CV19 initial spread

CV19 initial spread

I have not watched this yet but I understand that Mark discusses virus evolution and is partial to JC’s hypothesis.  Apparently Mark Kulacz removed the video after the stream but once something has been placed on the internet it is difficult to erase.  This is not meant to be an attack on Mark or even on JC. I have enormous respect as Mark has endured personal tragedy and done a sterling job  as a dot connector and archivist during this difficult time making his website freely available to everyone.

At this late stage many will think that it is a moot point how CV19 spread nearly three years ago.  Who cares?  It is just an academic debate.  We beg to differ because such a position wants us to believe that the original CV19 was not really dangerous (therefore long covid is more or less a fabrication) and all the subsequent “variants” are just  computer fabrications and rebranding of flu.  Now, the situation is complicated because they did conduct a psy-op and they did abuse PCR and COD and no doubt they fiddled the stats.  They also caused many iatrogenic deaths.  None of that is disputed.  We also do not dispute that synthetic clones were used to amplify the GOF virus as the work of Kevin McKernan is revealing.

What we do dispute is that GOF either did not happen or is more or less harmless. The JC hypothesis is that CV19 “synthetic clone” more or less de-attenuates and cannot maintain virulence or produce variants.  According to this hypothesis the pandemic was maintained by spraying synthetic clone everywhere, not by natural transmission. This from a virologist/epidemiologist on our discord:

There is NO need for continue seeding of recombinant viruses, when the original virus is firmly established in circulation. The Omicron offshoot can be clearly explained via normal host species jump of Delta into rodents then back into humans. The data in mice showing that hACE2 expression is no longer necessary to establish productive infection of Omicron in mice is clear evidence. I think JC is continuing to fuel divisions among dissenters creating a large deal of confusion on an offshoot topic which should not be our primary focus.

1.The infectious clone is already a mutant swarm because it has to be amplified in cell culture. 

2. Delayed pathogenic effects from infection would allow the virus time to transmit and spread prior to disease/death. 

3. Viruses natural state is to evolve toward high transmissibility and low lethality, but GOF viruses don't exist in a natural state.

Our position is that the virus can maintain its characteristics and can spread and therefore precautions must be taken.  We also believe that the vaccine is dangerous.  I personally believe that “shedding” and constant vaccination maintains and evolves the “swarm”.

We should not be complacent with the virus or with the vaccines.  The virus is not “just a cold” it is a bio-weapon with untold long term consequences.  It is my belief that the original CV19  strain was meant to lay the groundwork for the “vaccination campaign” as in preparing the immune system  to be breached.

In any case, discounting the possibility and danger of GOF lets them off the hook.  They want to continue with GOF because….it does not really do any harm (JC/Mark). The harm was caused by spraying synthetic clone.  Sorry, I am not buying it.  This must be fully investigated and the people that did this must be punished.

 

Defuse the Bomb

Defuse the Bomb

This is an actual game and I think this is a great metaphor for what is happening. This one minute clip stresses Keep Talking and nobody Explodes and that is exactly what everyone should do.

The Freedom Movement is fracturing and that is exactly what (((they))) want but we must refuse to allow paranoia to dictate strategy.  Are we being gamed and psychologically targeted?  Yes, there can be no doubt that the “pandemic” has certain strategic and ideological goals and they are nudging us to accept. They want us to reach certain conclusions naturally even though they are steering us in the background. Initially I thought that Jonathan Couey’s proposal on synthetic clones explained many of the anomalies but the argument put forward as “gain of purity” has morphed into one of no excess deaths from Covid19 and sequencing does not work.  All the deaths are more or less iatrogenic or fabricated.  This argument is starting to look like a first cousin marriage of the retarded no virus and gain of purity cousins giving birth to retards (lolz). The argument turns on dismissing the Defuse document as unverifiable or a psychological operation. Discounting its validity as evidence of malfeasance and seeing it as a red herring. Here follows a very good (and long) discussion between Dr Kevin McCairn the systems neuroscientist and Charles Rixey who is a trained Weapons of Mass Destruction expert and a former Marine.  Recommended viewing. 

Charles has analyzed the excess deaths for different age cohorts and a definite signal can be seen prior to the vaccine rollout. Moreover,  asymptomatic infection could well negatively influence the effect of the “vaccine” which is exactly what you would want with a binary weapon.  Perhaps Covid19 was simply a matter of preparing the ground and making it receptive to the real seeding. Why did they insist on people who had already recovered from Covid to get a vaccine anyway?    That is in my view highly suspicious.   Also at at 1:15:40 regarding defuse, Rixey says “Congress already knows that [the documents] they’re not fake”.  Would congress not demand proof?

SARS Biowarfare With Charles Rixey (4:26)

Forensic Analysis

Mark Kulacz from Housatonic is somewhat of an expert  in data retrieval, tracking , storage and destruction (which is not as easy as it may seem…ask Hillary).  In this video he looks at the authenticity and verifiability of the Defuse Document which is a photocopy without metadata. However, it is unlikely that the photocopy distributed on the internet represents all the information available as any chain of custody will be obscured until it is required as evidence for legal proceedings. The grant was declined and that is very easy to establish as I imagine that as much of this material was conveyed by email the metadata is recoverable from the ISP and probably stored somewhere on a DHS database.  As Mark points out it was not classified information and the proposal was rejected by DARPA.   The fuss about the photocopy is in my view a distraction because as I was watching the video I commented that if I were spying I would take a picture with my phone and include the metadata on the file and also the time clock on the computer which would tie in with my own metadata.  Images can easily be converted using OCR.

All this is a moot point because I am sure that Rixey knows who leaked it and has verifiable evidence of authenticity.  It is possible that DARPA themselves deliberately leaked the document to distance themselves as it was becoming impossible  to deny GOF  biowarfare.  They needed plausible deniability.  Perhaps that is also the job of someone like Robert Malone.  We can only guess at motivation and it is a certainty that we are all being gamed.  What should we do?  Perhaps we are unconsciously still doing their bidding by exposing the GOF malfeasance.    We must be aware of what they want and that is relatively easy to answer. They want full spectrum dominance which is the surveillance state panopticon that will eventually reside under your skin  and they want mRNA to form the basis of their bio-revolution economy in order to fulfill their transhumanist agenda.  As long as we make sure that we are not duped into the new paradigm we should be OK.

Ep 182.1: EcoHealth Alliance DEFUSE proposal to DARPA PREEMPT grant, leaked to DRASTIC  (1:19)

https://youtu.be/K7YsJGfxSmA

 Sequencing Fidelity

Jonathan raised the question of sequencing fidelity and Quasi-species diversity and drift swarms this article provides some excellent answers and a rebuttal:

The Time Line

Last but not least the Defuse proposal fits within the larger context of Fauci’s pronouncements, Daszak’s own comments (both on video) and the wider DARPA PREEMPT PROGRAM who lavishly funded areas of pandemic preparedness, with EcoHealth, the Global Virome Project, USAID’s PREDICT, and more all giving and receiving tons of cash to go out and find new viruses.  This did not happen in a vacuum.     Moreover, it was run on the back of the very successful  Special Virus Cancer Program (sic) which resulted in HIV/AIDS.  Now I know that Kerry Mullis could not find anyone to point him to a source that connected AIDS with the virus (sounds familiar??).  Is there something weird going on?  I have no doubt and whatever it is it looks like they perfected it with the AIDS pandemic.  No wonder Mullis despised Fauci.  There is still much that is unknown and I still have many, many questions. Perhaps we should start with refusing all vaccines.  It seems that the Spanish Flu (American military flu) and HIV (and Covid) possibly all started with vaccination programs.  Are we not seeing the forest for the trees?   Is it that simple?   Have they figured out how to use vaccinations to trigger pandemics?  What a great way to reduce the population and make money.

Documents

Are we being played?

Probably, but the trick is to use their gaming tactics and their evidence and turn it against them until we get our outcome.  You work with what you have got and what you have been given.   The most important question in all this is what is the desired outcome?   What do you all want?

Rigs (not Rixey) Defuses the bomb.

Aren’t you going to miss all this good stuff when you retire? (lolz)