In this video Dr Kevin McCairn PhD neuroscientist has a discussion with E. Michael Jones Catholic writer, former professor at Saint Mary’s College in Indiana and the current editor of Culture Wars magazine concerning consciousness and metaphysics. At the conclusion of the discussion after E. Michael Jones leaves, I join Dr McCairn for a chat. Though I differ on the theology it was refreshing to listen to E. Michael Jones and his rational presentation of metaphysics.

Logos, language, mathematics, and nature

My position is that there is a connection between these abstract concepts which are to a lesser or greater degree focused on nature and on the activity of divine agency in the material world. The following short video has an interesting understanding of the role that language plays:


Language is unique in communicating and structuring abstract ideas, crucial to our thought processes and therefore of critical importance to consciousness and metaphysics. It also determines relationships and hierarchical structures. I give my children and my dog a name, they do not name me. When language is combined with mathematics and that is used to describe creation, we are dealing with something uniquely powerful and as far as I can determine this first occurred with the proto-Hebrew language and passed via Phoenician to the Greek language. Below are some initial findings which I hope to express in a separate article, but they demonstrate that Genesis encodes the cyclical nature of the destructive and creative process that was also known to other ancient civilizations. What makes the Semitic approach unique is that it combines language and mathematics (sacred geometry) with revelation resulting in an ontological unfolding of a continuously evolving manifestation of consciousness. The divine name is not just linked with what God is, but with what God will be. Everything lives and moves and has its being in him, ipso fact he is then the source of consciousness and we are nodes in the matrix. The Genesis narrative highlights alienation and existential angst.

"And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons" (Gen 3:7).

The word naked has the following values: ‘ê-rum-mim (naked) עֵֽירֻמִּ֖ם – 360 Standard / 72 Ordinal and 360 x 72 =25,920 years which is the number of years in the Platonic Great Year considered by the ancients (and Newton) to reflect the Precession Cycle. The full Hebrew verse has the standard value 4066 whereas the other verse with the plural form (‘ă·rūm·mîm עֲרוּמִּים   std 366 / 78 ord) in Genesis 2:25 has the value 2,626 (std) and 4,066-2,626 = 1,440 (the minutes in a 24-hour day) which is 2 cycles of 720.  The figures 72 and 144 (or multiples thereof) are found in all the ancient precession cycle calendars from the Babylonian, Mayan, Indian etc. 18 x 1,440 =25,920

(note that both numbers reduce to 9), moreover the sum of the squares of these two numbers (144^2 +72^2) is also 25,920.  The value of the word naked pre-fall (Gen 2:25- 366/78) is different to the value after the fall (Gen 3:7 naked= 360/72). The serpent in Gen 3:1 is described as cunning (crafty, shrewd) with the word cunning having the same values   (366/78  both reduce to 6) as naked in Gen 2:25 (before the fall) with the full verse (as we have seen) reflecting double the yhvh name value (2626) reflecting their primeval innocence with emphasis on both male and female imaging yhvh (And they were both naked the man and his wife and were not ashamed) hence the double 26.

That the word naked can when re-pointed and differentially contextualized (cf. Job 5:12 and Job 15:5 עֲרוּמִ֑ים) take on the negative connotation of crafty (=the serpent) demonstrates that the omniscient narrator already anticipates that the idyllic harmony will be ruined by rebellion. The phrase “were not ashamed” (ולא יתבששו) just happens to have the ordinal value of 101 and 26 x 101 =2626 (the std value reduces to 11=2). We saw previously the mathematics and sacred Geometry connected with Genesis 1:1 –

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth (Gen 1:1)

Std value =2,701 Ordinal =298      בראשית ברא אלהים את השמים ואת הארץ


There is much more, we are just scraping the surface.











The verse triangle can be inscribed in a circle with a radius of 42 units. Adding the seven Hebrew words of Genesis 1:1 in different combinations, one will find 23 multiples of the number 37, including a compound figurate square of 23 hexagrams (37 7²) and cubes of hexagrams (37 2³) and (37 3³). Random chance would indicate only about three multiples. Note that each of the seven words is used exactly twelve times in making up the 23 multiples of 37 (i.e., 913 appears twelve times; 203 appears twelve times, and so on). Here are the gematria and order of each of the seven Genesis 1:1 words: 913, 203, 86, 401, 395, 407. And there is much more (reserved for future articles).

The Logos

There is therefore a nexus between language, mathematics and nature resulting in the revelation of what John refers to as the Logos in his prologue. The first verse of the Fourth Gospel builds on the geometry of Genesis 1:1 by adding a plinth to the triangle:

John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God - Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ Λόγος,  καὶ ὁ Λόγος ἦν πρὸς τὸν Θεόν, καὶ Θεὸς ἦν ὁ Λόγος. 

Standard =3627, Ordinal= 605









The Triangular  plinth of 3627 has 12 divisors with a totient of φ = 2160 which happens to be a Platonic month. The value of the first triangle (2701) and plinth (3627) is equivalent to the 112 th triangular number (6328) which also happens to be the length of the base making the perimeter 333 dots and the product of the digit pairs (63 x 28) is the square of 42 as does the ordinal value of both verses, which sums up to the Triangular number of 42 (903).








Therefore, we have a direct connection between the Genesis 1:1 and that of the Fourth Gospel with the appearance of Jesus on the scene described in terms of creation. Moreover, the name used for Jesus in the Talmud (וּשֵׁי Yēšū) which is often hostile towards him has the ordinal value 37 which is the same as the Hebrew word for wisdom which is in turn the 37th triangular number (666+37 =703) and Yēšū also has the standard value of 316 which is the mirror of 613 the number of commandments (mitzvot) in the Torah (Tractate Makkot 23b). With the word becoming flesh (καὶ ὁ λόγος σὰρξ ἐγένετο : kai o logos sarx egeneto) the word flesh (sarx) in the Greek giving us the value 361 we have the unusual triumvirate of : 316 (Yēšū) 613 (word) 361 (flesh) the sum giving the 1290 days of Daniel 12:11 (from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away…).

LIVE – E. Michael Jones: Consciousness and Metaphysics (3:14)


Is the Prologue of John influenced by Platonic, Philonic or Gnostic concepts?

A case can be made that all three strands of thought cross-fertilized each other especially as the Fourth Gospel was written to the church at Ephesus and the Gospel emphasized the superiority of Christ over John the Baptist and the influence of Jewish gnostic sorcery (cf. Acts 19) a church that was made known the manifold wisdom (Sophia) of God (Eph 3:10)….  And to know the love of Christ, which passeth knowledge (gnosis), that ye might be filled with all the fulness (pelorma) of God (Eph 3:19). Ephesians is employing gnostic terminology, the problem was that Gnosticism became “secret knowledge” only available to initiates and it tended to regard the material creation as evil and slip into Docetism, namely that Christ’s body was not human but either a phantasm or of real but celestial substance, and that therefore his sufferings were only apparent. For this reason, early Christianity rejected extreme forms of Gnosticism and the Fourth Gospel emphasizes that the Logos became flesh thus emphasizing his physical body and his human nature.

Many Christians use the Latin word incarnation for the Logos which is derivative from the ecclesiastical Latin verb incarno, itself derived from the prefix in- and caro, “flesh”, meaning “to make into flesh” or, in the passive, “to be made flesh” as in the Word became flesh in the Latin Vulgate “et Verbum caro factum” understood as  a hypostatic union of the divine nature and the human nature and pointing to pre-existence, co-substantiality etc. More apropos to Johannine usage would be the term phanerōthē (Greek: φανερωθῇ) carrying the idea of manifestation, a word that occurs frequently in the Greek NT, particularly in the Gospel of John with reference to Jesus’ manifesting to Israel (John 1:31), manifesting glory (John 2:1), manifesting truth and light (John 3:21), manifesting the name (John 17:6), manifesting his risen self (John 21:2,14).  Jesus is seen by John as the ultimate manifestation of the name (I AM) although a lesser manifestation is encountered in the healing of the blind man whose visage was altered that much as to make him unrecognizable to the crowd who questioned his identity to which he replied with the “I AM” formula; “Some said, This is he: others said, He is like him: but he said, I AM “ (John 9:9  Note that he in italics in the KJV is added by the translator). Jesus explicitly says- “Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest (phanerōthē) in him” (John 9:3).  In the act of healing the blind man becomes an example of the manifestation of divine power. Moreover, the phrase this is he is the 45 th time that Οὗτος (Houtos) is used in the Fourth Gospel with the other forty-four times referencing Jesus, where it is either translated as this one, or in combination “this man” or as “the same” as in the first occurrence of the gospel; “The same was in the beginning with God” (John 1:2) with all 45 occurrences reflecting the value of Adam in the Hebrew (45), Jesus is depicted as the last Adam ἔσχατος Ἀδὰμ (1 Cor 15:45) the express image (Heb 1:3).

It is thought that the Hellenistic Jewish philosopher Philo merged the Ancient Greek Logos philosophy (the principle of cosmic reason) with the Hebrew concept of Wisdom, God’s companion and intimate helper in creation (See Prov 8 article on wisdom to follow soon). Logos became a technical term in Western philosophy beginning with Heraclitus (c. 535 – c.  475 BC), who used the term for a principle of order and knowledge, but the concept was already in use in the Hebrew scriptures before it was popularized in Greek philosophy.  Moreover, sacred geometry, higher mathematics and the length of the Great Precession Year was encoded into the language before it appeared in Greece (watch from 16 mins):


The fact remains that the concept of LOGOS in the Hebrew Bible was earlier than the Greek philosophers and the remarkable “coincidence” that the translation of John 1:1 having the same value as Psalm 107:20 is remarkable.


A rough Timeline demonstrates that the sacred geometry and mathematics in Scripture  is earlier than the Greeks and earlier than  Hermes Trismegistus / Gnosticism.

  • Isaiah-Hezekiah 700 BC -Logos
  • Babylonian Exile 586 BC
  • Pythagoras (570-495 BC)
  • Heraclitus c. (535 – 475 BC)-Logos
  • Plato c. (428-348 BC)
  • Euclid 330 BC
  • Archimedes c. (287 – 212 BC)
  • Hipparchus c. 120 BC Precession year
  • Ptolemy c.170 BC Precession year
  • Legendary Hermes Trismegistus c.170 BC


Exposition Johannine prologue

The translation used is the KJV of John 1.

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.


Note: The absence of an article in the phrase In the beginning rendering In beginning note also the accusative preposition pros indicates movement towards a destination called THE God differentiated from god by the absence of an article. G. R. S. Mead places the prologue of the Fourth Gospel in a gnostic context and is partly correct as it was at Ephesus that followers of the John the Baptist were found (Acts 19:1-3) and the Mandæans (lit. Gnostics—mandā = gnōsis) of the lower Euphrates who are the only known surviving community of the ancient Gnosis.The Sidrā d’Yahyā (Book of John) deal with the life and teachings of John the Baptizer.  Mead  renders the first verse as; “In Beginning was Mind; and Mind was with GOD” which offers the temptation to substitute mind with “tensor field” or “consciousness” or perhaps translate Logos as “purpose” or “idea” or “reason” until we realize that Logos is translated as Word 208x  and  as saying 50x in Young’s concordance and sending forth the word is idiom for sending an agent (like a prophet) to speak on God’s behalf.  The terms of the Fourth Gospel must be defined by the Johannine corpus because he has his own distinct idiom. Thus, John refers to The Word in three other places, and in each case his allusion is to Jesus the Man. “His name is called the Word of God” (Rev. 19:13). “That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life” (1 Jn. 1:1); that is, they heard his preaching, they saw his miracles, they looked upon him crucified, and they handled him when risen from the dead (Lk. 24:39). “Who bare record of the word of God, and of the testimony of Jesus Christ, and of all things that he saw” (Rev. 1:2). Even this passage, which at first sight seems to require a different meaning for “the word of God” lines up with the others when it is realised that this is the first of a series of triads which meet the reader in Revelation 1 (compare verses 4b, 5a, 7). In fact, “the testimony of Jesus and all things that he saw” is the exact equivalent of 1 John 1:2. The tentative conclusion concerning “the Word” in John 1:1 would therefore appear to be that it means Jesus the Man, and not Jesus the Idea or Purpose.

The identity of the expression: “In the beginning” with Genesis 1:1 has led many to assume that John 1:1 refers to the beginning of the visible creation. But a careful use of the concordance reveals that out of 16 other instances where John speaks of “the beginning”, in no single case does he allude to Genesis 1:1. Admittedly, in two of them he refers to Genesis, but in both instances (John 8:44; 1 John 3:8) the allusion is to the serpent. This, however, is Genesis 3 and not the beginning of creation, when all material things were made by the word of God: “And God said…”

It is impressive to observe that all other occurrences of “the beginning” in John’s writings have to do with the beginning of the ministry of Jesus or the beginning of discipleship or some related idea. A few examples:

“And ye also shall bear witness, because ye have been with me from the beginning” (John15:27).

“And these things I said not unto you at the beginning, because I was with you” (John 16:4).

‘Then said they unto him, Who art thou? And Jesus saith unto them, Even the same that I said unto you from the beginning” (John 8:25).

“For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him” (John. 6:64).

“Brethren, I write no new commandment unto you, but an old commandment which ye had from the beginning. The old commandment is the word which ye have heard from the beginning” (1 John 2:7).

“For this is the message that ye heard from the beginning, that we should love one another” (1 John 3:11).

This list should be conclusive. John 1:1 is speaking about the beginning of the ministry of Jesus. Hence, appropriately, the immediate reference to the Baptist: “There was a man sent from God whose name was John” (v.6), a reference which in the traditional exposition is badly out of place.  Mark’s gospel is now seen to have exactly the same approach: “The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God; as it is written in the prophets, Behold, I send my messenger before thy face” (Mk. 1:1,2). And in Luke’s introduction also: “Forasmuch as many have taken in hand to set forth in order a declaration of those things which are most surely believed among us, even as they delivered them unto us, which from the beginning were eyewitnesses-and-ministers of the Word” (Lk. 1:1,2). Note here also, that, as in John, “the Word” must be Jesus; the phrase “eyewitnesses and ministers” requires this.

So we see that it is a matter of allowing the Bible to interpret itself.

There is much more that I could say  but the article would become too long.   It is however interesting to note that John the Baptist is and we are explicitly told that he was not that Light (John 1:6-9).  The reason for the emphasis on Lights is because the annunciation of the birth of John occurred (see my commentaries) at the Feast of Lights a Feast that celebrated the cleansing and re-dedication of the temple (cf. John 2:21) after the defilement wrought by Antiochus Epiphenes.  The birth of Jesus who was six months younger than the Baptist would have seen him presented at the temple at Pentecost as the fruit of the Spirit.  The point is that John the Baptist was the forerunner to herald the new temple (Jesus Christ) and the church at Ephesus need to be reminded that despite the unusual circumstances of John’s birth he was not “that light”.

John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me.  And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace (John 1:15-16).

The emphasis is on the superiority of Christ note the use of the word fullness or the Greek pléróma. The Greek pléróma (plērōmatos, πληρώματος) in Gnosticism understands the spiritual universe as the abode of God and of the totality of the divine powers and emanations but a similar phraseology occurs in the Greek version of Isaiah 6:3 (LXX): “Holy, holy, holy, is the LORD of hosts: the whole earth is full (πλήρης/plérés) of his glory”. The root (plē-) expresses totality, and implies full quantity (“up to the max”). DNTT (1,733) notes its cognates (plērēs, plēroō, plērōma) all come from the root (plē-/plēthō) meaning “full in quantity.” Thus plḗthō (“to fill or complete”) refers to “that which is complete in itself because of plenitude, entire number or quantity. . . . the whole aggregate,” WS, 395,96). In Christian theology the totality or fullness dwells in Christ denoting that he received the spirit without measure (John 3:34). So, although there is cross fertilization one need not speak of dependence but rather shared motifs, however, once again we see that the Johannine corpus draws on the Old Testament for conceptual language.

Not only is Jesus depicted as superior to John, he is greater than Jacob (John 4:12), has a greater witness than John (John 5:36), is greater than Abraham (John 8:53), he is before John (John 1:15), and before Abraham (John 8:58) he has the fullness and is the I AM and yet the the Father is greater than him (John 14:28) for  he is greater than all (John 10:29). Rater than construct theories to explain these apparent anomalies and contradictions  Christians should examine scriptures where it is explained how Abraham “saw my day”  because in the mount of the LORD it shall be seen (Gen 22:14) and  Abraham lifted up his eyes, and saw the place afar off (Gen 22:4 ) and he called the place Yahweh Yireh  or Yah will be seen.  The love of God would be manifest in the place where Jesus was sacrificed.  This is about manifestation and bearing the name.

In John 1:30 the Greek for ‘preferred’ is literally ‘became’ (γέγονεν, gegonen) and the Greek for man (ἀνὴρ,anēr) is very often used to refer to a husband. A literal reading could therefore just as well be, “after me cometh a husband,who has come before me, for he was first of me”. In the case of Redemption by the kinsman redeemer the one that comes AFTER and takes the place of the dead husband comes BEFORE. Jesus born after John took precedence before him because he had come to raise seed to the dead.


  • Note that the women praising Ruth say, “… do thou worthily in Ephratah, and be famous in Bethlehem” (Ruth 4:11) and that Jesus was born in Bethlehem from the line Of David and a direct descendant of Ruth.

I could continue writing about the Fourth Gospel but this must suffice with some earlier material on John 1:3-4 and staircase parallelism.

Your web browser doesn’t have a PDF Plug-in. Click to download Covid articles



Scripture is multivalent and encoded sacred geometry and mathematics in the language before the Greeks systematized their mathematics and their philosophy. The fact that the encoding operates across the  Hebrew/Greek language barrier with reference to cosmology and astrophysics is remarkable. Scripture can only be understood intertexually and any deviance from proper hermeneutics leads to error. That said, scripture can be read by a child and  the truth can be grasped in a child like manner.

Complexity emerges from simple rules employed iteratively and the outcome of the “causal chain” is the same regardless of the input variables. But who sets those initial rules? As E. Michael Jones inferred, philosophy and rationality will only get you so far as beyond a certain point is unknowable.  At this point the believer falls back on faith which in its outworking becomes as real as “data” and is classed as “evidence” of unseen realities (Heb 11:1) as the consciousness of the believer with the help of God the source of all, calls into being the things that are not as if they were (Rom 4:17).

Jesus was superior to all who came before but by his own admission he was not greater than the Father. No man has seen the Father yet whoever saw Jesus in action had seen the Father (John 14:8-10). Unlike Adam he was the perfect image and the face of Jesus is the reflection of God’s glory (2 Cor 4:6). World without end. Amen.


Bruce MacDonald and the Black Arts

Bruce MacDonald and the Black Arts

This was a very interesting interview with Bruce MacDonald who is living somewhere in the Jungles of South America.   His background is from a very devout Catholic family and he ended up rejecting the ritualistic traditions and dogma to seek a more transcendental way by researching various philosophies practicing meditation  etc.

His take on black magic is interesting and his information that Jimmy Saville was a Jew  is shocking.  Saville  was a degenerate and a “wizard” with connections to the monarchy. See the videos on the page Pedos, murderers and Psycho’s.

This is what I wrote to Bruce:

Hello, I am the guy that you saw debating Doovid. I am not an evangelical by the way even though Doovid tried to classify me that way because I believe in Scriptural interpretation. I think labels are unhelpful. My paternal grandparents and many relatives were RC and I spent time in a very RC region of Holland (Maastricht). My observations is that RC is very into ritual and tradition (unlike other Christian streams) but then the RC church was subverted by Judaists early on. I have three commentaries and numerous articles on my website. I have done stylometric analysis on Parts Of Speech of the Hebrew using PCA and LDA on function words. As you noted I am busy with Gematria which is a new area for me but already bearing fruit. You mentioned African Gematria palimyome (?) from the Congo. I can find no information on this.

African slaves (from Central Africa Congo) combined the bible with hoodo in a syncretic adaptation to their superstition. In this view God is a conjurer as is Moses. In the twentieth century a spell book based on Kaballah called The Sixth and Seventh books of Moses (you mentioned the "sixth book of Moses" but there are only five according to tradition) was sold to African Americans containing numerous signs, seals, and passages in Hebrew related to the prophet Moses' ability to work wonders. Obviously the book was a fraud.

I differ in my opinion about Moses and the temple etc. The characters and events are based on historical events. Moses withstood the "magicians" of Egypt obviously worshipers of Thoth forerunner to Hermeticism. This is the "black magic" Kabbalah that you mentioned. The Jews creation of money (debt) ex-nihlo and their casting of spells (propaganda) is indeed manipulation of consciousness and very dark. The revelation of Yhvh was meant to counter that. The name is linked to existence itself and to manifestation. The Genesis story counters the idea that man can become God through knowledge (Illumination or gnosis/Hermetic) and the Genesis story also counters the idea of sacrifice in the sense that man must appease God by literally sacrificing their children. These two measures (1) knowledge (2) sacrifice were coping mechanisms of humanity because they realized that they were vulnerable (naked and ashamed) in a world that brought sudden catastrophes. The history of Israel is schematized, and their calendar only goes back some 6,000 years which takes us to the Time of Taurus (bull=golden calf) followed by Aires (ram caught in a thicket) followed by Pieces (Christianity 153 mega fish) followed by the water pourer Aquarius (Num 24:7). We are at the end of the Great Year Precession cycle and things are about to get crazy.


The Man Moses

A few things that I need to mention.  The northern tribes of Israel (called Ephraim collectively) were half Egyptian. Joseph was married into the  Egyptian priestly aristocracy and it was through him that the aristocracy centralized their power base during the famine caused by natural disaster as they exchanged their land for food (sound familiar, at least he didn’t make them eat bugs).  That said, the nation and the people survived because of his actions.  Moses name is similar to  the Egyptian “Meses”  as in Rameses (=the son of Ra).  The daughter of Pharaoh called him MY SON  because she found him.  Often Moses is mistakenly thought to mean “drawn out” because she drew him out the water.:

” And the child grew, and she brought him unto Pharaoh’s daughter, and he became her son. And she called his name Moses: and she said, Because I drew him out of the water” (Exodus 2:10).

Of course, this finds theological parallels in God drawing the nation through the waters of the red sea (baptism) and calling them “my son”  (Hos 11:1) and Jesus being baptized (Mark 1:11) and the midrash in Matthew 2:15.

The Legend of Sargon of Akkad (c. 2300 BE) is similar to the origin story of Moses, namely found in a basket in the river (Euphrates?). This was a mechanism so that Sargon could distance himself from the kings of the past (who claimed divine right) and aligned himself with the common people of the region rather than the ruling elite. Moses on the other hand was a commoner elevated to royalty by adoption. The following translation of the Legend comes from J. B. Pritchard’s The Ancient Near East, Volume I, pages 85-86:

Sargon, the mighty king, king of Agade, am I.
My mother was a changeling, my father I knew not.
The brother(s) of my father loved the hills.
My city is Azupiranu, which is situated on the banks of the Euphrates.
My changeling mother conceived me, in secret she bore me.
She set me in a basket of rushes, with bitumen she sealed
My lid.
She cast me into the river which rose not (over) me,
The river bore me up and carried me to Akki, the
drawer of water.
Akki, the drawer of water lifted me out as he dipped his
Akki, the drawer of water, [took me] as his son
(and) reared me.
Akki, the drawer of water, appointed me as his gardener,
While I was a gardener, Ishtar granted me (her) love,
And for four and [ ... ] years I exercised kingship,
The black-headed [people] I ruled, I gov[erned];
Mighty [moun]tains with chip-axes of bronze I con-
The upper ranges I scaled,
The lower ranges I [trav]ersed,
The sea [lan]ds three times I circled.
Dilmun my [hand] cap[tured],
[To] the great Der I [went up], I [...],
[...] I altered and [...].
Whatever king may come up after me,
Let him r[ule, let him govern] the black-headed
[Let him conquer] mighty [mountains] with chip-axe[s
of bronze],
[Let] him scale the upper ranges,
[Let him traverse the lower ranges],
Let him circle the sea [lan]ds three times!
[Dilmun let his hand capture],
Let him go up [to] the great Der and [...]!
[...] from my city, Aga[de ... ]
[...] ... [...].

I already hear the cries of Jewish plagiarism but if this was a common origin motif circulating at the time it may well have given Moses’ mother the idea to put her son in a basket. Pharaoh’s daughter would have regarded him as a gift from the Nile god Hapi. It was no accident that he was left where the princess bathed and where his sister could guard him.

Moses’s history is supposedly around 1500 BC but this is still controversial as the dates range from the “traditional” 18th dynasty date (ca. 1450 BC) and the current “consensus” 19th dynasty date (ca. 1250 BC), but touching also on other Exodus dates advocated from ca. 2100 BC through ca. 650 BC (See Exodus Dates and Theories).

The Taurus (bull) age range extends to 2150 BC (ca. 4300-2150 BC) would coincide with a very early date  and Thera the eruption (c.1600 BC)  with a later date and Exodus phenomenon. The bronze age collapse of many ancient civilizations (12th century BC, between c. 1200 and 1150) is still largely unexplained.

Circumcision was originally Egyptian and adopted by the Hebrews as a sign of the covenant which is probably why the Hebrew word for covenant means “cut” because a covenant  (agreement) is cut. The member is cut as a sign that the covenant (agreement) is not just with the covenant maker but with his seed (offspring).  As to the neurological effects I cannot say but ritual male circumcision is known to have been practiced by South Sea Islanders, Australian Aborigines, Sumatrans,Incas, Aztecs, Mayans as well as the Ancient Egyptians. Today it is still practiced by Jews, Muslims and many tribes in East and Southern Africa.

In an enigmatic fragment of text (that warns of the death of Pharaoh’s firstborn)  Moses himself was nearly killed because he neglected to circumcise his sons (Exod 4:22-26) which may be a reflection of later history (Josh 5:2-9). Under the new covenant circumcision is not necessary because the promised seed has arrived and the covenant is reformulated in him.

The Temple

As to the temple Bruce readily admits (along with just about everyone) that the temple of Herod existed as it is acknowledged by other Roman historians including Josephus.  Herod did not actually build a new temple he renovated the existing temple that had been rebuilt after the exile (Zerubbabel’s temple) but the remodeling and reconstruction was that extensive that it was almost a complete rebuild (John 2:20).

The fact is that Hezekiah reformed the cult and cleansed Solomon’s temple (the first temple). There is ample evidence of Hezekiah (a direct Davidic descendant) existing and reforming the cult and cleansing Solomon’s temple. Not just from Scripture but archeological evidence and evidence from the Assyrian records (Taylor Prism). Hezekiah (c 700 BC) did not build the temple he reformed it. So it was already standing and was destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar in 586 BC.

So the charge that no temple existed in the time of Solomon is not true. Solomon gained his wealth from the copper trade mined by the Edomites (who had been conquered by his father David) in the Negev wilderness in the Timna valley near Eilat. There was a huge smelting complex and Solomon supplied all the food water etc and acted as the middleman.  The ancient world craved copper (together with 12% Phoenician tin to make bronze). Solomon was buddies with Hiram I the Phoenician king of Tyre who supplied the workforce and some of the materials for building the temple and so between them they corned the global metals market (kerching).  The Egyptians had copper mines in the Sinai.  Solomon married an Egyptian princess because the marriage covenant was a way of consolidating power and gaining international influence.  Hence he had a 1,000 wives (poor bloke the nagging lolz) and they turned his heart away from God.  All his wisdom and wealth did not save him even though his revenue was 666 talents of gold annually.  He apostatized but to say he consulted 72 demons to help build the temple is Kabbalah and masonic nonsense.  Yes, we know the stories are sacred history and make theological points but they are based on truth.

Moreover, the Dome  the Rock is the threshing floor of Araunah the Jebusite one of the original inhabitants of Jerusalem before it was conquered by David. It is a stone floor for threshing the harvest and separating the wheat from the chaff. It was purchased legally by David for building an altar (2 Sam 24:21) and Ritmejier has found the the level carving where the Ark stood.  It is the place where according to tradition Abraham went up to sacrifice Issac (Gen 22:2).  It is the place where the plague caused by the Numbering (see my article) in (2 Sam 24:1) was halted  (cf. numbering of the transgressors Isa 53:12). It was co-opted by the Muslims in recognition of its holiness as the place of Mohamed’s night journey. Therefore, Jerusalem (city of peace) is called the foundation stone and a rock of offense and a stumbling block (Isa 8:14),  the irony is exquisite for the same epithet (cf. 1 Pet 2:8) is applied to Christ who is the Prince of Peace King of Salem.  Whoever meddles with the stone that is Christ will be crushed (Matt 21:42-46 Jesus is alluding to the Hezekiah Psalm 118:22-24 note the day=Passover day deliverance from Assyria in Hezekiah’s time).


The original “foundation stone” was the altar-rock of Zion — which was probably the site where Abraham prepared to offer Isaac (Gen. 22: cp. v. 9 there with v. 27 here), and which was probably also the threshing-floor of Araunah the Jebusite on mount Moriah (2 Sam. 24:18-25). The wicked Ahaz, infected with a zest for the worship of foreign gods, re-moved the altar of burnt-offering from its prominent place atop this foundation stone, and “hid” it away in a corner of the Temple enclosure (2 Kings 16:14). Yet whilst the true altar might be set aside, there was no way to shift the massive outcropping of rock on which it had stood (it is still there today, in the center of the Dome of the Rock). Thus, in Ahaz’s day it remained — quite literally — a “stone of stumbling” (Isa. 8:14,15) for priests walking across the temple court, and a “rock of offence” in a spiritual sense. 

It was only when Hezekiah came into full control of the kingdom that he could remedy this sacrilege, and restore the Temple worship to its rightful setting. And so the “stone” rejected by the new “builders” of Judah became, once again, a precious stone and a sure foundation for the true worship of the Lord (Isa. 28:16).

It is easy, then, to see how this foundation stone symbolized Hezekiah himself (and his faith in the Lord), upon which all true worship in Judah depended. While sick unto death, he had been “set aside” by other would-be “builders” and rulers, but when miraculously healed he would stand forth again as the chief prince of his people. (See further on H.A. Whittaker, Bible Studies, pp. 111-116.)

This is recent video is great but argues that the threshing floor is separate from the Dome of the Rock (I don’t think so):

Amazing discoveries under the Dome of the Rock (26 min)


Glow-Op Goy-Slop Investigations: Abraham is Not Your Patriarch – With Bruce Macdonald (2:55 min)

Uncut Gematria

Uncut Gematria

The title I chose for this article reflects the title of the movie “Uncut Gems” which is essentially an analogy about Jacob (Howard) using deceit and manipulation to control the randomness and chaos of the universe. Ever since humanity was ejected from the idylic state of ignorance (the garden) and realized his utter vulnerability (nakedness) he has sought to control his environment. The price of Illumination was existential angst. If chaos cannot be controlled it can be used as an agent of rapid change and this is reflected by the motto Ordro ab Chao of secret societies and authoritarian institutes who use chaos as an instrument of social change.

That the ancient texts contain deep intertextual meaning is already known in scholarly circles. Intertextuality is the shaping of a text’s structure and meaning by another text, either through deliberate compositional strategies such as quotation, allusion, calque, plagiarism, translation, pastiche or parody and can be extended to semiotics (the study of how signs derive their meaning within the structure of a text) and dialogism (which suggests a continual dialogue with other works of literature and other authors). Gematria adds another complex layer of infomatics that cannot be dismissed out of hand.

In the book, The History and Heritage of Scientific  and Technological Information Systems, Bella Hass Weinberg examines how The Masoretes  standardized the text of the Hebrew Bible and in the course of their work created alphabetical lists of words and phrases. These tenth-century lists may be viewed as the predecessors of thirteenth-century Latin biblical concordances.

Structurally, Masoretic lists and biblical concordances are analogous to KWOC (keyword out of context) indexes. Masoretic lists anticipated search features, including truncation and adjacency, developed in the latter half of the twentieth century. The Masoretes also created permuted indexes and produced frequency counts of biblical words. The first complete Hebrew biblical concordance, compiled in the fifteenth century, contains a “stoplist” or list of words not indexed that is similar to contemporary English stoplists. She comments; “One scholar, Jordan Penkower, believes that the Masoretes must have had an indexing system because their lists include function words, such as prepositions which, are often placed on “stoplists” (lists of words not to be indexed). How could anyone remember all the occurrences of the word on, for example, in twenty-four books?

The Masoretes did not exclude function words because every word in the Bible counted, and the standardizers of the text wanted to be sure that even non-content words were copied correctly. They prepared lists of the occurrences of similar-sounding function words, such as el (to) and ‘al (on)…….. Masoretic notes on the Bible often include frequency counts, which one might think could have been produced only with the aid of a computer. Keep in mind the scope of the Masoretic frequency counts: they cover all occurrences of a word or phrase in the twenty -four books of the Hebrew Bible. Scholars I have consulted are divided as to whether the Masoretes had the entire Bible memorized or used an indexing system (Weinberg. 2001. pp. 183 —185)”.

***Bella Hass Weinberg, “Predecessors of Scientific Indexing Structures in the Domain of Religion” in The History and Heritage of Scientific and Technological Information Systems, (eds. W. Boyd Rayward, Mary Ellen 
Bowden, Information Today, Inc., 2004:126-136), 127-128

Stop words are the words in a stop list (or stoplist or negative dictionary) which are filtered out (i.e. stopped) before or after processing of natural language data (text) because they are insignificant predecessor concept was used in creating some concordances. For example, the first Hebrew concordance, Isaac Nathan ben Kalonymus’s Me’ir Nativ, contained a one-page list of unindexed words, with nonsubstantive prepositions and conjunctions which are similar to modern stop words.

The use of stop words is interesting and I suggest that a DOM (Differential Object Marker or Direct Object Marker) might well have a stop word or infomatics function as well as a syntactical role in Hebrew. In my preliminary examination of Exodus 20:7 it was discovered that the cumulative standard word value of the three words preceding the first DOM divided by six (31+70+401)/6 =188.883) ends in the same fractional digits as the second DOM marker when the three preceding word values are summed and divided by six (166+26+401/6) =98.8333. Moreover, when both these solutions are summed the (188.833+98.833) the value 287.666 emerges which can be reduced to 8666 which when further reduced is the value of the tetragammaton (26).

This and other considerations led me to believe that the number 6 and patterns thereof are foundational to the infomatics layer of the text and led me to the article by David Buckle the Sexagesamial Babylonian system found in the Babylonian tablet catalogued as YBC 7289 which is thought to be from c. 1800 – 1600 BCE.


Your web browser doesn’t have a PDF Plug-in. Click to download Covid articles

That there is a Sexagesimal pattern in the alphanumeric data is in my view undeniable but I suspect that the enneadic matrix that I presented (which was an actual hybrid of the Babylonian Sexagesimal system) may be an artifact of the methodology or a byproduct of the number theory that I employed. This still needs further analysis (but I am extremely time poor). Nevertheless, there is a deeper layer of complexity and this has opened up a whole new avenue of research that I believe will provide fruitful insights and may ultimately answer the question as to the criteria that were used by the sages to consider certain texts inspired and sacred and others as non-canonical.

As an aside I am trying to use ChatGTP to produce the formulas that I need to process and convert numbers automatically. The first formula it produced was only partially correct as the first digits of Pi 3.141592 in base 10 should be 3:08,29,44,00,47 according to the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Solutions. The first instances of the Excel formula which included truncation were too complex for Excel which kept posting error pop-ups and did not deliver anything beyond the first digit pairs 08,29 so the AI suggested using VBA which after several code adjustments still did not achieve the necessary accuracy so the AI suggest using Python Math (lolz). All I can say is those bronze age scribblers must have been pretty good at math. I will continue to analyze the data when I find time.

My hypothesis is linked to cyclical catastrophe (The Great Precession Year) and what Dr McCairn refers to as boundary conditions and it seems to me that certain groups are using the knowledge of such events to leverage advantage beyond the event horizon. The Story of Genesis has a complex cosmogony couched in terms of universal mythology with archaeoastronomy demonstrating that all the ancients regarded phenomena in the sky as important and may explain why the Hebrews have twelve tribes and a tabernacle/temple patterned after the heavens. They also have a schematized calendar (Seder Olam) in which they deliberately compressed the Persian era omitting 167 years to fit the period between temple destruction. Accordingly it is the year AM 5784 (+167=5951?) in 2023 which would fit an interlude of approx 6,000 years between catastrophe cycles. My understanding is that the Genesis story and the Abrahamic revelation is a direct counter against an ancient hermetic (Gnostic) system in the previous catastrophe cycle that believed that scientific knowledge (alchemy) is the answer (the illumination promised by the serpent) to avoid and survive the catastrophe. In the words of Matt Damon in the movie The Martian, “I am going to have to science the shit out of this”.

Many ancient myths recount the story of man aspiring to god-like knowledge and control of his environment and every time it fails. What we are experiencing now is the emergence of this ancient behavior at the end of our cycle. The bible calls this idea “the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan” (Rev 20:2). The Abrahamic Revelation gives an alternative, namely that, “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge” (Prov 1:7) but fear should mature to perfect love (1 John 4:18). I believe that scripture is inspired and that the layer of complex infomatics that we can barely discern is not fully explained by the ancients being math geniuses because it presupposes the simultaneous development of language,alphabet,numerical values and inter-textual meaning.

Christianity is under attack as never before and it is my belief that the attack is not organic, it orchestrated and coordinated. So many people have no understanding of the complexity of the issues and are not bothered to find out and thus they are vulnerable.


Gematria Stream

Gematria Stream

This is in preparation for a live stream.  I will be adding the video and any comments afterwards.







Exodus 20:7
Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.





Download link:

Shared link (view only):

Video and Discussion

This was a seven hour stream. Seven hours! I left before the end.

The Validity of Biblical/Kabbalistic Higher Dimensional Predictive Informatics (Doooovid & Tishbite) -7:11 mins

The video started with a presentation of my findings on Exodus 20v7 demonstrating that the cumulative running total divided by the word value when converted from a base 10 system to a Sexagesimal  Sumerian base sixty system delivers a matrix of digits mostly consisting of nines. The Sumerian number system is according to archeologists ancient as they have a tablet which calculates the square root of two in base sixty.  I need to do more investigation as to the antiquity of the Sexagesimal system.  Dovid suggested that I run a null hypothesis or blank to determine whether it is (as Dr.McCairn suggested) just an artifact of the mathematics and chosen methodology.  I think that is a good idea and I may attempt it with a short section of Talmudic Hebrew text or other period writing (perhaps from the DSS).  I also need to establish that I am not just making stupid mistakes (lolz). And I need to look into automating the calculating process more by employing a computer program or perhaps just expand to Excel. The problem is finding time as I am already so busy. Dovid questioned the utility of the finding as gematria is often used by charlatans as a sort of “magic” and even in the first century there were traveling Jewish exorcists who employed gematria in semiotic fashion to cast spells and predict the future etc. However, occult misuse of symbology and Biblical gematria does not detract from the fact that it is present in the text as a hidden layer. This begs the question why the text has extra meaning. My own view is that the patterns reflect the fingerprint of God and is linked to his wider creative (and destructive) purpose (“I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things” Isaiah 45:7). I think that the numeric values reflect the cyclical nature of our reality which has distinct beginnings and endings associated with ancient cosmogony hence 12 constellations, 12 tribes, 72 nations (LXX) and a Precession Cycle of 25,920 years which reflects a Babylonian/Sumerian circle of 360 degrees divided into 72 segments of years. Each tick of the cosmic clock is a human lifespan with 360 generations taking us back to the start point. It is to be hoped that more work on these patterns will lead to a deeper understanding:

He hath made every thing beautiful in his time: also he hath set the world in their heart, so that no man can find out the work that God maketh from the beginning to the end (Ecclesiastes 3:11)

The enneadic code crosses both the language barrier (Hebrew/Greek) and the covenant barrier (from the Old Testament to the New Testament) which is reflected in the 144,000 of Rev 7v1 as 144 (a Fibonacci number and square of 12) reduces to 9 and the 153 (triangular of 17) Great Fish caught by Jesus also reduces to 9 and the difference between the 144 and 153 is also 9. The number 153 Viscus Piscis has the famous fish shape. I pointed out to Dovid that the name for Jeus in the Talmud is Yeshu (וּשֵׁי Yēšū) has an ordinal value of 37 (the value of the word wisdom) and a gematria value of 316 which is the reverse of 613 (number of commands or mitzvot in the Torah Tractate Makkot 23b) with the Word becoming flesh (Greek: σὰρξ -sarx) in John 1:1 which has a value of 361 with these three values adding up to (Dan 2:11) cf. 316 + 613+ 361=1290.

As to my comments on Suffering and punishment Dovid believes in the eastern concept of Karma which is the force generated by a person’s actions held in Hinduism and Buddhism to perpetuate transmigration and in its ethical consequences to determine the nature of the person’s next existence. This idea is not Biblical and I pointed out that the book of Job (parabolic of Hezekiah’s condition) was a philosophical tract examining not just the question of suffering, but of disinterested service (in other words, is Job just serving God because of what is in it for him). The narrative allows Job to be tested and everything to be taken away from him but he refuses to curse God (Job 2:4-10). Dovid adopts the position of Job’s friends whose theology dictated that Job was being punished because he was so wicked and the more Job insisted on protesting his innocence the more heinous his friends accusations became. Job insists that his friends observations do not accord with reality; Why do the wicked live, reach old age, and grow mighty in power? Their offspring are established in their presence, and their descendants before their eyes. (Job 21 7-8). According to Job there was no instant Karma and his friends simplified theology of suffering and punishment was wrong. It seems that God agreed with Job and even had Job make intercession for his friends:
And it was so, that after the LORD had spoken these words unto Job, the LORD said to Eliphaz the Temanite, My wrath is kindled against thee, and against thy two friends: for ye have not spoken of me the thing that is right, as my servant Job hath. (Job 42:7). So Job spoke that which was right (not his three rabbi friends lolz). As to Job himself God answered him with a demonstration of awesome knowledge and power, the bottom line being that God does not owe Job an explanation and cannot be held accountable by his own creation. Sometimes a vessel is made to display his mercy and sometimes his wrath. (Rom 9:18-23). The simplistic view of suffering and punishment was also held by the rabbis of Jesus day with the story of the man born blind (who Jesus healed) the theology said that either the man or his parents had sinned ( John 9:2; newborn eye infections caused by gonorrhea can lead to eye damage or blindness that is permanent.) Jesus’ response was that neither the man nor his parents had sinned (to cause the blindness) but that the man was a vessel to manifest the works of God (John 9:3). The transformation of the man was so radical that people failed to recognize him(John 9:9-8) and when questioned the previously blind man answered I am (the word he is not in the original). This was a direct reference to the I AM of Exodus 3:14, not that the man was claiming to be God but (as Jesus said), the man was a manifestation of God’s healing power. In contrast, the rabbis with their short-sighted and simplistic theology of Karma were the ones who were blind to reality (John 9:41).

As to Noahide laws, they are a Talmudic creation With David Novak arguing that the historical starting point can only be established following the social, demographic, and religious dislocations of the Second Temple’s destruction in 70 CE. I particularly like the sixth Noahide law which says, “Do not eat of a live animal (no eating flesh taken from an animal while it is still alive)”. Everybody knows that Gentiles like taking a bite out of live animals and need to control their cannibalistic, animal urges to bite living things (lolz). The “Noahide laws”are derivative from and a corruption of simple Torah edicts. Therefore they are perverse and not Torah. The law about “idolatry” is obviously especially designed to punish followers of Christ for committing “idolatry” under the false premise that it is somehow against the Jewish understanding of monotheism, completely ignoring the Old Testament idea of agency, whereby God places his name in a representative be that an angel (Exod 23:21) and even Moses was made to be God before Pharaoh (Exod 7:1). In Semitic thought this messenger-representative was conceived of as being personally-and in his very words-the presence of the sender (Aubrey R. Johnson, The One and The Many in the Israelite Conception of God, (University of Wales Press, 1961). King Hezekiah becomes a proto-type of the Messiah in the prophecy of Isaiah 7:14 bearing the name Immanuel which means God with us and ignoring the fact that there would be no need to emphasize the the fact that in the future there would be one Lord and one name (Zech 14:9) because the chief Rabbi Akiva questioned the identity of the two beings in Psalm 110:1 (which led to the two powers heresy) and with which Jesus dumbfounded the Rabbis and Cohens of his day up until the present time (Matthew 22:42-46).

Finally, a people who have chosen Dositheos the Samaritan, Theodas, Judas of Galilee,Simon bar Kokhba, Shlomo Molcho, Sabbatai Zevi and Jacob Franks as messianic figures can hardly boast of a good track record. God promised to overturn the temple three times (Ezek 21:27) so any “third” temple will not stand for long. If the Jews are still under the law, then they need the temple so that they can practice atonement rituals and animal sacrifice. Seeing as they have not had a temple for two thousand years this means that they had no access to forgiveness during that period. Jesus foretold that it would be destroyed and it was. They refused the mercy extended to them and therefore they had any means of access removed. The only access to God is through Christ.

Further Reading see:

Abrahamic Cage Match

Talking Snake

Talking Snake

This short video was pushed out by me in response to a previous stream by Dr McCairn with Ryan Dawson . Although I find myself largely in agreement with Dawson’s Geo-political analysis and his disdain for conservative Christian-Zionist with their unstinting and unquestioning support for Israel I object to his characterization of all Christians and his ridicule. I asked Dr McCairn to send him the following message and video:

 Can you pass this onto Ryan Dawson? He should stick to his wheelhouse (geopolitics) rather than mimicking talking points by Bishai and Green. He is out of his depth. And by the way the bronze age collapse was not due to plague ask the archeologists about burn layers etc. He does not know what he is talking about just like Bishai blaming the burning of the library of Alexandria on Christians. Utter BS. So far, I have countered an occultist school shooter adjacent Marxist and a Classics Graduate who had his initial dissertation rejected and who does not quote sources. Christianity is under attack, and I am getting sick of people repeating BS talking points.

Response to Ryan Dawson (13 min)

Some good advice from Michael Heiser.

Why you should read the Bible as if it were fiction (4 min)

Dawson did not accept the invitation to debate me and left some silly message about talking snakes. A childish response that highlights his ignorance. I ended up doing a full stream with Dr McCairn. See below for links to other articles with similar themes. Starts at 16 min.

Addressing Glow-Op Goy-Slop for Armageddon Fetishists: A Christian’s Response to Ryan Dawson (2:21 min)










Metaphysical Discussion

Metaphysical Discussion


Revelation – A Discussion With The Faithful (John Brisson & Paul (The Tishbite)- 2:35 min

Starts at about 16 min

We had a discussion about Revelation with a couple of guys afterwards in live chat (not recorded) and watched these clips from the Movie Pi.  Afterwards I downloaded and watched the full movie (sorry not allowed to share…you will have to find it online). The next three videos are two short clips (2-3 mins) from Pi and a short Bro Nathanael clip, followed by a movie review of Pi.   I have included my calculations etc on the subject under each video.



I just noticed that the last section adds up to 24 which reduces to 6 therefore you have ..

R=2/ 26 / 72 / 26 / 66/ R=6 so it ends in 666

What does this mean ??

Two / Yahweh / nations /Yahweh /number of man

And just found this:

144/666 = An infinitely repeating cycle of 6 × 6 × 6 (the PERIMETER of the Genesis 1:1 Triangle = 6 × 6 × 6)

(6 × 6 × 6) = 216

144/666 = 0.216216216216 … to infinity





Pi Explained | Classic Explained Episode 13 (19 min)





The Sound of Freedom movement is not what it seems. Don’t be sucked in. We have already looked at some of the funding and supporters including a big Mormon input.

The Sound of Freedom Agenda (6 min)

Daniel 8 and the 2,300 Evening and Morning Sacrifices!

Do I agree with everything in this video?  No, because I don’t think anyone is beyond God’s grace.  Remember those in the wilderness bitten by the Serpent?   If they looked up to the serpent that Moses had raised on the pole they were saved.  The serpent poison could not kill them.  He is right about the time period because the 2,300 evenings and mornings is 1,150 days as I explain in my commentary. It has a first fulfillment in the time of Antiochus (Era of the Maccabees) and is related to the feast of Atonement (which is referenced in the seventy sevens prophecy) but this does not mean that the prophecy has expired because it is picked up by Jesus in reference to the destruction of Jerusalem and has a further future application in the eschatological 42 month period in the Apocalypse (e.g. Rev 11).

The video is certainly correct in highlighting that Jesus (and his saints) form the temple. I make it quite clear in the introduction to my commentary and in this short PDF article Daniel and Temple Theology  that the major thematic of Daniel is temple restoration (even in the court stories).

I found it extremely interesting that the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020,  declared the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak a global pandemic and on May 5 2023 (which was the second Passover and blood moon) declared the Pandemic over. This is a 1,150 day time period (I checked) and that is as far as I am concerned not a coincidence.  These people love there numerology and gematria:

March 11 2020             May 5 2023

Remove the Zeros:

3 11 22                               5 5 223

Reduce the 11:

3 2 2 2                                5 5 2 2 3

What do you notice?  Skull and bones 322 forward and in reverse.









I think there is also something going on with the 57 which is a reduction of 5 (2+5). In Rudyard Kipling’s short story “The Man Who Would Be King”, the character Peachy states: “This business is our Fifty-Seven” after he and Daniel are discovered to be men, not gods. This alludes to the Indian Rebellion in 1857 against the rule of the British East India Company. Also, the number 57 in the senary (six base) system =133 and it is the 16th semiprime which if you listened to the Alchemical video (https://youtu.be/bZJ-WQUXnpM) is an important number along with 21.  Could it be that this globalist Masonic faction is punishing the Zionist (East India Company) faction?  Maybe I am reading too much into it but at the very least we can say that they deliberately selected these dates to fit the 1,150 days of Daniel. 

Perhaps they symbolically envisaged “pouring out the plagues” on the “sanctuary”  of the opulent Masonic temple in the square mile of London financial district with the words avdi vide tace (look at me and be silent) above the throne. There are rumors of Jack the Ripper (reversed Satanic =666) having visited this temple (lolz). Eleven separate murders, stretching from 3 April 1888 to 13 February 1891 with 1046 days between dates (inclusive) which reduces to 11.

3 4 1888                          13 2 1891

(3+4+1)888                     13 (2+1+8+9+1=21=3)

8888 (sum=32)             133  (=4×33.3)

You think maybe coincidence?  what about Aaron Kosminski (born Aron Mordke Kozmiński;

11 September 1865 – 24 March 1919) was a Polish barber and hairdresser, and suspect in the Jack the Ripper case. (both days and weeks between the dates reduce to 21).

9 11 1865 (= 9 11) and  243 (=9) 1919 (=91919= reduce middle 9 10 1 9 = 9119 palindromic number reads 911 in reverse) middle name is Murder (Mordke) he is 666…
Mordke =66 (ordinal)
Mordke =96 =6 (reverse ordinal)
Aron =60=6 (reverse ordinal)
Kosminski =123 =6 (Reverse ordinal)

So, I think a prophecy has been misappropriated by people who practice magic, sorcery, propaganda (whatever you want to call it) and who are adept at using Semiotics to create a false reality.   We re obviously seeing warring factions fighting it out and we are the meat in the sandwich.

But the Lord God has his own time frame and his hand will not be forced….

updated verse (error found)

Daniel 8 and the 2,300 Evening and Morning Sacrifices! (33 min)

Metaphysics & Pattern Recognition

Metaphysics & Pattern Recognition

The latest stream from Dr Kevin McCairn  in which we discuss metaphysics, the meaning of life and the number 42 (lolz).  The first 32 minutes are memes and the last 10 minutes of the 3 hr 40 min stream comes with a language warning.     See below the video for relevant links.

Links and Resources

Harari is professor in the Department of History at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Harari writes about the “cognitive revolution” occurring roughly 70,000 years ago when Homo sapiens supplanted the rival Neanderthals and other species of the genus Homo, developed language skills and structured societies, and ascended as apex predators, aided by the agricultural revolution and accelerated by the scientific revolution, which have allowed humans to approach near mastery over their environment. His books also examine the possible consequences of a futuristic biotechnological world in which intelligent biological organisms are surpassed by their own creations; he has said, “Homo sapiens as we know them will disappear in a century or so”. https://www.ynharari.com/

Yuval Noah Harari: The 2021 60 Minutes interview (13 min)


The Culture of Critique series is a trilogy of books by Kevin B. MacDonald, an antisemitic conspiracy theorist, white supremacist and a retired professor of evolutionary psychology.

Culture of Critique for Normies (58 min)

Magnetic Mapping with NOAA: https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/geomag/WMM/soft.shtml

Wheels within wheels; the merkabah: http://www.biblaridion.info/Anthology/cherub.pdf


Gematria Calculator: https://www.ridingthebeast.com/gematria-calculator/

The 72 nations:  https://www.biblaridion.info/video/72.pdf

Number 42: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/42_(number)

I said ye are gods….. (Psalm 82) http://www.biblaridion.info/resources/Ps82.pdf

Psalm 89 http://www.biblaridion.info/resources/Ps89.pdf

 Wickedness in Shinar (Babylon):   https://www.biblaridion.info/resources/shinar.pdf


1 Corinthians 15:35-50 35 But some man will say, How are the dead raised up? and with what body do they come? 36 Thou fool, that which thou sowest is not quickened, except it die: 37 And that which thou sowest, thou sowest not that body that shall be, but bare grain, it may chance of wheat, or of some other grain: 38 But God giveth it a body as it hath pleased him, and to every seed his own body. 39 All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds. 40 There are also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial: but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another. 41 There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars: for one star differeth from another star in glory. 42 So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption: 43 It is sown in dishonour; it is raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; it is raised in power: 44 It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body. 45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit. 46 Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual. 47 The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven. 48 As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly. 49 And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly. 50 Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption. 



I have recently been highlighting how the Masons use the number 33 and how that 72 is coded into the virus DNA.  Chabad and the Free Masons love their number symbolism and gematria. It is all a load of Kabbalah to me.  Yesterday my web host migrated my old Cpanel to a new one.  These are the statistics that came up.  Must be a coincidence.  I am starting to feel like Jerry (p.s. Click the tweet chart to enlarge image…..I nearly fell out my wheelchair!)