I have called my second tweet the big lie because that “scientific” article is arguing that the vaccine (gene therapy) stops the virus mutating. This article might as well bear the title…blame the unvaccinated for the mutations. JC says that the article is rubbish and should be binned. They are trying to bamboozle people with (bad) science. These are some of the comments under the article:
Linear entropy is a measure of how evenly spread are the lineages. As stated, if for one month all sequences are the same lineage (no diversity), then the measure is zero… on the other hand if the sequences are evenly distributed amongst all 1296 lineages, the value is about 7. When a VOC appears, it is labelled a VOC precisely because a large number of cases are seen of that lineage! So, of course, when VOCs begin to dominate the linear entropy decreases.
Figure 1 shows that starting in January 2021, just as alpha becomes dominant, linear entropy begins to decline as expected. January 2021 happens to be the time that mass vaccination gets underway - so it is not clear how much (or if any) of the reduced diversity is due to vaccination.
The second claim in the title (regarding breakthrough infections) is questionable. The sample size is small and no statistical test is presented that supports the claim of greater diversity in the unvaccinated compared to vaccinated.
That confirms that mass vaccination with spike-only antigen streamlines the coronavirus evolution.
Besides Dr Kevin McCairn Ph.D. (the systems neuroscientist) we have neurobiologist Jonathan Jay Couey, Ph. D. speaking out. He was an early member of DRASTIC (but unacknowledged ) exposing the lab origins and lost his job at Pittsburgh University because of his stance. He is a father (like Kevin) and producer of Gigaohm Biological (on Twitch). He went to the doctor with his wife (also a biologist) and convinced the doctor that should a mandate for children be issued he would write them an exemption. They argued from science and changed the doctors mind (lets be honest what do most doctors know about this specialized field?). I am creating a tag called JC (Jay Couey). He has contact with the McCairn group.
Before we put up the 1 hour twitch video we place a one minute truth from Mark Koulac (Housatonic). They are reverting back to “natural origins” and pushing back real hard with the lie that it was a zoonotic transmission. Nothing to do with them sticking swabs up the poop chute of bats. The liars.
Lying psychopathic scientists to subject our kids 2 experimental gene therapy based on West Nile lie (one minute)
Jonathan Jay Couey, Ph. D. on Gigaohm Biological (1 hour)
Underneath the video are the articles he mentions. I have deliberately not embedded them in tweets because I feel that my account is in danger of being wiped again. Better to let my account lie dormant for a bit. Still have to start another (no time).
Resources – Articles
====================== This is what happens when your vaccine is non-sterilizing. You force the virus evolve. They are turning us into chickens (Marek disease).
Risk of rapid evolutionary escape from biomedical interventions targeting SARS-CoV-2 spike protein
Shared B cell memory to cronaviruses and other pathogens varies in human age groups and tissues. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/372/6543/738 ================= They are spinning. The T cells get activated FIRST not the ANTIBODIES. This paper is WRONG. Propaganda not science. T cells appear in hours…antibodies appear days later.
Here follows analysis and reports on the very highly qualified Geert Vanden Bossche who has turned whistleblower and warned in apocalyptic terms what will happen if continue this mRNA vaccination campaign. Basically it will completely destroy our immune system and make us dependent on vaccines to survive….and even then the viruses will be forced to mutate so quickly we won’t keep up. If we continue with this we will extinct the human race. He warns to stop the vaccines immediately. I told you so hardly seems strong enough.
A number of longer and shorter interviews are posted below – all on BitChute because I expect that YouTube will remove them.
An excellent video by John E. Hoover that raises many questions.
Spanish flu has a characteristic double wave. The 1918 influenza was caused by a H1N1 virus. Covid has a classic double wave it is also a H1N1 virus. Spanish flu and Covid are both known to cause cytokine storms.
So, it turns out that we had a mini pandemic of H1N1 in 1977 that (according to Michael Worobey) can be traced back to a strain from 1950 released by (you guessed it) Russia (or China). At least that is what we are supposed to believe. In any case, this probably provided the excuse for the mad scientists to go digging around dead bodies entombed in ice to find a sample of the Spanish Flu. They found a sample among 72 frozen bodies in a mass grave (that magic number again). So, the original virus was resurrected, and the killer flu was recreated in the lab.
And that brings us to the recent awfully bad double-barrelled flu seasons of 2017-2018. A double-barrelled flu season occurs when two flu outbreaks (2 different strains) overlap one another, a pattern which is very unusual, according to flu experts.
That very bad flu season was followed by the Covid outbreak at the end of 2019 (Dec) that lasted a full year until now (Feb 2021) where all other influenza strains have disappeared. We are led to believe that only one type of flu can exist in the population at one time as the others die out. As time goes on there are fewer antibodies for other flu so the fresh strain has open playing field. Competing strains co-exist for a brief period it is said. They call this Competitive Exclusion although experimental data predicts that two strains will coexist in the long run through assistance by the fitter strain.[i] Even if that were not the case it is unusual for one strain to suddenly cease existing without showing a gradual bell curve tail end decline. For example, the numbers in Australia halved and halved again.[ii]
Now Covid 19 is not Spanish flu with between 50-100 million dead in a global population of 1.8 billion which represents anywhere between 2.8 and 5.6% of the global population versus Covid with 0.03% of global population (Feb 2020).
The other interesting fact is that although people were infected with the Spanish flu virus it was bacterial pneumonia that killed them. Remember they had no antibiotics which were only discovered by Fleming in 1946. So, it is a bit like getting a slap followed by a knockout punch. This is established by none other than Jeffery K Taubenberger and Anthony S. Fauci himself.[iii]
All this leads me to speculate as to the origins of the Spanish flu virus. The First World War was known for the use of chemical weapons such as pulmonary agents (phosgene) and blistering agents (mustard gas).
These conditions are not exactly conducive to good lung or respiratory health. Nor is the stress of constant bombardment in the trenches. Nor is the assault with Electro Magnetic Frequencies (EMF) for the first time (transmission of radio signals).[iv]
It is strange that the same medical institutions and “philanthropic” organizations from the 1900s are involved today. So, rather than a virus perhaps the original precursor of the flu was simply the body detoxifying itself using exosomes and this process made the compromised patient more vulnerable to secondary bacterial infections. Exosomes have several characteristics that are like some viruses. These characteristics include biogenesis, molecular properties uptake by cells, and exosome-mediated intercellular transfer of functional RNAs, mRNAs, and cellular proteins.
Recently, patients in Nebraska who where treated with products marketed as containing exosomes experienced serious adverse events, including bacterial infections. There are no FDA-approved exosome products.https://t.co/6kSujzouyKpic.twitter.com/wU78PXnmTz
Who knows? All I know is that Covid was never isolated using Koch’s Postulates (despite what they tell you). They even employed vaccines in 1918-1919:
“Many vaccines were developed and used during the 1918–1919 pandemic. The medical literature was full of contradictory claims of their success; there was apparently no consensus on how to judge the reported results of these vaccine trials”.[v]
That sounds familiar. In any case there is a lot we do not know about the “Spanish Flu” that spread from an army fort in Kansas to Europe. All we know is what we are told by the medical establishment of the day. Was Spanish Flu a biological weapon that got out of hand? The British army used smallpox (on blankets) against the Indians in the 1760s so nothing would surprise me.
Whatever the case Covid virus was man-made. It may well have been released in China, but it was not made in China. Fauci was deeply involved with the development and transmission of the virus. He is a Rothschild agent part of the Kissinger, Soros, Schwab (et al) cabal and their forward fire base Israel. The virus is a tool for achieving the Great Reset and Jewish rule over the 72 goy nations. The Spanish flu was resurrected and sequenced and gain of function research was employed to refine it into a less pathogenic but more transmissible form of the disease. It is the vaccines that turn bodily cells into protein spike factories that cause pathogenic priming and that will deliver the coup de grâce when the next strain of covid appears. The vaccine is a Trojan horse. Very soon I will be making another full-length video on the origins of the vaccine.
[i] Pe ́re ́farres F, The ́baud G,Lefeuvre P, Chiroleu F, Rimbaud L, Hoareau M,Reynaud B, Lett J-M. 2014 Frequency-dependent assistance as a way out of competitive exclusion between two strains of an emerging virus.Proc. R. Soc. B281:20133374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.3374
[ii] On this see Benford’s law, also called the Newcomb–Benford law, the law of anomalous numbers, or the first-digit law, is an observation about the frequency distribution of leading digits in many real-life sets of numerical data. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benford%27s_law
[iii] Morens, D. M., Taubenberger, J. K., & Fauci, A. S. (2008). Predominant role of bacterial pneumonia as a cause of death in pandemic influenza: implications for pandemic influenza preparedness. The Journal of infectious diseases, 198(7), 962–970. https://doi.org/10.1086/591708
[iv] Radio waves are electromagnetic waves of frequency between 30 hertz (Hz) and 300 gigahertz (GHz). In 1901, Marconi transmitted across the Atlantic. Navy radio stations, which had higher powered signals than those sent out on the frontlines, were able to relay timely wartime news to vessels at sea. https://dp.la/exhibitions/radio-golden-age/radio-frontlines
Nursing homes in the UK are already seeing a 46% increase in death after the administration of the vaccine. You think this is a “conspiracy theory” ? This was reported in the Guardian Newspaper who reported that it was caused….
"....as the more transmissible variant of covid-19 breaches care home defenses"
Nothing to see here…move along. Scores of people catching covid and dropping dead after the vaccination is a “coincidence”.
The word the Guardian is looking for is geriatricide.
“The UK started vaccinating the elderly on Dec 8th. By January 8th, four weeks later, nursing home deaths had risen by 46%.”
People who believe this are “coincidence theorists”. We warned that injecting mRNA (gene therapy experiment) would suppress leukocytes (white blood cells) and make people more vulnerable. However, it is worse than that because you are changing your genome into a spike protein making factory. Your immune system does not whether it is coming or going. The second dose will probably see auto immune reactions (cytokine storms). We told you so. This is sinister and evil and starting to look like a genocide. See our previous article:
We also told you that the vaccine would not confer immunity and that you would need to continue to wear masks etc. We were right again. But carry on living in denial thinking it will all go away.
And FOREVER LOCKDOWNS. You wanted it and now you have it. Your future is constant lockdowns and genetic experiments until they cull the population and figure out how to make us trans-human. pic.twitter.com/lsFIH6rzdI
The media is making people terrified of a virus that has a survival rate of 99.86%. It is only dangerous if you are elderly and are already sick. There is absolutely no need for vaccination as there are very good treatments and very good preventative measures out there. This information is being deliberately suppressed.
Firstly, this website informed everyone at least four months ago about the importance of vitamin D. That was censored from platforms like YouTube as disinformation…..but now that it is becoming overwhelmingly obvious governments are forced to recommend increasing vitamin D levels for the elderly, however, the UK gov is still keeping the levels deliberately too low at 400 units. Watch this important video:
We also highlighted the importance of increased vitamin C intake and Zn. Trials that demonstrate the effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine have been deliberately sabotaged and the medication has been politicized. Personally I have stocked up on quercetin and I drink tonic water (which contains quinine). Quercetin acts as a substitute for the Hydroxychloroquine.
There are also steroidal treatments that combat inflammation but as with all these interventions it depends on when they are given – at an early stage at the first sign of symptoms or when someone is in critical care. In any case a new treatment is emerging that is proving to be very effective at every stage.
Ivermectin is the active ingredient in medicines that treat human and animal diseases caused by parasites (eg, mites, lice, nematode worms). They are already slandering and attacking doctors that are advocating for this treatment just like they did with Hydroxychloroquine.
dear, few people, including me and @Thinkerks geared up to use it in very first week of April, after seeing this, and the faith of people like you, is making our all efforts much worth ful to help people getting out of this menace. thanks pic.twitter.com/Kvzqn6Iz6n
0:44 Conflict of interests Patrick Vallance has 6k shareholding in vaccines ——————————————- 4:20 Big Pharma advising government They are all compromised Imperial college and Welcome Trust funded (or connected) to the Bill and Melinda gates Foundation Sir Patrick Vallance CSO former head of GSK Chris Whitty CMO board member of Gates funded CEPI vaccine coalition Kate Bingham on board of DDF investment ———————————- 9:02 T Cells Immunity We already have herd immunity —————————- 11:52 Matt Hancock- THEY ADMIT Government strategy all about vaccines —————————— 12:59 Conversation in the United States Dr Scott Atlas head of CoronaVirus task force 90% are NOT SUSCEPTIBLE ANYMORE There is T Cell immunity ——————————- 15:05 Believe the science ————————- 16:52 Nest of Vipers….Chris Whitty @CoronavirusPlu2 —————————- 18:15 NHS app -track and trace ——————- 21:46 The contact tracing app is not mandated (yet) mixed messages ——————— 23:17 Rishi Sunak Chancellor of the exchequer Job support scheme from November Only 22% paid by gov —————– 26:19 Institute for Government Only save some jobs GREEN INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION ————————– 27:29 Mark Carney former Governor BOE If you are on the wrong side you will go bankrupt No credit extended ————————– 29:42 2 Trillion debt 100% of GDP ———————– 33:00 Students lockdown for Xmas ——————– 37:33 Updated infection fatality -survial rates for Covid19. —————————- 39:42 90% of Coronavirus tests are not fale positives ——————- 41:40 false Positives Prof Carl Heneghan – false positives could be as high as 50% ——————————– 42:45 Are they right? Yes…but…(ha, ha) Being disingenuous —————– 47:39 Hospital admissions —————— 51:27 When is covid Covid? —————— 54:24 Boris Johnson
A collection of tweets and articles about vaccinations. We both know that they are coming and we both know that they have little (if anything) to do with the virus. There is no such thing as a vaccine against a coronavirus. At least 20% of common colds are caused by the coronavirus. Note how they no longer call it Covid but have reverted to coronavirus? They would never force vaccinations would they?
This is the end game. We must resist.
“Make vaccines free, don’t allow religious or personal objections, and punish those who won’t be vaccinated. They are threatening the lives of others.” https://t.co/vTsyFdl4vD
While we are getting rid of the cold we might as well permanently change your DNA (and that of your offspring). Don’t worry, we will just inject it directly into your cells.
A vaccine that will alter DNA.
“Inovio Pharmaceuticals, has just begun Phase 1 human clinical trials of its new DNA vaccine for COVID-19. Inovio’s DNA vaccine uses an electrical device to deliver DNA directly into the cells of a person being vaccinated.”https://t.co/cPm7mycnAk
In my view a lot of these so called mRNA vaccines do not have a chance in hell of being accepted by people. I think they are a deliberate red herring to put monoclonal antibodies in a good light. Remember we wrote a blog post about it and found it highly suspicious:
"This scramble for monoclonal antibodies could happen two months from now or even earlier." Companies like Regeneron and Eli Lilly have already started ramping up production in the hopes their antibody treatments will prove effective.
So not made in Israel but made in the good all USA? That is just smoke and mirrors because Leonard S Schleifer is Co-President/CEO/Co-Founder at Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Leonard S. Schleifer (born 1953) is the co-founder and chief executive of the biotechnology … he was born and raised in a Jewish family, the son of Florence and Charles Baker Schleifer, in Queens, New York. He came out of nowhere and is now a billionaire making vaccines and seems to have even beaten Israel (sic).
I have heard nothing more about the antibody vaccine from Israel. The question we should all be asking is whose blood plasma was used for the antibodies? Perhaps that of J.C? No not Jesus Christ but Jared Corey Kushner (lol) or J.C., to his friends (who used to live at 666 NYC). Partaking of the blood? (lol). Who knows? But whatever the case might be they must have come from a human who has recovered and it would be interesting to know who that is.
We know that there is a big global push to vaccinate everyone. We also know (no matter what they say) that these vaccines will be linked with some sort of ID. In other words they want to make the vaccine your passport to living. Some of these vaccines will actually change your DNA which is tinkering with our humanity at a fundamental level. Added to this they are rushing these vaccines without proper testing. Moreover, countries without lockdown (like Sweden) have already passed the peak and therefore achieved general population immunity naturally. They don’t even need a vaccine. Even the UK has peaked and is headed down. The CFR is only 0.1%-0.2% not even a bad flu season. Anyone paying attention knows that this is a scam and is criminal.
#lockdowns make no difference . there’s little correlation between the severity of a nation’s restrictions and whether it managed to curb excess fatalities, a measure that looks at the overall number of deaths compared with normal trends. Thx @Dave66317784https://t.co/YWQtT3F4eJ
I came across this video which is really interesting. It is about the father of Mass Vaccination Jonas Salk. Jonas Edward Salk (October 28, 1914 – June 23, 1995) was an American physician, medical researcher and virologist who developed one of the first successful polio vaccines. He was also a monster and eugenicist who believed in his own supremacy. Oh, and coincidentally (sic) he was an Ashkenazi Jew.
Those who were surprised to see Dershowitz rewriting the Constitution informing us that we will have to choose whether to be vaccinated or stay at home forever can now see the deep ‘rational.’ An Israeli doctor promises to “fix” our genetic-code.. https://t.co/tU0A3Ofaft
Apparently we now have a Covid test that is 100% accurate. What a relief no more false positives. No more goats or sheep testing positive for covid. No more dangerous pieces of Covid fruit lying about. I will sleep better tonight.
They are all telling us that it is a “Game-Changer” so that must be the approved messaging. Note that none of them say that they are sorry for promoting a test that was not fit for purpose and making decisions on invalid test results that had consequence for your job, your finances, your mental health and/or you physical health (cancellation of elective surgery). It is as if it doesn’t matter. Water under the bridge. So what. Who cares? We destroyed the economy and disrupted your life using faulty computer models and invalid test results but we are fighting a war against an invisible enemy (we certainly are). Every war has casualties. Tough luck. However, even in a war bad generals get sacked. You will be relieved to know that we now have a 100% accurate test.
You will be relieved to know that it has been independently tested at Porton Down which is a science park in Wiltshire, England, just northeast of the village of Porton, near Salisbury. It is home to two British government facilities: a site of the Ministry of Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL) – known for over 100 years as one of the UK’s most secretive and controversial military research facilities, occupying 7,000 acres and a site of Public Health England. In the past they experimented with nerve gas on people but they don’t do that anymore. Porton Down is very close to Salisbury were a military army nurse found the poisoned Skripals but that is a mere coincidence and a different story. The take away from this is that a Government bio-weapons lab has found the test to to be 100% accurate so that must be true.
What is 100% accurate or 100% specific?
The claim is that it is 100% accurate despite the Independent (above) saying 100% specific. They are not the same thing.
The phrase 100% accurate immediately peaked my curiosity. As a scientist (industrial Chemist) I have performed thousands of chemical tests and as a junior chemist performed tests etc at a Phytopathology research lab. I have never come across a test that is 100% accurate. I have even checked the validity of test methods using statistics. I have never found a 100% accurate test. Is it just me? Perhaps the unicorn of the 100% accurate test exists but I have just never encountered it?
Of course, we know nothing of how this test was validated. In order to check for antibodies you need recovered patients but how do you determine that they are recovered if you have no test? In other words how do you set a baseline or standard? You need a group that are definitely negative and a group that are definitely positive (recovered). You need to do double blind randomized tests or even triple blind. You need to know the full medical history of each subject so that you can determine if the outcome can be influenced by other antibodies which are present or absent. No two test subjects are going to be exactly the same with different patient pathologies and different genetic make up.
You need a large sample size otherwise your errors are magnified. You need to calculate confidence intervals and look at sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios etc. Do we know if any of this has been done? Are we allowed to see the actual results, the test parameters etc. How many tests were conducted? Are they compared with rival tests? Are journalists allowed to interview any of the test subjects? And how about financial disclosure? Who besides Roche benefits and by how much? So many questions but don’t you worry now because the government assures you that it is 100% accurate.
What does Roche say?
Roche has two tests – the first one we shall call the “spit test” or swab up the nose or in the mouth known as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test to diagnose active COVID-19 (cobas SARS-CoV-2 Test) which could take days for a result.
The test that is being touted as a “game changer” is a blood test (Elecsys anti-Sars-CoV-2 antibody test). It is supposedly very fast (18 minutes) but of course it still needs to be sent to a lab (Hospital etc) that has the Roche analysis equipment. The problem with both tests is that a negative result does not rule out that you still might be a Covid carrier.
Accuracy and Sensitivity are not the same thing
If you are interested in the distinction between accuracy and sensitivity have a quick look at this article which is very clear. I suggest you make yourself familiar with the science because soon they will be using manipulation and coercion backed up by pseudo science to force change. The perception is that the test is 1000% accurate and therefore infallible and that is not so. There are two very good articles with tables from the evaluate website which I recommend reading in full but which I partially quote below. Both articles are about the blood antibody test – Elecsys anti-Sars-CoV-2 antibody test. The first citation talks about accuracy and specificity:
There are two major questions here. Firstly, are these claims to be trusted without independent verification?....And accuracy needs to be high. The prevalence of Covid-19 is estimated at around 5% in the US, and at this low a level the risk of false positives becomes a major problem. If a serological test has 90% specificity, its positive predictive value will be 32.1% – meaning nearly 70% of positive results will likely be false. At this same disease prevalence, a test with 95% specificity will lead to a 50% chance that a positive result is wrong. Only at 99% specificity does the false positive rate become anywhere near acceptable, and even here the chances are that 16% of positive results would be wrong. evaluate link
And the next article citation actually gives us some test results and sample sizes:
Roche claims sensitivity of 100% and specificity of more than 99.8% when an individual is tested two weeks after a PCR test has diagnosed an active Covid-19 infection.....Roche assessed its test’s sensitivity on 204 samples from 69 symptomatic patients with a PCR-confirmed Covid-19 infection. But only 29 samples were from the 14-day time point, a smallish dataset, though to be fair the assay correctly flagged them all....Still, specificity is the crucial point, and here the Elecsys test acquitted itself well, and in a much larger cohort. It was used to test 5,272 blood samples taken from routine diagnostic testing, blood donors, a common cold panel, and a coronavirus panel comprising 40 potentially cross-reactive samples from individuals with past infection with non-Covid-19 coronaviruses. All of these samples were obtained before December 2019 and thus could not carry the Covid-19 virus. [My emphasis] 10 of the samples came back positive, giving a specificity of 99.81%. Evaluate link
So, I did the calculation for the specificity:
10/5,272*100= 0.19% 100-0.19%= 99.81%
Some weird findings
I decided to do a search on the term 99.81% specificity and found some strange stuff. What I mean by that is that I found a number of other PCR tests that all had the same result with different sample sizes. Have a look at my search results:
Validation according to OIE criteria of a monoclonal, recombinant p26–based, serologic competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as screening method in surveillance programs for the detection of Equine infectious anemia virus antibodies https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1040638715625092 The adoption of the cELISA as a screening test in routine testing, generated 182 sera (0.19%) with nonspecific reactions, as confirmed by AGID and immunoblot, out of a total of 96,468 samples examined.13 For this, the screening method has an apparent DSp of 99.81%, higher than that estimated in its validation. My calculation: 182/96,468 *100= 0.19% and 100-0.19 = 99.81% specificity.
A screenshot 2016: Abstracts 2697-5293 By American Association for Cancer Research (AACR):
Now, I don’t know about you but I find this extremely strange. What is the chance of these different tests one on sexual diseases in the Chinese and the other on horse diseases, anti-HAV Igm and cancer all having different sample sizes all giving 98.91% specificity? What is the probability of that occurring? The only common factor is that they are all PCR tests. This suggests a methodological error or bias built into the test. However, what would I know I am only a “bucket chemist” not a PhD genetics professor. Perhaps I am over looking something obvious. Surely all these big pharma companies with their computer software and fancy equipment cannot be making basic methodological errors? I would laugh my socks off if they were. My gut feeling (for what it is worth) is that there is something basically very wrong with the PCR test. Is this a systematic error?
It was stated before that making mistakes in analytical work is unavoidable. This is the reason why a complex system of precautions to prevent errors and traps to detect them has to be set up. An important aspect of the quality control is the detection of both random and systematic errors. This can be done by critically looking at the performance of the analysis as a whole and also of the instruments and operators involved in the job. For the detection itself as well as for the quantification of the errors, statistical treatment of data is indispensable. http://www.fao.org/3/W7295E/w7295e08.htm
And here is the other thing I find suspicious…..it says of the samples…“All of these samples were obtained before December 2019 and thus could not carry the Covid-19 virus”.
How does anybody know that? There are reports online that the disease was circulating in France and in Northern Italy (and the USA for that matter) undetected before the Chinese outbreak. If that is the case then the test is compromised because you have no true baseline to use as a standard.How do we know that these samples (presumbly from other blood banks) have been handled correctly? How do we know whether they have degraded or not over time? You are making an assumption that before a certain date your samples are covid free. I still come back to the point that covid has never been isolated using Koch’s principles.
It turns out that the answers to these questions don’t just hinge on the accuracy of the test. “Mathematically, the way that works out, that actually depends on how many people in your area have Covid,” Eleanor Murray, an assistant professor of epidemiology at the Boston University School of Public Health, said.
A serological test looks for antibodies, which play a crucial role in the body’s immune response to Covid-19. It can take several days for an infected person to develop antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19. So a negative result doesn’t necessarily mean that the virus isn’t present. On the other hand, a positive antibody test doesn’t always mean you are immune, nor does it mean that the virus has been defeated. Vox
Trust me I am from the Government and I am here to help
I freely admit that I am not a geneticist or epidemiologist but this very brief investigation makes me very squeamish. If you want to trust big pharma that stands to make gazillions out of this and a military government poison lab then go ahead but it raises red flags. The emphasis on 100% accurate is deliberate. This imbues the test with godlike authority to decide who has a life and who doesn’t. You can protest as much as you want that you have no symptoms and feel perfectly OK as they drag you off to quarantine or forcibly vaccinate you. No arguing with a test that is 100% accurate. Believe the science it is never wrong. Such a test in the wrong hands becomes a tool of oppression. The reason they needed a new test was because everyone knew the old test was not fit for purpose.
This is why they need a test that is 100% accurate
DOD Awards $138 Million Contract, Enabling Prefilled Syringes for Future COVID-19 Vaccine with the ultimate production goal of over 500 million prefilled syringes (doses) in 2021https://t.co/dgXivzE32g