liked me. I liked him.” — and to praise him as someone with a lot of “charm and a lot of pride” who “loves his country.”
Feb 23 2022 The Washington Post

What is very strange is that Dugin is portrayed as a Russian ultra-right ideologue but he has been subsequently a Bolshevik, a fascist supremacist and an occultist and a member of the Ordo Templi Orientis. Originally the sect was intended to be modeled after and associated with European Freemasonry, such as Masonic Templar organizations, but under the leadership of Aleister Crowley, O.T.O. was reorganized around Crowley’s Thelema as its central religious principle. One of the major features and core teachings of the organization is its practice of sex magic.

Putin’s Satanist Advisor – Alexander Dugin Multi – Polar world

Aleksandr Dugin – Occult & The Kremlin

Are Russia and China in on the Great Reset? (54 min)

In this discussion with Hrvoje Morik on TNT Radio, Matt Ehret responds to the claims made in a James Corbett video now going viral regarding China and Russia’s complicity in the Great Reset program for global depopulation and world government. Watch James Corbett’s video here;

Here is the sub-stack article:


The Great Reset and the NWO are no longer a “conspiracy theory”  and the bankers have been working towards it for over a hundred years.   The pace accelerated in the 70s with the abolishing of the gold standard and exporting of technology and manufacturing to China.  There is a globalist fifth column that is destroying the West from within.

It is starting to look like Putin has gone rogue from the Davos “Great Reset” crowd.  However, the globalists play the long-game and the destruction of the economy suits the globalist agenda. I doubt that Dugin has Putin’s ear although Putin does want a multi polar world.  There are no good guys in this story.  Russia may be a “Christian” country but the religion is more or less a state religion and the clergy were all former KGB collaborators.  The rebranding of Dugin as far-right and his appearance on Alex Jones demonstrates that we are being gamed.

Aleksandr Dugin

Aleksandr Dugin

This is one on my watch list  (when I find time).

This from Reddit;

Aleksandr Dugin is a Russian political philosopher. He co-founded the National Bolshevik party in Russia. This map illustrates his geopolitical preferences as he laid out in his 1997 book Foundations of Geopolitics. He has close ties to the General Staff Academy, where his work serves as a textbook.

The declared purpose in his book is the rule of ethnic Russians “from Dublin to Vladisvostok.” In Dugin’s words, the basis of this Empire is “A negation of Atlanticism, a repudiation of the strategic control of the United States, and the rejection of the supremacy of economic, liberal market values…which will prepare the way for a strong political and strategic union.”

These ends are not to be sought by militaristic means, but by a complex mix of subversion, destabilization and disinformation spearheaded by special services and supported by tough use of gas, oil and other natural resource riches to pressure other countries to bend to Russia’s will. They are three axises which are to be established in this quest. One with Germany, one with Japan and one with Iran.

According to Dugin, “The task of Moscow is to tear Europe away from the control of the U.S. (NATO), to assist European unification, and to strengthen ties with Central Europe under the aegis of the fundamental external axis Moscow-Berlin. Eurasia needs a united, friendly Europe.” With the Berlin-Moscow axis, Dugin advocates giving the Kaliningrad oblast back to Germany. Germany and Russia are then to divvy up de facto spheres of dominance across Europe and thus mutually decide issues facing the region. A strong Franco-German axis is to be encouraged, allowing Germany’s sphere to extend beyond central and southern Europe to Iberian countries and Italy. France and Germany are considered to be bastons of anti-Atlanticism. Only the United Kingdom is to cut off and shunned from this Europe-Eurasia, it being an Atlantist ‘floating base’ of the US. Finland will be annexed directly into Russia. The countries of Latvia, Lithuania and Poland are to be granted ‘special status’ in the Eurasian sphere. ‘Belorussia’ and the eastern regions of Ukraine will be direct parts of Russia. Catholic regions of Ukraine are to be a separate federation. Finally, Dugin expects the ‘Russian South’ (orthodox Balkans) will be constituent parts of the Eurasian Empire.

In regards to Asia and the Japanese-Russian axis: The Kuriles are to be given to Japan, and Japan will being constructing its ‘new order’. A security belt will be established between Russia and China from separatist regions of China and China given a sphere of dominance to its south, excluding Vietnam. Mongolia will be absorbed directly into the Empire.

Moving westward, Dugin argues a Russian-Islamic alliance is to the detriment of Atlanticism. Russia will get naval bases on the Indian ocean in the Iranian Empire’s territory. Russia will have all eastern access to the Caspian, and the Central Asian and Caucasian states are to be Russia’s again, at least for awhile. Armenia is an exception and will be a Russian partner, getting Armenian-populated regions. Georgia goes to Iran as booty in return for being a prickly problem for Russia. Azerbaijan goes as well in return for its ‘pro-Turkish orientation’. Any minorities in Turkey will be stirred up to rebellion. Turkey will be allowed southward expansion only.

India, the two Koreas and Vietnam will be allowed to join in efforts to constrain China’s threat to Dugin’s Russia.

Aleksandr Dugin Admits To Whom He is Working For As a World Order Puppet Master – Brzezinski (1:40)

China & Russia

China & Russia

How do China & Russia fit in with what is happening?  I thought I would post some videos on the subject that show somewhat contrasting views to get you thinking on the subject.  I will also give my own opinion on the subject and ask questions. 

What do Russia and China have in common?

Both Russia and China are no longer “communist” (especially Russia) but the Communist or Bolshevik movement in Russia was Jewish….however, not many realize that the Communist revolution in China was also Jewish.  I post a link here to a very good thread on the subject which I suggest you have a look through at your leisure.  It is a real eye opener and I have backed it up because all sorts of things are disappearing of the internet nowadays.

China Thread

This is very…..very good…..


Brother Nathaniel on Russia

Brother Nathaniel is a Jew who converted to Orthodox Christianity.   So, he is a big fan of what Putin is doing in Russia.  Putin has brought back the Church to the center of Russian life and Russian values. He has also revalued the importance of the family unit and clamped down on homosexuality etc.   I watched the first half of the first video and it was very good (but long) the videos are placed here as much for my own benefit as anything else, will go back and watch them fully when I have more time.

From what I have already seen bro Nathaniel regards Putin as a good guy. Putin is certainly a statesman and has strategic smarts.  I don’t believe anybody is a good guy but he is certainly turning the fortunes of Russia around.  However, there are many others who regard Putin as a Zionist.   Now this is a complex question because Russia and the Jews have a history together.  Putin himself was close to a Jewish couple who used to look after him when he would come home from school.  Most of the oligarchs in Russia are Jewish. Putin has good relations with the Rabbi’s and with Israel. Nearly a million Russian Jews live in Israel. Moreover, Putin seems to have a good relation with Trump who is a Zionist.  I think Putin is happier dealing with Zionist (nationalist) Jews than with internationalist (globalist) Jews. He certainly does not want any “dual citizens” with split loyalties holding any Government positions.  This disadvantages both the Globalist Jews and the Zionist Jews. So, I think Putin is just being pragmatic although he does favor the nationalists.  These next two videos are very informative and very pro-Putin.  Afterwards I will post one that shows a darker side.

Brother Nathanael pack on Russia / Putin (& the jews) 2010 to 2015 (1 of 2)

Brother Nathanael pack on Russia / Putin (& the jews) 2015 to end of 2019 (2 of 2)

 We would argue that Putin’s approach is pragmatic while others see him as a Zionist stooge and those who support him as controlled opposition or Russia apologists.

Russia and Gog

Controlled opposition?

The next video states that  people like Richard Spencer, David Duke, brother Nathanael, Mike Enoch, Heimbach who promote Putin are controlled opposition.The aforementioned people are anti-Zionist and often regarded as anti-Semitic.  It is argued that in Russia you land in jail for being a nationalist, or for denying the holocaust or for being anti-Semitic.  This video is basically saying that Putin is not “the great white hope” that he is portrayed to be but that he is in league with the Zionists.

There is some truth in all of the above but Russia acts out of Russian interests. Perhaps you do end up in jail if you are a “nationalist”…..but what kind of nationalist…..a “separatist” who wants to fragment the Russian federation?  Perhaps you end up in jail if you deny the holocaust…..but Russia has many powerful Jewish interests and it would be foolish to unnecessarily antagonize them.   He has encouraged a resurgence of Christianity but he is also tolerant towards Judaism.  In my view that is just pragmatism.  He seems intent on making Russia as independent as possible from any globalist NWO.  Anyway, I post this video to give a balanced view of the many undercurrents:

Beware of the Dugin infiltrators


A communist (Jewish) world takeover

This video is even more extreme seeing the fall of Russia and East Germany (when the wall came down) as a stage managed event.  Bjerknes says the following; “The fall of Communism in Red China appears to be stage managed just like the phony dissolution of the Soviet Union, which is today led by KGB chieftain Vladimir Putin. Donald Trump is acting as the new Trotskyite neo-Con mirroring Ronald Reagan’s act. China is the new “evil empire” and Soviet Russia the new ally of the false Right”.

The Fake Fall of Red China

China Taking Over


If you watched all the above videos and are confused that is a good thing.  You should be confused. There is a great game being played and a lot of disinformation out there. I believe that Books is wrong when he says that Putin and Bolsonaro are killing there own people using Covid-19.  That is clearly leftist (globalist) propaganda. The figures coming out of Russia and Brazil are massaged and inflated. The globalists want the economy of Brazil and Russia destroyed and Putin and  Bolsonaro are refusing to comply. The bit about the fires in Brazil is also propaganda as it was not worse than other years. Bolsonaro is a Zionist and a Trump ally and Putin is also friendly with Trump and a (marginal) Zionist.  So these two leaders are fighting against the more extreme version of globalism and choosing either the Zionist version or a more independent multi-polarity over one world rule. Otherwise why would Russia strive to decouple the internet from the global system?  I believe Putin is being pragmatic with the Zionists but drawing a line in the sand regarding Syria.  He has done naval exercises with Iran and China as a threat to the Zionists – thus far and no further. Does he want to increase Russian influence in Europe?  Of course, he sees them as a natural ally.  Does he want globalism aka Chinese style Sino-commie-capitalism?  I think he will cooperate with the bridge and road but not allow the unique character of mother Russia to be overwhelmed by  globalist -Jewish-control.

A great game is being played for world hegemony. Whoever wins, the Jews win, whether that is via the Chinese (globalist Jews) or via the Anglo-Zionists.    If the globalists win you can expect a communist style repression of religion. If the Anglo-Zionist win there will probably be more religious freedom (maybe) but only if the “Noahide Laws” are obeyed and only if Christianity becomes a secondary offshoot to Judaism with Jesus demoted to the status of a prophet.



Interesting to note that Christianity is only allowed in Russia if it is in state approved Churches.  So, not real freedom of religion.