The banks will save us

The banks will save us

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The above is an image from the Foreign Policy website article; Why Central Banks Need to Step Up on Global Warming.   The image above  shows New York Central Bank, Wall Street and Goldman Sachs. The article liberally quotes Mark Carney who is still governor of the BOE but used to work for Goldman.  Minimal research on the website reveals the following (Wikipedia, yea I know….but…); “Foreign Policy is an American news publication, founded in 1970 and focused on global affairs, current events, and domestic and international policy…… It produces content daily on its website….. the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace acquired full ownership of Foreign Policy…… Foreign Policy endorsed Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton in the run-up to the 2016 US presidential election.”   So, you know where they are coming from. Also note that they are supported by a “Foundation”…..remember what we said about foundations?

Meet the Messiah, he is not a very naughty boy, he is a banker 

Apparently the banks are going to save the planet. That is what they want you to believe. It begs the question of how stupid are people? Biblaridion website is politically neutral.  Trump and the Anglo-Zionists are not supported and neither are the globo-bolsheviks supported. We have no axe to grind for either the left or the right.  A pox on both their houses. We aim to tell the truth and damn the consequences. We are all being played. There are no good guys. It is called the Hegelian dialectic = action, reaction solution…..and I can tell you this…whoever wins  you will not like the solution.

Never let a good crisis go to waste

The climate is changing.   It will get worse and disasters will become more frequent and be bigger. They know this.  They also know why it is happening but they will not tell you the truth.   The truth is that it is natural and they cannot stop it but they can use it.   They can use it to reduce the population and take complete control.  When we are at our most vulnerable the Central Banks will step in and shut down fossil fuels.   Imagine facing dramatic climate change and natural disasters without recourse to fuel or power?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

They are ramping up the rhetoric in Australia.  The headline in the Australian Newspaper is that Climate Change could trigger the next financial crisis (LOL).   I ask myself if people are so crazy or stupid to believe this?   The world economy is already in crisis and it has nothing to do with climate and everything to do with neoclassical economics. The Ponzi scheme of factional reserve banking and huge, huge, huge debt and derivatives.  But they want you to believe it is going to fail…..because…..because….the sun is shinning…or worse still….it is YOUR FAULT because you breathe out CO2 and fart methane pollutants (phew). They already have the fall guy lined up.  The supposed reason why the global economy has all failed is because the dirty Anglo-Zionists will not back down from using fossil fuels (sic).  Wake up.  This is not about climate but about politics and bringing in the New World Order.

Shut it down….divest

This is what the Geelong Advertiser has to say “In an expansive new report, the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) told its members they had to start including climate change in their thinking about the stability of the economy. The BIS, the Switzerland-based international body comprised of more than 50 of the world’s most influential central banks, including Australia’s Reserve Bank (RBA), warned the RBA could be forced into rescuing the economy andthe environment. The RBA may have to buy up coal mines and fossil fuel power stations to reduce the economic impact”.

Whoopie!   The useless RBA, who have failed the Australian economy at every turn and allowed the biggest property bubble in history to inflate, will save us all by shutting everything down. The private banks who launder drug and child porn money will also help save us.  What could possibly go wrong?

Not only that, but they want to ban cash in Australia and they want to put the unemployed (soon all of us will be “dole bludgers”) on “cashless welfare cards” which is the first step towards “Universal Basic Income”.  They want to control your money so that they can control you.  I was told that that “conservatives”  or “liberals”  loved freedom and independence and entrepreneurship.   Can someone please explain to me how giving everyone the same income and making them dependent on the state is not communism?   I don’t understand?  Who is pulling your strings? I wonder.  Don’t you suffer from cognitive dissonance simultaneously holding two diametrically opposed ideologies in your head?

 

The weather as political weapon =”divestment”

Who would have thought that “climate” would become a political weapon?   The climate has been weaponized.  This is what Wikipedia says (yeah…I know); “In 2013 a study by HSBC found that between 40% and 60% of the market value of BP, Royal Dutch Shell and other European fossil fuel companies could be wiped out because of stranded assets caused by carbon emission regulation. Bank of England governor Mark Carney, speaking at the 2015 World Bank seminar, has stated: “The vast majority of reserves are unburnable” if global temperature rises are to be limited to below 2 °C. In 2019, Carney suggested that banks should be forced to disclose their climate-linked risks within the next two years, and said that more information would prompt investors to penalise and reward firms accordingly. He warned that companies and industries that are not moving towards zero-carbon emissions could be punished by investors and go bankrupt.A report by the Carbon Tracker Initiative found that between 2010 and 2015 the US coal sector had lost 76% of its value including the closure of 200 mines”.

Do you think it will stop at coal?   Really?  How gullible are you?   Ask yourself this….if we go completely carbon neutral (or negative as some want) what are the political consequences?  Without the backing of fossil fuels the Petrodollar would collapse.   Without the Petrodollar there is no Anglo-Zionist empire. What you are seeing is a death struggle between “capitalism” (although it is not really capitalism) and “communism” (although it is not really communism).  The globalists (internationalists)  used greed as a weapon by encouraging the Anglo-Zionists to place all their manufacturing in China (result=  loss of good jobs) then they replaced lost productivity and GDP with debt (result=debt slaves) they suppressed and stagnated wages with open border immigration (result=societal tensions) and introduced division through cultural Marxism (result =fractured societies) now they want to take away your energy and your money.   Of course, you will get “renewable energy” and “carbon credits”  (at least some of us will) and a “basic income” .  They have been working towards this outcome for at least 150 years through their “foundations” and “NGO’s” and have infiltrated and undermined the education system completely.  In the UK they have virtually captured the civil service.  They have been very clever and patient and waited until the Anglo-Zionists have hoist themselves on their own petard (greed).  Trump is desperately trying to undo some of the damage (his scrabble to get jobs back from China and his tariffs) but is  making the situation worse.  So, you have a choice between warmongering thugs and crony-capitalist technocrats (Anglo-Zionists) or the internationalists (globalist) Malthusian eugenicists control freak nutters (Globo-Bolsheviks) technocrats.   You have Hobson’s choice.  Your free choice is to become a perpetual slave no matter who is in charge.  A plutocracy of thugs and gangsters rule.  

Anecdotal evidence (you must establish this through your own research) shows that a number of Rothschild organizations and family members are involved in divestment strategy. I have discovered a number of “Rothschild” members and I assume that they are related (it is an unusual name).  For example Matthew Rothschild edits a Progressive magazine, Herb Rothschild blogs contra fossil fuels,  Rachel Emma Rothschild wrote a book about acid rain etc.  And then there is the undeniable connection with Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild who added at a conference that “When we talk with companies, we have to be very clear with them that we care about issues like their carbon footprint, ” according to P&I. And what of Edmond de Rothschild and his connection with the Sustainable Finance and Responsible Investment Chair or the fact that investment banks Rothschild and Perella Weinberg were selected by Italy’s Edison for divesting of its oil and gas unit or that Rothschild & Co. walked away from Adani mine investment in Australia.  There is too much going on for it to be coincidence (sic)…it looks like the Rothschild family is squarely behind disinvestment.   Why would bankers want to “disinvest” from industries that made them billions (trillions).   Because the love us.  Because they love the environment. Because they want you to thrive and prosper.

Hegelian Dialectic and/or controlled opposition?

There are some who believe that Trump is controlled opposition.  Some of his actions are so stupid that they are counterproductive.  They are actually speeding up the demise of Empire.   I am not so sure. I think that we are seeing acts of desperation.  I have placed a tweet below to demonstrate the absolute hypocrisy of the debate. On this occasion Donald Trump junior is entirely Correct:

 

 

Hey, Jeff Bezos!  You are a globalist, monopolist, corporatist who works for the CIA and spouts propaganda and the Donalds are also plutocrats who push an Anglo-Zionist agenda.  Hmmm…..whose side am I on?  Such a difficult choice. (LOL) 

 

Conclusion: The Globo-Bolshevik strategy

 

1. Destroy the Anglo-Zionists by destroying the fossil fuel industry

2. Destroy agriculture (meat etc)

3. Drive people into Mega cities (urban populations are easier to control)

4. Blame climate change for the coming financial crisis

5. Use the financial crisis to depopulate

6. Issue a new centrally controlled digital currency

 

I have probably forgotten some points but you get the picture.  I urge you to take pity on the “left”.  Many of them are just useful idiots.  They are frightened and anxious and are being used. However, some know full well what they are doing.  Still think it is all a conspiracy?   Go back to sleep but don’t blame me when you wake up in a technocratic paradise.

 

Climate Derangement syndrome

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is an anonymous comment that I found online. 

I thought that it was so good that I have reproduced it below.

Eco-fascism

Just so you all know, the next step, after “green deals” turn out to cause more emissions than the status quo, will be the true socialist concept of rationing electricity, petrol and gas via a quota system controlled by politicians for whom science was always an unnecessary evil. After that fails, world wars will commence between the yellow, black and brown countries (polluters) and the green countries (cleaners).

Remember anyone that thinks that CO2 emissions rising from 0.04% of air to 0.06% of the air (stating CO2 in percentage terms rather than the scary 400 parts per million to 600 parts per million) whilst ignoring changes in nitrogen content of 78.09% (780,900 parts per million) or oxygen’s 20.95% (209,500 parts per million) – is deranged enough to think that each 0.01% change in the CO2 content of air lifts the global average surface temperature by 1 degree centigrade.

So, CO2 is the temperature control knob. Not water vapor, clouds, the sun, cosmic impacts etc and mankind is the sole increaser in CO2. Not volcanoes or forest fires (natural and man-made) or any other seismic activity like plate tectonics.

A couple of questions that those attacking CO2 emissions should answer (not solid particle carbon emissions like soot, but carbon dioxide GAS emissions;

  • What is the “correct” level of CO2 in the air?
  • What is the “correct” global average surface temperature?
  • how much of the increase in CO2 of the last fifty years has helped increase the population of the world from 3.5 billion in 1968 to 7.6 billion now?
  • How much will the global population decrease if CO2 drops to 0.03%?
  • What is the “correct” global population?

The UK is as subject to the morons like the GOON SQUAD driven by occasional cortex in the US and the other morons suffering from mental illness across Europe. Make no mistake, these people are lunatics that have escaped from the asylum. Like Greta Thunberg. Rather than allowing science to evolve to startle us with its inventions and life enhancing capabilities, these lunatics have co-opted science by only allowing tax payer funding of bogus research that locks in progress to standards and knowledge of ten year old debunked fraudulent theories.  Sickeningly stupid.

 

What could I possibly add to that comment?

Climate Doom

More climate doom has emerged in the news. A group of 11,000 scientists has demanded urgent climate action and “shock horror” population control.   World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency 

Analysis

This is of course propaganda and PR and we could dismiss it out of hand.  That would be unfair because a number of valid points are made.  Bloomberg refers to the article as Earth Needs Fewer People to Beat the Climate Crisis. The Hedge has an even more alarmist headline when it says; 11,000 Experts Propose Final Solution To Global Warming: Just Kill Billions Of People.

 

 

These headlines are an exaggeration although the article does summarize the following under the heading Population“Still increasing by roughly 80 million people per year, or more than 200,000 per day, the world population must be stabilized—and, ideally, gradually reduced—within a framework that ensures social integrity”.

Population Reduction

Many countries in the Western world including Japan and China face an aging population.  Fertility rates have plateaued and are going down.   The future will see more adult diapers (nappies) than baby diapers.   The population of Africa is growing and this (surprisingly) is linked with poverty, poor health and lack of education.  Wealthier nations have less children.  To lift Africa out of poverty would require more fossil fuels not less.   Africa needs to follow the development path of China.   However, China attempted population control which has resulted in a shortage of females.   It also resulted in “dying rooms” for female babies and forced abortions.  Eugenics and proscribed population control does not have a good record.

Natural Climate Change

As we have stated before, the earth is undergoing natural climate change.   The solar system  travels through space and encounters different conditions in our “electric universe”.  Our sun is experiencing a maunder minimum.  Our earth is experiencing magnetic pole shift.  These events are linked.  They cause variation in cosmological rays which influences cloud formation.   As the upper jet streams change the weather becomes unpredictable (weird) followed by global cooling.  In that case we need more fossil fuel power stations.  The growing zone will be reduced  leading to famines.  This is the opposite of what we are being told.

Nice Graphs

We use only relevant data sets that are clear, 
understandable, systematically collected for 
at least the last 5 years, and updated at
least annually.

 

Let us translate the above.   We use data sets that are clear:   we cherry pick.  Understandable: you are dumb we will not bother you with scaling. Systematically collected for at least the last 5 years: we chose 5 years out of 4.5 billion years to prove our point.   Updated at least annually:  if we get a heat wave reported this summer we will definitely include it.

 

At least five years of Data

I find that statement amusing.  As a scientist (who is familiar with statistics) I would be ashamed to quote five years of data.  You might as well produce a plot of last weeks weather.  It has about the same predictive power as their graphs.  This is like the hockey stick graph which was proven in court to be  fraudulent.  In light of this we have taken it upon ourselves to change the headings of the plots.

 

 

 

 

 

Good points

The “report” does make some good points but neglects many others.  For example they want to reduce emissions of black carbon (soot), and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs).  That can be done without shutting down fossil fuels.  They also want to reduce methane which is basically “cow farts”.

The agenda is to become vegetarian.  Once again this is too simplistic. Cattle often thrive on land that is barely arable.  In the not too distant past herds of millions of buffaloes roamed the American plains.  Millions of years ago Dinosaurs existed.  They also farted – especially the “stinko-sore-ass”.  The report also says that, “we must protect and restore Earth’s ecosystems”.  On that we are all agreed.

Other important issues

More than 40 years ago when it was not “sexy” I studied environmental science alongside chemistry.  As a junior researcher I was set the task of correlating tree ring data and temperature (the problem then was acid rain).  What this report neglects to mention are plastic contamination of the oceans.  The recycling problem. Endocrine mimickers.  Antibiotic overuse.  We could go on and mention pesticides and GMO foods and herbicides (roundup).  No argument from me that we are damaging the environment and need to drastically change our ways.   We need to be sustainable and we need to conserve energy.  All those things must be done but we need not return to the stone age.

Industrial Revolution

It was the use of fossil fuels coupled with the industrial revolution that brought about massive improvements in living standards, improvements in longevity and the population explosion. A couple of hundred years ago a global population of  7- 8 billion would have been thought impossible.  It would have been considered as beyond the carrying capacity of the earth.  That is quite an achievement but it has created other problems.

Exponential growth

You cannot have exponential growth in a finite system.  Therefore we need to completely change the way we do things in the future.  We need to be sustainable.  The sort of capitalism that we now have with constant “growth” and  “off-book exigencies” (pollution etc) needs to end.  The price  must reflect all the costs including recycling etc.

Conclusion

Climate change is happening but it is not man made.  Perhaps carbon dioxide results in a small “forcing” of the global temperature but it is not the root cause.   That does not mean that we do not need to make major changes on how we do things.   The world does not belong to an elite with the rest condemned to slavery and poverty.  However, the change that is really needed will not happen because of human nature.  As Christians we await the age of renewal which only God can inaugurate.  But first comes the time of judgement.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Climate Change

Climate change is being used to pursue an agenda of social change and centralized control.  Guilt and virtue signalling are used to manipulate the public.    I am sure Greta  is convinced of the rightness of her cause  but she is being exploited. It has has recently come to light that fear over climate change made her stop eating at the young age of eight  -see the following twitter thread (click on live link):

 

 

The following article delves into the background: The Manufacturing of Greta Thunberg – for Consent: The Political Economy of the Non-Profit Industrial Complex [ACT I]

 

Article on Climate Change

The Last Things web page has been updated with a section on Climate Change which includes a video and a Giff:

http://www.biblaridion.info/html/Last_Things.html#CLIMATE

The static version (including links) can be downloaded as a pdf (below):

Man, or God made Climate ChangePDF download