The Devil’s horns

This came from another of those Craazee Socha Faal articles but I liked the link mainly for the beautiful  images. The Devil’s horns above Iran. (LOL)  The abyss is opening?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The horned one

Satan etc is often depicted as hairy with goat horns.   Reminds me of the scapegoat.   Nah.  The scapegoat represented the sins of the nation being sent to Azazel.  Nah. The Jews will not be exiled anymore?

 

"Behold, the day of the LORD cometh, and thy spoil shall be 
divided in the midst of thee. 2 For I will gather all nations
against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken,
and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half
of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue
of the people shall not be cut off from the city".
(Zech 14:1-2)

 

The Jewish nation as the ScapegoatPDF download

The Scapegoat and the Jews

An article examining the biblical concept of the scapegoat.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


"But the goat on which the lot fell for Azazel shall be
presented alive before the LORD to make atonement
over it, that it may be sent away into the wilderness
to Azazel". (RSV Leviticus 16:10)

 

The Jewish nation as the ScapegoatPDF download

The Holocaust and Isaiah 53

 

The term “holocaust” means whole burnt offering.  The Talmud (not the Old Testament) predicted that it was necessary that 6 million Jews had to die (be offered) before God would allow the Jews to return to the land.   Nowhere in the Torah does God demand 6 million Jewish deaths. In fact, God did not even allow Isaac to be offered. The figure of 6 million is repeatedly found in newspaper reports at least 20 years before WW2 as is the word “holocaust”. 

Moreover, Judaism promotes an interpretation of Isaiah 53 that understands the “suffering servant” as the nation of Israel.   The interpretation offered by Judaism is completely unnuanced and biased and demonstrates either a complete lack of understanding of their own scriptures or a deliberately dishonest approach. The rabbis teach a Talmudic version of “prophecy” where the messiah is replaced by the “Jewish state”.    The nation becomes its own saviour.  This is typical of the type of commentary that can be found online:

The Jew suffered due to other people. He was the first victim, the eternal scapegoat for the faults and misfortunes of others. The Gentiles will admit that Judah was considered accursed, yet his affliction was due to our imposing upon him the results of our own calamities (Isaiah 53:4). The Jew was punished for the sins of others (53:5). The Jew often succeeded in dedicating himself to the Law when he could. When he was forced (by outsiders) or seduced to abandon it he applied his energies in other directions: in jurisprudence, trade, science, philosophy, philanthropy. The Messiah shall come from Judah. The Jew has a natural instinct to reform things, to rectify the world. When the Jew is deprived of Torah this instinct can be misdirected. Sometimes it does good and on occasion it can do damage. Either way the Jew is hated by many Gentiles merely because he is active, is different and stands out. The sins of others are transposed onto the Jew (53:11). In the Last Days Judah shall be rich and powerful and a great nation, among the greatest that exist. AND HE SHALL DIVIDE THE SPOIL WITH THE STRONG: Judah shall be a military might, an old lion who must be dealt with carefully and with respect. AND HE WAS NUMBERED WITH THE TRANSGRESSORS; Jews were accused and still are of all the sins under the sun and still more and of being criminals and controlling all the crime and mischief of the world. AND HE BARE THE SIN OF MANY, Not only was Judah made responsible for the sins of others, but he also took upon himself to make retribution for the faults of others. AND MADE INTERCESSION FOR THE TRANSGRESSORS. Jews champion the oppressed and seek to help whoever needs help even when those who are in need were the cause of their own downfall (53:12).

This demonstrates how little the Jews understand of their own Scriptures.  The scapegoat does indeed represent the nation.  The scapegoat bears the sins of the nation and was released in the wilderness.  As such the scapegoat represents the nation sent into exile bearing its own sin (not gentile sin).   The story of Cain and Able is based on this ritual, with Cain sent away from the sanctuary into exile (scapegoat) and Abel (goat for Yahweh) slaughtered.  Cain was “accursed” because he brought the wrong offering (grown by sweaty labour [Gen 3:19] from the cursed ground) and Cain slew his brother out of jealousy and anger. Cain ought to have known that God provided animal skins as covering for his parent’s nakedness, atonement was not solely dependent on human effort. Once again, the Jews revel in their self-imposed victim-hood.  Similar to Cain they complain that they are vagabonds and unable to bear the punishment that is the result of their own disobedience and intransigence.  And yet God is merciful and protects Cain. God does not allow the scapegoat to be killed (an “innovation” later adopted by the Rabbis) because at some future point God will forgive and cleanse the scapegoat and bring it back home. However, forgiveness requires repentance (think here of the parable of the prodigal son) but how can you forgive someone who never, ever, ever admits that they have done any wrong? Everyman’s hand is against them for no reason.   They are the perpetual victim and bear no blame. 

Debunking a bad interpretation

The following introduction to Isaiah 53 is from Rabbi Tovia Singer via the Outreach Judaism[1] website:

Despite strong objections from conservative Christian apologists, the prevailing rabbinic interpretation of Isaiah 53 ascribes the “servant” to the nation of Israel who silently endured unimaginable suffering at the hands of its gentile oppressors. The speakers, in this most-debated chapter, are the stunned kings of nations who will bear witness to the messianic age and the final vindication of the Jewish people following their long and bitter exile. “Who would have believed our report?,” the astonished and contrite world leaders wonder aloud in dazed bewilderment (53:1).[2]

The stimulus for the world’s baffled response contained in this famed cluster of chapters at the end of the Book of Isaiah is the unexpected salvation of Israel. The redemption of God’s people is the central theme in the preceding verse (52:12) where the “you” signifies the Jewish people who are sheltered and delivered by God. Moreover, the “afflicted barren woman” in the following chapter is protected and saved by God, and is also universally recognized as the nation of Israel [3] (54:1).

There are so many things wrong with this interpretation that it is difficult to know where to commence.  It portrays the nation of Israel as a “victim” silently enduring unmerited suffering at the hand of horrible gentiles.   In the case of Isaiah, the gentiles are the Assyrians who were known for their cruelty and violence, but the interpretation conveniently leaves out the fact that God himself brought the Assyrians against Israel because of the nation’s disobedience and sinfulness.

“Ah sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity,
a seed of evildoers, children that are corrupters:
they have forsaken the LORD, they have provoked
the Holy One of Israel unto anger, they are gone
away backward” (Isa 1:4).

It is remarkable (or perhaps not) that the rabbi completely neglects the fact that the original context of Isaiah is the near death of Hezekiah.  Hezekiah is the “suffering servant” of Isaiah 53 and he represents the faithful remnant.   Answer me this rabbi…. why is the central portion of the book of Isaiah chapters 36-38 all about the sickness and recovery of Hezekiah?

Hezekiah was the “suffering servant” and his miraculous recovery from his death bed and the miraculous Passover deliverance of Jerusalem from Assyria are the initial subject of Isaiah 53.   Hezekiah represented the faithful remnant in the nation.   The rabbi says;

“Moreover, the “afflicted barren woman” in the
following chapter is protected and saved by God,
and is also universally recognized as the nation
of Israel (54:1)”.

The rabbi is correct.  The barren woman is based on Rachel, one of the matriarchs who died in childbirth (Gen 35:16-19).   But what is the saying in Isaiah 54:1 based on?

“And they said unto him, Thus saith Hezekiah, This day is a day of trouble, and of rebuke, and blasphemy: for the children are come to the birth, and there is not strength to bring forth”. (2 Kings 19:3)

The saying comes from the very mouth of Hezekiah who portrays the nation as writhing in excruciating birth pangs like Rachel.   The nation is about to die in childbirth.  The promise to Eve was that deliverance (= the messiah) would come through childbirth (Gen 3:15) but now the nation faced death.  How could the nation “bring forth the messiah” when the king was about to die childless?   How could the promise to Abraham be kept and the covenant with David if Hezekiah died?

And yet, Hezekiah willingly accepted and absorbed the divine punishment meted out against the disobedient nation.  He endured the mocking and contempt of Sennacherib. He silently bore the plotting of Shebna and the pro-Assyrian party (and the drunken defeatism of the Ephraimites).  He kept faith in his God. 

Hezekiah was a faithful king and as such he represented the faithful remnant in the nation.   The kings of Israel and Judah were believed to serve as divine agents to rule the nation.  Therefore, the king held a unique position in that he was a corporate representative but also a divine agent.

In other words, the king represented the nation to God.  Kingship had a corporate, representative function.  However, the king was also meant to represent God to the nation.  Agency was an important part of everyday life in the ancient world.  Individuals such as prophets and angels mentioned in the Jewish Scriptures were thought of as ‘agents’ of God.  And the key idea regarding agency in the ancient world appears to be summarized in the phrase from rabbinic literature so often quoted in these contexts: “The one sent is like the one who sent him.”[4]

“So shall my word be that goeth forth out of
my mouth: it shall not return unto me void,
but it shall accomplish that which I please,
and it shall prosper in the thing whereto
I sent it”
. (Isa 55:11)

How would this anthropomorphised prophetic “word” prosper?

 

“Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise him; 
he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt
make his soul an offering for sin, he shall
see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and
the pleasure of the LORD shall prosper in
his hand”
. (Isa 53:10)

Hezekiah was saved.  On the third day he was raised from his death bed. The city was saved.  Hezekiah was granted an extra 15 years of life.  He had a son and continued the Davidic line.   Like suffering Job, king Hezekiah kept the faith and God kept his covenant.  As with Job, everyone except God had abandoned him.

So, Hezekiah proved to be the initial fulfillment of the Emmanuel prophecy (God with us) but the story does not end there.  These are quite clearly messianic prophecies and typical fulfillment. In other words, they are repeat patterns pointing forward to an even greater deliverance.

That deliverance found its fulfillment in Jesus Christ, the true King of the Jews and Son of God. The ultimate intermediary between God and man.

Conclusion

Isaiah 53 is initially based on Hezekiah but ultimately typical of Jesus Christ.   All scripture points towards the messiah Jesus Christ.  He was the perfect representative between God and man.  He was not equal to God and never claimed to be.

The rabbis who portray the “nation of Israel” as the “suffering servant” are disingenuous and dishonest.   They are presenting the Jews as perpetual victims of racist and cruel gentiles who for no apparent reason want to make them suffer.   Apparently Jewish suffering has a unique vicarious quality that will “cleanse” the gentiles and herald the messianic age.  Such suffering is (according to them) well pleasing to God.  Of course, it is all nonsense.  Any suffering that the Jews experience is a consequence of their bad behaviour and is divine punishment for disobedience.  Such behaviour is not well pleasing to God.  And their suffering does not expunge anyone’s guilt.

 

“The soul that sinneth, it shall die. 
The son shall not bear the iniquity
of the father, neither shall the father
bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness
of the righteous shall be upon him, and the
wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him”. (Ezek 18:20)

Approximately 55 million people died as a consequence of WW2.  Many of them were not Jews.  The holocaust was not an “offering” to God.  It was not a fulfilment of “Talmudic prophecy” and one does not even have to delve into the truth claims of the holocaust to understand that a historical tragedy has been fetishized and scripture has been manipulated and “spun” to propagandize for Zionism.  You may be able to fool men, but you will not be able to fool God.  God will not be mocked.  Jacob the deceiver is about to meet his maker and he will be wrestled to a halt.   I suggest that the rabbis read my commentary “Dark Sayings” and other articles on this website and brush up on their appalling lack of Old Testament understanding.     https://www.biblaridion.info/html/dark.html

 

Download the article as a PDFPDF download

 

 

What Happened to Jews Sent to the Aktion Reinhardt Camps?

 

 

Notes


[1] https://outreachjudaism.org/gods-suffering-servant-isaiah-53/

[2] Midrash Rabbah (Numbers XXIII.2), Zohar (Genesis & Leviticus), Talmud (Brochos 5a), Rashi, Joseph Kara, Ibn Ezra, Joseph Kimchi, David Kimchi, Nachmanadies, Abarbinbanel, et all

[3] Ibn Ezra on Isaiah 53

[4] James F. McGrath, The Only True God: Early Christian Monotheism in its Jewish Context, (University of Illinois Press, 2009) p. 14.

Hilaire Belloc’s “the Jews”

Reflections on Hilaire Belloc’s “the Jews” (1922)

Hilaire Belloc
Hilaire Belloc

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This article functions as a commentary on a Book Review that appeared on the Unz website:

http://www.unz.com/article/reflections-on-hilaire-bellocs-the-jews-1922/

The book entitled “The Jews” was written by Hilaire Belloc in 1922 and is reviewed by Andrew Joyce.  It is still relevant today and I recommend reading the review and my response here:

 

The Mark of CainPDF download

Something different

And now for something completely different

Here is an amusing and rather sad article that demonstrates that some people are crazy or suffering from some form of psychosis. The reason why I am posting this will become apparent anon.  First let me say that this story broke in the New York Times a well know Jewish media outlet (look at the names under the article heading). I add this information because any criticism immediately gets classified as anti-Semitic, so if you have a problem with it take it up with the NYT.  

Well, to fill in the background. Epstein is already a convicted pedophile and sex trafficker who got let off lightly on his previous trial. He has been re-arrested because fresh evidence has appeared. A lot of influential people were drawn into his web and it seems he has compromised (blackmailed) them. There is a strong suspicion that he works either for Mossad or for Jewish financiers (Rothschilds). He is now in jail awaiting a re-trial as he is considered a flight risk. It appears that an attempt was made on his life while in jail or perhaps (unlikely) a suicide attempt. He holds a lot of damaging information and certain people want to shut him up.

Now the NYT headline;

Jeffrey Epstein Hoped to Seed Human Race With His DNA

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/31/business/jeffrey-epstein-eugenics.html

Apparently he also wanted his head and his penis cryogenically frozen

Can we extrapolate from this?

Epstein  is obviously a damaged individual but can we draw any wider conclusions from this?  Many would say that would not be fair as you have good and bad everywhere but is there more going on than meets the eye?  Of course I know nothing about his “religiosity” (Judaism) or whether or not he is a “Zionist” but the former is likely and the latter is virtually a given.   Can we extrapolate from this something about the current Jewish mindset?

Judaism and the afterlife

The Torah teaches resurrection from the dead, it does not teach an “immortal soul”.   Very early on there was a split among the Jews with the Pharisees believing in the resurrection and the Sadducee (priest) denying the resurrection.

This is what Freud had to say about his people;“No other people of antiquity 
[than the Egyptians] has done so much to deny death, has made such careful
provision for an after-life […]. The early Jewish religion, on the other hand,
had entirely relinquished immortality; the possibility of an existence after
death was never mentioned in any place.
Sigmund Freud, Moses and Monotheism,
Hogarth Press,
1939 (archive.org), pp. 33-34.

So, according to Freud the Jews denied immortality (immortal soul); the doctrine of the immortal soul was introduced into reform Judaism by  Moses Mendelssohn (1729-1786),he did not rely on the Jewish tradition, but instead produced a Platonic dialogue titled Phaedo or the Immortality of the Soul.

Many Jewish intellectuals protested against the introduction of that foreign body into Jewish thought, and their reaction would become a central tenet of Zionism. According to Moses Hess (Rome and Jerusalem: The Last National Question, 1862),

“Nothing is more foreign to the spirit of Judaism
than the idea of the salvation of the individual which,
according to the modern conception, is the cornerstone of religion.”
For Hess, the essence of Judaism is “the vivid belief in the continuity
of the spirit in human history,” because “the Jews are something more
than mere ‘followers of a religion,’ namely, they are a race brotherhood,
a nation.”
Moses Hess, Rome and Jerusalem: A Study in Jewish Nationalism,
1918 (archive.org), pp. 48, 64-65, 71, 98.
“Only by intermarriage can a person uproot himself from a nation,
and then only in so far as his descendants are concerned.
His individuality, which is an extract and an example of the
qualities of his nation, may then be lost in future generations,
dominated by qualities of other nations. Quitting a nation is,
therefore, even from a biological point of view, an act of suicide.”

Benzion Netanyahu, The Founding Fathers of Zionism (1938),
Balfour Books, 2012 , kindle ed., 157-66 and 2203–7.

 

Jewish Materialism and Jewishness as a corporate soul

This brings us to our conclusion. Materialism is at the root of Zionism and that is essentially the Sadducee doctrine. The only “afterlife” is the one we make now and our destiny (afterlife) is expressed through our children. The whole (nation) is greater than the individual parts. In the end people live on through their descendants. Jews are destined to rule the world (so the Torah says) and the Jews are determined to do this. However, freezing your penis (even if it is circumcised) will not achieve this.

Abraham and Sarah were barren.  The promise and continuation of the race came through faith in the promise of God embodied in the Messiah it did not come through a frozen penis, or through circumcision.

"I just wish that those troublemakers who want to mutilate 
you by circumcision would mutilate themselves".
(NLT Gal 5:12)

The promise does not come through the flesh it can never come through the flesh whether that is “spreading your seed”  or through nationalism (Zionism)  materialism will fail.

Wake up Christians….this is a sign of complete madness

In his time Jesus declared the following:

 

21 When a strong man armed keepeth his palace, his goods are in peace:
22 But when a stronger than he shall come upon him, and overcome him,
he taketh from him all his armour wherein he trusted, and divideth his spoils.
23 He that is not with me is against me: and he that gathereth
not with me scattereth.
24 When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places,
seeking rest; and finding none, he saith, I will return unto my house
whence I came out.
25 And when he cometh, he findeth it swept and garnished.
26 Then goeth he, and taketh to him seven other spirits more wicked
than himself; and they enter in, and dwell there: and the last state of that
man is worse than the first.

(Luke 11:21-26)

 

Here the nation is depicted as a mad man who has been healed (think here of Legion). The unclean Spirit in this story is sent into dry places (the wilderness) not into the abyss (sea of Galilee as in the Legion story). The point is that the nation is sent into the wilderness like the Scapegoat (bearing its sins) sent to Azazel (the strong one) and the place of demons (Babylonian captivity).  But God does not banish them forever. He took pity and called them back from Babylon.  In the first century Jesus “swept the house” when he cleansed the temple. The Jews always cleaned the unleavened bread out of their homes (they still practice a spring clean) at Passover.  Jesus cleansed the temple at Passover.  So we have an allusion here to two Jewish feasts 1. Day of Atonement (sending the scapegoat into dry places) and 2. cleaning the house (feast of unleavened bread in preparation for Passover).

The point is that Jesus came to replace the “unclean spirit” with the Gospel and the nation (apart from a small Jewish remnant) rejected that message and rejected the Messiah.  Therefore God sent them into dry places again….and they have returned again.

[Actually, technically, that is wrong….he sent them into the ABYSS (not dry places) and they were unclean animals (swine not goats)….and now they are in the process of emerging from the abyss…..to build a Third Temple (sic)….they emerge “riding a beast” and they murder the witnesses]

However, Jesus warned that if they did not accept him as their Messiah or accept the gospel message, in the end they WOULD GO COMPLETELY MAD.

Surely, Epstein’s approach is the sign of a deep rooted psychosis in some (not all ) Jews.  Materialism will get you nowhere. If there is no repentance there will only be punishment.  God will not be mocked. Jacob will be wrestled to a halt and crippled.

 

The Jews have been manipulating the nations from before the first world war but judgement day is nearly here. As a Christian you should preach to the Jews without fear or favor, with compassion and hope. You should however not pander to their psychosis. You should not become a sycophant and an enabler. Stick with the facts and call them out but always remember that you are an in-grafted branch. If you do this you will be called an anti-Semite, your career and reputation will be destroyed you will be blacklisted for telling the truth and preaching the gospel. Ezekiel 33:

Nevertheless, if thou warn the wicked of his way to turn
from it; if he do not turn from his way, he shall die in his iniquity;
but thou hast delivered thy soul.
11 Say unto them, As I live, saith the Lord God, I have no pleasure
in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way
and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die,
O house of Israel?
13 Ye have plowed wickedness, ye have reaped iniquity; ye have eaten the
fruit of lies: because thou didst trust in thy way, in the multitude
of thy mighty men.
19 The way of the wicked is as darkness: they know not at what they stumble.
22 Because with lies ye have made the heart of the righteous sad,
whom I have not made sad; and strengthened the hands of the wicked,
that he should not return from his wicked way, by promising him life:
26 The righteous is more excellent than his neighbour: but the way of
the wicked seduceth them.

Important Notice:

New website page (Last Things)

coming soon

 

Update:

A quick update:

New York Area Fire Commissioners Make History, Call for New 9/11 Investigation

https://www.ae911truth.org/news/540-new-york-area-fire-commissioners-make-history-call-for-new-9-11-investigation

 

This is not a bunch of “conspiracy theorists” or “nutters” but NY firemen who lost colleagues. They believe that explosives were used. They want a new investigation.

“We’re a tight-knit community and we never forget 
our fallen brothers and sisters. You better believe
that when the entire fire service of New York
State is on board, we will be an unstoppable force.”
— Commissioner Christopher Gioia.

Are all the lies starting to unravel?  I believe that people are starting to wake up. Many know that a financial collapse is at hand. Many are starting to understand the manipulation and lies behind the wars. Many feel that the “climate change” agenda is hiding something much more complex and resistant to human input.  In other words the ones who are watching and alert are starting to sense and feel the “wrongness” and the “lies”.  This can only mean that the “hidden hand” will soon pull the plug. I expect financial collapse and/or war will start shortly, before too many people wake up. Be ready to bail-in your savings to save the banks, to send your children to shed their blood in Middle East wars and will you please stop using your gas and electric….we need to save the world, ya know!   Get with the program.