Follow up of DoE Origins Live Stream
I know things are moving rapidly and everyone is suffering from information overload but it is crucially important that we do not become dogmatic and keep asking the right questions. Asking the right question is as important as finding the right answer. In fact you cannot find the correct answer unless you ask the right questions. It is also OK to admit that you don’t know something. As Scott Fitzgerald said (paraphrase) the sign of a first rate intellect is the ability to hold two opposing ideas in your mind at the same time. That is all good and well but unless some sort of synthesis is finally achieved it might drive you insane (lolz).
We are dealing with highly specialized science where people have carved out a niche within a militarized bio-weapon milieu protected by layers of disinfomation and narrative control. No wonder people gravitate to easy answers as such answers offer reassurance and comfort. However, I would rather know the truth than have false comfort.
So, this is intended as a summary in which I employ material from the Raccoon Discord and add my own thoughts and a simplified overview. I operate on the KISS principle (Keep It Simple Stupid) otherwise you drown in the minutiae. So here goes.
On discord five groups of people were differentiated:
- Sars-Cov-2 does not exist. The tests have been engineered to pick up something
- Sars-Cov-2 exists and was spread but couldn’t cause or maintain pandemic
- Sars-Cov-2 is rebranded flu and the picking up of it on tests doesn’t mean anything and it’s just something we find (i.e. not causative but incidental.. Cf. Duesberg re HIV).
- Sars-Cov-2 exists, spreads, caused pandemic but is not that serious (99.7% recover).
- Sars-Cov-2 exists, spreads, is serious and basically air borne HIV
Essentially Jonathan Couey falls into a crossover between Group 2 and 3 and rests his theory on “Gain of Purity” and the use of clones to amplify the virus. The use of clones is not an earth shattering revelation because it is technique that is regularly employed and was even in the Ecohealth proposal. Recently Jonathan engaged with a group of doctors and scientists were he was forced to adjust his hypothesis and apologize for coming across as hostile. He later removed the video from his website (https://t.wtyl.live/w/m1feQMxwRRD3KnHJQ17V5U). This is not about who is right or wrong. These are complex issues and we have to adjust our hypothesis as more data becomes available.
Sars-CoV-2 is not a rebranded flu but is a long term incapacitating agent. It has a supposed “recovery” rate of 99.7% but accelerates senescence activating vascular thrombotic pathways and neuropathy. So although you may have had a largely asymptomatic infection it could be a dormant trigger waiting to be activated by other environmental factors (or by “vaccines”).
Furthermore, the picture is complicated by the constant administration of “vaccines” (sic) coding for the same Spike Protein and leading to similar pathologies which are difficult to distinguish from the original infection. How many people have died without proper autopsies? It is even likely that the vaccines amplify the effect of the original infection. So I would probably fall in group 5 (as many raccoons) with the added observation that the vaccines are causing viral shedding and they are a way of maintaining the pandemic “quasi-species” swarm and probably preventing it from attenuating into a harmless variant.
This from the Discord:
In JC's latest stream, he showed a video where David Martin read the following section of a paper from 2015 titled "SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence": [https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1762234304?t=28m49s, https://www.pnas.org/doi/epdf/10.1073/pnas.1517719113] Using the SARS-CoV infectious clone as a template (7), we designed and synthesized a full-length infectious clone of WIV1-CoV consisting of six plasmids that could be enzymatically cut, ligated together, and electroporated into cells to rescue replication competent progeny virions (Fig. S14). In addition to the full-length clone, we also produced WIV1-CoV chimeric virus that replaced the SARS spike with the WIV1 spike within the mouse-adapted backbone (WIV1-MA15, Fig. S1B). WIV1-MA15 incorporates the original binding and entry capabilities of WIV1-CoV, but maintains the backbone changes to mouse-adapted SARS-CoV. And then David Martin said: "Let's stop and get this really clear. The thing that killed Americans and continues to kill Americans was engineered from an infectious clone. It was not a naturally occurring phenomenon, it was in fact something that by their own admission was engineered, and not in China - it was engineered in the United States." [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMSz209wV8g?t=14m12s] However I don't know if David Martin is saying that regular RNA viruses can't sustain a pandemic or that COVID was caused by a release of infectious clones. But it's suspicious because David Martin was one of the four speakers that Jane Ruby booked to an event she held last year, and the other three speakers were Sasha Latypova, Karen Kingston, and Mike Yeadon, who have all said that COVID was not caused by a virus: (Henjin)
The question of Virus Isolation
The question of isolating the virus according to “Koch’s Principles” is not a new one and can be traced back to the AIDS/HIV controversy. Unfortunately isolating the virus has been conflated with understanding the virus as the cause of AIDS. As they like to repeat…correlation is not causation. Just because you find the presence of a HIV virus does not mean that it causes AIDS. Neither does the presence of amyloid protein mean that amyloid causes dementia. However, the presence of those markers is important. Both Mullis and Duesberg challenged the consensus and Dr. Luc Montagnier who won the Nobel prize for discovering HIV also adjusted his perception and focused on oxidative stress. There is no doubt in my mind that HIV/AIDS was the precursor to the Covid Pandemic and two suspect plane crashes confirm this.
Henjin comments: Duesberg said is that HIV exists and it has been isolated and sequenced, but that it’s a harmless passenger virus which is not pathogenic. That’s why I differentiate the neo-Duesbergians from the no-virusers. The neo-Duesbergians say that SARS 2 exists but it’s not that dangerous or it’s not capable of sustaining a pandemic, and that COVID was caused by a release of synthetic cDNA clones (JC), by nanoparticle bioweapons (Latypova and Kingston), by aerosolized bat vaccines (Kingston), or by some kind of a release of toxins (Latypova). For example in 1997 Duesberg sent a reply to Stefan Lanka and Eleni Papadopoulos-Eliopulos et al. where he wrote the following: [https://duesberg.com/papers/continu2.html]
I am honored by the profound and passionate reactions of Hodgkinson, Lanka, and Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al. to my letter on the existence or the non-existence of HIV (Hodgkinson, 1996; Lanka, 1996; Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., 1996) . However, I cannot surrender to the HIV-non-existentialists for the following two scientific reasons: > 1) The weakest point of the HIV-non-existentialists is their failure to explain the origin of "19 sequences encompassing the full-length, 10 kb-HIV-1 genome" (Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., 1996) and "19 full-length HIV genomes" (Hodgkinson, 1996) . Hence Papadopulos et als unanswered question: "Can one exclude the possibility that the 19 "full-length HIV genomes" described so far, even if they all had the same length of 9150 bp and identical sequences are nothing more than a chance finding among the many molecular species present in the cultures, or even the uncultured lymphocytesŠ?"(Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., 1996) , that were "...taken from AIDS patients and AIDS risk groups", as Hodgkinson points out (Hodgkinson, 1996) . - Yes, one can exclude that. Remember the odds of coming up with even one nucleotide sequence of 9150 bp by chance are astronomically low, namely 1 in 49150 which is very very close to 0 (see my letter in the July/August Continuum, (Duesberg, 1996) ). The chance of coming up 19-times with the same HIV-DNAs, even "from cultures treated with chemical or physical oxidants" (Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., 1996) are another 19 orders of magnitude lower than finding it once by chance. Indeed the odds are much much lower than finding 19 guys on this planet with the same phone numbers. Science offers but one rational origin for such sequences appearing "very occasionally" (Hodgkinson, 1996) in species, namely viruses or other infectious agents. Thus the virus hypothesis is not a "specious" (Hodgkinson, 1996) explanation for the origin of 9150 bp DNA that is "very occasionally" found in AIDS patients. 2) The HIV-non-existentialists also fail to realize that available isolation efforts have already adequately identified the 9150 bases as the genome of a virus. In order to "isolate" a given infectious agent, one needs no more than to isolate it from all other, possibly contaminating, infectious agents - this is in fact Koch's second postulate. Since viruses have an extracellular and intracellular existence, viruses can be isolated from two entirely different sources: > > (i) Viruses have been traditionally isolated from extracellular fluids. Such viruses may be contaminated by extracellular proteins, nucleic acids and possibly other microbes. Montagnier's original isolate of HIV from extracellular fluids is an example. Indeed, Montagnier's isolate appears to meet functional standards of isolation adequately, because two of the world's leading retrovirologists, Robert Gallo of the NIH and Robin Weiss of the Chester Beatty have re-isolated only HIV from Montagnier's virus stock (Weiss, 1991; Cohen, 1993) . If Montagnier's virus had been grossly contaminated by other viruses or microbes, those would have been found by Gallo and Weiss. (ii) Since the 1980s viruses can also be isolated as infectious nucleic acids from infected cells. Such infectious nucleic acids initiate replication of virus in uninfected cells from which new virus particles are subsequently released. In this case viral nucleic acid is contaminated by cellular nucleic acid, and possible other intracellular viruses. As I pointed out in my Missing Virus Reward claim in the July/August Continuum, infectious HIV DNA has been isolated from infected cells several times by molecular cloning (Duesberg, 1996) . This cloned, infectious HIV DNA of 9150 bases represents an almost theoretical isolation, as it is a 100,000 fold purification from all nucleic acids of the cell and its possible viruses. This is because the human cell contains 1 million kilobases of DNA and HIV only 10. Contrary to Papadopulos et al.'s slogan - "No isolation no cloning." - cloning is isolation, and is in fact the most rigorous isolation science has to offer for retroviruses. Thus the high standards of virus isolation from extracellular materials postulated by Papadopulos et al. and Hodgkinson may be relevant for crystallographers or chemists who want to analyze the structure of a virus, but are not relevant for functional isolation. In view of this I hope to liberate the minds of HIV dissidents from HIV for the cause that unites us all - the solution of AIDS. It seems tragic that over 99% of AIDS researchers study a virus that does not cause AIDS and that the few who don't are now engaged in a debate over the existence of a virus that doesn't cause AIDS. In a paper in 1988, Duesberg said that HIV can be isolated but that it's difficult to isolate: [http://duesberg.com/papers/ch3.html] Due to Extremely Low Titers, HIV Can Be Isolated Only with Great Difficulty from AIDS Patients. Koch further postulated that it must be possible to isolate and propagate the etiological agent from all cases of the disease. However, virus isolation, although possible in up to 80% of AIDS cases, is technically very difficult and is perhaps best described as maieutic  (23, 69, 70, 81-84). It depends on reactivation of dormant proviruses from one or a few latently infected lymphocytes among millions of uninfected lymphocytes from AIDS patients. This is only possible by culturing these cells for several weeks in vitro, away from the suppressive, virus-neutralizing immune system of the host (23, 48-50). Even then success sometimes comes only after 15 (!) trials (85). These difficulties and the often over 20% failure rate (84) in isolation of HIV from AIDS patients are consistent with the extremely low titers of HIV in such patients. Thus, HIV does not meet Koch's second postulate.
AIDS pandemic at the root of the problem
We postulate then that the AIDS pandemic lies at the root of the problem and was the precursor event and the outcome of the Special Virus Cancer Program (SVCP). In other words they were messing with viruses under the guise of finding a “cure for cancer” all the while developing techniques that were dual purpose. They could be used for good or bad. Guess which they chose (sic).
Emerging viruses : AIDS and Ebola : nature, accident, or intentional?
This brings us back to the live-stream and the fact that Charles Rixey has highlighted that when they tried to make a vaccine for HIV they removed the FCS. Why then did they include it in the “vaccine” And why does the Spike Protein contain the GP120HIV-1 epitope?
Why did they keep the FCS in the Covid Vaccine? (7 min)
Partial transcript: In every study that I have found from 2006 to 2019 from the WIV or the NIH or whoever they have always taken out that Furin Cleavage site. ALWAYS. So why? What they are trying to say now is that it is natural which is bullshit. It is obviously from HIV. They don't keep it in the HIV vaccine, so why would...why would.. (they leave it in the vaccine spike) J.C. We need...we need... and independent molecular biologist to confirm this (good luck finding one)we need somebody who is not naive but say, could be asked to do this alignment without being told why it is being done...Oh, that is interesting ...I am not being a shithead..just saying that if this is true and I can over the weekend...over this week teach myself how to verify this somehow using BLAST. That would be a stark revelation that up until now no one knows...if this unique insert We are getting to the heart of it. I said from the beginning that they are making us focus on these four amino acids, because those four amino acids are what they want us to attention to ..when in reality what you have identified is a larger fragment that other people have identified different parts of as well and a lot of different searches have cued off as an alarm bell and if you have made this connection where the various designs of these HIV vaccines have omitted a sequence of HIV which contains a FCS...
Plasmids and cloning (it gets worse)
There is also the question of Plasmid which we looked at previously:
In my view the presence of plasmid demonstrates that they used E. Coli to clone the Spike Protein. Is it contamination or is something else going on? There is also a SV40 promoter present. Many of these viruses originated in chimpanzees including HIV and RSV and SV40 among other viruses. So something untoward is going on.
— Elijah (@CherithElijah) March 13, 2023
To complete this article on Bio-warfare we need to mention Mycoplasmas (a form of bacteria) which according to Dr. Garth Nicolson have also been used.
— Elijah (@CherithElijah) March 13, 2023
Dr. Garth L. Nicolson : Weaponized Mycoplasmas (Non-lethal Biological Warfare) -58 min
Last but not Least
Last but not least, they have been doing this for decades. Aids started when the SVCP (Special Virus Cancer Program) ended at the start of the 80s. The Israel Cancer Research Fund was already using recombinant DNA in 1979  The AIDS pandemic was followed quickly by BSE (mad Cow) a prion disease. The earliest suspicions of BSE in the UK were on a farm in Sussex in December 1984. The farm was 66 km distance away from the renowned bio-lab at Portondown. Before that they were looking at scrapie in sheep (also a prion disease) also at the relationship between bovine viruses and and human immunodeficiency virus. So this has been ongoing for decades.
 COVID-19 News: Study Shows That SARS-CoV-2 Infections Can Cause Acute Phrenic Neuropathy and Diaphragmatic Dysfunction! – Thailand Medical News
 The meaning of MAIEUTIC is relating to or resembling the Socratic method of eliciting new ideas from another. Maieutics ( Template:Pron-en) is a procedure of pedagogy. It is based on the idea that the truth is latent in the mind of every human being due to his innate reason but has to be “given birth” by answering questions (or problems) intelligently proposed. The word is derived from the Greek “μαιευτικός”, pertaining to midwifery .
 For the ICRF Annual Report, 1979: II. Retroviruses as Mutagens: Isolation of Revertants with Deletions and/or Insertions in the ASV Provirus in B31 Cells after Superinfection with MuLV, 1979 For the ICRF Annual Report, 1979: III. Co-Transfection with Papovavirus and Retrovirus DNA Using Recombinant DNA Prepared In vitro, 1979 Language: English