Despite his warning the method was reformulated into a diagnostic test by Drosten. The same Drosten who was responsible for the swine flu scare and vaccine injuries. The same Drosten who is being sued by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich for crimes against humanity.
A recent (separate) court case in Portugal was victorious and declared the lockdowns illegal because the emergency laws were based on false positives because the PCR test was being abused. If the test is faulty everything that flows from it is fruit from the poisonous tree. All those who supported it are personally liable for damages and crimes against humanity.
Trump has supposedly got Corona Virus 33 days before the election (lol). Not suspicious at all…..keep believing the plan (lol) …….Trump will save you. In the words of Trump the treatment he was given is like a miracle come down from God. The emergence of the beast from the abyss is also like a miracle.
"And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live". (Revelation 13:14)
Is Trump’s Corona Virus Testing a Staged Event?
A good video from Israeli News Live who are now also on Brand New Tube to avoid censorship. This is pretty good.
During the video he mentions Prof Drosden who developed the specific and fraudulent PCR test for Covid. Prof Drosden is currently being sued in Germany after the accumulation of overwhelming scientific evidence. We have below and interview with Kerry Mullis invented the PCR test…actually I should not call it a “test”….he invented the PCR methodology for detecting very small pieces of virus by amplifying them. It is like you have a speck of dust and amplify it until you have a mountain. It is much easier to examine a mountain but that does not mean you are walking around with a mountain up your nose. Coincidentally (sic) Kerry Mullis died at age 72 last year in August. He would have been adamantly against the misuse of his PCR methodology.
They are back from their summer break. I am a bit late posting this because I tried the “live stream” and did not realize it was already up. I recommend watching the full show it is excellent. I have placed timestamps underneath.
Timestamp=https://youtu.be/TVuFReu9MPI?t=92 Consultation Document: changes to Human Medicine Regulations to support the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines =========================== Timestamp=https://youtu.be/TVuFReu9MPI?t=554 Health Passports ============================ Timestamp=https://youtu.be/TVuFReu9MPI?t=806 Case-demic PCR test and viral load. Even the NYT is now exposing the falacy. ==================================== Timestamp=https://youtu.be/TVuFReu9MPI?t=1216 Hardly any new cases perhaps 1 per 100,000 Hospitals empty. Where is the pandemic? Timestamp=https://youtu.be/TVuFReu9MPI?t=1420 =========================================== CDC:Administrative fraud: Covid deaths Timestamp=https://youtu.be/TVuFReu9MPI?t=1629 ================================================== Lockdowns and Mask Mandates Do not Lead to Reduced Covid Transmission Rates or Deaths, New Study Suggests Timestamp=https://youtu.be/TVuFReu9MPI?t=1748 ============================================ Scotland Care home Covid cases https://youtu.be/TVuFReu9MPI?t=1854 Covid travels up drain pipes (lol) ============================================ https://youtu.be/TVuFReu9MPI?t=1995 Dirty banknotes ============================== https://youtu.be/TVuFReu9MPI?t=2166 Northern Exposure ============================= https://youtu.be/TVuFReu9MPI?t=2216 Piers Corbyn arrested ================================ https://youtu.be/TVuFReu9MPI?t=2420 BLM Protest only 300 ================================== https://youtu.be/TVuFReu9MPI?t=2554 Berlin protest numbers ================================ https://youtu.be/TVuFReu9MPI?t=2742 RFK junior speaks in Berlin ================================== https://youtu.be/TVuFReu9MPI?t=2874 Australia – Melbourne – Ground Zero ====================================== https://youtu.be/TVuFReu9MPI?t=3091 USA ANTIFA fatal shooting ======================================= https://youtu.be/TVuFReu9MPI?t=3301 Krankie Nicola Sturgeon ================================
Piers Corbyn on Good Morning Britain
The media are losing the plot. They must be getting desperate because they are losing the plot. This is my analysis of the interview on Good Morning Britain.
Show this video to anyone who thinks this is all a conspiracy and that it will all soon go away and go back to normal. People are in denial and need to wake up quick smart.
This next video is rather good (although long). It establishes that we are in a simulated exercise. Pompeo actually admits it with a slip of the tongue (fat idiot). This is a bigger psychological exercise than 9/11.
The “pandemic” is being used to standardize global health care which actually means that they will standardize populations….in other words reduce populations. I was already well aware of Agenda21 but did not know that so many countries had already signed up to the scheme in 2005. Ordinary people have been badly betrayed by their governments. This lady uses the WHO’s own documents and makes her case very effectively ( i have backed the video up just in case). We are facing a global health tyranny.
This is her description of the video:
Major documentary confirmation of something many of us have come to know for certain in recent times: the entire COVID-19 world-shutdown is part of a live training and simulation exercise run by the unscrupulous WHO and United Nations, as documented in their Global Preparedness Monitoring Board’s annual 2019 report and their International Health Regulations treaty of 2005—which 194/or 196 countries signed off on—which pretty much establishes a Global Government (of the WHO & United Nations, & the high-level international GMPB) along with their sponsors, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, & other unnamed donors.
Please share this video widely. People in office have failed their oaths to protect the people, and We the People need to wake up and do something definitive about it. Every government has been complicit in the destruction of their own country’s economy, the vast suffering of their people brought on by these massive shutdowns and house-arrest assaults-on-the-psyche as people lost jobs, livelihood, purpose in life, social life, and were held back from any normalcy in going outdoors, even to sanctuaries in Nature but forced to wear masks in public instead and submit to police tyranny. Meanwhile, small and large businesses have crashed, families have been prevented from seeing their elderly relatives in hospice, many have died alone. Hospitals are cooking up numbers for COVID deaths, MSM plays out strings of new cases and new deaths.
Military guinea pigs
So many gulf war vets have ongoing vaccine damage and now they are once again using soldiers to experiment with the dangerous mRNA vaccines. They probably don’t tell the grunts that they could become sterile or get cancer in 5 years. They certainly don’t tell them that it changes their DNA which will be inherited by their offspring (if they can have any).
“If you cut off at 20 [cycles] everybody would be negative… at 50, you might have everybody positive… They could quietly send around a memo … ‘If we put it at 32 [not 37] the number of positive[s] drops dramatically… [Y]ou can control the sensitivity.'”https://t.co/LTAJr5UunQ
There is nothing great about it. It is a control tool and not effective. It is an outward symbol of compliance to make you think you are a walking dirt bag. And you know what? You are (lol). As I recently tweeted….I have 350 trillion viruses in me and 40 trillion bacteria I have no room for Covid-19. They want to frightened and suspicious of everyone else. That is why they said your could wear a cloth mask which does absolutely nothing except cover your face. Even N95 Masks are ineffective.
JewTube are censoring correct information getting out there. They are solidly behind the scam which is why they remove factual reports even from doctors and epidemiologists. It is a good thing that I backed the video up. I have uploaded it to my BitChute channel….here it is:
A direct link to the video on my BitChute channel can be found here:
Whether by neglect or design the elderly have been killed as the nursing homes figures indicate. According to the HighWire report as many as 60,000 of the deaths in the US were from nursing homes. Apparently the majority of the deaths happened in five democratic states which points to policy failure. A similar situation happened in the UK – watch the video by Dr Vernon Cole:
Sorry, but they removed Dr Vernon’s video. He accused the state of murder. It is obviously “hate speech” to tell the truth. JewTube doesn’t like it. So, I found a version on BitChute nah-na-the na-naha
The dreaded second wave that is emerging has more to do with the testing regime than anything else. The PCR test is simply not fir for purpose. It is not reliable and gives many false positives.
“A third example is a study from Singapore in which tests were carried out almost daily on 18 patients and the majority went from “positive” to “negative” back to “positive” at least once, and up to five times in one patient.”https://t.co/lTIL2NxQqI
So, the test results have become virtually meaningless. The fact that the death rate has dropped dramatically means that the virus is less virulent and is on its way out. What they have done is a bait and switch, as they no longer talk about mortality but about cases.
We have had X amount of cases ……the cases have shot up…..bla, bla… is meaningless if those cases are either false positives or asymptomatic or at worst a sniffle. It is as thought the world has caught “man flu”. We should celebrate the increase in cases (if the number is real) because it means we are achieving herd immunity.
It seems that the second wave might not be bad enough to get the job done so they are already talking about the emergence of a new strain of sine flu in China. It is laughable. As if that were not bad enough Covid is being linked with climate change.
https://t.co/WQxTznLHMa The COVID-19 recovery can be the vaccine for climate change. 🤣🦠However, what is most concerning about COVID-19 is not the virus itself, but rather that it may be a harbinger of things to come.
The climate will change dramatically and we will see the effects very soon. The changes will be due to space weather Geo-magnetic shift and cosmological rays etc. I believe that this will be blamed on CO2 as will the emergence of all these virus threats. The proposed solution will be rapid industrialization and forced technocracy. However, the earth changes that are coming will be even bigger than even they anticipated.
This concerns Floyd George and I found this twitter post interesting:
How did George Floyd get his hands on counterfeit money from China that was wholly in the hands of the federal government?
The seizure of counterfeit money happened in Minnesota and Floyd was arrested trying to pass off counterfeit money that could only have come from the secret service. The whole thing reeks to high heaven of a false flag operation.
Have a laugh
There is so much madness and evil in the world but this made me laugh (short video):
Apparently we now have a Covid test that is 100% accurate. What a relief no more false positives. No more goats or sheep testing positive for covid. No more dangerous pieces of Covid fruit lying about. I will sleep better tonight.
They are all telling us that it is a “Game-Changer” so that must be the approved messaging. Note that none of them say that they are sorry for promoting a test that was not fit for purpose and making decisions on invalid test results that had consequence for your job, your finances, your mental health and/or you physical health (cancellation of elective surgery). It is as if it doesn’t matter. Water under the bridge. So what. Who cares? We destroyed the economy and disrupted your life using faulty computer models and invalid test results but we are fighting a war against an invisible enemy (we certainly are). Every war has casualties. Tough luck. However, even in a war bad generals get sacked. You will be relieved to know that we now have a 100% accurate test.
You will be relieved to know that it has been independently tested at Porton Down which is a science park in Wiltshire, England, just northeast of the village of Porton, near Salisbury. It is home to two British government facilities: a site of the Ministry of Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL) – known for over 100 years as one of the UK’s most secretive and controversial military research facilities, occupying 7,000 acres and a site of Public Health England. In the past they experimented with nerve gas on people but they don’t do that anymore. Porton Down is very close to Salisbury were a military army nurse found the poisoned Skripals but that is a mere coincidence and a different story. The take away from this is that a Government bio-weapons lab has found the test to to be 100% accurate so that must be true.
What is 100% accurate or 100% specific?
The claim is that it is 100% accurate despite the Independent (above) saying 100% specific. They are not the same thing.
The phrase 100% accurate immediately peaked my curiosity. As a scientist (industrial Chemist) I have performed thousands of chemical tests and as a junior chemist performed tests etc at a Phytopathology research lab. I have never come across a test that is 100% accurate. I have even checked the validity of test methods using statistics. I have never found a 100% accurate test. Is it just me? Perhaps the unicorn of the 100% accurate test exists but I have just never encountered it?
Of course, we know nothing of how this test was validated. In order to check for antibodies you need recovered patients but how do you determine that they are recovered if you have no test? In other words how do you set a baseline or standard? You need a group that are definitely negative and a group that are definitely positive (recovered). You need to do double blind randomized tests or even triple blind. You need to know the full medical history of each subject so that you can determine if the outcome can be influenced by other antibodies which are present or absent. No two test subjects are going to be exactly the same with different patient pathologies and different genetic make up.
You need a large sample size otherwise your errors are magnified. You need to calculate confidence intervals and look at sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios etc. Do we know if any of this has been done? Are we allowed to see the actual results, the test parameters etc. How many tests were conducted? Are they compared with rival tests? Are journalists allowed to interview any of the test subjects? And how about financial disclosure? Who besides Roche benefits and by how much? So many questions but don’t you worry now because the government assures you that it is 100% accurate.
What does Roche say?
Roche has two tests – the first one we shall call the “spit test” or swab up the nose or in the mouth known as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test to diagnose active COVID-19 (cobas SARS-CoV-2 Test) which could take days for a result.
The test that is being touted as a “game changer” is a blood test (Elecsys anti-Sars-CoV-2 antibody test). It is supposedly very fast (18 minutes) but of course it still needs to be sent to a lab (Hospital etc) that has the Roche analysis equipment. The problem with both tests is that a negative result does not rule out that you still might be a Covid carrier.
Accuracy and Sensitivity are not the same thing
If you are interested in the distinction between accuracy and sensitivity have a quick look at this article which is very clear. I suggest you make yourself familiar with the science because soon they will be using manipulation and coercion backed up by pseudo science to force change. The perception is that the test is 1000% accurate and therefore infallible and that is not so. There are two very good articles with tables from the evaluate website which I recommend reading in full but which I partially quote below. Both articles are about the blood antibody test – Elecsys anti-Sars-CoV-2 antibody test. The first citation talks about accuracy and specificity:
There are two major questions here. Firstly, are these claims to be trusted without independent verification?....And accuracy needs to be high. The prevalence of Covid-19 is estimated at around 5% in the US, and at this low a level the risk of false positives becomes a major problem. If a serological test has 90% specificity, its positive predictive value will be 32.1% – meaning nearly 70% of positive results will likely be false. At this same disease prevalence, a test with 95% specificity will lead to a 50% chance that a positive result is wrong. Only at 99% specificity does the false positive rate become anywhere near acceptable, and even here the chances are that 16% of positive results would be wrong. evaluate link
And the next article citation actually gives us some test results and sample sizes:
Roche claims sensitivity of 100% and specificity of more than 99.8% when an individual is tested two weeks after a PCR test has diagnosed an active Covid-19 infection.....Roche assessed its test’s sensitivity on 204 samples from 69 symptomatic patients with a PCR-confirmed Covid-19 infection. But only 29 samples were from the 14-day time point, a smallish dataset, though to be fair the assay correctly flagged them all....Still, specificity is the crucial point, and here the Elecsys test acquitted itself well, and in a much larger cohort. It was used to test 5,272 blood samples taken from routine diagnostic testing, blood donors, a common cold panel, and a coronavirus panel comprising 40 potentially cross-reactive samples from individuals with past infection with non-Covid-19 coronaviruses. All of these samples were obtained before December 2019 and thus could not carry the Covid-19 virus. [My emphasis] 10 of the samples came back positive, giving a specificity of 99.81%. Evaluate link
So, I did the calculation for the specificity:
10/5,272*100= 0.19% 100-0.19%= 99.81%
Some weird findings
I decided to do a search on the term 99.81% specificity and found some strange stuff. What I mean by that is that I found a number of other PCR tests that all had the same result with different sample sizes. Have a look at my search results:
Validation according to OIE criteria of a monoclonal, recombinant p26–based, serologic competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as screening method in surveillance programs for the detection of Equine infectious anemia virus antibodies https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1040638715625092 The adoption of the cELISA as a screening test in routine testing, generated 182 sera (0.19%) with nonspecific reactions, as confirmed by AGID and immunoblot, out of a total of 96,468 samples examined.13 For this, the screening method has an apparent DSp of 99.81%, higher than that estimated in its validation. My calculation: 182/96,468 *100= 0.19% and 100-0.19 = 99.81% specificity.
A screenshot 2016: Abstracts 2697-5293 By American Association for Cancer Research (AACR):
Now, I don’t know about you but I find this extremely strange. What is the chance of these different tests one on sexual diseases in the Chinese and the other on horse diseases, anti-HAV Igm and cancer all having different sample sizes all giving 98.91% specificity? What is the probability of that occurring? The only common factor is that they are all PCR tests. This suggests a methodological error or bias built into the test. However, what would I know I am only a “bucket chemist” not a PhD genetics professor. Perhaps I am over looking something obvious. Surely all these big pharma companies with their computer software and fancy equipment cannot be making basic methodological errors? I would laugh my socks off if they were. My gut feeling (for what it is worth) is that there is something basically very wrong with the PCR test. Is this a systematic error?
It was stated before that making mistakes in analytical work is unavoidable. This is the reason why a complex system of precautions to prevent errors and traps to detect them has to be set up. An important aspect of the quality control is the detection of both random and systematic errors. This can be done by critically looking at the performance of the analysis as a whole and also of the instruments and operators involved in the job. For the detection itself as well as for the quantification of the errors, statistical treatment of data is indispensable. http://www.fao.org/3/W7295E/w7295e08.htm
And here is the other thing I find suspicious…..it says of the samples…“All of these samples were obtained before December 2019 and thus could not carry the Covid-19 virus”.
How does anybody know that? There are reports online that the disease was circulating in France and in Northern Italy (and the USA for that matter) undetected before the Chinese outbreak. If that is the case then the test is compromised because you have no true baseline to use as a standard.How do we know that these samples (presumbly from other blood banks) have been handled correctly? How do we know whether they have degraded or not over time? You are making an assumption that before a certain date your samples are covid free. I still come back to the point that covid has never been isolated using Koch’s principles.
It turns out that the answers to these questions don’t just hinge on the accuracy of the test. “Mathematically, the way that works out, that actually depends on how many people in your area have Covid,” Eleanor Murray, an assistant professor of epidemiology at the Boston University School of Public Health, said.
A serological test looks for antibodies, which play a crucial role in the body’s immune response to Covid-19. It can take several days for an infected person to develop antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19. So a negative result doesn’t necessarily mean that the virus isn’t present. On the other hand, a positive antibody test doesn’t always mean you are immune, nor does it mean that the virus has been defeated. Vox
Trust me I am from the Government and I am here to help
I freely admit that I am not a geneticist or epidemiologist but this very brief investigation makes me very squeamish. If you want to trust big pharma that stands to make gazillions out of this and a military government poison lab then go ahead but it raises red flags. The emphasis on 100% accurate is deliberate. This imbues the test with godlike authority to decide who has a life and who doesn’t. You can protest as much as you want that you have no symptoms and feel perfectly OK as they drag you off to quarantine or forcibly vaccinate you. No arguing with a test that is 100% accurate. Believe the science it is never wrong. Such a test in the wrong hands becomes a tool of oppression. The reason they needed a new test was because everyone knew the old test was not fit for purpose.
This is why they need a test that is 100% accurate
DOD Awards $138 Million Contract, Enabling Prefilled Syringes for Future COVID-19 Vaccine with the ultimate production goal of over 500 million prefilled syringes (doses) in 2021https://t.co/dgXivzE32g