Geert made some good points at the start of the pandemic which established his credibility but now he is being wheeled out as damage control. He is never going to say…..we killed and injured people with the vaccine. He does no talks on excess deaths. We are on 17% in Australia. He says give them to the elderly but not to children. He even condemns the bivalent vaccine. Those are just concessions to the obvious. The bivalent vaccine and the injection of Children is a moot point because uptake is extremely low (except for retards) and will never get higher. However,they need to protect the legacy of this “wonderful” new technology. The legacy is….”see the vaccines worked” and cut the severity of the disease. We had some problems because some of the antibodies were not fully neutralizing (leaving the door open for improvements). We can use this new vaccine mRNA technology to power our (Fourth Industrial) medical revolution. According to Geert the non-neutralizing antibodies prevent severe disease (while still creating ADE go figure) but he never mentions that it is T cells aimed at non-structural proteins that prevent severe disease. His job is to keep you focused on the SPIKE and ANTIBODIES and nothing else. I seem to remember the virologist expert rancid yellow (Vincent Racaniello) stating that, “there is no correlate of immunity with antibodies”. Other experts have said the same. All antibodies tell you is that at some point you had X disease. After a while even the antibodies disappear. But the Tcells have long memories. The Tcells don’t forget. Moreover his astonishment at the “rapid evolution” of the variants is suspicious. Apparently thousands of years of mutations have suddenly sped up and produced a plethora of variants. Quell surprise. Even if the appearance and sequencing of these new variants is 100% correct might it have something to do with constantly jabbing people (with who knows what different formulations?) thereby forcing viral evolution by running it through different populations. The shedding alone will create differentiated viral quasi swarms. We need to stop vaccinating and we need to hunt these people down and prosecute them.
Geert needs to be asked these questions:
1. Do you think we should continue developing mRNA vaccine (transfection) technology?
2. Was the pandemic man made or natural?
3. Does anyone need to be prosecuted for crimes against humanity?
Put him on the spot and watch the vaccionologist squirm. There are very few of them not playing some roll in this global pantomime.
Synthetic clones can be made by the truckload and purified mRNA will code for pathogenic viruses but burn out easily. Such viruses do not have the adaptability of a quasi-swarm and therefore harm will be contained (but shocking to anyone on the receiving end). They used this technique coupled with a psychological campaign, manipulated death numbers and a rigged PCR test to get us to inject.
It was all about the “vaccines”….they needed billions of test subjects…shooting us full of who knows what….and feeding the results into A.I. so as to discover how to make us transcendent humans. Instead they created zombies.
Not watched this yet. J.C. has been MIA for the last two weeks. I wonder why?
Comment added on 12/10/2022:
Having watched the video I can now add a comment (12/10/2022). Frankly I am disappointed. J.C. is going back (again) to calling Covid an elaborate psyop. A redefining of flu and influenza data and manipulating mortality figures thereby discounting GOF. There is no doubt that they did exaggerate and run a psyop but Covid has distinct symptoms. We know the virus is not "novel" as it shares 60% of its epitopes with other coronaviruses. However the furin cleavage site (FCS) is unique and is not found in nature although the FCS does form part of the 19 nucleotide sequence in the MHS3 Homolog that Moderna patented in 2017. J.C. stated that GP120HIV-1 and DC-sign is generic to other coronaviruses (and is therefore not unique) which is why short peptide inhibitors work on many of the Sars coronaviruses family thus implying that Charles Rixey had been misled? However, they have been experimenting with GOF on coronaviruses for years. SARS-Cov-1 and MERS etc may well also have had GOF inserts. J.C. asserts that they cobbled together a GOF "scare story" by taking this bit out of nature and adding that bit from a lab. However, many people got very sick with Covid without exhibiting flu symptoms. You can make the case that the virus was not novel and therefore some pre-existing T cell memory was present, but some people got very sick.
1. The virus was real
2. It was GOF and it was deliberately released
3. Some people had some pre-existing immunity
4. They exaggerated the death figures
5. They ran a psyop to terrify people.
All these ideas can co-exist, they are not mutually exclusive. If memory serves me, all-cause mortality did increase but happened in the flu and influenza seasons prior to the official Covid "pandemic" narrative. We also had the strange "vaping illness" with symptoms akin to Covid. In my view the virus ( or a variant thereof) was circulating before 2019 and was already pushing up all-cause mortality destroying the statistical baseline. They have been experimenting for decades with pathogens and tick born vectors etc. It may well be the case that Covid 19 was released to mask a previous leak. In any case this whole exercise was planned to coincide with the first signs of market liquidity because the Federal Reserve started Repo on 18 Sept 2019. While I agree that many elderly who died from the original Covid 19 Wuhan strain received the wrong treatment protocols (ventilators, midazolam and/or remdesivir) that only occurred in certain places (e.g. New York).
Stress response + immunology link – Optimism training 2 WARNING: GLACIAL WINDS!(9min)
WARNING: GLACIAL WINDS IN THE BACKGROUND! You can still hear everything ok, but you will have nature’s engine on in the background throughout this video. We investigate some of the limited information related to how optimism might confer its biological health benefits and discuss a possible theory on how optimism might directly influence immunological outcomes. Described content: Optimism and stress response: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgero… T-cells and immunity: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/…
Dr Kevin McCairn featured this video and commented on it in during his last live stream and I thought it was important to feature it separately.
Dr. Ryan Cole, an anatomic clinical pathologist with a subspecialty in skin pathology and postgraduate Ph.D. training in immunology, has been on the frontlines exposing the fraudulent COVID narrative.
Since 2004, he’s been operating his own business, a pathology laboratory, which gives him rare freedom and flexibility to comment on what he’s seeing. Most others would lose their jobs for speaking out the way Cole has.
Good show but disappointed at Jonathan’s analysis of the debate which had me sending out these tweets to JC and Kevin.
1./ The emphasis on coronavirus being novel is semantics. Covid shares at least 60% of its genome with other coronaviruses therefore it cannot be novel. On the other hand the FCS was engineered which does make it novel.
2./ We understand from the systemic Amyloidogenesis and other thrombo-inflammatory effects that this is not a normal coronavirus. It is not a cold or influenzas. It is not the body "detoxing" via exosomes (Kaufman).
3./ How can you take people seriously who argue that there is no virome only a biome? (Bailey) The "viruses do not exist crowd" are part of a psyop (wittingly or unwittingly) even when their critique on particular experiments may carry some validity.
4./ As to sequencing etc we have sequenced the human genome and many other genomes. We now have computational biology and with super computing can model protein folding, electrostatic charge, binding strength etc.
5./ Such is the basis of Trevor Bedford's work comparing sampling date to the number of amino acid changes in spike S1 subunit.
6./ The military has spent millions on coronaviruses - looking for them and enhancing them. These programs (SVCP) have run for decades. To say that viruses are "not real" is denialism. To make money from peoples ignorance and fear is despicable.
7./ They are doing harm and muddying the waters. They divide the resistance camp by promoting a false position.
Agree 100%, their calumny about cultures being starved or overdosed with antibiotics is them stretching methods 1st used in virology.
“Are you going to reach people with that garbage?” (2:00)…
I would say that sometimes a slap shocks people out of their hysteria. Have you reached your parents or bro with your science? pic.twitter.com/7OrxRAr2R6
We are in a culture war as well as a science war and the time for niceties is long gone. The gloves are off we are fighting for our lives. You are not going to save everyone. Some people do not want to be saved.
45:00Analysis of Debate between Dr Kevin McCairn and Dr Bailey hosted by Tim Truth.
01:33 Vincent Racaniello from TWiV (This Week in Virusrses otherwise known as The Wuhan Institute of Virology) gives a n eacceptance speech (lecture) after recieving an award in Germany. It is pure propaganda.
Another great show. Jonathan starts with Kary Mullis the Nobel prize winner and inventor of PCR (now deceased) questioning the science behind aids. Of course the mainstream now wants to paint him like a nut job, just like they did to Luc Montagnier the other Nobel winner who challenged the narrative (also now deceased). It does not matter how smart you are…if you go against their narrative you are a crazy conspiracy theorist and they will dismiss you. These two highly intelligent men knew that there was something wrong with the AIDS story. However, it goes deeper than AIDS. They have been experimenting with virus and pathogens for decades using the war against cancer as a cover story.
Immunomythology Update LIVE: Gigaohm Biological High Resistance Low Noise Information Brief (2:04)