Hermetic Hancock

Hermetic Hancock

Note:  I just checked and all my comments have been purged. Even my replies to  other people.  I cleared my cache and re-posted, and they were purged again. If I had not saved them they would be gone.  Hancock is often hosted by Joe Rogan.  Can you see it yet?  Do you see it yet?

He might as well bow down and worship Thoth.   Transhumanist spreading lies about the Bible so they can usher in their New Age.  See the comment that I posted below this video.

Graham Hancock Reveals The TERRIFYING Truth About Jesus & Bible (20 min)

Graham Hancock is a Hermetic/Gnostic and this is an attack on the Old Testament and indirectly on the New Testament. I have parsed the OT language using PCA (Principle Component Analysis) and LDA (Linear Discriminant Analysis) and the text is ancient and reliable. Furthermore, there is a layer of gematria that is unfalsifiable and that confirms the reliability of the text. Further the idea of a relationship between early Christianity and the cultus of Mithras is based on a remark in the 2nd century Christian writer Justin Martyr, who accused the initiates of Mithras of imitating the Christian communion rite. (https://www.tertullian.org/rpearse/mithras/display.php?page=mithras_and_christianity). The OT and NT has been attacked for thousands of years and stood its ground and the test of time, Graham Hancock has "discovered" nothing new he is merely leveraging syncretism and the public lack of knowledge. Why does he do this? He does this because he is a Gnostic (those who claim secret knowledge) who were thrown out of the church two millinnea ago and who trace their origins back to the Hermetic founder known as Hermes Trismegistus a Greek bastardization of the Egyptian god Thoth. This is the "religion" of transhumanism, a cult that uses science to transcend what it means to be human and become "gods" (Elohim). For this reason they elevate the serpent in Eden as the "light-bringer" (illumination) and YHWH as the demiurge. Understand this, it is YWHW that abolished human sacrifice which was still practiced up to as recently as 500 years ago. Human sacrifice was prominnet in all cultures until Abraham was taught that God would provide and there was no need for humans to sacrifice children. So Graham Hancock is untruthful and deceptive, twisting texts and deliberately taking them out of context. Transhumanists abolish all boundaries hence the transgender movement which abolishes the male/female difference in its quest for "unity" followed by the abolishing of borders (nation state) and the abolishing of sovereignty (according to them you have no free will) all in the quest to become the monad. The final frontier is digital, human convergence. In order to do this they must discredit and destroy Christianity and introduce a New Age religion. They will be transformed into Elohim through mRNA injections and brain computer interface which is why they are experimenting on you (hermetic alchemy or transformation). This is a dangerous, rebellious cult perpetrating the same sin as in the Genesis myth. Last but not least is their secret knowledge is that this natural cycle is ending as we progress through the Great Precession Year of 25,920 solar years. We are due a reset (the ouroboros) which they have obfuscated with the man-made climate change lie. We are undergoing a magnetic excursion and an extinction/rebirth event and afterwards they want to emerge as the gods of the new age and build back better. God knows the beginning from the end and is initiating another reset in order to prevent them from turning the earth into an abomination. As for Hancock and his ilk.If any man love not the Lord Jesus Christ, let him be Anathema Maranatha. (1 Corinthians 16:22) My commentaries: http://www.biblaridion.info my blog: https://www.biblaridion.info/blog/

Are you listening to a pied piper?

Are you listening to a pied piper?

This video is a rebuttal of the after analysis of the debate with Christopher Bjerkness moderated by Dr Kevin McCairn.   I was rather disappointed at the assessment with phrases like “Christopher won the debate” and “Paul was trounced” and the charge that I was not polite.  I believe that whereas Christopher resented  John Brisson sarcastic tone he actually thanked me and said he would look into some of the things I suggested because they were interesting.

Do I sometimes go on?   Yes, because that is necessary when people make sweeping claims about things they do not understand.  Kevin complained about the back and forth over the academic  minutiae because it is about pointing out who is the enemy and who is the useful idiots. Well you can’t do that unless you understand the the academic  minutiae otherwise you are at a disadvantage when false claims are made. If the foundation is built on sand the house collapses.

Christopher presents a deluge of information that he strings together but they come from different sources and different contexts on which he places equal weight.  How can you place the same weight on the Old Testament as on the Zohar that appeared in 13th century Spain?  He makes sweeping claims (without evidence) that the Greek Bible (LXX) is not a translation but that it is the original Old Testament (which they presumably translated back into Hebrew scrolls some even written in paleo-Hebrew and scattered around everywhere.)   He even points to the Massoretic Text (MT)  being written about 1000 AD as a “gotcha” moment (lolz).

This demonstrates to me that he has no understanding of textual transmission and his Biblical knowledge (inter-textual hermeneutics) is poor.  I think I remained very polite and I had to bite my tongue and show restraint on numerous occasions.   The problem is that there is some truth to what he is saying and it needs to be honestly examined but we cannot throw the baby out with the bath water.

I do not have to answer for other Christians nor do I carry the same burdens.  Just because Tertullian and Origen misunderstood the typology of the scapegoat does not mean that I do.  Just because some Christians may believe in Ransom theory and a bet with the devil does not mean that I carry that burden and it does not mean that Scripture even teaches it.  As to burning in hell Christians would do well to remember that Jesus went to hell and came back on the third day.  Moreover, who are we to judge another man’s servant?  The Lord makes one vessel to honor and another to dishonor.   The clay cannot cry out to the potter..why have you made me thus?   Understand the meaning of the Lord’s name:

"And he said, I will make all my goodness pass before thee, and I will proclaim the name of the LORD before thee; and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will shew mercy on whom I will shew mercy" (Exodus 33:19).

Some men’s hearts will be hardened, other will fall by the wayside and yet others will bring forth tares. Some will die in ignorance and some will be as if they had never existed.  Your lot is not to judge but to do what is right towards your neighbor and love the Lord they God with all they heart, soul and mind. Amen.

Are you listening to a pied piper? (1:10)


Psalm 82 in the Fourth Gospel

Soteriology and Atonement Theory

The Language of Atonement

See the original debate for more links:

Are You Being Punked?