The Return of the Jews to Israel

The Return of the Jews to Israel

I must admit that this article was largely inspired by listening to an interview with Whitney Webb that I found immensely interesting and that highlighted a knowledge gap regarding Zionism.  Although I knew that Christians had a hand in the Zionist movement, I had not realized how influential they were in laying the ground for Theodore Herzl and his Zionist movement. The idea can be traced back to the Puritans of the 16th century  and as the return of the Jews to nationhood became a prerequisite to Christian eschatology it became, as it were a “self-fulfilling” prophecy.  That is not to say that God cannot use the machinations of man to control events but as I have noted previously Jesus remarked that the violent attempt to take the kingdom of heaven by force (Matt 11:12) they attempted to forcefully crown Jesus King (John 6:15) which influenced even Peter (Matt 16:23). This was in fact a repeat of the temptation in the wilderness (Matt 4:8-10), to take temporal power (establish a Zionist kingdom) in opposition to the divine will.   The kingdom of God cannot be brought into being by manipulation or force.  There were many zealots in Jesus’ day who equated the Kingdom with liberation from Roman occupation and the speculation is that Judas Iscariot was one such who attempted to provoke a divine response and uprising by betraying Jesus.  Who knows?

I would encourage everyone to read the article by Whitney, the Untold Story of Christian Zionism’s rise to power in the United States.  I cannot help but draw parallels with the eighteenth-century restoration movement and the ideology of Zionism.  A brief history of the sudden birth of all the new religious movements follows:  The First Great Awakening (1730s and 40s cf.  George Whitefield, John Wesley, and Jonathan Edwards and the Evangelical Revival). The Second Great Awakening was a Protestant religious revival during the early 19th century in the United States.  The Restoration movement developed during the Second Great Awakening. Dispensationalist Christians had been promoting a Jewish ethnostate in Palestine at a time when the idea was unpopular among many prominent Jews in Europe and the United States and more narrowly, the term “Restorationism” describes Restorationist groups emerging after the Second Great Awakening, such as the Christadelphians (Greek: ‘Brothers of Christ’), Swedenborgians (i.e., The New Church), Latter Day Saints (i.e., Mormonism), Jehovah’s Witnesses (from the tetragrammaton for God), La Luz del Mundo (Spanish: ‘the Light of the World’), and Iglesia ni Cristo (Tagalog: ‘Church of Christ’). In this sense, Restorationism has been regarded as one of the six taxonomic groupings of Christianity: the Church of the East, Oriental Orthodoxy, Eastern Orthodoxy, Roman Catholicism, Protestantism, and Restorationism. These Restorationist groups share a belief that historic Christianity lost the true faith during the Great Apostasy and that the Church needed to be restored.  The term has been used to refer to the Stone–Campbell Movement in the United States. The Third Great Awakening refers to a historical period was marked by religious activism in American history and spans the late 1850s to the early 20th century. It influenced pietistic Protestant denominations and had a strong element of social activism.  We are now in The Fourth Great Awakening and like any social, political, or religious movement it can be hijacked and used as a tool to manipulate outcomes.

It is interesting that many of the Christian restoration movements were pushing for an ethnostate in Palestine before Theodore Herzl proposed the idea. For many years, the Mormon Church has claimed that Native Americans were the descendants of one of the lost tribes of Israel that migrated to the Americas around 600 B.C. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) has several unique teachings about Judaism and the House of Israel.

The Rabbi Menasseh ben Israel (1604-1657) a Dutch Jew with connections to the Anglo-Dutch coalition was instrumental in applying for Jewish readmission to England, that was regarded favourably by Oliver Cromwell. In 1652 his book The Hope of Israel (not to be confused with the Greek titled Elpis Israel by John Thomas) was translated from Latin into English by John Dury or one of his associates, and it was published in London by Moses Wall, prefixed with a dedication to the Parliament and the Council of State; his account of descendants of the Lost Tribes being found in the New World deeply impressed public opinion and stirred up many polemics in English literature.   So, we know where the Mormons (LDS) got the idea of “lost tribes” from.   Regarding the scattering of the lost tribes of Israel, Menasseh notes:

"We have shewed that the ten Tribes are in divers places, as in the West-Indies, in Sina; in the confines of Tartary, beyond the river Sabbathion, and Euphrates, in Media, in the Kingdome of the Habyssins; of all which the Prophet Isaiah is to be understood, in Isa. 11. II. It shall come to passe in that day, that the Lord shall set his hand the second time to recover the remnant of his people, which shall be left from Assyria, from Egypt, from Pathros, from Ethiopia, from Elam, from Sinear, from Hamath, and from the Islands of the Sea."

 

The original petition for readmission to England  was submitted by Johanna and Ebenezer Cartwright, two English baptists living in Amsterdam, to Thomas Fairfax’s Council of War in January 1649. As well as asking that Jews be allowed to live in England, their petition also expressed the wish that the Jews “shall come to know the Emanuell” and that they be transported to the “Land promised to their fore-fathers”. It can be seen as a distillation of the Judeo-centric trends of Puritan thought that had developed over the previous century since John Bale (1495–1563). However, the petition was sent the day before the high court was established to try Charles I, so in the ensuing turmoil the Cartwrights never received an answer. The following year Amsterdam-based Rabbi and diplomat Menasseh Ben Israel wrote in his book Hope of Israel of the necessity of the Jews being “spread out to the ends of the earth” (Daniel 12:7) before they could be redeemed. The book was originally published in Dutch and Latin in 1650, and then in English (dedicated to Parliament and the Council of State) in 1652. In 1651 Ben Israel met Oliver St John and his envoys on their mission to secure an Anglo-Dutch coalition. The English were impressed by learning and manner, and advised him to formally apply for Jewish readmission to England.

The British East India company was established in 1600 with its monopoly to colonize and rob the world with its private armies.  In 1648 the mystic rabbi Sabbatai Zevi from Ottoman Smyrna in modern Turkey claimed he would lead the Jews back to Palestine (Zevi eventually converted to Islam on threat of death). Rabbi Menasseh published the Hope of Israel in 1652.  The Jewish merchants found a lucrative home in the British East India Company an unholy alliance where they became the owners and financiers of the slave trade and the drug runners (Opium) to China.  The Great Fire of London occurred in 1666 the same year that Zevi announced his messiah-ship.

Rabbi Manasseh (living in the same era) thought it necessary to demonstrate that the Jews were scattered everywhere (even the new world) as this would act as precursor to their ingathering back to Israel. However, we know that genetically speaking native Indians of the New World are not lost Jews (neither are aborigines lolz). The largest denomination in the Latter-Day Saint movement, the LDS Church, teaches the belief that the Jewish people are God’s chosen people, and it also teaches the belief that its members share a common and literal Israelite ancestry with the Jewish people.  Joseph Smith published the Book of Mormon in 1830.  He was a Freemason and Freemasons are obsessed with the temple and the temple builder Solomon.

Judah must return, Jerusalem must be rebuilt, and the temple, and water come out from under the temple, and the waters of the Dead Sea be healed. It will take some time to rebuild the walls of the city and the temple, &c.; and all this must be done before the Son of Man will make His appearance.

History of the Church, Joseph Smith 5:337

What was the object of gathering the Jews, or the people of God in any age of the world?… The main object was to build unto the Lord a house whereby He could reveal unto His people the ordinances of His house and the glories of His kingdom, and teach the people the way of salvation; for there are certain ordinances and principles that, when they are taught and practiced, must be done in a place or house built for that purpose.

History of the Church, Joseph Smith 5:423

John Nelson Darby (18 November 1800 – 29 April 1882) was an Anglo-Irish Bible teacher, one of the influential figures among the original Plymouth Brethren and the founder of the Exclusive Brethren. He is the father of modern Dispensationalism and Futurism. Pre-tribulation rapture theology was popularized extensively in the 1830s by John Nelson Darby and the Plymouth Brethren, and further popularized in the United States in the early 20th century by the wide circulation of the Scofield Reference Bible. Darby’s end-times doctrine also influenced the American preacher Charles Taze Russell, whose church later gave rise to several different churches, including the Jehovah’s Witnesses.

 Cyrus Scofield was a charlatan and he was allowed membership of the Lotos club with the rich and powerful.   He was obviously a cut-out for the power elites who wanted to manipulate historical events to create a global empire and one world government. To them religion and the return of the Jews to Israel is just a stepping stone to technocratic hegemony.  The involvement of Lord Shaftesbury and the Blackstone Memorial (highlighted by Whitney),  which was presented to the president of the United States in Favor of the restoration of Palestine to the Jews, are testament this.  So, powerful manipulative forces were at work to create an ethno-state and force Jews back to the land.  Some of those forces were Jewish but many were Christian. The question remains how many of those Christian movements were subverted?

Jehovah’s Witnesses is a nontrinitarian millenarian restorationist Christian denomination.  The group emerged from the Bible Student movement founded in the late 1870s by Charles Taze Russell, who also co-founded Zion’s Watch Tower Tract Society in 1881 to organize and print the movement’s publications. Initially their eschatology had a role for ethnic Israel and the temple, and they even published a book Comfort for the Jews. They combined the rise of natural Israel with the rapture: The Herald of the Morning. October 1, 1878. p. 52. “Hence, the ‘real rising again of Israel’ cannot begin until the autumn of 1881, at which date, the presumption is, that the gospel church will be taken away to meet the Lord.”  However, after many failed predictions and a confused eschatology which includes the invisible return of Christ, the judgement of the nations and pyramidology theories they now preach a replacement theology whereby the JWs replace the nation of Israel. They see Zionism as a political nationalist ethnocentric movement though they do not specify “political Zionism”. So, their position is confused and has shifted over time.

The Christadelphians also emerged out of the American Restorationism movement including the Millerites who later split and became the Jehovah’s Witnesses.  William Miller (1782 – 1849) was an American Baptist minister who is credited with beginning the mid-19th-century North American religious movement known as Millerism. After his proclamation of the Second Coming did not occur as expected in the 1840s, new heirs of his message emerged, including the Advent Christians (1860), the Seventh-day Adventists (1863) and other Adventist movements. In 1848 Dr Thomas, the founder of the Christadelphians, published his book Elpis Israel (the Hope of Israel) the same year that Marx published the communist manifesto. One hundred years later (3 x33.3333) in 1948, the nation of Israel was founded. The eschatology of Elpis Israel predicted a return of the Jews to the land and a building of a messianic age temple (Ezekiel’s temple) and an invasion by Gog (Russia) with the protagonist styled as the “tsar” and the “autocrat” of Russia.  It is no doubt that the build up to the Crimean war (1853-1856) and the writings of Granville Penn in “The Prophecy of Ezekiel Concerning Gog” helped formulate these ideas as did the predominance of the British Empire and transfer of transatlantic power (ships of Tarsus) to the USA. It is not difficult to predict the return of Israel to the Palestine when there was a push by the Anglo-Zionist power elites to make it happen.  However, many other detailed predictions about then current-day events did not happen (as was noted in the foreword to subsequent editions of Elpis Israel after his death).

It is interesting to note that in 1861 rabbi Sneersohn gave a lecture tour in Australia that was reported in the Christadelphian magazine and then reissued in 1943-44. From 1933 to fall 1941 Nazi Germany pursued an aggressive policy of forced emigration for the Reich’s Jews and from 1944 to 1948 a successful paramilitary campaign was carried out by Zionist underground groups against British rule in Mandatory Palestine, so the anticipation of an ethno-state was in the air. Rabbi Sneersohn (1834–1882) was a Jewish-Belarusian Zionist of the Old Yishuv, a doctor, and a Chabad Chasid. Schneerson is a distant relative of Menachem Mendel Schneerson of the Lyubavitchi Schneerson family, considered to be one of the most influential Rabbis in Hasidic Judaism.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Rebbe and Bibi Netanyahu: Don’t Be Intimidated

This short video from 10 years ago:

This overview was produced by Tony Garland.

1796-1861 Walter Scott
“‘The great tribulation’ is yet future. It pre-supposes the Jewish nation restored to Palestine in unbelief, to serve Gentile political ends, and brought there by the active intervention of a great maritime power (Isa. 18).”2
1800 Elhanan Winchester “A notable preacher, both in Great Britain and America, at the beginning of the nineteenth century was Dr. Elhanan Winchester; in 1800 he published a most interesting volume entitled, “A Course of Lectures in the Prophecies that Remain to be fulfilled.” The third lecture was devoted to the thesis that “The return of the Jews to their own land is certain.” In this lecture, Dr. Winchester said: “As the Turkish power has always been a great enemy to the Jews and having their land in possession at this time, nothing can well be more evident then that the Turkish power must be greatly weakened before the Jews can return to their country and possess it . . . This even may be easily accomplished if the nations that shall weaken the Turks make this one of their demands, namely, that they which yield up the holly land to its rightful owners, the Jews, to repossess which God sware to give to the patriarchs and their posterity.” He even foresaw a great conflict to take place here. “The nations round them will make a general combination against them when they least expect it and will gather a numerous and very formidable host to effect their destruction. In this they shall not finally succeed.””3
1816-1900 John Charles Ryle
“I believe that the Jews shall ultimately be gathered again as a separate nation, restored to their own land, and converted to the faith of Christ, after going through great tribulation (Jer. 30:10-11; Jer. 31:10; Rom. 11:25-26; Dan. 12:1; Zech 13:8-9).”4 “I might show you by scriptural evidence that the Jews will probably first be gathered in an unconverted state, though humbled, and will afterwards be taught to look to Him whom they have pierced, through much tribulation. . . . I can see no ground for refusing to believe that God may yet do wonderful things for the Jewish people. It would not be more marvelous to see them gathered once more into Palestine, than it was to see them brought from Egypt into the promised land. What God has done once, He may surely do again. [J. C. Ryle, “Coming Events and Present Duties, and Prophecy” (1867) cited by Richard L. Mayhue, Editorial]”5.
1835-1913 Bullinger “The Zionist Movement commenced with the first National Congress of 1896, and has made great strides since then. Other changes in the Balkan States, and in the Constitution of Turkey, which took place so unexpectedly in 1908, show us how suddenly a change may take place which will lead up to the re-settlement of the Jews in their own land, perhaps, at first, under the suzerainty of the Sultan; and prepare the way for the rise of the Beast . . .”6
1841-1918 Robert Anderson
“But first it must be clearly recognised that in the twenty-fourth of Matthew, as in the book of Daniel, Jerusalem is the centre of the scene to which the prophecy relates; and this of necessity implies that the Jews shall have been restored to Palestine before the time of its fulfilment. Objections based on the supposed improbability of such an event are sufficiently answered by marking the connection between prophecy and miracle. The history of the Abrahamic race, to which prophecy is so closely related, is little else than a record of miraculous interpositions. . . . the question is one of peculiar interest on general grounds, whether passing events are not tending towards this very consummation, the restoration of the Jews to Palestine.”7 “If the dismemberment of the Turkish Empire be still delayed, it is due entirely to the jealousies of European nations, whose rival interests seem to render an amicable distribution of its territories impossible. But the crisis cannot be deferred indefinitely; and when it arrives, the question of greatest moment, next to the fate of Constantinople, will be, What is to become of Palestine? Its annexation by any one European state is in the highest degree improbable. The interests of several of the first-rate Powers forbid it. The way will thus be kept open to the Jews, whenever their inclinations or their destinies lead them back to the land of their fathers. . . . the probabilities of the case . . . are in favour of the colonization of Palestine by that people to whom historically it belongs. . . . But long ere then the Cross must supplant the Crescent in Judea, else it is incredible that the Mosque of Omar should give place to the Jewish Temple on the Hill of Zion.”8 “Of the great political changes which must precede his advent [the rise of Antichrist], the most conspicuous are the restoration of the Jews to Palestine, and the predicted division of the Roman earth.”9
1849 John Thomas “In 1849, the author John Thomas wrote in his book (entitled Elpis Israel — The Hope of Israel) the following words: “The truth is, there are two stages in the restoration of the Jews, the first is before the battle of Armageddon; and the second, after it; but both pre-millennial. God has said, “I will save the tents of Judah first.” This is the first stage of restoration…There is, then, a partial and primary restoration of Jews before the manifestation, which is to serve as the nucleus, or basis, of future operations in the restoration of the rest of the tribes after he has appeared in the kingdom. The pre-adventual colonisation of Palestine will be on purely political principles; and the Jewish colonists will return in unbelief of the messiahship of Jesus, and of the truth as it is in him.””10
1850-1924 Clarence Larkin
“From these scriptures we see that the Jews have not been supplanted by either the Gentiles or the Church, and when the time comes they will again become a nation. We indulge in no idle and profitless speculations when we attempt to forecast the future of the Jewish People. All we have to do is to gather together and place in their logical order what the Holy Spirit through the Prophets, has foretold. The method is as simple as the result is sure.”11
1855 Charles Spurgeon “Preaching on Ezek 24:26 in 1855, just prior to the rise of modern Zionism, he [Spurgeon] declared, Not long shall it be ere they [the Jews] shall come — shall come from distant lands, where’er they rest or roam; and she who has been the off-scouring of all things, whose name has been a proverb and a bye-word, shall become the glory of all lands. Dejected Zion shall raise her head, shaking herself from dust, and darkness, and the dead. Then shall the Lord feed his people, and make them and the places round about his hill a blessing. I think we do not attach sufficient importance to the restoration of the Jews. We do not think enough of it. But certainly, if there is anything promised in the bible it is this. I imagine that you cannot read the bible without seeing clearly that there is to be an actual restoration of the children of Israel. [C. H. Spurgeon, The C. H. Spurgeon Collection, Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, I, no. 28, 1855 (Albany, Oregon: Ages Software, 1998), 382]”12 “Speaking on Ezek 37:1-10 in 1864 at the Metropolitan Tabernacle in aid of funds for the British Society for the Propagation of the Gospel amongst the Jews, Spurgeon declared, “This vision has been used, from the time of Jerome onwards, as a description of the resurrection, and certainly it may be so accommodated with much effect. . . . But while this interpretation of the vision may be very proper as an accommodation, it must be quite evident to any thinking person that this is not the meaning of the passage. There is no allusion made by Ezekiel to the resurrection, and such topic would have been quite apart from the design of the prophet’s speech I believe he was no more thinking of the resurrection of the dead than of the building of St. Peter’s at Rome, or the emigration of the Pilgrim Fathers. . . . The meaning of our text, as opened up by the context, is most evidently, if words mean anything, first, that there shall be a political restoration of the Jews to their own land and to their own nationality; an then, secondly, there is in the text, and in the context, a most plain declaration, that there shall be a spiritual restoration, a conversion in fact, of the tribes of Israel. . . . If there be meaning in words this must be the meaning of this chapter. I wish never to learn the art of tearing God’s meaning out of his own words. If there be anything clear and plain, the literal sense and meaning of this passage — a meaning not to be spirited or spiritualized away — must be evident that both the two and the ten tribes of Israel are to be restored to their own land, and that a king is to rule over them.” [C. H. Spurgeon, The C. H. Spurgeon Collection, Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, X, no 582:533 1864 (Albany, Oregon: Ages Software, 1998), 536-37]”13 “In 1887 [Spurgeon] declared, “We cannot help looking for the restoration of the scattered Israelites to the land which God has given to them by a covenant of salt: we also look for the time when they shall believe in the Messiah whom they have rejected, and shall rejoice in Jesus of Nazareth, whom today they despise. There is great encouragement in prophecy to those who work among the seed of Israel; and it is greatly needed, for of all mission fields it has been commonly represented to be the most barren, and upon the work the utmost ridicule has been poured.” [C. H. Spurgeon, The C. H. Spurgeon Collection, Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, XXXIV, no. 2036, 1887 (Albany, Oregon: Ages Software, 1998), 545]”14
1918 David Baron
“There will be at first, as compared with the whole nation, only a representative minority in Palestine, and a Jewish state will be probably formed, either under the suzerainty of one of the Great Powers, or under international protection . . . A large number more from all parts of the world will in all probability soon be gathered; but we shall only be able to speak of a restoration of the Jews as an accomplished fact when Palestine becomes by international consent (to quote from the Zionist programme) the ‘openly recognized and legally assured home’ of the Jews, i.e., when the Jews are once more acknowledged as a nation with a land of their own to which they might go.”15

For the sake of completeness, here are some additional early quotes recognizing the Scriptural prediction of a restoration of Israel to her land, although not necessarily prior to the return of Jesus:

1558-1625 Henry Finch “Sir Henry Finch (1558-1625) . . . wrote a seminal book on the topic. . . . Finch not only taught a restoration of Israel to their land, he took many of the details of a Jewish millennium literally. A regathered Israel “shall inhabite all the parts of the land” and “shall continue in it for euer.” Finch also taught that all twelve tribes will be united and “all nations shall honour them.” [Cited in Culver, “Contribution of Sir Henry Finch,” p. 57] cited by Thomas Ice, Sir Henry Finch: Early Christian Zionist16
1635-1711 Wilhelmus a Brakel
“A further example of a more pro-Judaic European eschatology that appeared in the seventeenth century was that expressed by Wilhelmus a Brakel (1635-1711), an esteemed Dutch Reformed theologian who ministered in Rotterdam, Holland, having eschatological views that contrasted with the more standard Augustinian variety, Willem VanGemeren explains that, in objecting to Calvin, Brakel held that, “the Church could not be identified with the New Israel. When Paul wrote about "all Israel" (Rom. 11:25) he was referring to the nation, and not the totality of the church and national Israel.” This rejection of Calvin was also found in Brakel's contemporaries. Brakel expected all twelve tribes to repent and express faith in Jesus as the Messiah. He also held that the Jews would be privileged to return to their land. The promise of the land is not just a type of the eternal rest or of heaven, rather it is part and parcel with the covenant of grace which God made to and affirmed with Israel. . . . Brakel . . . wrote, “Will the Jewish nation be gathered together again from all the regions of the world and from all the nations of the earth among which they have been dispersed? Will they come to and dwell in Canaan and all the lands promised to Abraham, and will Jerusalem be rebuilt? We believe that these events will transpire.””17
1669 Increase Mather “The first of [Increase Mather’s] many works on prophecy was published in London in 1669, entitled “The Mystery of Israel’s Salvation Explained and Applied — a discourse concerning the general conversion of the Israelitish nation.” . . . Concerning the matter of their return to the land, Mather is clear: “Some have believed and asserted a general conversion of the Jews, yet have doubted whether they should ever again possess the land of their fathers. But the Scripture is very clear and full in this, that you see not how it can justly be denied or questioned.” . . . Even the great period of Israel’s tribulation was not hidden from Mather’s mind. Later in the book he amplifies this truth: “A little before the conversion of the Jews, there will be the most terrible doings in the world that ever were heard of in respect of wars and commotions, the waves of the sea roaring, confused noise, and garments rolled in blood, blood and fire, and vapor of smoke; but after the kindome [sic.] shall be restored unto Israel, then shall be glorious days of peace and tranquility.””18
1673 John Owen
“In 1673 an interesting book was published, with a preface by Dr. John Own, “A Collection of Prophecies which Concern the Calling of the Jews and the Glory that Shall Be in the Latter Days.” The scores of references were classified under eight headings which may be of interest to my readers: “I. The Jews shall be gathered from all parts of the earth where they now are scattered, and brought home into their own land. II. They shall be carried by the Gentiles to their place; who shall join themselves with the Jews, and become the Lord’s people. III. Great miracles shall be wrought when Israel is restored, as formerly when they were brought out of Egypt — viz.: 1. Drying up the river Euphrates. 2. Causing rivers to flow in desert places. 3. Giving them prophets. 4. The Lord Christ himself shall appear at the head of them. IV. The Jews, being restored, and converted to the faith of Christ, shall be formed into a State, and have Judges and Counsellors over them as formerly: the Lord Christ himself being their King, who shall them also be acknowledged King over all the earth. V. They shall have the victory over all their enemies, and all kings and nations of the earth shall submit unto them. VI. The Jews, restored, shall live peaceably, without being divided into two nations, or contending with one another any more. VII. The land of Judea shall be made eminently fruitful, like a Paradise, or the Garden of God. VIII. Jerusalem shall be rebuilt, and after the full restoration of the Jews shall never be destroyed, nor infested with enemies any more.” All of this material was quoted by the famous Dr. Philip Doddridge in a work now seldom seen [Philip Doddridge: “Works,” Leeds, 1802, Vol. V.]”19
1707-1788 Charles Wesley Although not explicitly predicting a nation, Charles Wesley’s hymn Calling the Hebrews Home clearly recognizes the restoration of the Jews in a gathered nation: “O that the chosen band might now their brethren bring And gathered out of every land present to Sion’s King. Of all the ancient race not one be left behind But each impelled by secret grace his way to Canaan find! We know it must be done for God hath spoke the word All Israel shall their Saviour own to their first state restored. Rebuilt by His command Jerusalem shall rise Her temple on Moriah stand again, and touch the skies. Send then Thy servants forth to call the Hebrews home From west and east, and south, and north let all the wanderers come. Where’er in lands unknown Thy fugitives remain Bid every creature help them on Thy holy mount to gain.”
1740s Jonathan Edwards
““[Jonathan Edwards held that] when ‘the fulness of the Gentiles’ is brought in, then ethnic Israel will also be largely saved and, while restored to their own land, they will be united with all the church of Christ and ‘look upon all the world to be their brethren, as much as the Christians in Boston and the Christians in other parts of New England look on each other as brethren’.”20
1848 John Nelson Darby “In 1848 he wrote, “As far as the world is concerned, Jerusalem is nothing; it is a city trodden down, with neither commerce nor riches nor aught else. Superstition is established there on the sepulchre of the Lord. It is true, indeed that the kings of the earth are beginning to look that way, because providence is leading in that direction, but as for God, He ever things of it; it is always His house, His city. His eyes and His heart are there continually. Now faith understands this.” [Paul R. Wilkinson, John Nelson Darby and His Views on Israel]”21

See also Is Today’s Return of Israel Scriptural?a

Conclusion

There was a push to restore the Jews to their land long before Theodore Herzl appeared on the scene in 1897. The push was exercised by Christian and Jewish power elites, and we can only suppose that different groups had different motivations for desiring such an outcome. They have ensured (so they think) that the prophecy is self-fulfilling.  These elites understand Israel as the geographical pivot of history  and we can see the multi polar world forming with BRICS. Whoever controls this area controls the world and whoever controls the religious sentiments controls the minds of billions of people. Several presidents including Dwight Eisenhower, Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon were influenced by dispensationalist preacher and Third Temple advocate Billy Graham.  However, it is not just the “religious” who understand the pivotal importance of this region as the technocrats and transhumanists also want to centralize power which is why Israel is turning into a technological and biological superpower. This is the Hegelian Dialectic writ large with a new paradigm set to emerge from the opposing factions.

The theology of an ethno-state and a temple comes from a misreading (deliberate or otherwise) of scripture and chapters like Romans 11.  This subject is worthy of a separate article, and I have touched upon aspects of it elsewhere. The fact is that God never wanted a temple (house) in the first place, moreover, the eschatological “New Jerusalem” descends out of heaven (Rev 21:2) and we are specifically told that, “And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it “(Rev 21:22). Surprisingly, this is in agreement with Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss of Neturei Karta (an ultra-Orthodox Jewish group based in New York that opposes Zionism) who says that, “… the Third Temple was, prior to Zionism, understood as indicating not a change in physical structures on the Temple Mount, but a metaphysical, spiritual change that would unite all of mankind to worship and serve God in unison”.    So, the discussion then comes down to what Paul understands as “all Israel” (Rom 9:6) because “the Israel of God” (Gal 6:16) is more than an ethno-state or a Zionist entity.  It refers to the faithful of all ages regardless of ethnicity or of space and time because nothing can separate them from the love of God (Rom 8:35). The New Israel is constituted in Christ and has always been created with him in mind from time immemorial (Col 1:16-18). They are the Living stones of the new temple (1 Pet 2:4-7, Eph 2:19-22) for God is worshiped in Spirit and Truth (John 4:24).

Despite the machinations of man God will achieve his purpose. The divine will cannot be thwarted, and God has a multiplicity of ways of fulfilling his prophecies even to the point of allowing humanity enough rope to hoist themselves on their own petard.  You want to force your way?  Go on then and see what happens (lolz).  A The situation overflows with irony. As to recommencing blood sacrifice that would be an abomination and God will have the last word with a third overturning of the temple (Ezek 21:27).   We are at the end of a natural cycle and this period of revelation and manifestation is almost over.  Hold fast.

Endnotes:

1. I remain both amazed and disappointed by the numerous “Bible teachers” of our day who are busy writing blogs and e-books to educate us concerning things they themselves know little of (Rom. 2:21; 1Ti. 1:7; Jas. 3:1).
2. Ref-0225, 163
3. Ref-1163, 52-53
4. Ref-0114, 384
5. Ref-0164, Vol. 19 No. 1, Spring 2008, 1:14, 9
6. Ref-0214, 527
7. Ref-0762, 165-167
8. Ref-0762, 167-168
9. Ref-0762, 210
10. BITT, Bible in the Newsb accessed 20080312
11. Ref-0835, 33
12. Ref-1263, pp. 11-12
13. Ref-1263, 11-12
14. Ref-1263, 11-12
15. Ref-0206, 494
16. Ref-0181, Vol. VIII No. 82 November/December 2010, pp. 1,5
17. Ref-1263, 153
18. Ref-1163, 49-52
19. Ref-1163, 47-49
20. Ref-1302, 49
21. Ref-0200, Vol. 166 No. 661, January-March 2009, 84:99, 96

Sources:

Ref-0114 Mal Couch, ed., Dictionary of Premillennial Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 1996). ISBN:0-8254-2351-1c.
Ref-0164 Richard L. Mayhue, ed., The Master’s Seminary Journal (Sun Valley, CA: Master’s Seminary). [www.mastersem.edu].
Ref-0181 Tim LaHaye, ed., Pre-Trib Perspectives (Dallas, TX: Pre-Trib Research Center, n.d.). [www.pre-trib.org].
Ref-0200 Roy B. Zuck, ed., Bibliotheca Sacra (Dallas, TX: Dallas Theological Seminary, n.d.). [www.dts.edu].
Ref-0206 David Baron, Zechariah: A Commentary On His Visions and Prophecies (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 1918).
Ref-0214 E. W. Bullinger, Commentary on Revelation (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 1984, 1935).
Ref-0225 Walter Scott, Overcoming the World Missions Crisis (London, England: Pickering and Inglis, n.d.).
Ref-0762 Robert Anderson, The Coming Prince (TX: Galaxie Software, 2004).
Ref-0835 Clarence Larkin, Rightly Dividing the Word (Philadelphia, PA: Clarence Larkin, 1921).
Ref-1163 Wilbur M. Smith, Israeli/Arab Conflict and the Bible (Glendale, CA: G/L Publications, 1967).
Ref-1263 Barry E. Horner, Future Israel: Why Christian Anti-Judaism Must Be Challenged (Nashville, TN: Broadman and Holman, 2007). ISBN:978-0-8054-4627-2d.
Ref-1302 Iain H. Murray, Jonathan Edwards: A New Biography (Edinburgh, Scotland: The Banner of Truth Trust, 1987). ISBN:978-0851514949e.

Links Mentioned Above
a – See https://www.spiritandtruth.org/questions/231.htm.
b – See http://bibleinthenews.com/home/view_art.php?id_pag=22.
c – See https://www.spiritandtruth.org/id/isbn.htm?0-8254-2351-1.
d – See https://www.spiritandtruth.org/id/isbn.htm?978-0-8054-4627-2.
e – See https://www.spiritandtruth.org/id/isbn.htm?978-0851514949.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Israel global climate repentance

Israel global climate repentance

Important

Here are your false prophets. One is even called the Elijah Institute. I sent them a message from Malachi:

"And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse" (Malachi 4:6 ). 

COP27 Repentance Review (12 min)

COP27 Repentance Ceremony Review. A brief overlook at the individuals there & the 10 Principles in the Israel Today & from the Interfaith Center for Sustainable Development. Have a great day!

The Elijah Interfaith Institute Video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVdyf...

-- 10 Principles in Elijah Interfaith - https://climaterepentance.com/the-spi...

-- Elijah Interfaith FB pictures - https://www.facebook.com/Elijah.Inter...

-- Israel Today - https://www.israeltoday.co.il/read/is...

-- Rockefeller Brothers Fund FB pictures - https://www.facebook.com/RockefellerB...

A New Cult… (2 min)

Global War is a “Blessing” for the Climate, Says UN Weather Chief (9 min)

God Wins

God Wins

Important -Recommended

Watch this short video and then read my comments underneath:

Yuri Bezmenov had a warning but he also had a way out (4 min)

Be careful because religion will be used as a weapon

What Bezmenov says here is true but as always the truth can be used to manipulate (a full version of his interview on psychological tactics can be found here). People are created to seek existential meaning and that cannot be substituted with technocracy. Russia reintroduced religion as a stabilizing force after the fall of communism and Putin advocates for the Christian Orthodox Religion and supports the Jewish and Muslim faiths.  However, Christianity in Russia is state sponsored and worship (and bible study etc) is controlled by the church.  That is not freedom of religion.

In America there is a Great Awakening happening a kind of religious revival as counterpart to the Great Reset.   The light as counterpart to the dark.  This is typical Hegelian Dialectic on a grand scale.  Thesis, anti-thesis, synthesis or if you prefer problem,reaction,solution.  They are going to crash the system completely (mimicking Revelation 18) in order for a new system to emerge.  Order out of Chaos (Masonic motto).  There are no heroes or saviors here.  Neither on the left nor on the right.

Below I place a very long thread of tweets by an investigative journalist (Dave Troy) showing the links between the “New Age” Sasha stone and Prof Jeffery Sachs.  The interesting thing is that Jeffery Sachs (an economist) was instrumental in engineering the fall of the Old Soviet Empire and the reemergence of the asset stripping Oligarchs.  Jefferey Sachs has recently gone over to the “good side” and even Dr Kevin McCairn has spoken to him (as well as Sasha Stone). He was involved with the Lancet covid investigation and has turned against them.  Sachs has even spoken out against the Ukrainian war. What is going on?   I cannot shake the feeling that we are being played.  The Trump Card is religious revival.  One World Religion.  Team Trump including Steve Bannon (ex Goldman Sachs) have all “caught religion”.  Hallelujah, the good guys  are going to save us (sic).  The investigative journalist warns that the mid terms will see  a red wave (Republicans) who will refuse to increase the debt ceiling thereby crashing the US economy (and the global economy).  They will use the War against Ukraine as an excuse by refusing to send any more money.  So unless the Democrats stop sending money to Ukraine the Republicans will crash the system.  So the story goes. 

What to make of it?  What he says contains a lot of truth but is also absolutely biased.  It is the Democrats who are in power and who are warmongering and sending billions to Ukraine.  It is the Democrats who have substantially increased govt debt.   The takeaway is that they are all corrupt (both political parties). Do not look to any side to rescue you or save you.  Always be mindful that you are being played.  They want you to welcome and accept your slavery.  The beast is about to emerge and it matters not whether the beast is unleashed by the left or by the right.   The dawning of the “new age” is a false light.  Be very careful because none of them is your friend. They will stab you between the ribs in the blink of an eye.

And Joab said to Amasa, Art thou in health, my brother? And Joab took Amasa by the beard with the right hand to kiss him.  But Amasa took no heed to the sword that was in Joab's hand: so he smote him therewith in the fifth rib, and shed out his bowels to the ground, and struck him not again; and he died. So Joab and Abishai his brother pursued after Sheba the son of Bichri (2 Samuel 20:9-10 ).

Very long thread by Dave Troy:

If some of the tweets do not load refresh your browser.

Metaphysics and Myth

 Metaphysics and Myth

A nearly six hour stream in which Dr Kevin McCairn discusses a paper which shows Beta Amyloid identified In Young Covid patients and also information that vaccines don’t stop long hauler syndrome.  From 2:29 onward Dr Kevin McCairn hosts a conversation in which I join him to discuss metaphysics.  The conversation is partly a response to the ideas brought forward by Christopher Jon Bjerknes (CJB) in his book Satanic Secrets of Jesus Christ  wherein he portrays Christianity as part of a Jewish plot to subject the world.   I already pointed out that this argument is logically flawed and inconsistent as the Jews attempted to subvert Christianity and adsorb it back into Judaism from its very inception in the first century.  Moreover Christianity has always stood as a bulwark against Bolshevism which attempted to destroy Christianity.  Internationalism (globalism) and/or communism has always understood Christianity as the enemy.  Three previous videos dealing with these matters are the following:

The Caodemon (discussing issues raised by CJB’s book) and Are you listening to a Pied Piper? (debunking claims about the scapegoat and the LXX) and the video that deals with matters raised by Eric from Hot Topikz called Blood sport or debate?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes’ theories are derived from the Christ Myth Theory which has been rejected as a fringe theory by virtually all scholars.  CJB adds an extra twist to this theory by arguing that Jewish Scripture was originally written in Alexandria as a recasting of Greek myth into a Hebrew worldview in which Gentiles would be convinced to reject their old (better gods) for a mythical (Satanic) Christ by adopting Christianity, a religion designed to deceive them and weaken them  and prepare them for Jewish subjection.

History

The enlightenment brought the age of reason and “science” and the fall of totalitarianism in the twentieth century saw the truth as an artifact that could be subverted by ideologues and therefore absolute truth was neutralized by post-modernism and post-truth.  In this view all truth is relative but where does that leave historical truth?  Can anything concrete be know about the past?  Historical revisionism can be legitimate pursuit if driven by new evidence or it can be negationism (distortion or denial of history for nefarious purposes). History is, after all written by the victors and therefore seldom unbiased. The post -enlightenment era saw the rise of deconstructionism and biblical-criticism which are useful tools when employed holistically.[1]

The question of the existence of Christ as a real historical person is not doubted by most scholars (biblical and historical). It is strange that the historical reality of Christ should be asked to meet higher criteria of proof than other historical personages.  If we do not have epistemological clarity then we can never have ontological certainty and the world and our place in it can never be know or understood. Methodological approaches are therefore fundamental to determining meaning and therefore I suggest understanding the text as literature and how it interacts intertextually both with itself (inner biblical exegesis) and externally (with myth).  No single text exists in a vacuum the meaning is formed by other texts and in doing so the text transcends its boundaries.  The biblical text is great literature but it is more than that it is theology and history as well and herein lies the difficulty as it does not fall into easily defined categories.  Underneath the live stream video I place links to videos looking at different approaches that need to be integrated in order to achieve a holistic understanding of the text.

Myth

All cultures have myths about the “gods” and they all reflect a certain cosmogny related to cyclical patterns of destruction and rebirth.  The story of Noah is found in Sumerian myths and in many other cultures [2] and seems to be related to a Heinrich event with the melting of ice sheets and sudden climate change. Interestingly, the biblical ark came to rest on Mt Ararat which is close to the most ancient continuously cultivated vineyards for 8,000 years [3] complimenting the biblical account of Noah planting a vineyard. Traumatic catastrophes are preserved across cultures  and they are related to repeating cosmic events which the ancients knew how to calculate. The cosmogony of Israel and its Zodiacal arrangement shows an awareness of wider ancient myth and deconstruction and demythologizing (reinterpretation) whereby the twelve tribes become the zodiac and the Sanhedrin become the 70 gods or rulers (Elohim) who will eventually judge the 70 nations (Gen 10). [4]   In this theology heaven has come down to earth and Yahweh is enthroned among his people.  This suggest that the knowledge of cosmic patterns transited the Younger Dryas boundary. [5]   The ubiquity of the myths across cultures suggests that the ancients were aware of the cyclical nature of destruction but that over time that knowledge was lost.  The question is whether the Jews preserved the knowledge through a group evolutionary strategy or whether it was the product of revelation.

The Jewish Question

"As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes" (Rom 11:28).

Any look at the Jewish question must be nuanced and balanced. Not all Jews are supremacists neither did all Jews support Bolshevism.  The Jewish people themselves have been subject to abuse by a privileged class who think nothing of sacrificing  them on the altar of their ambition. It was the same in the first century when a priestly aristocracy and ruling class exploited the poor.   It is not antisemitic to note that all the levers of power are now in the hands of the Jews, neither is it antisemitic to note that the early church was persecuted and subverted by the Jews.  The apostle Paul makes it perfectly clear that they are contrary or hostile (NKJ), or oppose (NIV) all men. Paul believes that they are hateful towards other races.

"For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews:  Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men" (1 Thess 2:14-15).

Jesus says their Father (talking about the rulers) was a liar and a murder from the beginning (an obvious reference to the serpent):

"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it" (John 8:44).

This is very strong condemnatory language that reflects the persecutions that the church was facing, nevertheless it must be balanced against the wider purpose of divine mercy towards the Jews  and their repentance and in-gathering.

"For if the casting away of them be the reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead?"  (Rom 11:15).

What about other religions? Are only Christians saved?

This is a challenge that is often heard. There are nearly 8 billion people on earth are only Christians going to be saved?  In fact, many would answer that only their sub-set of Christianity is worthy and everyone else will burn in hell (lolz).  Another remark is that the Abrahamic religions are contentious in comparison to the more harmonious eastern philosophies.  This may be due to other factors beside religion including national temperament and whether or not they are a regional minority or majority. First let us look at the distribution of world religions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We see that the Abrahamic religions make up about 56% of total religions and when we add unaffiliated (mostly atheist or humanist) we account for 72% of the world population leaving 28% non-Abrahamic religions.  Note that Judaism is not even on this chart because it represents only 0.2% of the global population.  The two biggest non-Abrahamic religions are Hinduism and Buddhism. Hinduism includes a diversity of ideas on spirituality and traditions, but has no ecclesiastical order, no unquestionable religious authorities, no governing body, no prophet(s) nor any binding holy book; Hindus can choose to be polytheistic, pantheistic, panentheistic, pandeistic, henotheistic, monotheistic, monistic, agnostic, atheistic or humanist.  Hinduism has a belief in rebirth and cycles. Buddhists believe that the human life is one of suffering, and that meditation, spiritual and physical labor, and good behavior are the ways to achieve enlightenment, or nirvana.

Christianity is a universal religion in that opportunity is extended to all men regardless of class or race (John 12:32) but just because someone is Christian does not automatically mean that they will be saved for the path to destruction is broad but the way to salvation is narrow and constrained “…and few there be that find it” (Matt 7:14). Moreover, humanity can take no credit for discovering salvation,  “No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day” (John 6:44). It is the divine prerogative to both select and to forgive whomsoever he wants: “….and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will shew mercy on whom I will shew mercy” (Ex. 33:19 ). Not only that but the apostle makes it clear that the creator (artist) does not have to answer to his creation, “Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?  Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?” (Rom 9:20-21). So, God does not owe us an explanation and ultimately it is not our place to judge another man’s servant.

 

Textual Approaches

The Art of Biblical Narrative by Alter was a groundbreaking approach to understanding the Bible as literature which is a prerequisite to obtaining any theological meaning. The following video is the first of four videos (recommended) reviewing the book [6]

First episode, Robert Alter, The Art of Biblical Literature (14 min)

This video on Hermenutics and Intertextuality is a good introduction and I start it part way where it is talking about Palimpsests (Gerard Genette 1982):

What is intertextuality?

This video demonstrates that intertextuality is inimical to understanding any piece of writing, or movie or even music (lyrics).   Nothing happens in a vacuum.

Intertext/intertextuality| Context of Text Development| Reading and Writing-Senior High School (12 min)

Resources

A number of texts were discussed and also referred to in the chat.  Matthew 2 which records The Flight into Egypt was brought up as an example of the grey area between historical event and pesher/midrash.    The embarrassment around Jesus’ birth and the woman caught in adultery is indirect corroboration (at the very least) of the mystery surrounding his birth and his legitimacy in John 8.  The Book of Job was mentioned as an example of a parabolic way of examining philosophical questions surrounding suffering and disinterested service based on the real-life experiences of Hezekiah.  The miracle of the healing of Legion was placed in the intertextual context of exorcising the unclean spirit out of the nation of Israel by sending them away.  It was a parody of the scapegoat ritual with the unclean animal (pig) drowning in the “Abyss” from which the “beast” emerges in Revelation 11 to kill the two witnesses who had tormented them (like Jesus did).   This teaching miracle must be put in the wider context of demonology found in the testaments.  Moreover, the Apocalyptic twist given to the healing of Legion demonstrates that the Beast power is at its heart Jewish.

 

 

 

 

 

This is discussed in depth in my commentary PRITA on the Apocalypse.

Finally someone commented on the fact that Sarah was a half-sister to Abraham misunderstanding the cultural norms and the complex theology behind the sister-wife narratives.  Consanguinity was not unusual in the ancient near east one only has to look at the ancient Egyptian Kings and Queens etc. 

Notes

[1] I. Howard Marshall once famously compared the scholarly deconstruction of Christ and the gospels with the scene in John 20:15 where Mary is weeping and when the “Gardner” asks why she is crying she responds that they have taken away the Lord’s body and she does not know what they have done with it.

[2] A Flood of Myths and Stories

[3] World’s oldest wine found by scientists in Georgia

[4] See the article on The Great Year The rabbis dispute whether there are 70 nations (MT) or 72 nations (LXX) in Genesis 10 but the wilderness Sanhedrin together with Moses and Aaron suggest 72 is correct.

[5] See the article on the Younger Dryas

[6] Select the watch on YouTube button to find the other three parts. This is an excellent channel.  See also the Review that I wrote some years back (the links may have degraded) Review of The Art of Biblical Narrative.

Zuck becomes God

Zuck becomes God

Like I have said before, I am suspicious of Russel with his 33 tat on his wrist….though at the moment he is saying the right things and making the right noises.

What is wrong with religious people?

I have to ask that question because so many think that what is happening is perfectly normal and they are supporting it and going along with it.  This is the next step in creating a virtual reality.  The god of this world will become the AI Borg mind – all human data scrapped and manipulated by machine learning and processed by algorithms.  It represents the Beast System on Steroids. The mind of man enhanced and augmented by computers. It becomes a parody of God.  Evil incarnate.

“Err, Metaverse The RELIGION Now??!” This Is SINISTER (13 min)

What did he just say? (5 min)

Welcome to your godless, dystopian future. NO. NO. we will not give up our privacy for health care.  NO. Our lives belong to God not to the technocrats.

 

New Age Religion

New Age Religion

John Brisson is often a guest on Dr McCairn’s Live Streams. He is a Christian who is extremely knowledgeable on supplements, drugs etc and has written a book on gut health. He is also somewhat of a “conspiracy theorist” in the good sense of the word  in that he digs through the “official” narratives.   He has a YouTube Channel called We’ve Read The Documents. The video below comes from that website.  The video features the famous Bill Cooper who predicted 911 and his own death and at 15:30 says this:

"Either these men are following the book of Revelation just like a plan which brings the prophecy to pass or there really is a God and what he said is going to come to pass is coming to pass".

Of course Bill Cooper is portrayed as a UFO promoting and tax evading conspiracy theorist in Wikipedia but the Report from Iron Mountain (although a “hoax” like the “protocols”) talks about Governments using UFO’s and War etc etc and fear to control the population. The Great Reset is the Great Awakening.

New World Order of Love and Light Exposed – E511 Ministries – Christian Video Vault (1:08 min)

In this shocking documentary the modern New Age Movement is clearly proven to be teaching the exact same lies that Satan the Serpent taught to Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. Countless New Agers are shown in the film teaching that men are gods and that Jesus isn't returning like He said He would. Rather, they say, we are the second coming of Christ ourselves. The same lies that Jesus Himself warned would be prominent before He returned.

Over the Moon

The next video is also from John Brisson’s website. It is based on the Conference held on 12 September in Korea (9/11 U.S. time)  hosted by the Unification Church otherwise known as the Moonies. Trump spoke at the conference as did ex-prime minister of Japan Shinzo Abe. The conference ends with a speech by the “Only begotten” daughter of God Mrs Moon (lolz).

Trump At The Helm of The One World Religion of Love and Light – The Beast and The Harlot Part 14 ( 1 hour 50 min)

The Last Trump

In the light of the above video I found this short video interesting.  A vote recount has recently been completed in Arizona Maricopa County which “apparently” still shows a Biden win and “no corruption” (lolz) with Trump losing by 360 votes and yet door to door canvasing in the county shows that  votes cannot be found for lot of people who said that they had voted (without specifying who they voted for).  Also a lot of “ghost” voters etc. And we have not even talked about an audit of the voting machines connected to the internet. For anyone interested in the 4 hr audit hearing see here.   Biden was never going to lose…it is all spin.

Will Trump and Netanyahu Return to Power? (4 min)

 

Conclusion

Whatever may or may not happen remember that there are no good guys.  Trump may well make an incredible “come-back” from being the underdog to being the savior. Remember that he did say that he was the “chosen one” (lolz).  Whatever the case might be….Trump is no Christian.  He was trying to bring in the Noahide Laws, which were signed into law with Sanhedrin Jews under Education Day. These laws are not-benign and are anti-Christian.  Will he make a come-back and will he “rebuild the temple” with Bibi?    Who knows.  Nothing would surprise me now.   Both men are supported by Chabad  and it is their 72 code found in the furin site.

There is a big push for a “one world religion”:

Here is the rub.  The only thing standing in the way is true Christianity.   We knew that it would eventually come to this.  Do not be deceived.   There are many False Christians out there.

We Know

We Know

Anyone who has been watching this unfold can now start putting the pieces together. If you do not think something is badly wrong by now you are suffering from denial and cognitive dissonance.

We now know what they are doing and we know who is behind it.  If you are a Christian you know that Jacob attempted to wrestle God (his angel) to a halt.  That is exactly what he is doing now and his name is Jacob Rothschild or Red shield.    God had promised Abraham to be his shield (protection) and his very great reward (Gen 15:1).   Apparently that is not good enough for Mr Red Shield and his ilk.  Red being the Hebrew root of Edom and Adam. We reject the shield of man.  Our protection comes from God for he is our rock and our strong fortress.

You will not be saved  by either a Space Shield nor  by a Rocket Shield. All your lovers will turn against you and burn you. You labor under the mistaken notion that knowledge (AI) is power and you are attempting to deify yourself.  It takes more than “knowledge” and “power” to make yourself a god.

"I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.  But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes.  Arise, O God, judge the earth: for thou shalt inherit all nations" (Ps 82:6-8).

 

Whereas God is all-righteous and morally pure you are a moral imbecile. Gods name will be glorified and you will be wrestled to a halt. Until you weep and make supplications and acknowledge your sin you will have no lasting peace. Repent.  The previous world was punished by water and this one will be punished by fire.  Many will die but the earth will survive and so will many people. 

Judgement Day

This is my video.  All the pieces fit with what I know and make sense historically, scientifically and scripturally. Make up your own mind. It is coming and cannot be stopped. Order your life with God and put your trust in him. Do not be deceived.

 

Redshield and Schwab

China & Russia

China & Russia

How do China & Russia fit in with what is happening?  I thought I would post some videos on the subject that show somewhat contrasting views to get you thinking on the subject.  I will also give my own opinion on the subject and ask questions. 

What do Russia and China have in common?

Both Russia and China are no longer “communist” (especially Russia) but the Communist or Bolshevik movement in Russia was Jewish….however, not many realize that the Communist revolution in China was also Jewish.  I post a link here to a very good thread on the subject which I suggest you have a look through at your leisure.  It is a real eye opener and I have backed it up because all sorts of things are disappearing of the internet nowadays.

China Thread

This is very…..very good…..

http://archive.is/nRODk

 

Brother Nathaniel on Russia

Brother Nathaniel is a Jew who converted to Orthodox Christianity.   So, he is a big fan of what Putin is doing in Russia.  Putin has brought back the Church to the center of Russian life and Russian values. He has also revalued the importance of the family unit and clamped down on homosexuality etc.   I watched the first half of the first video and it was very good (but long) the videos are placed here as much for my own benefit as anything else, will go back and watch them fully when I have more time.

From what I have already seen bro Nathaniel regards Putin as a good guy. Putin is certainly a statesman and has strategic smarts.  I don’t believe anybody is a good guy but he is certainly turning the fortunes of Russia around.  However, there are many others who regard Putin as a Zionist.   Now this is a complex question because Russia and the Jews have a history together.  Putin himself was close to a Jewish couple who used to look after him when he would come home from school.  Most of the oligarchs in Russia are Jewish. Putin has good relations with the Rabbi’s and with Israel. Nearly a million Russian Jews live in Israel. Moreover, Putin seems to have a good relation with Trump who is a Zionist.  I think Putin is happier dealing with Zionist (nationalist) Jews than with internationalist (globalist) Jews. He certainly does not want any “dual citizens” with split loyalties holding any Government positions.  This disadvantages both the Globalist Jews and the Zionist Jews. So, I think Putin is just being pragmatic although he does favor the nationalists.  These next two videos are very informative and very pro-Putin.  Afterwards I will post one that shows a darker side.

Brother Nathanael pack on Russia / Putin (& the jews) 2010 to 2015 (1 of 2)

Brother Nathanael pack on Russia / Putin (& the jews) 2015 to end of 2019 (2 of 2)

 We would argue that Putin’s approach is pragmatic while others see him as a Zionist stooge and those who support him as controlled opposition or Russia apologists.

Russia and Gog

Controlled opposition?

The next video states that  people like Richard Spencer, David Duke, brother Nathanael, Mike Enoch, Heimbach who promote Putin are controlled opposition.The aforementioned people are anti-Zionist and often regarded as anti-Semitic.  It is argued that in Russia you land in jail for being a nationalist, or for denying the holocaust or for being anti-Semitic.  This video is basically saying that Putin is not “the great white hope” that he is portrayed to be but that he is in league with the Zionists.

There is some truth in all of the above but Russia acts out of Russian interests. Perhaps you do end up in jail if you are a “nationalist”…..but what kind of nationalist…..a “separatist” who wants to fragment the Russian federation?  Perhaps you end up in jail if you deny the holocaust…..but Russia has many powerful Jewish interests and it would be foolish to unnecessarily antagonize them.   He has encouraged a resurgence of Christianity but he is also tolerant towards Judaism.  In my view that is just pragmatism.  He seems intent on making Russia as independent as possible from any globalist NWO.  Anyway, I post this video to give a balanced view of the many undercurrents:

Beware of the Dugin infiltrators

 

A communist (Jewish) world takeover

This video is even more extreme seeing the fall of Russia and East Germany (when the wall came down) as a stage managed event.  Bjerknes says the following; “The fall of Communism in Red China appears to be stage managed just like the phony dissolution of the Soviet Union, which is today led by KGB chieftain Vladimir Putin. Donald Trump is acting as the new Trotskyite neo-Con mirroring Ronald Reagan’s act. China is the new “evil empire” and Soviet Russia the new ally of the false Right”.

The Fake Fall of Red China

China Taking Over

 Conclusions

If you watched all the above videos and are confused that is a good thing.  You should be confused. There is a great game being played and a lot of disinformation out there. I believe that Books is wrong when he says that Putin and Bolsonaro are killing there own people using Covid-19.  That is clearly leftist (globalist) propaganda. The figures coming out of Russia and Brazil are massaged and inflated. The globalists want the economy of Brazil and Russia destroyed and Putin and  Bolsonaro are refusing to comply. The bit about the fires in Brazil is also propaganda as it was not worse than other years. Bolsonaro is a Zionist and a Trump ally and Putin is also friendly with Trump and a (marginal) Zionist.  So these two leaders are fighting against the more extreme version of globalism and choosing either the Zionist version or a more independent multi-polarity over one world rule. Otherwise why would Russia strive to decouple the internet from the global system?  I believe Putin is being pragmatic with the Zionists but drawing a line in the sand regarding Syria.  He has done naval exercises with Iran and China as a threat to the Zionists – thus far and no further. Does he want to increase Russian influence in Europe?  Of course, he sees them as a natural ally.  Does he want globalism aka Chinese style Sino-commie-capitalism?  I think he will cooperate with the bridge and road but not allow the unique character of mother Russia to be overwhelmed by  globalist -Jewish-control.

A great game is being played for world hegemony. Whoever wins, the Jews win, whether that is via the Chinese (globalist Jews) or via the Anglo-Zionists.    If the globalists win you can expect a communist style repression of religion. If the Anglo-Zionist win there will probably be more religious freedom (maybe) but only if the “Noahide Laws” are obeyed and only if Christianity becomes a secondary offshoot to Judaism with Jesus demoted to the status of a prophet.

 

Update

Interesting to note that Christianity is only allowed in Russia if it is in state approved Churches.  So, not real freedom of religion.