The Dirty Dozen

The Dirty Dozen

Rixey has called them the ‘Disingeneus Dozen’ in his latest article but I call them out for what they are…Dirty.  I have reproduced his article below. Please support his work by becoming a Patreon at $100 a year.

Perspective is important

As this article was being finished, yet another article appeared in the world’s foremost academic journal Nature that perfectly illustrates the phenomenon that I highlighted last week, when I analyzed the COVID-19 origin articles that were published by the world’s top-6 most prestigious academic journals. The results of that analysis showed a 35:1 ratio for natural-origin to lab-origin publications, despite the fact that, at best, the evidentiary basis of both possibilities is equivalent [a very generous assertion, as virtually all evidence found thus far argues against a natural origin [per recent Congressional testimony].

Yesterday’s [8/25] Nature article Origins of SARS-CoV-2: window is closing for key scientific studies is the 3rd peer-reviewed article by scientists pictured above in the last two weeks, a phenomenon that seems [luckily?] to coincide with the growing focus on the Congressional origin investigations – and [miraculously] appeared on the same day as the Biden report was delivered to Congress. Only Peter Daszak could have rationalized making an obviously political move even more blatantly political, as if it were a good maneuver. It would’ve been much easier for Daszak to simply call up Peter Ben Embarek, the leader of the World Health Organization’s COVID origin investigation, and tried to talk him out of releasing a documentary last week in which Embarek describes China’s creation and nurturing of a false narrative for the WHO. I’m not sure why anyone would think gathering the rest of that team in hopes of debunking its leader is an effective response.

This week, I want to focus on the scientists who’ve been writing these articles and appearing on television, arguing against the possibility that COVID-19 came out of a lab, rather than jumping from animal to human somewhere in the wild. In particular, I want to highlight the fact that these same scientists are the ones that are on the record as having lied to us about their ‘expert’ opinions regarding COVID’s origins:

 

Recently, Dr. Mercola’s Fauci Exposed: Historical Research of COVID highlighted my Fauci research, and it’s only fitting to use his experience to highlight the stunning hypocrisy that we’re still seeing from some scientists. Since March, several mainstream media outlets have been attacking Mercola [more than usual] in response to his being listed as the number 1 spreader of ‘“disinformation” about vaccines and masks in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. These attacks have been fairly successful – despite the fact that Facebook itself rejected the researcher’s conclusions as having been exaggerated; Facebook’s data was the primary driver of the arguments used in that study, but that fact hasn’t prevented Dr. Mercola from being blacklisted and effectively censored for his views.

Perhaps I’ve misunderstood what the purpose of science actually is, but growing up I was always taught that it was the rational pursuit of an understanding of how things work in the real world, built upon a foundation of conclusions drawn from evidence. Scientific truths are not meant to be flexible or political. Some have argued that the circumstances of this pandemic require scientists to speak with one voice, because otherwise the public at large will be confused and thus not know what advice to trust.

COVID-19 has shown us that the opposite is true: the public is perceptive enough to see that the scientists speaking with the most certainty are the ones who’ve been shown to have the largest conflicts of interest, and their crusade against fellow scientists who disagree continues to do more damage to ‘Science’ than any public discourse on the merits ever could.

I’d argue that the full picture is actually even worse, because we can at least look at Dr. Mercola and see someone whose advocacy for natural remedies appears genuine; in contrast, we already have proof in writing that Dr. Fauci and most natural-origin supporters were literally lying as they wrote & published peer-reviewed articles in the world’s most prestigious journals. During that same period, they were privately voicing their very real concerns that SARS-CoV-2 might not be natural. In other words, Dr. Fauci and many of the world’s leading virologists have supported the censorship of scientists who legitimately disagreed with them, while privately harboring many of the same concerns. Dr. Mercola, at least, actually believes what he’s defending; how can Dr. Fauci claim that “questioning me is questioning science” when we have proof that his ‘science’ consists of narratives that he wants us to believe?

 

When common sense was an uncommon virtue

Of course, my argument depends upon a situation in which common sense is meaningfully applied, and our current circumstances don’t meet that standard. After all, we’ve seen renewed vigor from natural-origin proponents in the last few weeks, despite zero new evidence to support their position. It appears to be a repeat performance in the vein of the 2 months following a 2/4/20 email exchange that explicitly documented their efforts at collusion, meant to steer the narrative towards more favorable ground.

Among the most recent disclosures, FOIA emails show that a scientist in Beijing contracted COVID-19 while working on it in a lab, that the existence of the Furin Cleavage Site [FCS] was “very chilling” and that Zheng-Li Shi & Ralph Baric, the scientists at the center of the lab controversy, were were involved in the editing of an article that rejected the lab hypothesis.

In The Origins of SARS-CoV-2: A Critical Review – Andersen, Holmes et al barely referenced Jeremy Bloom’s analysis of deleted sequences from Wuhan, and only then so that they could categorically deny that it affected any of their conclusions. That’s an incredibly bold assertion for them to make, when the sequences point away from their preferred wet-market narrative. Ian Lipkin, another signatory of the Lancet letter organized by Daszak, also ignored most of the last year’s worth of questions in his recent article The known knowns, known unknowns, and unknown unknowns of COVID-19.

The duplicity of Anthony Fauci, Jeremy Farrar, Kristian Andersen, Ralph Baric, Stanley Perlman, Ed Holmes and Ian Lipkin emerged within Buzzfeed’s FOIA emails of Fauci’s, while Linda Saif, Susan Weiss, Shan Lu, Shan-Lu-Liu, Lishan Su & Ralph Baric [below] discussed their misgivings across several FOIA caches obtained by US Right-to-Know:

   

As a reminder, here are the scientists who wrote these emails [Saif & Liu are faculty at Ohio State, Su & Baric are from UNC-Chapel Hill, Susan Weiss is from the University of Pennsylvania [Penn] and Shan Lu is an editor for Emerging Microbes and Infections and recently transferred from U-Mass to the University of Maryland]:

   

Special highlights for Susan Weiss:

   

Yes, chilling.

Here are snippets from Shan-Lu-Liu:

   

The same authors’ article was ultimately read 75,000 times – an article they made up solely to trash the hypothesis they found credible. It ended the year on Taylor & James’ Top 10 Open-Access Articles for 2020 [at #5].

Susan Weiss’ timely re-entry into the fray last week was quite similar in substance and tone to what they’d produced 18 months ago, but at least she was willing to address some of the substantive concerns raised in the interim in Can Science Help Resolve the Controversy on the Origins of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic?. Unfortunately, the quality of the peer-review is very reminiscent of that old article, too [but at least in that case there literally was no peer review].

I’ve included a couple of the many errors:

   

First, she and her co-authors repeat the same argument from the ‘landmark’ The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2 – that the SARS-CoV-2 virus can’t have been manipulated in a lab because it’s genome doesn’t resemble anything previously published. Weiss further states:

Prior to COVID-19, there would’ve been no need for secrecy in this type of fundamental science work.”

What? No need for secrecy? I hope the virology community is sitting down, because apparently they’re going to be shocked to learn that scientists don’t always publish all of their work – especially if that work might look suspiciously like bioweapons/defense research. Imagine being Hirohito in 1945, post-Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and shrugging off suggestions that the atomic bombs were actually just regular ones; after all, why would anyone build a bomb with material other than conventional explosives?

As idiotic as that analogy might seem, imagine being a world-renowned virologist, and publishing a paper that [as 1 of its 3 primary arguments] rejects the COVID-19 lab-origin hypothesis on the basis of the viral genome not utilizing a known viral backbone in its construction. 5.5 million people read that article in Nature Medicine, and nobody questioned that assertion?

If I were engaged in research that potentially violated the Biological Weapons Convention [BWC], I’d probably refrain from using anything that would point directly at my lab in a future investigation. It really isn’t that complicated.

“…since the virus is not stable in air for long and even less stable on surfaces.”

This fragment isn’t even grammatically correct, but who am I to judge? Weiss should look further into the literature, because SARS-CoV-2 is stable enough to be at least the 2nd-most efficient aerosol-transmitting virus known to man.

-What is science if it’s not honest?-

In a sane and just world, all of the COVID-origin articles published by authors for whom we have proof that they were lying about their conclusions should be retracted immediately.

Alternatively, journals like Nature, Science, The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine should clarify who is allowed to use their platforms to deceive us and which circumstances justify the use of fabricated narratives.

   
*‘Flag’ refers to the flagship/primary journal by the publisher

At first glance, it might seem that my last statement was meant to be sarcastic, but I assure you it isn’t sarcasm. As I wrote last week:

Just 3 weeks ago, Dr. Peter Hotez’s Mounting Anti-Science Aggression in the United States openly called for hate crime legislation from Congress to combat those who question scientists. He even ended with a comparison to 1930’s Nazi Germany, which seems odd for someone whose favored political party is in control and actively suppressing free speech.

Science is literally the development and enhancement of a system of knowledge through evidence, observation and investigation. Dr. Hotez’s proposition to protect science is actually anti-science itself; in a world filled with common sense, he would be one of the first people arrested for the hate crime of questioning science, so I’d respectfully ask him to withdraw his idea to prevent his own prosecution.


Since time may be running out on our ability to question scientists, I urge everyone to share this article with your own motley crew of dissidents, by clicking the button below. Or, as I’m sure pediatrician Dr. Hotez would argue,

Do it for the children.

~Rixey

FDA Approved

FDA Approved

The FDA has approved the vaccines which means that they can now be mandated because they are “safe”.    I have placed a full five our stream from Dr. Kevin McCairn below.  I had no time to edit it down etc.  If you watch it from the beginning don’t be offended by the memes…they have actually been highly effective.

So far I have only watched the first hour and I have taken a clip of the CDC CEO Walensky to tweet out (see below).  The section about the Rev Jesse Jackson is funny.  He literally has rainbow turds on his mouth (lolz).   The world has truly gone mad.

 

The insidious face of a pandemic of variants

Geert warned more than 2 months ago and no one listened.

US Congress hearing Nov 2019

US Congress hearing Nov 2019

Mark Kulacz talks with John Brisson about Christianity, faith, non-violent resistance and the stress response. God is in control. A call to reach out to neighbors and community. Mark and John analyze a video on Flu Vaccine Science and Innovation with Fauci before the House Science Space and Technology Committee in Nov 2019 about the time of the Wuhan Games just as the virus was emerging. Get ready to be nauseated. Skip from 23 to 34 minutes (technically difficulties).

Ep 102.1 : Live watch-party w/ Weve Read the Docs : Flu Whackzine Tech, US congress hearing Nov 2019

 

Send in the marines (Rixey)

Send in the marines (Rixey)

Anyone who takes time to look at the work done by ex-marine and WMD investigator Charles Rixey can see that the wheels are falling off their narrative.  The Beast is exposed and we must go for the soft underbelly.  Make no mistake we are in the belly of the Beast but we possess the sword of truth and the determination to cut our way out of that lugubrious bloated belly.

And then there is this:

The Fauci List

The Fauci List

Fauci seems to be a dangerous person to be around.  In that sense he is a bit like Hilary (who he “loves”).   A lot of untimely deaths happen around them. It is definitely not healthy working around them.

Here is the page on the Housatonic website:

Fauci Page

UK Column is Fifth Column

UK Column is Fifth Column

I am afraid that I am going to have to call out the UK Column as a Fifth Column. What else can I do?  It is with a heavy heart but they have expended their goodwill. It must be obvious to anyone with eyes that Henningsen is IIA (Interactive Internet Activities).  He has been leaned on.   The one thing that you are not allowed to say is that covid is a bio-weapon and that it had a lab origin.  I offered the crew an opportunity to debate and discus it. No answer. Instead one of the members responded that it was a conspiracy theory (like Hennigsen did).  The irony of Alt Media calling someone a conspiracy theorist is exquisite:

It is not a “theory” how can it be a theory when the genome has been sequenced? We KNOW that it was made in the lab (lab origin) and we KNOW that Ft Detrick and China have data missing so that it can no longer be traced. But the EVIDENCE is in the genome itself and then there is the murder suicide and disappearance of bio engineers geneticists etc. Low level bio-war has been ongoing for decades. They have been funding this for decades and trying it on. Look at the history of the first pandemic SARS-Cov-1. Are they lying about PCR and death numbers? YES. Are they promoting fear? YES Are the vaccines dangerous? YES. Unlike Patrick I will not let these bastards off the hook. Saying that it originated in a lab is the ONE THING that gets you attacked from ALL SIDES. Both the alt media and the MSM attack you when you dare suggest that they made it in a lab. We are to believe that someone ate bat soup and had pangolin as a side dish? Transgenic humanized mice were used, but meh! natural. I KNOW THEY MADE IT AND RELEASED IT. And I will expose the bastards and their fear/propaganda campaign. The virus/vaccine was designed to trigger inflammatory pathways so that they can gather data for their transhumanism project. They want you to believe that the virus is not real. If you believe it is a figment of imagination…a computer printout….a propaganda phantom then they have got you where they want you. They have run a brilliant misinfo campaign. Hats off to them.

And this:

And why no reply from Patrick, or Mike or anyone on the UK column? I have supported them since the beginning. Why no response? This issue is crucial. Why don't they arrange a debate then? I can bring a number of PhD. neurobiologists and WMD experts and DRASTIC members and researchers to the table. A video by "Kaufman" who admits he knows "nothing about viruses" and charges $1700 for a private session....is that your source? You rely on a conman who says that no viruses exist at all? Germ theory (laughable) or perhaps Dr Sam Bailey who Patrick refers to. Promoting her book. All grifters. Ask yourself this why are they allowed to continue? Why do the algorithms promote their channels? And yet Kevin gets his Discord server nuked and all his followers thrown off? They even publish counter articles in Nature and the Lancet. Why is that do ya think? Have they done that for the UK column?


So there is the challenge.....debate the central issues:

1. Lab origin
2. Who is behind it
3. Why are they doing it


Anything else...masks, lockdown etc is just distraction. They are important but they are side issues. You are being led away from the truth.

So, debate? Any answer?

There was no answer forthcoming so as far as I am concerned they are fair game now. One by one they are showing their true colors.  Alex Jones, Whitney Webb, Last American Vagabond, UK column,Gab the free-speech platform. This list is by no means exhaustive. Just about everything is false.They are limited hangouts, distracting you and directing the information flows towards  less damaging routes. You are being managed. It makes me wonder if the UK Column is  run by military intelligence as Brian is ex-Navy and Alex is ex-MI6.

We truly are in the Matrix which were the last words spoken by the software CEO  Erin Valenti before she died on her way back from a meeting in Silicone valley (https://youtu.be/oMmoMZzsAVE).   A matrix of lies. You are not allowed to talk about bio-weapons and you are not allowed to talk about the corrupt networks running these operations. Here follows Dr Kevin McCairn’s video:

Dr Kevin McCairn exposes Interactive Internet Operation (57 mins)

A look at vaccine success (sic) in Iceland, the SC2 Viral Envelope and exposing the UK Column IIA (Interactive Internet Activities) operation. I have edited this down from 3.5 hrs but it still comes with a language warning.  He calls out and visits my website blog (Biblaridion at about 30 mins) during the live stream and plays the clip in my article “The UK Column in Denial”.

 

Here is the article on the SC2 envelope:

Mark from Housatonic was able to open a can of worms starting with Jewish CDC director Dr Rochelle Walensky.  This is what Kevin is referring to during the show when he mentions Auchincloss.  All the dots are beginning to join up.  Watch these two one minute videos:

Auchincloss part 1

Auchincloss part 2 – they got a CDC/NIAID/FDA coup

 

What does this mean?

It means the networks run deep and wide. It means they have captured everything.  Mark says the following:

Vanderbilt ancestors are running the CDC, FDA, AND NIAID. Sounds like a conflict of interest to me when one "discovers" the new pandemic virus, the other manages how to respond to it and develop the medicine, and the third part approves the medicine.
Research: 1) Dudleytown, Connecticut. 2) Dr. William Cogswell Clarke 3) Dark Entry Forest, Incorporated - Connect the dots. Flexner - Vanderbilt - Kennedy - Kissinger - Lederberg - Auchincloss - Skull and Bones - Medical experimentation - Memorial Sloan Kettering - Its getting real, folks. And now we know why Dr. Stephen Fauci's history was wiped. And now we get an idea of why Dr. Alice E. Moore got her home right next to Dudleytown, Connecticut ... and possibly why this area is heavily patrolled to keep people out.

Why does Fauci love the Spanish Flu so much? Note his deputy High Auchincloss' grandad created the tool used to drain the lungs of those people who died of it. Helpful if re-writing the narrative to be only caused by a "zoonotic" virus.

Why Fauci was picked - Because his deputy is Hugh Auchincloss. Family is married into Sloan. Powerful at Memorial Sloan-Kettering. And thats where Tony Fauci's dad Stephen Fauci was a pharmacist. Auchincloss is related to Bundy, Vanderbilt, Gore, Kennedy, and many more. An Auchincloss even replaced US Rep Joe Kennedy in Massachusetts. This is why Anthony Fauci was picked, and why he is immovable. Even worse - Auchincloss picked the CDC director Walensky, and Auchincloss relatives were FDA deputies. Meaning - control of finding pandemics, control of addressing pandemics, and control of approving the medicine. Holy holy crap. We got it. For those helping with the research, thank you - we all made this possible. Please share - please dammit share this.

The link in this tweet takes you to a connection map on LittleSis that will clarify many of the connections that go back to Sloan Kettering. This is based on the work done by Mark (Housatonic) and a click on the entery below each circle will take you to his research page:

Discord nukes Dr Kevin McCairn (18 mins)

Discord buys AI company Sentropy to shutdown free-speech under the guise of harassment and uses AI to nuke Dr Kevin M’cCairns server and all the associated user accounts. If you demonstrate from science that Covid is a bio-weapon and call out the nepotistic, corrupt institutions pushing forward communitarian wokeism (cultural Marxism) you get shut down.

In this video there is also a tweet about Amy Maxman sister of Isaac Maxman (part of the Maxwell-Epstein network) CEO of Predict getting the Cohen prize for writing (she attacked Kevin in the Nature Journal).  It is all one big corrupt swamp and they are all patting each other on the back and giving each other prizes.  But don’t you dare call them out because that would make you antisemitic.

Look what just came in over twitter….they are getting desperate to shut down any investigation into bio-weapons.

UK Column in denial

UK Column in denial

This is a short clip from the UK Column News – 6th August 2021:

I have posted numerous reports from the UK Column on this blog and supported them with membership but I am afraid that after watching Patrick Hennigsen’s ridiculous and irresponsible reporting that I will have to cancel my membership.

He continues to promote the idea that the covid virus does not exist at all.  According to Patrick it is a phantom, a fantasia. That is an insult to people who lost loved ones from covid and an insult  to the many scientists who have sequenced the genome and who have isolated covid.  It is an insult to doctors who have developed and used alternative treatments such as HCQ or IVM etc.  What were they treating?  Propaganda? (lol)

He relies on “experts” such as  Sam Bailey and the charlatan Kaufman who have been comprehensively debunked. His extreme standpoint takes away from the important message of the UK Column and the otherwise excellent reporting that they do.

The virus has been isolated and the gain of function (GOF) and race targeting aspects that the virus acquired are not from natural evolution. The argument from the eighteenth century Koch’s postulates (1884) is sophistry because a virus replicates in living cells. A virus is not a bacteria. Outside a living cell, a virus is a dormant particle, lacking the raw materials for reproduction. Only when it enters a host cell does it go into action, hijacking the cell’s metabolic machinery to produce copies of itself that may burst out of infected cells or simply bud off a cell membrane. This lack of self-sufficiency means that viruses cannot be cultured in artificial media for scientific research or vaccine development; they can be grown only in living cells, fertilized eggs, tissue cultures, or bacteria. Those viral isolates were injected in monkeys and sequenced. They were observed with scanning electron microscopes (which did not exist in the era of Koch), they were stained with fluorescent markers  (IHC, or ImmunoHistoChemistry) and virus distribution was traced in the human body. So, we can see the  virus with Cryo electron tomography, we can trace the virus with IHC and we can double check  genomic models with Proteomics and Isoelectric focusing and we can reinfect monkeys and make them reproduce the same symptoms using the isolate.

Here is the question that Covid deniers such as Hennigsen must answer.  If no one got sick from the Covid spike protein how come they are getting sick from the “vaccine” that is based on the same toxic “spike protein”.   According to your logic the vaccine injuries and vaccine deaths must also be propaganda.   The toxic spike protein causes harm whether it is attached to the covid virus or made in your body cells.  You can’t have it both ways.

You underestimate the long-term danger of Covid as an incapacitating agent.  The latest research shows that it can cross the blood-brain barrier and cause neurodegenrative diseases (prions).  The virus and the vaccine are dangerous long-term.  The virus has a number of autoimmune inflammatory pathways.  It was purposely designed stay dormant and probe any genetic weaknesses.  It is race specific. It was put together in a lab and can trigger numerous  inflammatory pathways……this is not normal:

 

Fig. 3 In the center appears the SARS-CoV-2. Around it, at the upper part of the figure, appear autoantibodies linked to the SARS-CoV-2-infection. At the bottom part of the figure, appear autoimmune diseases linked to the SARS-CoV-2-infection [,, , , ,, , , , , , , , ].

The first covid victims were the elderly, the vulnerable and the co-morbid.  Their deaths were exacerbated by the lockdowns and the wrong treatment protocols (intubation). The biggest risk factor is being overweight. Most healthy people under 70 did not suffer any respiratory disease, or any initial consequences…..but the virus still replicated in their bodies and was still transmitted. The question is whether it stays dormant after you develop immunity?  Think here of varicella zoster virus (VZV) or chicken pox that sits at the base of the spine. The virus can reactivate decades later (triggered by immune stress?), causing shingles.  So even dead nucleotide and anti-bodies might not mean that you have lifetime immunity.

Why the propaganda?

It is undeniable that they exaggerated the death numbers and the case numbers.  We know they have lied. We know they have abused the RT-PCR test.  Henningsen immediately draws the conclusion that it is all a hoax and that the virus does not exist.  However, other explanations are possible and fit the facts better. 

If you are tracing the distribution of a long-term bio-agent then you would want to track all the cases. It would not matter if you were picking up dead nucleotide.  You might be collating it with genetic data so that you can determine effectiveness at some later date.

Just imagine the data that can be collected from an agent that has multiple inflammatory pathways and can be matched over time with genetic data.  Billions of people, multiple inflammatory pathways, billions of individual genetic code represent thousands of years of human experimentation analyzed in the blink of an eye by Artificial Intelligence.  Patterns will emerge.  A huge filtering and processing project that will find which genes confer protection against multiple diseases.  A way to eliminate the “flawed” and “genetically inferior”.  A eugenicists wet dream.   This is the way to make an Übermensch.    A transhuman Superman. 

So, intensive over the top testing would be needed to know how effectively the enemy bio-agent was distributed. On the other hand, if you released it yourself  you would also want to know how successful your “project” was. These agents are dual use.  They can be used for warfare or genetic improvement.  The line is blurred.  You can use the atom to make  nuclear power or a nuclear bomb. Dual use.  But even nuclear power has risks.

Moreover, the huge case numbers help justify the lockdowns.  And the lockdowns help destroy the economy which is one of their goals.  The same goes with the death numbers. Exaggerating the initial death count increases the fear, which increases compliance. That is a good thing if you want to protect people. It is also a good thing if you want to destroy the economy.  Take your pick.

So, if an enemy has released a bio-agent it makes sense to exaggerate the case numbers and the death numbers.  What do you want them to say?  An enemy released this and it may give you cancer or brain disease in the next three years…please stay indoors? But if your own government was complicit with the release and wanted the “Reset” they would also lie about the numbers and act in the same way.  The course of action that you see now would be the same either way.  They would lie about the numbers but that does not mean covid is a hoax and does not exist.  That is a false equivalency.

Rebranding Influenza

I hear you already saying that covid is just the rebranding of flu.   We all know that WHO data showed the complete disappearance of flu. It just vanished…and poof it is gone.  The fact is that the CDC’s own statistics showed that they amalgamated Influenza and Pneumonia data together with covid.  However, it was still possible to work out the contribution of flu and it turned out that the first wave was about 50 flu : 50 covid.   As time progressed the flu just vanished and that has to do with evolutionary dominance.  It simply out-competed the flu. Think of it this way. You are at the Olympics watching a race between a transgender woman (she/them) and a real woman (she). They pace each other to the half way mark but then suddenly the transgender (she/them) strength advantage shows and leaves the real woman in the dust.  The artificial version wins. Evolutionary dominance.  It is real….just like genetic racial differences.  Science does not care about your fictive realities.

Letting them off the hook

Henningsen is letting them off the hook.  By supporting a natural “zoonotic” origin you are allowing them to perpetuate the false narrative that covid is the fault of humans who came into contact with nature (bats).  This allows them to push the argument that we must be locked up in smart cities and kept under surveillance to stop us coming into contact with nature.  It is another version of the climate change argument.  Climate change is not happening because of space weather and magnetic reversal and solar activity but because you drive a car and eat meat.  You horrible, germ ridden, grandma killing, meat eating, farting, human. How dare you.   They need you to believe it had natural origins.  Then they can force their One Health Agenda on you.

You know full well they have been planning this and working on this for decades. There are Level 5 bio-labs all over the world. They have spent billions on developing genetic/viral and cyber (AI) platforms.  They fit together like a hand in a glove.  A virus can be used to hack a computer system or to hack a body. It is the same principle. Change the code, change the function. That is why psychopath Bill Gates is both a “vaccine” and a “computer”  genius (sarcasm tag). He never saw something he didn’t want to hack or patch (lol).  We are now experiencing the fruits of next generation warfare.  There are no good guys. They all want to dominate us and you want to let them off the hook.

You offer a cheap shot about CNN now admitting that it was a lab leak.   They deliberately chose the wrong word.  It was not a lab leak it was lab origins. Gates was fed a soft ball question so that he could deny it.   The lab origin of the virus is crucial to destroying their whole fake narrative.   The pressure and evidence is mounting including the Fauci email.

All your scoffing and mocking demonstrates is that you don’t understand the science and have been taken in by IIA (Interactive Internet Activites) who want you to believe that it was either natural or an accident. An “accident” with exquisite timing just after they completed the table top exercise Event 201 and just after the Federal Reserve started Repo.

They are using psychological warfare and have flooded the zone with misinformation. I used to believe the same as you but have moved on as more evidence has become available. Your approach needs to be more nuanced and flexible.  Your pride and ego prevent you from admitting that you are wrong so now you double down.  We do not have time for ego.  We face an existential threat. In the next few years we face a massive wave of injury and death. Especially if they keep vaccinating with a leaky vaccine.   Whether it is caused by the covid spike or by the vaccine spike (forcing ADE and VOC)…you will see more injuries and death.

Take a look at these clips and tell me they were not working on bio-weapons:

 

 

In Deep Denial

Denail is not just a river in Egypt.  It is when people refuse reality because it is just too scary to accept.  They want the old normal but what they get is the HyperNormal. You have been propagandized.   I suggest you watch this:

 

At one point I was accused of being 77 Brigade.  Yeah, Patrick I am 77 Brigade telling people not to get vaccinated and that the government are a bunch of techno fascists.  This is a picture of my room. They pay me well and give me free masks.

 

I could call you controlled opposition but I believe that you are genuine but mistaken.  Just pull your head out of your ass. The threat is real and we have no time for egos.  The video you used as scientific evidence was comprehensively debunked. Time to man up and fight the misfits who would make and release such a thing.

P.S. see my article on the Phantom Virus.

Anti-Science and Anti-Semitic (twofer)

Anti-Science and Anti-Semitic (twofer)

You get two for the price of one because if you attack science you are attacking the Jews.  A bit like attacking bankers.

Dr. Peter J. Hotez, M.D., Ph.D., is a professor of pediatrics and molecular virology and microbiology at the Baylor College of Medicine, discusses the coronavirus produced an article about the  Mounting antiscience aggression in the United States.  Peter J. Hotez is the Jewish physician who won the B’nai B’rith Distinguished Achievement Award winner (2017).   You must not criticize or question your scientific superiors.  If you do question them it means that you are far-right and probably anti-Semitic.  Here is a live stream from Kevin that analyzes the article. I have cleaned it up a bit but still comes with a language warning:

I am the science

Dr. Peter J. Hotez can’t wait to jab your kids and hates “anti-vaxers”  he sets up the fallacy that the covid vaxx is like taking the polio shot when he knows it is not the same because it is a gene therapy. Moreover, polio is on the increase where Gates has been running his vaccination campaigns. His attenuated vaccine was causing polio.  The reference to a fraudulent science paper is interesting because it refers to the one that Dr. Andrew Wakefield wrote.  The reason that it is interesting is because Wakefield co-authored a paper with Dr. Peter Daszak: Detection and comparative analysis of persistent measles virus infection in Crohn’s disease by immunogold electron microscopy. I smell a rat. Wakefield was probably unleashed to discredit the anti-vaxx movement.  They probably had something on Wakefield he seems unsavory.  There has been a huge increase in autism and other studies show that unvaccinated children have less autism and other childhood illness. Most healthy children survive measles without complications (I did). Of course, correlation does not prove causation but Hotez just gives me the creeps.

 

The icing on the cake is that Hotez knows Katzwoman:

 

Remember this Katzwoman interview (search for the article on this site):

 

I guess Jews of a feather stick together…..which reminds me….it seems Peter Daszak (aka Fat Peter, aka Peter disease-sack) comes from a Ukrainian Jewish family. Oh, what a complicated web we weave when we set out to deceive.

 

Conclusion

Suffice to say everywhere you look you find this interconnected, unaccountable  network. They are not all Jews but there is a huge preponderance.  And they are not to be criticized. The Jews and  crypto Jews are above questioning.  They are the new priesthood. The forerunners of the Communitarian techno-fascist takeover. Even the Jewish CDC head Rochelle Walensky is intent on destroying property rights while BlackRock (run by the Jew Larry Fink) buys up property (for renting out) for pennies on the dollar.  The goyim are dumb.

The USA is under full attack by the techno-fascists and now they are coming to inject your kids. This is not going to end well. The USA is not Russia in 1917. 

Housatonic.Live Youtube Shorts for June 2021

Housatonic.Live Youtube Shorts for June 2021

Mark puts together a number of one minute shorts. Very interesting.

Once again the global disappearance of the influenza virus is picked up my Mark. This could be due to viral dominance i.e., covid out-competed influenza.  This could be possible because the first wave in the USA was almost 50/50 covid and influenza/pneumonia. Perhaps it did get out-competed?

 

 

Ex-marine, Ex-WMD Specialist

Ex-marine, Ex-WMD specialist

Charles Rixey, a member of DRASTIC is still digging and exposing them. They are the conspiracy. He was interviewed by Dr. Kevin McCairn.  He is one of the good guys and posts credible well researched material. Follow him and support him.