Media Lies About Origin of Covid (45 min)

It might seem that we are beating a dead horse but we cannot let them get away with the lie. The lie is the cause of everything and the people that perpetuate the lie are receiving millions in tax payer grants to “protect you”.    They are experimenting with pathogens to keep you safe (lolz).  Ultimately their ideology wants to lock you away from nature permanently and feed you artificial food.  So it is crucial to expose them for what they are.  They are liars and murderers.    Chris is one of the good guys and has been spot on right from the beginning.

Charles Rixey has done extensive work on the origins of Covid and has all the documents archived.

Is it important that we find out whether SAR-CoV-2 originated from a natural source or due to human activity in a lab? Of course it is! The solutions you need to apply to each source are entirely different. Getting this right is important for all sorts of reasons. Not least of those reasons is that millions of lives were lost and billions of lives were upended as a consequence. You’d think the media would be all over this story and exceptionally interested in getting to the bottom of it all. But, you’d be wrong. Instead, the media not only ignored the lab leak angle for over a year, they demonized anybody who dared to explore that option. As a result, they gave far more credence to the natural origin story and failed to correct their many mistakes.  Now the NYTimes is clearly, obviously committed to promoting the "natural origin" angle above any other possibilities.  You might want to ask yourself why that is...? To me, the data is thick and rich and increasingly and overwhelmingly points to SARS-CoV-2 having arisen as a result of human efforts in a lab. So, what does the New York Times do in the face of all that evidence? They pounce on a couple of pre-print papers written largely by the same scientist already caught up in the Fauci-email cover-up scandal, and then completely fail to point out that massive conflict of interest to its readers.  How was that left out?  Again, you might ask yourself how that 'oversight' might have occurred...? This was terrible journalism, worse science reporting, and the pre-prints themselves prove absolutely nothing at all. They fail to advance science in any way. All in all, a big fat “F” for all involved. Links to References in This Video: NY Times Article https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2... NY Post 80,00 animals tested, no SARS2 https://nypost.com/2021/05/22/the-wuh... Washington Post Rasmussen/Goldstein natural origins editorial https://www.washingtonpost.com/outloo... Alina Chan Map: https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/14... NYTimes Editors email addresses: dean.baquet@nytimes.com joe.kahn@nytimes.com letters@nytimes.com