Tag: Koch’s principles

Is the virus real (part-1)

Posted on

Is the virus real?    (part 1)

On the face of it an utterly ridiculous question.  The gut response (and mine also) is…of course it is, real people are getting sick (and dying) and it is contagious.  Can’t get more real than that. However, I know for a fact that they are also conducting a psychological operation and using the media to ramp up fear and there are elements about the virus that are highly suspicious.

 I thought it was time to examine the question again and draw all the threads together into a coherent narrative. That is how you conduct proper science. You constantly evaluate and re-evaluate as new evidence becomes available.  What led to this was a comment I posted about the virus never being isolated using Koch’s postulate after which I was sent links to about ten different scientific articles showing how it had been isolated and how it had been injected into monkeys, mice and hamsters etc and made them sick with similar symptoms…so there (lol).

 Now these scientific articles are difficult to read – they are not in plain English and I think this is often deliberate obfuscation.   Moreover, unless you work in that particular field it can be difficult to evaluate the methodology.   Now, I did do microbiology many moons ago and worked as a junior scientist  at a lab researching plant pathogens.  Although I have done work with bacteria and used the ELISA  technique (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay is a plate-based assay technique designed for detecting and quantifying soluble substances such as peptides, proteins, antibodies, and hormones) I am not familiar with virology or the newer DNA sequencing techniques etc.  However, science is about critical thinking and evaluating not just about technique. Anybody (scientist or not) can evaluate a methodology.

Koch’s Postulate

The whole argument is about Koch’s Postulate which is about how you establish the cause of a disease.   This is not as easy as you might think.  First you have to find a bug. You need to isolate the germ from a sick human or animal (say from their saliva). Then you need to purify the bug and isolate it from the spit and snot or blood etc. Then you need to inject the purified bug into a healthy  animal or human to see if they get the same illness. Then you need to isolate the bug again from the  person or animal that you made sick and check that it is indeed the same bug. It is a sort of “double check” .  It is the  gold standard for identifying the cause of diseases.

 

 

 

 

 

Click here to enlarge

 

Were the criteria established by Koch’s applied?

In theory, if the methodology established by Koch is not exactly followed you cannot speak of a particular “germ” being the cause of a disease.   Let us say you always find the presence of X-particle in a person that is sick — that does not mean that X-particle is causing the disease.    It could be that X-particle is simply part of an immune response against an environmental onslaught.   It could be that your own body produces X-particle as a response to a particular attack from outside.   It might not be the cause of the disease but a symptom.

The only way to establish it for sure is to use Koch’s principles and here is where I fell down the rabbit hole because although Koch’s postulate works fine for bacteria it does not work for viruses.  Apparently when you isolate a virus in vitro (in  glass eg test tube etc) it looses its pathogenicity.  It can no longer make you sick.     Ruh, Roh. 

I found a paper discussing a problem with a different virus. The paper is from 2010 and is about a different virus but the problem back then is the same as now: 

——————————————————————————

De´ja ` Vu All Over Again: Koch’s Postulates
and Virology in the 21st Century

John V. Williams

Departments of Pediatrics and Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, and the Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital
at Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee

This article describes prolonged shedding
of the recently identified human bocavirus
(HBoV) by children and detection of
HBoV in the absence of respiratory symptoms.

 So, I have done something naughty and taken the relevant passages from his article (which is very good) and changed the HBoV into Covid etc to reflect the current situation:

Another feature used to assign disease causality [to Covid] is the absence of the virus in healthy individuals. However asymptomatic subjects do have the "disease"
The work also nicely illustrates a common problem facing modern virologists: how to assign disease [Covid] causality to a microorganism that is not amenable to Koch’s postulates.

 

HBoV [Covid] has been detected in serum samples [13, 16] and stool specimens [14, 28–30] by PCR, but the biological significance of this is not clear.

 

So the PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) test detects something…but how relevant is it? And the amplification is non-linear.   Depending on the sensitivity you can more or less influence the outcome (positive or negative).  You can get what you want.

Does HBoV [Covid]contribute to the pathogenesis of a specific clinical syndrome in either a primary or helper fashion? Is there a contribution of host immune response to HBoV [Covid]reactivation and detection during intercurrent infection? The many unanswered questions about this newly discovered virus return us to basic approaches for establishing causation and pathogenesis regarding any virus.
Koch espoused his core principles regarding the proof of an etiologic role for a potential pathogen in 1884. These postulates were revised by the eminent virologist Thomas Rivers in 1937 to reflect the biology of viruses, which, as obligate intracellular parasites, cannot be isolated in pure culture [37]. Huebner [38] further modified these principles in 1957, during the heyday of virus discovery that followed the development of tissue and cell culture.
Fredricks and Relman [39] eloquently applied these guidelines to sequence-based microbe discovery. There are numerouschallenges in proving viruses as the etiologic causes of specific syndromes: pro-longed viral shedding after acute illness (eg, enteroviruses); latent infection and asymptomatic shedding (eg, herpesviruses); clinical disease in a minority of infected individuals (eg, poliovirus); and re-current asymptomatic infection of immune adults (eg, respiratory syncytial virus) are but a few of these challenges. Huebner proposed a “Bill of Rights for Prevalent Viruses” that comprised a “guarantee against the imputation of guilt by simple association” [38, pp. 434–437] consisting of 8 conditions: (1) isolation of a virus in culture; (2) repeated recovery of the virus from human specimens; (3)antibody response to the virus; (4) characterization and comparison with known pathogenic viruses; (5) constant association of the virus with specific illness; (6)reproduction of clinical illness in volunteer challenge studies; (7) epidemiologic studies (with controlled longitudinal studies offering the greatest value); and (8)prevention of disease by vaccination. The difficulty in meeting several of these conditions for HBoV,[Covid] or for any other new virus, is immediately obvious.

 This article was written 10 years ago about a different virus.  It asks valid questions that have still not been answered.  So, this is not just a bunch of  “tin foil hat” people who have recently jumped on a bandwagon. The science shows that the question is far more nuanced and the results far more uncertain than some like to make out.

From the horses mouth

This is what the scientist involved with the first testing and identification of the virus say in their scientific articles.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click here to enlarge

In all of these papers they admit that they have not purified the virus.  So, then what are you looking at under the Electron Microscope?  You cannot say for sure that it is a virus because you have not purified it.   So, you are not using Koch’s postulates as even the Zhu paper admits.

Although our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates, our analyses provide evidence implicating 2019-nCoV in the Wuhan outbreak. 

Zhu N et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 14.
* https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017

 I am sorry Zhu Manchu but if it does not fulfill Koch’s postulates it does not provide evidence of anything.   My backside does not fulfill Koch’s postulates either, nor does it provide evidence of WuFlu.

For further evidence see David Crowe:  COVID SCIENCE: A Challenge to the Discovery of the Virus. Or see his more extensive PDF here: Flaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory

The Challenges and requests for information

A number of people have offered challenges and even rewards to scientists to prove that the virus does exists.  This doctor offers you 5000 bucks if you can prove the existence and a European doctor offers 100000.  So far no takers.

 

 

Health Canada has no record of “COVID-19 virus” isolation

 

What is causing the disease if it is not a virus?

The answer put forward is that the tests are picking up on exosomes.  These are pieces of RNA “solvents” that the body excretes when it is under immunological stress and needs to get rid of toxins.  Like viruses, exosomoes are “dead” and need “living tissue”…..do you see where this is going?

 

Could the cause of “viruses” be environmental or terrain factors?

 

 

The fact is that both Wuhan and Northern Italy were the first hit and the worst hit. They both had very high pollution including particulate matter and also high cyanide (from Industry and traffic) and both rolled out 5G at about the time that the virus struck. Now we all know that causation is not correlation but the anecdotal evidence is getting stronger.  They have trillions invested in this new technology and 5G has many overlapping symptoms with Covid.  Something is going on.  Look at recent data from the USA:

 Conclusion

Koch’s postulates have not be fulfilled.  No point denying it as the scientists themselves admit it.  On that basis alone we would be justified in saying that the virus was not real.  However, we are not so hasty although it does raise a giant red flag as does the introduction of 5G.  In part 2 we will delve further into the whole scamdemic and try and establish what is really going on – is the Wu Flu a  Flu Manchu  or  is it a Flu Manju…?

 

 

Computational biology

Posted on

Computational biology

If you get this warning when you click on the Zero Hedge link please ignore it.  It is a deliberate scare tactic by Google so that you will self-censor. More dirty tricks.

 

Computational biology, which includes many aspects of bioinformatics, is the science of using biological data to develop algorithms or models in order to understand biological systems and relationships. Until recently, biologists did not have access to very large amounts of data.I t involves the development and application of computational, mathematical and data-analytical methods for modeling and simulation of biological structures.

I find this merging of data and information with “biology” very interesting. The assumption is that they were working towards a vaccine but what if they were working to expose the truth behind the virus.  A lot of people would not want that to come out. This was no accident.

Kawasaki Disease

An article on the mysterious Kawasaki disease which has now also appeared in the  USA among children: Mysterious Coronavirus-Linked Syndrome Spreads From London To New York


Of course, the use of the term “spreads” is a leading term making the reader think of an  infectious disease that can be caught. However, Kawasaki disease is nothing other than toxic shock syndrome or a cytokine storm which is the bodies defense mechanism gone wrong. It is an auto immune response and it is perfectly plausible that this was brought on by 5G as discussed in a previous article here.

The problem is that we have multiple competing mechanisms to explain Covid.  Some are saying it is a complete pysyop (e.g., Icke) and that the virus does not even exist in reality. In support of this is the strange way it codes to 72 and the multiple simulations that were run in advance of the actual disease breaking out and the fact that it has never been isolated using Koch’s principles.  The Covid symptoms could then all be related to 5G or influenza and this mistake can be attributed to false positive testing and inflated morbidity reporting. A virus can only replicate inside a living host. A virus is dead material. Some argue that the virus is the bodies own response – it is produced by the bodies immune system (not externally). They are called exosomes whose function is to mop up all toxins. It is (in my view) plausible that a person undergoing such a cytokine storm might exude quantities of these exosomes that trigger a reaction in other people (i.e., they catch the “virus”).

Another  mechanism is natural emergence. However, that would take hundreds of years and probability rules out the chance combination of these zoonotic diseases. Natural emergence  can be discounted as implausible because we know that military labs in different countries were all working on corona and it seems to be an “ensemble” of different viruses.

So that leaves the virus as a lab manufactured bio-weapon.  However, as we have previously indicated we see no problem with accommodating more than one mechanism. It is the perfect way to muddy the waters and deliver multiple overlapping symptoms and fulfill multiple agendas.  The roll out of 5G, the roll out of vaccinations, the crashing of the economy…. etc, etc.  If viruses are actually exosomes then it must be possible to isolate zoonotic material and recombine the RNA proteins etc to make a more pathogenic strain.  So, I leave the question open and keep my mind open to all possibilities because I know that something strange is going on. Computational biologists don’t just suddenly start murdering each other. Strange toxic shock disease does not suddenly start appearing. And a “virus” does not compute to the number 72 by accident. Especially as God’s name is linked in Kabbalah to 72 angels (with corresponding 72 demons) and the masonic compass is coincidentally (sic) open at an angel of 72 degrees.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Competing theories

Here we place the two most prominent explanations side by side without feeling the need to chose between them. Who says that it is either/ or?  The fact is that we are facing lies and propaganda on multiple fronts. It is a deliberate strategy to keep you confused, frightened and off balance. The pandemic is obviously very well planned as we know they have run multiple simulations. It is not some vast conspiracy as the outworking has been compartmentalized and most of the medical fraternity is simply following the guidelines or working on projects for which funding  has been allocated. Many doctors are themselves starting to question what is going on.  It is the military research labs, the NGO’s and the supra national organizations that are the root of the problem.

*The video links below will need to be copied and pasted if you want to watch them as they are not hyperlinked to prevent loading.

The virus and vaccine theory

We have been deeply, profoundly & repeatedly lied to…

Cellular and molecular biologist Judy Mikovits, Ph.D. believes COVID-19 — the disease — is NOT caused by SARS-CoV-2 ALONE, but rather that it’s the result of a COMBINATION of SARS-CoV-2 and XMRVs (human gammaRETROviruses).
SARS-CoV-2 has LIKELY been manipulated to include components of HIV that destroys immune function along with XMRVs.
People PREVIOUSLY (unknowingly) INFECTED with XMRVs (retroviruses) VIA knowingly dirty VACCINEs end up getting SERIOUS COVID-19 infectionS and/or die from the disease.
Mikovits’s research suggests more than 30 million Americans carry XMRVs and other gammaretroviruses in their bodies from contaminated vaccines and blood supply.
Mikovits believes 40+YEARs of data suggest Type 1 interferon at very low dose would be an ideal treatment for COVID-19.
RT-PCR (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) testing, currently used to diagnose active infection by detecting the presence of SARS-CoV-2 genetic material, OVERestimates infection rates. For an accurate account of COVID-19 prevalence, we need to test for ACTUAL ANTIBODIES to SARS-CoV-2.
What we’re facing here is a PLANNEDEMIC SET OF DISEASEs, CAUSED BY vaccines (previously administered to MILLIONs of Americans), into which a genetically modified flu virus acts as a TRIGGER that (based upon the INDIVIDUAL’s prior vaccination history) manifests in the VARIETIES of disease stateS that is seen in the presenting sick patient.
The 50+ year SEPARATION from the vaccines administered to the later introduction of the TRIGGER appears to be one of the reasons why this has caught the medical establishment flat-footed.
This is PURE EVIL intended to MURDER millions using biowarfare.
More can be found #COVID19 is caused by vaccines Dr Judy Mikovits, PhDJason Bainbridge4.2K views1 week ago
Dr Rashid Buttar with Dr Judy Mikovits Discussion about Covid /Cofraud/ScamVid 19 Part 1 & Part 2SlenderMan12K views1 week ago
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sF4zcVXyA8E
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FTAhNeiyji8
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=imIiQF3T9hM

Viruses, Exosomes and 5G

He (the murdered Chinese researcher) was most likely on the brink of realizing, like Dr Andrew Kaufman (an independent science researcher), that the so-called covid-19 ‘virus’ was in fact our bodies’ own beneficially healthy EXOSOMES whose function is to mop up all TOXINS (from air pollution, food poisoning etc to stress created toxins).

American Dr Kaufman identified the electron microscope images in the original Wuhan lab scientific papers as EXOSOMES.

Moreover, on scrutinizing these papers thoroughly he discovered that their methodology was pseudo science – at no time did they actually find any virus, nor separate it and purify it, from the lung material as the first step to testing whether it might even be responsible for the 200 sick people connected to the disgustingly unhygienic Wuhan meat market.

I repeat, the Wuhan lab that ‘identified covid-19 virus’ in fact NEVER IDENTIFIED ANY VIRUS let alone isolate and purify said non-existent virus in order to then test on control group to see if this non-discovered virus was or was not responsible for the 200 sick people.

Why did Fauci in 2014 give US$3.7 Million to Wuhan lab? In 2019 he AGAIN gave US$3.7 Million to Wuhan lab ‘TO STUDY FOR CORONA VIRUS’.

In Oct 2019 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, WHO (Gates personal fiefdom as their largest non-govt donor), World Economic Forum, and John Hopkins financed a ‘SIMULATION FOR A CORONA VIRUS PANDEMIC’.

In 2010 (10 years ago) the ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION created a ‘BLUEPRINT FOR A CORONA VIRUS PANDEMIC ORIGINATING OUT OF CHINA’ ie the money power who control all the major foundations are working in this scam together with Chinese lab at least, if not with the Chinese govt. Now the money power media is promoting war with China??!!!

Why have hospitals and doctors been advised to fudge the figures ifo a ‘covid-19’ virus cause of death? financially rewarding them to do so.

Why are there no more deaths so far this year than any other year IF this year alone, there is a supposed PANDEMIC? This aone proves there isn’t!! By definition a Pandemic means far more deaths than normal each year.

Why are there no longer any deaths from all the normal causes of death every year (heart attack, stroke, cancer, kidney failure etc etc) NOT EVEN ANY DEATH FROM THE FLU! Yet the flu causes 80,000 deaths every year (US).

Why are so many city hospitals around the world closed and no injured or sick admitted? Yet same hospitals reported on their local news as ‘CHAOTIC’. Individuals with their cameras have filmed the empty hospitals from NY Brooklyn, Dublic Ireland, Germany to Australia. Injured and sick being refused entry. Old people therefore dying in their nursing homes without treatment. This is DE-Population eugenics whilst blaming it on a non-existent ‘virus’.

Even the New York funeral parlors have questioned why all the death certificates state only 1 cause – covid-19 for the first time ever. People have always died and always will – stand up whoever was here 120 years ago. They die from multiple variety of causes and always will. This is a scam!

Why are we being forced all around the world to wear a mask when viruses are so tiny that the pores of the mask are the equivalent of trying to block a mosquito from getting in through open double doors. They are unhygienic and need constant changing. They cause you to breath CO2 out then breath it back in – good for plants, not for humans to inhale.

Learn for yourself the misidentification by the Wuhan Lab who never identified any virus whatsoever:

DR ANDREW KAUFMAN REVEALS TO YOU THE COVID-19 IDENTIFICATION BY WUHAN LAB WAS IN FACT OUR OWN BODIES’ EXOSOMES: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=225&v=KGGd7-vvd9Y&feature=emb_logo

The second wave

They are already programing you to accept that there will be a second wave.  This wave will be worse than the first and will require even more drastic measures (lol). People will be begging for their governments to “save them”. The authors of this study appear to be extrapolating a lot of functional activity from a genomic study and chose an attention grabbing title. The claims made in the paper that if the virus is more transmissible the authors thought it may lead to more severe disease is surprising. As it often means the opposite- less virulent viruses commonly have more transmission from asymptomatic cases. Such as SARS2 vs the original SARS.   Usually a pathogen becomes more transmissible and less virulent.  Just think how many colds have you had during your lifetime?   Was each cold progressively worse? Have they found a cure for the common cold yet? It has been estimated that there are over 380 trillion viruses inhabiting us, a community collectively known as the human virome.