Scientific Collusion and Corruption

Scientific Collusion and Corruption

The following two videos are edited down from  14 hours of live-streaming.  The frustration of Dr Kevin McCairn is clearly apparent and the video comes with a language warning. These same  group of people continue their “natural origins” campaign unabated.  Their articles appear in Nature (as pre-prints) even although they are not peer reviewed.  They reference each other and self-reference.  Journals like Nature and the Lancet are captured.  People like Anderson (who initially suggested to Fauci that the virus look lab engineered)  got bought off with a grant.

Scientific Collusion and Corruption (part 1) 43 min

A two minute reminder (2 mins)

Daszak admits (see below) that some Chinese living near the bat caves have already developed natural immunity.  He also admits (talking about his work since the first pandemic in 2003) that coronavirus’ are easy to work with as you can use their “backbone” and insert sections etc.  He is talking about Gain Of Function. Not very smart is he?  And yet he wants us to believe that it is “natural”.

 

Like Kevin says…if the “bats” are such a problem send a drone with flame thrower into the bat caves and kill them all.   Of course…we all know that the bats are not the real problem it is the scientists who are playing with them and are receiving military funding.  This is dual use technology which is why they can get away with it. I wonder why Peter Darszak wants to blame Raccoon dogs?   Perhaps one of Kevin’s raccoons has bitten him?

 

 

 

These “scientists” have no shame.  They already have blood on their hands and they want to blame your intrusion into nature as the cause of the pandemic.   As long as they can continue to blame natural origin they can continue their lucrative funding and their dystopian plans to lock you up in a SMART city where they can continue surveilling you (for health reasons of course).

Scientific Collusion and Corruption (part 2) 34 min

Four jabs and pills

Four jabs and pills

Apparently we now need four jabs and daily pills. We have truly entered clown world.  I made this to tweet out:

Mission Impossible 2

If you want to relax from all the madness watch Mi2.  The plot is based on some bad guys who make a chimera flu virus in the lab and release it on purpose so that they can sell the vaccine.  Before you watch the movie enjoy the clip I made (lolz):

Shut it down

The Biden administration has concluded its investigation…so that is it.  It was natural (lolz) China told Biden to shut it down. He was only too happy. He did not want video of his meth-head son Hunter having sex with children being made public and the corrupt American institutions, military etc., who were involved with GOF are only too happy to tow the line. The only one who will pay for this crime is you. With your job, your freedom and your life.  Just like 911 and the GFC.  They just took a dump on you from a great height and you better smile and like it.  Now go get your jab(s) and take your pill(s).

 

Before Covid (BC) and after Covid (AC)

These people are evil and they are nuts. Refuse…refuse…refuse….and watch it burn down. Start making alternatives…peoples banks, farmers co-oops, communities need to pull together. Plant and build and repurpose. Let them go to Hell and above all pray to the Lord. The only BC and AC   that we know is Before Christ and After Christ.

 

The Anno Domini is coming soon.

Gigaohm Biological (4 Sept)

Gigaohm Biological (4 Sept)

Highly Recommended — spread everywhere

Interviewing Jesse “Transhuman-phobic” Matchey from twitter (former Black-hawk Pilot) someone I follow because he is a great dot connector. I played this at 2.5x speed. At 38 minutes they are joined by Dr. Kevin McCairn. Good stuff big picture Geo-politics etc.

Update:  I was listening to this while putting together another page. Charles Rixey joins in just after the second hour.  He has done brilliant statistical work and gathered the raw data on a spreadsheet. What is happening is shocking.

If the sound does not work refresh the page, or go directly to the twitch page: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1139235804

 

The Dirty Dozen

The Dirty Dozen

Rixey has called them the ‘Disingeneus Dozen’ in his latest article but I call them out for what they are…Dirty.  I have reproduced his article below. Please support his work by becoming a Patreon at $100 a year.

Perspective is important

As this article was being finished, yet another article appeared in the world’s foremost academic journal Nature that perfectly illustrates the phenomenon that I highlighted last week, when I analyzed the COVID-19 origin articles that were published by the world’s top-6 most prestigious academic journals. The results of that analysis showed a 35:1 ratio for natural-origin to lab-origin publications, despite the fact that, at best, the evidentiary basis of both possibilities is equivalent [a very generous assertion, as virtually all evidence found thus far argues against a natural origin [per recent Congressional testimony].

Yesterday’s [8/25] Nature article Origins of SARS-CoV-2: window is closing for key scientific studies is the 3rd peer-reviewed article by scientists pictured above in the last two weeks, a phenomenon that seems [luckily?] to coincide with the growing focus on the Congressional origin investigations – and [miraculously] appeared on the same day as the Biden report was delivered to Congress. Only Peter Daszak could have rationalized making an obviously political move even more blatantly political, as if it were a good maneuver. It would’ve been much easier for Daszak to simply call up Peter Ben Embarek, the leader of the World Health Organization’s COVID origin investigation, and tried to talk him out of releasing a documentary last week in which Embarek describes China’s creation and nurturing of a false narrative for the WHO. I’m not sure why anyone would think gathering the rest of that team in hopes of debunking its leader is an effective response.

This week, I want to focus on the scientists who’ve been writing these articles and appearing on television, arguing against the possibility that COVID-19 came out of a lab, rather than jumping from animal to human somewhere in the wild. In particular, I want to highlight the fact that these same scientists are the ones that are on the record as having lied to us about their ‘expert’ opinions regarding COVID’s origins:

 

Recently, Dr. Mercola’s Fauci Exposed: Historical Research of COVID highlighted my Fauci research, and it’s only fitting to use his experience to highlight the stunning hypocrisy that we’re still seeing from some scientists. Since March, several mainstream media outlets have been attacking Mercola [more than usual] in response to his being listed as the number 1 spreader of ‘“disinformation” about vaccines and masks in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. These attacks have been fairly successful – despite the fact that Facebook itself rejected the researcher’s conclusions as having been exaggerated; Facebook’s data was the primary driver of the arguments used in that study, but that fact hasn’t prevented Dr. Mercola from being blacklisted and effectively censored for his views.

Perhaps I’ve misunderstood what the purpose of science actually is, but growing up I was always taught that it was the rational pursuit of an understanding of how things work in the real world, built upon a foundation of conclusions drawn from evidence. Scientific truths are not meant to be flexible or political. Some have argued that the circumstances of this pandemic require scientists to speak with one voice, because otherwise the public at large will be confused and thus not know what advice to trust.

COVID-19 has shown us that the opposite is true: the public is perceptive enough to see that the scientists speaking with the most certainty are the ones who’ve been shown to have the largest conflicts of interest, and their crusade against fellow scientists who disagree continues to do more damage to ‘Science’ than any public discourse on the merits ever could.

I’d argue that the full picture is actually even worse, because we can at least look at Dr. Mercola and see someone whose advocacy for natural remedies appears genuine; in contrast, we already have proof in writing that Dr. Fauci and most natural-origin supporters were literally lying as they wrote & published peer-reviewed articles in the world’s most prestigious journals. During that same period, they were privately voicing their very real concerns that SARS-CoV-2 might not be natural. In other words, Dr. Fauci and many of the world’s leading virologists have supported the censorship of scientists who legitimately disagreed with them, while privately harboring many of the same concerns. Dr. Mercola, at least, actually believes what he’s defending; how can Dr. Fauci claim that “questioning me is questioning science” when we have proof that his ‘science’ consists of narratives that he wants us to believe?

 

When common sense was an uncommon virtue

Of course, my argument depends upon a situation in which common sense is meaningfully applied, and our current circumstances don’t meet that standard. After all, we’ve seen renewed vigor from natural-origin proponents in the last few weeks, despite zero new evidence to support their position. It appears to be a repeat performance in the vein of the 2 months following a 2/4/20 email exchange that explicitly documented their efforts at collusion, meant to steer the narrative towards more favorable ground.

Among the most recent disclosures, FOIA emails show that a scientist in Beijing contracted COVID-19 while working on it in a lab, that the existence of the Furin Cleavage Site [FCS] was “very chilling” and that Zheng-Li Shi & Ralph Baric, the scientists at the center of the lab controversy, were were involved in the editing of an article that rejected the lab hypothesis.

In The Origins of SARS-CoV-2: A Critical Review – Andersen, Holmes et al barely referenced Jeremy Bloom’s analysis of deleted sequences from Wuhan, and only then so that they could categorically deny that it affected any of their conclusions. That’s an incredibly bold assertion for them to make, when the sequences point away from their preferred wet-market narrative. Ian Lipkin, another signatory of the Lancet letter organized by Daszak, also ignored most of the last year’s worth of questions in his recent article The known knowns, known unknowns, and unknown unknowns of COVID-19.

The duplicity of Anthony Fauci, Jeremy Farrar, Kristian Andersen, Ralph Baric, Stanley Perlman, Ed Holmes and Ian Lipkin emerged within Buzzfeed’s FOIA emails of Fauci’s, while Linda Saif, Susan Weiss, Shan Lu, Shan-Lu-Liu, Lishan Su & Ralph Baric [below] discussed their misgivings across several FOIA caches obtained by US Right-to-Know:

   

As a reminder, here are the scientists who wrote these emails [Saif & Liu are faculty at Ohio State, Su & Baric are from UNC-Chapel Hill, Susan Weiss is from the University of Pennsylvania [Penn] and Shan Lu is an editor for Emerging Microbes and Infections and recently transferred from U-Mass to the University of Maryland]:

   

Special highlights for Susan Weiss:

   

Yes, chilling.

Here are snippets from Shan-Lu-Liu:

   

The same authors’ article was ultimately read 75,000 times – an article they made up solely to trash the hypothesis they found credible. It ended the year on Taylor & James’ Top 10 Open-Access Articles for 2020 [at #5].

Susan Weiss’ timely re-entry into the fray last week was quite similar in substance and tone to what they’d produced 18 months ago, but at least she was willing to address some of the substantive concerns raised in the interim in Can Science Help Resolve the Controversy on the Origins of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic?. Unfortunately, the quality of the peer-review is very reminiscent of that old article, too [but at least in that case there literally was no peer review].

I’ve included a couple of the many errors:

   

First, she and her co-authors repeat the same argument from the ‘landmark’ The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2 – that the SARS-CoV-2 virus can’t have been manipulated in a lab because it’s genome doesn’t resemble anything previously published. Weiss further states:

Prior to COVID-19, there would’ve been no need for secrecy in this type of fundamental science work.”

What? No need for secrecy? I hope the virology community is sitting down, because apparently they’re going to be shocked to learn that scientists don’t always publish all of their work – especially if that work might look suspiciously like bioweapons/defense research. Imagine being Hirohito in 1945, post-Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and shrugging off suggestions that the atomic bombs were actually just regular ones; after all, why would anyone build a bomb with material other than conventional explosives?

As idiotic as that analogy might seem, imagine being a world-renowned virologist, and publishing a paper that [as 1 of its 3 primary arguments] rejects the COVID-19 lab-origin hypothesis on the basis of the viral genome not utilizing a known viral backbone in its construction. 5.5 million people read that article in Nature Medicine, and nobody questioned that assertion?

If I were engaged in research that potentially violated the Biological Weapons Convention [BWC], I’d probably refrain from using anything that would point directly at my lab in a future investigation. It really isn’t that complicated.

“…since the virus is not stable in air for long and even less stable on surfaces.”

This fragment isn’t even grammatically correct, but who am I to judge? Weiss should look further into the literature, because SARS-CoV-2 is stable enough to be at least the 2nd-most efficient aerosol-transmitting virus known to man.

-What is science if it’s not honest?-

In a sane and just world, all of the COVID-origin articles published by authors for whom we have proof that they were lying about their conclusions should be retracted immediately.

Alternatively, journals like Nature, Science, The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine should clarify who is allowed to use their platforms to deceive us and which circumstances justify the use of fabricated narratives.

   
*‘Flag’ refers to the flagship/primary journal by the publisher

At first glance, it might seem that my last statement was meant to be sarcastic, but I assure you it isn’t sarcasm. As I wrote last week:

Just 3 weeks ago, Dr. Peter Hotez’s Mounting Anti-Science Aggression in the United States openly called for hate crime legislation from Congress to combat those who question scientists. He even ended with a comparison to 1930’s Nazi Germany, which seems odd for someone whose favored political party is in control and actively suppressing free speech.

Science is literally the development and enhancement of a system of knowledge through evidence, observation and investigation. Dr. Hotez’s proposition to protect science is actually anti-science itself; in a world filled with common sense, he would be one of the first people arrested for the hate crime of questioning science, so I’d respectfully ask him to withdraw his idea to prevent his own prosecution.


Since time may be running out on our ability to question scientists, I urge everyone to share this article with your own motley crew of dissidents, by clicking the button below. Or, as I’m sure pediatrician Dr. Hotez would argue,

Do it for the children.

~Rixey

Solutions

Solutions

I thought this was an enjoyable conversation. Pretty optimistic with a lot of truths.

Dan Schultz who runs a sustainable living project in the remote Siskiyou Mountains talks about focusing on our relationship with the land through permaculture/agroforestry, animal husbandry, and wildcrafting during these dramatic socio-economic changes. • Reactive vs. Proactive • Supplementing fresh produce with storable emergency foods • Just start and obtain any type of yield in your garden • Bridging form the unsustainable to the Sustainable • Solar EMP • Root Cellars • Faraday Root cellar • Canning, Smoking Drying foods for preservation • Greenhouse food diversity

 

 

Moving From Money to Food & Tribe (Dan Schultz FULL)

The Epsteinisation of science

The Epsteinisation of science

These videos are edited (somewhat cleaned up) versions of another 4 hour live stream. The Live stream itself is called:

The Lancet Pushes Paedo Linked Amy Maxman To Deflect Lab Origin & General Bakshi Brings The Heat!

The full version can be found at Kevin McCairns Dojo:

https://www.mccairndojo.com/

Trigger Warning – if you watch the Live Stream get ready to be offended (lol).

The Lancet letter

Among other things Kevin analyzes the Lancet letter which has connections with Amy Maxman (her brother Isaac+Nathan Wolfe+Gislane Maxwell+Epstein+Peter Darzak+Hunter Biden etc, etc) and therefore with her article in Nature.  They are still arguing for the natural emergence of covid despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.  The Lancet and Nature are prestigious scientific journals and carry academic weight.  This demonstrates how utterly corrupt and captured they are which reflects the state of science; it has been epsteinised and corporatized.Not only that, but as Kevin points out in this (and previous videos) the Jews have a polymorphism that makes them less susceptible to Covid. Another Coincidence? See previous article under race based weaponry:

Bio-war race targeting (McCairn1)

This is not “Jew bashing” Kevin points out that even people like Bret Weinstein (who is a Jew and an evolutionary biologist) has been censored and removed (from YT I believe). It is not just Jews who are involved but they seem to be the framework which hold it all together.  The swamp runs deep and wide.  The point is that the time has come for everyone to speak out. Science has run amok and we face an existential threat if we continue like this.

Video: The Epsteinisation of Science (53 minutes)

Resource: verinicline blocks sars cove 2 infections in cells

We are all Chickens Now

The corporate solution is to turn us all into chickens. Neurologist Dr.Kevin McCairn discusses the COVID-19 vaccines dampen genomic diversity of SARS-CoV-2: Unvaccinated patients exhibit more antigenic mutational variance and concludes that Geert vanden Bossche may well be correct.

We are all chickens now (13 mins)

I wrote about this months ago.

I am so ahead of the curve that I frighten myself sometimes (lol):

Ode to a Chicken

 

Bakshi and Bullpoop

The last section of video is more or less unedited (1 hr 27 mins) and ends with an analysis of Dr Jane Ruby from the “new right” (Qtard) with links to the degenerate Roger Stone, Mike Cernovich (the rapist) and Trump et al.  She is pushing the narrative (nonsense) that the Pfizer vials are 90 odd% graphene oxide.  This is utter nonsense like Kaufman (Jewish) and his viruses do not exist (exosome blah).  These are IIA (Interactive Internet Activities) that are meant to discredit and confuse and paralyze the information flow.  I have examined every theory myself and have independently arrived at similar conclusions as Dr Kevin M’cCairn.

The Indians are having none of this pussyfooting and woke-ism. They are very angry. Here follows the interview (which includes General Bakshi).  The sound memes that you hear are from General Bakshi:

None of this virus Jiggery Jaggery

…..fight like men

What are you going to do about it?  Sweet Fanny Adams, is it?

Video: Bakshi and Bullpoop (1 hr 27 mins)

Here is the original debate:

China Plays The Victim Card, Deflects From COVID-19 Truth | The Debate With Arnab Goswami

Conclusion

We need to badly clean house.  Not just the political institutions but also all the scientific institutions have been corrupted and captured.  It is not just China many countries are experimenting with bio weapons.  China may well have been set up. All governments have behavioral nudge units to  change and direct societies. The cabal owns the media and have propagandized and conditioned the public.  They have deceived everyone.  The internet is full of misinformation and much of it is deliberate because they put it there. It is meant to confuse and demoralize you.  Examine everything critically. We still do not have all the answers. Kevin’s advice is sound….we should wait (and gather more data)……and we should root out all these criminals.