Streaming With Charles Rixey

Streaming With Charles Rixey

Charles Rixey is a WMD instructor and an ex marine. His job was to train the military in the area of biological and chemical weapons. He has been more or less dismissed by JC who asserts that the initial virus spread was a psy-op, buttressed by abuse of PCR testing and falsely assigning the cause of death (COD). The pandemic was (according to JC) seeded by spraying synthetic clones (gain of purity) but according to JC these synthetic clones quickly become harmless and cannot “sustain a pandemic for three years” as they de-attenuate and revert to harmless non-functional (non-replication competent) viruses within the “quasi-species-swarm” .

Rixey does not deny the iatrogenic contribution but finds in his data a clear indication of a younger cohort that died because of covid (not because of the vaccine).  Furthermore, just because a virus or a virus-like particle is not replication competent does not mean that it is harmless. While it is true that the body can clear RNA fragments and foreign proteins an onslaught  of alien proteins must make the immune system more vulnerable to a viral assault and certainly prepares fertile ground and building blocks. Neither does Rixey deny the necessity of synthetic clones as they are used in the manufacturing process to amplify the virus.  Therefore JC has not discovered some sort of new technique or exposed  an earth shattering revelation.  Just look at how they make insulin. Moreover JCs oft repeated mantra that you cannot sustain a pandemic for three years does not take into account that the constant vaccinations maintain evolutionary pressure on the “swarm” through the introduction of exosomes and Extra Cellular Vesicles (ESVs).  The “swarm” is being fed new proteins, mRNA etc from millions of immune compromised people.  Lastly, I believe that the initial  attack which was “asymptomatic” for 99% of recipients laid the groundwork for accelerated senescence and “long covid” (including neuro-degeneration) which was amplified by constant vaccinations. 

They were probably attempting to achieve multiple goals with the pandemic.  Reducing population, reducing fertility, experimenting with different formulations. Trying to find the secret to longevity, determining epigenetic influences, destroying immunity so as to create dependence, launching the bio-industrial complex. The motives are myriad but one thing is certain they pulled the trigger on global bio-warfare.

So what does JC want us to say? That GOF is harmless?  That it is only the vaccines that caused harm and JFK is going to sort that out when he is president along with his chief scientific advisor Scooby-Do?   Seriously?   What are you smoking man?  Is that why you want the Defuse document dropped out of JFKs book?  You cannot ignore decades of bio-warfare research starting with the SVCP that resulted in AIDS. Nor can you ignore decades of GOF research and hundreds of scientific papers. They Epsteinized the science and pulled the trigger on bio-warfare.

Streaming With Charles Rixey (3:12)

Lies and Spin

Lies and Spin

Dr Naomi Wolf: Weaponization Of Gain of Function (24 min)

To The Lifeboats Shorts (3 min)

“I stopped talking when I was 18 months old”. Good News AUS and CAN (4 min)

CV19 initial spread

CV19 initial spread

I have not watched this yet but I understand that Mark discusses virus evolution and is partial to JC’s hypothesis.  Apparently Mark Kulacz removed the video after the stream but once something has been placed on the internet it is difficult to erase.  This is not meant to be an attack on Mark or even on JC. I have enormous respect as Mark has endured personal tragedy and done a sterling job  as a dot connector and archivist during this difficult time making his website freely available to everyone.

At this late stage many will think that it is a moot point how CV19 spread nearly three years ago.  Who cares?  It is just an academic debate.  We beg to differ because such a position wants us to believe that the original CV19 was not really dangerous (therefore long covid is more or less a fabrication) and all the subsequent “variants” are just  computer fabrications and rebranding of flu.  Now, the situation is complicated because they did conduct a psy-op and they did abuse PCR and COD and no doubt they fiddled the stats.  They also caused many iatrogenic deaths.  None of that is disputed.  We also do not dispute that synthetic clones were used to amplify the GOF virus as the work of Kevin McKernan is revealing.

What we do dispute is that GOF either did not happen or is more or less harmless. The JC hypothesis is that CV19 “synthetic clone” more or less de-attenuates and cannot maintain virulence or produce variants.  According to this hypothesis the pandemic was maintained by spraying synthetic clone everywhere, not by natural transmission. This from a virologist/epidemiologist on our discord:

There is NO need for continue seeding of recombinant viruses, when the original virus is firmly established in circulation. The Omicron offshoot can be clearly explained via normal host species jump of Delta into rodents then back into humans. The data in mice showing that hACE2 expression is no longer necessary to establish productive infection of Omicron in mice is clear evidence. I think JC is continuing to fuel divisions among dissenters creating a large deal of confusion on an offshoot topic which should not be our primary focus.

1.The infectious clone is already a mutant swarm because it has to be amplified in cell culture. 

2. Delayed pathogenic effects from infection would allow the virus time to transmit and spread prior to disease/death. 

3. Viruses natural state is to evolve toward high transmissibility and low lethality, but GOF viruses don't exist in a natural state.

Our position is that the virus can maintain its characteristics and can spread and therefore precautions must be taken.  We also believe that the vaccine is dangerous.  I personally believe that “shedding” and constant vaccination maintains and evolves the “swarm”.

We should not be complacent with the virus or with the vaccines.  The virus is not “just a cold” it is a bio-weapon with untold long term consequences.  It is my belief that the original CV19  strain was meant to lay the groundwork for the “vaccination campaign” as in preparing the immune system  to be breached.

In any case, discounting the possibility and danger of GOF lets them off the hook.  They want to continue with GOF because….it does not really do any harm (JC/Mark). The harm was caused by spraying synthetic clone.  Sorry, I am not buying it.  This must be fully investigated and the people that did this must be punished.


Live-Stream: The DoE Origins Report

Live-Stream: The DoE Origins Report

Listening to this now.  Interesting insights from Charles Rixxey into the East Palestine Chemical spill.  Just listening to his insights into Redfield (former CDC chief) who was a specialist (virologist) on HIV. They NEVER developed a vaccine for HIV despite spending hundreds of millions and decades.   So what were they doing?  Bio-warfare research.  Who is the enemy?  You are.  How are they funding it?   With your taxpayer money.

What The DoE Origins Report Really Means – With Charles Rixey

Dindu nuffin

Dindu nuffin

Pillpul. Typically Jewish. You never win an argument because they just change the definitions and terms of engagement.  Nothing to see here move along.

Why is it then that I still feel queasy about the whole Veritas sting?


Scooby -Do where are you?

Scooby-Do where are you?

Johnathan has a lot to say in this video that makes sense and in some way I am glad that he keeps challenging all of the narratives before they get set in concrete.  The fact is that with the exception of very few people no one knows the whole truth.  Rest assured that everything about Covid was compartmentalized.   From their reactions I believe that many of the politicians were shocked and some (like Trump and Boris) initially  attempted to resist.  Jay has simplified it to four scenarios:

  1. Natural (Zoonosis)
  2. No virus (Psych war)
  3. Scooby-Do (DRASTIC)
  4. Biology (Jay)

In Jay’s view, if only we understood the biology we would be OK (one presentation to save them all).  Jay rejects 1 and 2 although he admits that the no virus crew have some valid points (true) but laments that they might have been integrated into  the wider resistance if treated with more respect.  Of course, that ignores the fact that many are just con-men (grifters) and others are undoubtedly IIA operations run (or at least signal boosted) by the intelligence services and the supranational institutes who are the players at the top.  Their job is to sow discord and confusion to muddy the waters and discredit legitimate opposition.

Then there is 3. which is meant to be the “great reveal” where DRASTIC et al unmask the villains and solve the mystery.  According to this narrative the virus originated in a lab (either leaked or was released).  In this view all the FOIA emails and the DEFUSE document are part of an operational plan B to fool us into thinking that we are dealing with bio-warfare. In other words they deliberately left bread crumbs for us to find.  According to Jay figuring out that it is bio-warfare makes us more likely to accept the jab.  It is difficult to know how he reached this conclusion because by the time the bio-warfare story was breaking millions had already been vaccinated and were suffering side effects.  Trust in governments and institutions is falling everywhere and a belief that they engaged in bio-warfare has made people even more wary of vaccines.  Moreover, as pointed out in a previous article, Covid 19 is the legacy of decades of bio-warfare research which includes the HIV/AIDS pandemic that emerged at the end of the Special Virus Cancer Program (SVCP).  Covid 19 did not happen in a vacuum. In the past experiments were conducted using ticks as viral vectors.

I am glad to see that Jay has reconsidered his stance on sequencing and the fidelity of the reads.  Jonathan is however correct in pointing out that it is impossible that a viral particle propagated itself globally for three years.  That is true. Not unless the virus had help from further releases or from the “vaccines”.  I believe that cloning as a method of amplification makes sense but only if combined with GOF.  One again I find myself in agreement that many of the deaths were iatrogenic but they cannot all be written off as pneumonia or influenza. There was definitely a unique  symptomatology on display in certain hot-spots that had connections with China.  Jay noted two interesting things which I want to come back too later, namely that  there may have been an “early release” in 2018 (accidental??) that then triggered the “clonal” release later on in 2019 and he mentioned that Northern Italy had a vaccination program before the outbreak (something that I also noted at the time).

As to Jays references to the racial targeting  element of the vaccines I pointed out very early on in the pandemic the coincidences surrounding the gematrial encoding of the FCS (See:  Moreover,  a number of scientific papers have appeared showing that Ashkenazim have advantageous polymorphism. It was known that Ashkenazim suffer less from respiratory diseases but have a number of unique genetic diseases caused by consanguineous marriage. Surprisingly the Amish whose timeline crosses with the Jews of Eastern Europe share some of the same genetic traits and similar isolationist -religious world views (even though they are Christian).

Finally, Jay’s comments on amyloidosis and priongenic  impact are lacking. We know that there has been an uptick in these diseases but they take time to manifest. Even cancers can be triggered by these mechanisms.  I am disappointed that Jay misrepresents the bio-weapon narrative without any nuance as a  “Scooby-Do” straw-man argument.

Scooby Doo Narrative

1. Novel GOF Virus (For sure lab leak super China Virus)
2. No previous immunity (Most infectious ever?)
3. Everyone vulnerable (maybe ethnically tuned?)
4. Constantly changing
5.Transfections questionable (maybe also a bioweapon?)
6. Millions have died as a result of the virus
7. PCR works, sequencing is cool, and data is awesome
8.Vaccines work,just maybe not these? (Huff has had 38)
9. Amyloidosis,GOF disease,etc Bioweapon? Built in?

This is definitely not my narrative, but it does contain elements that are half-truths. I think there are still too many unknowns. I suggest that Jay takes another look at the measles outbreak in Samoa which I believe was used as a dry run (see here: This is about the measles outbreak in 2019 just before the global SARS outbreak. It has it all a mutant measles-SARS chimera, lockdowns, mandates, Chinese troops, WHO…the horror…Mutant Measles morbillivirus strain MeVvac2-SARS2-S(H). They already had vaccination programs. Why did a measles outbreak occur in 3 neighboring islands at the same time, just weeks after a delivery of UNICEF vaccines to those very islands?  There was a new strain of measles introduced that was not covered by the vaccines. Now comes the insidious bit. The bit that links the fact that there is emerging evidence that SARS-CoV-2 appeared before December 2019.

My hypothesis

What if quasi-species swarms of virus related to SARS-CoV-1(2003) and MERS (2012) were already recombining into a deadly strain that gave us the very bad influenza and pneumonia seasons of 2017/18?   All cause mortality was already ramping up before SARS-Cov-2 (Covid 19) appeared.  I note that there was a big push for flu vaccines in the years leading up to the 2019 pandemic.  The fact that many places had undergone vaccine campaigns for flu (Northern-Italy) before the outbreak is suspicious (same as Samoa with measles).  Are we dealing with a binary weapon whereby asymptomatic infection primes the system for the “vaccine” or for administering the “nasal swab” against the bbb (who knows?).  Putting my tin-foil hat firmly on my head I note that Spanish flu (American military flu) was proceeded by a vaccination campaign, AIDS was proceeded by a vaccination campaign, measles in Samoa was proceeded by a vaccination campaign.  I think they have perfected the technique of making pandemics.   Perhaps you need a small external stimuli (a pathogen release) followed by a vaccination campaign in order to trigger a self perpetuating “swarm” caused by shedding??   But what would I know I am just a bucket chemist.

And lastly, I do not trust Huff or Malone etc but I see the necessity for them. It is like having a pet snake that you have trained to catch rats.  Perhaps they are genuine in the sense that the military is practicing damage control.  I just don’t trust them because even if they are in the same trench firing in the right direction they might be phoning through the coordinates for an air strike later on when they excuse themselves to go for a dump (lolz).  Finally, where is Jay going with his?  You need evidence to prosecute cases and convince people.  The acronym KISS -Keep It Simple Stupid applies.  Even for judges and prosecutors.    Especially for judges and prosecutors.  You need bad guys.  You need evidence. You need to be able to trace it and document it.  All these institutions need reforming and  saying that people died because of bad advice or medical malpractice is just not going to do it.  Once these people start getting prosecuted they will turn on each other.  The pressure now must be unrelenting.

National Immunomythology Update: Gigaohm Biological High Resistance Low Noise Information Brief (2:06)

Defuse the Bomb

Defuse the Bomb

This is an actual game and I think this is a great metaphor for what is happening. This one minute clip stresses Keep Talking and nobody Explodes and that is exactly what everyone should do.

The Freedom Movement is fracturing and that is exactly what (((they))) want but we must refuse to allow paranoia to dictate strategy.  Are we being gamed and psychologically targeted?  Yes, there can be no doubt that the “pandemic” has certain strategic and ideological goals and they are nudging us to accept. They want us to reach certain conclusions naturally even though they are steering us in the background. Initially I thought that Jonathan Couey’s proposal on synthetic clones explained many of the anomalies but the argument put forward as “gain of purity” has morphed into one of no excess deaths from Covid19 and sequencing does not work.  All the deaths are more or less iatrogenic or fabricated.  This argument is starting to look like a first cousin marriage of the retarded no virus and gain of purity cousins giving birth to retards (lolz). The argument turns on dismissing the Defuse document as unverifiable or a psychological operation. Discounting its validity as evidence of malfeasance and seeing it as a red herring. Here follows a very good (and long) discussion between Dr Kevin McCairn the systems neuroscientist and Charles Rixey who is a trained Weapons of Mass Destruction expert and a former Marine.  Recommended viewing. 

Charles has analyzed the excess deaths for different age cohorts and a definite signal can be seen prior to the vaccine rollout. Moreover,  asymptomatic infection could well negatively influence the effect of the “vaccine” which is exactly what you would want with a binary weapon.  Perhaps Covid19 was simply a matter of preparing the ground and making it receptive to the real seeding. Why did they insist on people who had already recovered from Covid to get a vaccine anyway?    That is in my view highly suspicious.   Also at at 1:15:40 regarding defuse, Rixey says “Congress already knows that [the documents] they’re not fake”.  Would congress not demand proof?

SARS Biowarfare With Charles Rixey (4:26)

Forensic Analysis

Mark Kulacz from Housatonic is somewhat of an expert  in data retrieval, tracking , storage and destruction (which is not as easy as it may seem…ask Hillary).  In this video he looks at the authenticity and verifiability of the Defuse Document which is a photocopy without metadata. However, it is unlikely that the photocopy distributed on the internet represents all the information available as any chain of custody will be obscured until it is required as evidence for legal proceedings. The grant was declined and that is very easy to establish as I imagine that as much of this material was conveyed by email the metadata is recoverable from the ISP and probably stored somewhere on a DHS database.  As Mark points out it was not classified information and the proposal was rejected by DARPA.   The fuss about the photocopy is in my view a distraction because as I was watching the video I commented that if I were spying I would take a picture with my phone and include the metadata on the file and also the time clock on the computer which would tie in with my own metadata.  Images can easily be converted using OCR.

All this is a moot point because I am sure that Rixey knows who leaked it and has verifiable evidence of authenticity.  It is possible that DARPA themselves deliberately leaked the document to distance themselves as it was becoming impossible  to deny GOF  biowarfare.  They needed plausible deniability.  Perhaps that is also the job of someone like Robert Malone.  We can only guess at motivation and it is a certainty that we are all being gamed.  What should we do?  Perhaps we are unconsciously still doing their bidding by exposing the GOF malfeasance.    We must be aware of what they want and that is relatively easy to answer. They want full spectrum dominance which is the surveillance state panopticon that will eventually reside under your skin  and they want mRNA to form the basis of their bio-revolution economy in order to fulfill their transhumanist agenda.  As long as we make sure that we are not duped into the new paradigm we should be OK.

Ep 182.1: EcoHealth Alliance DEFUSE proposal to DARPA PREEMPT grant, leaked to DRASTIC  (1:19)

 Sequencing Fidelity

Jonathan raised the question of sequencing fidelity and Quasi-species diversity and drift swarms this article provides some excellent answers and a rebuttal:

The Time Line

Last but not least the Defuse proposal fits within the larger context of Fauci’s pronouncements, Daszak’s own comments (both on video) and the wider DARPA PREEMPT PROGRAM who lavishly funded areas of pandemic preparedness, with EcoHealth, the Global Virome Project, USAID’s PREDICT, and more all giving and receiving tons of cash to go out and find new viruses.  This did not happen in a vacuum.     Moreover, it was run on the back of the very successful  Special Virus Cancer Program (sic) which resulted in HIV/AIDS.  Now I know that Kerry Mullis could not find anyone to point him to a source that connected AIDS with the virus (sounds familiar??).  Is there something weird going on?  I have no doubt and whatever it is it looks like they perfected it with the AIDS pandemic.  No wonder Mullis despised Fauci.  There is still much that is unknown and I still have many, many questions. Perhaps we should start with refusing all vaccines.  It seems that the Spanish Flu (American military flu) and HIV (and Covid) possibly all started with vaccination programs.  Are we not seeing the forest for the trees?   Is it that simple?   Have they figured out how to use vaccinations to trigger pandemics?  What a great way to reduce the population and make money.


Are we being played?

Probably, but the trick is to use their gaming tactics and their evidence and turn it against them until we get our outcome.  You work with what you have got and what you have been given.   The most important question in all this is what is the desired outcome?   What do you all want?

Rigs (not Rixey) Defuses the bomb.

Aren’t you going to miss all this good stuff when you retire? (lolz)