CV19 initial spread

I have not watched this yet but I understand that Mark discusses virus evolution and is partial to JC’s hypothesis.  Apparently Mark Kulacz removed the video after the stream but once something has been placed on the internet it is difficult to erase.  This is not meant to be an attack on Mark or even on JC. I have enormous respect as Mark has endured personal tragedy and done a sterling job  as a dot connector and archivist during this difficult time making his website freely available to everyone.

At this late stage many will think that it is a moot point how CV19 spread nearly three years ago.  Who cares?  It is just an academic debate.  We beg to differ because such a position wants us to believe that the original CV19 was not really dangerous (therefore long covid is more or less a fabrication) and all the subsequent “variants” are just  computer fabrications and rebranding of flu.  Now, the situation is complicated because they did conduct a psy-op and they did abuse PCR and COD and no doubt they fiddled the stats.  They also caused many iatrogenic deaths.  None of that is disputed.  We also do not dispute that synthetic clones were used to amplify the GOF virus as the work of Kevin McKernan is revealing.

What we do dispute is that GOF either did not happen or is more or less harmless. The JC hypothesis is that CV19 “synthetic clone” more or less de-attenuates and cannot maintain virulence or produce variants.  According to this hypothesis the pandemic was maintained by spraying synthetic clone everywhere, not by natural transmission. This from a virologist/epidemiologist on our discord:

There is NO need for continue seeding of recombinant viruses, when the original virus is firmly established in circulation. The Omicron offshoot can be clearly explained via normal host species jump of Delta into rodents then back into humans. The data in mice showing that hACE2 expression is no longer necessary to establish productive infection of Omicron in mice is clear evidence. I think JC is continuing to fuel divisions among dissenters creating a large deal of confusion on an offshoot topic which should not be our primary focus.

1.The infectious clone is already a mutant swarm because it has to be amplified in cell culture. 

2. Delayed pathogenic effects from infection would allow the virus time to transmit and spread prior to disease/death. 

3. Viruses natural state is to evolve toward high transmissibility and low lethality, but GOF viruses don't exist in a natural state.

Our position is that the virus can maintain its characteristics and can spread and therefore precautions must be taken.  We also believe that the vaccine is dangerous.  I personally believe that “shedding” and constant vaccination maintains and evolves the “swarm”.

We should not be complacent with the virus or with the vaccines.  The virus is not “just a cold” it is a bio-weapon with untold long term consequences.  It is my belief that the original CV19  strain was meant to lay the groundwork for the “vaccination campaign” as in preparing the immune system  to be breached.

In any case, discounting the possibility and danger of GOF lets them off the hook.  They want to continue with GOF because….it does not really do any harm (JC/Mark). The harm was caused by spraying synthetic clone.  Sorry, I am not buying it.  This must be fully investigated and the people that did this must be punished.