9
Nov 19

Climate Derangement syndrome

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is an anonymous comment that I found online. 

I thought that it was so good that I have reproduced it below.

Eco-fascism

Just so you all know, the next step, after "green deals" turn out to cause more emissions than the status quo, will be the true socialist concept of rationing electricity, petrol and gas via a quota system controlled by politicians for whom science was always an unnecessary evil. After that fails, world wars will commence between the yellow, black and brown countries (polluters) and the green countries (cleaners).

Remember anyone that thinks that CO2 emissions rising from 0.04% of air to 0.06% of the air (stating CO2 in percentage terms rather than the scary 400 parts per million to 600 parts per million) whilst ignoring changes in nitrogen content of 78.09% (780,900 parts per million) or oxygen's 20.95% (209,500 parts per million) - is deranged enough to think that each 0.01% change in the CO2 content of air lifts the global average surface temperature by 1 degree centigrade.

So, CO2 is the temperature control knob. Not water vapor, clouds, the sun, cosmic impacts etc and mankind is the sole increaser in CO2. Not volcanoes or forest fires (natural and man-made) or any other seismic activity like plate tectonics.

A couple of questions that those attacking CO2 emissions should answer (not solid particle carbon emissions like soot, but carbon dioxide GAS emissions;

  • What is the "correct" level of CO2 in the air?
  • What is the "correct" global average surface temperature?
  • how much of the increase in CO2 of the last fifty years has helped increase the population of the world from 3.5 billion in 1968 to 7.6 billion now?
  • How much will the global population decrease if CO2 drops to 0.03%?
  • What is the "correct" global population?

The UK is as subject to the morons like the GOON SQUAD driven by occasional cortex in the US and the other morons suffering from mental illness across Europe. Make no mistake, these people are lunatics that have escaped from the asylum. Like Greta Thunberg. Rather than allowing science to evolve to startle us with its inventions and life enhancing capabilities, these lunatics have co-opted science by only allowing tax payer funding of bogus research that locks in progress to standards and knowledge of ten year old debunked fraudulent theories.  Sickeningly stupid.

 

What could I possibly add to that comment?

6
Nov 19

Climate Doom

More climate doom has emerged in the news. A group of 11,000 scientists has demanded urgent climate action and "shock horror" population control.   World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency 

Analysis

This is of course propaganda and PR and we could dismiss it out of hand.  That would be unfair because a number of valid points are made.  Bloomberg refers to the article as Earth Needs Fewer People to Beat the Climate Crisis. The Hedge has an even more alarmist headline when it says; 11,000 Experts Propose Final Solution To Global Warming: Just Kill Billions Of People.

 

 

These headlines are an exaggeration although the article does summarize the following under the heading Population"Still increasing by roughly 80 million people per year, or more than 200,000 per day, the world population must be stabilized—and, ideally, gradually reduced—within a framework that ensures social integrity".

Population Reduction

Many countries in the Western world including Japan and China face an aging population.  Fertility rates have plateaued and are going down.   The future will see more adult diapers (nappies) than baby diapers.   The population of Africa is growing and this (surprisingly) is linked with poverty, poor health and lack of education.  Wealthier nations have less children.  To lift Africa out of poverty would require more fossil fuels not less.   Africa needs to follow the development path of China.   However, China attempted population control which has resulted in a shortage of females.   It also resulted in "dying rooms" for female babies and forced abortions.  Eugenics and proscribed population control does not have a good record.

Natural Climate Change

As we have stated before, the earth is undergoing natural climate change.   The solar system  travels through space and encounters different conditions in our "electric universe".  Our sun is experiencing a maunder minimum.  Our earth is experiencing magnetic pole shift.  These events are linked.  They cause variation in cosmological rays which influences cloud formation.   As the upper jet streams change the weather becomes unpredictable (weird) followed by global cooling.  In that case we need more fossil fuel power stations.  The growing zone will be reduced  leading to famines.  This is the opposite of what we are being told.

Nice Graphs

We use only relevant data sets that are clear, 
understandable, systematically collected for 
at least the last 5 years, and updated at
least annually.

 

Let us translate the above.   We use data sets that are clear:   we cherry pick.  Understandable: you are dumb we will not bother you with scaling. Systematically collected for at least the last 5 years: we chose 5 years out of 4.5 billion years to prove our point.   Updated at least annually:  if we get a heat wave reported this summer we will definitely include it.

 

At least five years of Data

I find that statement amusing.  As a scientist (who is familiar with statistics) I would be ashamed to quote five years of data.  You might as well produce a plot of last weeks weather.  It has about the same predictive power as their graphs.  This is like the hockey stick graph which was proven in court to be  fraudulent.  In light of this we have taken it upon ourselves to change the headings of the plots.

 

 

 

 

 

Good points

The "report" does make some good points but neglects many others.  For example they want to reduce emissions of black carbon (soot), and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs).  That can be done without shutting down fossil fuels.  They also want to reduce methane which is basically "cow farts".

The agenda is to become vegetarian.  Once again this is too simplistic. Cattle often thrive on land that is barely arable.  In the not too distant past herds of millions of buffaloes roamed the American plains.  Millions of years ago Dinosaurs existed.  They also farted - especially the "stinko-sore-ass".  The report also says that, "we must protect and restore Earth's ecosystems".  On that we are all agreed.

Other important issues

More than 40 years ago when it was not "sexy" I studied environmental science alongside chemistry.  As a junior researcher I was set the task of correlating tree ring data and temperature (the problem then was acid rain).  What this report neglects to mention are plastic contamination of the oceans.  The recycling problem. Endocrine mimickers.  Antibiotic overuse.  We could go on and mention pesticides and GMO foods and herbicides (roundup).  No argument from me that we are damaging the environment and need to drastically change our ways.   We need to be sustainable and we need to conserve energy.  All those things must be done but we need not return to the stone age.

Industrial Revolution

It was the use of fossil fuels coupled with the industrial revolution that brought about massive improvements in living standards, improvements in longevity and the population explosion. A couple of hundred years ago a global population of  7- 8 billion would have been thought impossible.  It would have been considered as beyond the carrying capacity of the earth.  That is quite an achievement but it has created other problems.

Exponential growth

You cannot have exponential growth in a finite system.  Therefore we need to completely change the way we do things in the future.  We need to be sustainable.  The sort of capitalism that we now have with constant "growth" and  "off-book exigencies" (pollution etc) needs to end.  The price  must reflect all the costs including recycling etc.

Conclusion

Climate change is happening but it is not man made.  Perhaps carbon dioxide results in a small "forcing" of the global temperature but it is not the root cause.   That does not mean that we do not need to make major changes on how we do things.   The world does not belong to an elite with the rest condemned to slavery and poverty.  However, the change that is really needed will not happen because of human nature.  As Christians we await the age of renewal which only God can inaugurate.  But first comes the time of judgement.

 

 

 

 

 

 

30
Sep 19

Climate Change

Climate change is being used to pursue an agenda of social change and centralized control.  Guilt and virtue signalling are used to manipulate the public.    I am sure Greta  is convinced of the rightness of her cause  but she is being exploited. It has has recently come to light that fear over climate change made her stop eating at the young age of eight  -see the following twitter thread (click on live link):

 

 

The following article delves into the background: The Manufacturing of Greta Thunberg – for Consent: The Political Economy of the Non-Profit Industrial Complex [ACT I]

 

Article on Climate Change

The Last Things web page has been updated with a section on Climate Change which includes a video and a Giff:

http://www.biblaridion.info/html/Last_Things.html#CLIMATE

The static version (including links) can be downloaded as a pdf (below):

Man, or God made Climate ChangePDF download