This is very good and we will be following the series and looking at the links provided. I do not believe that there will be a global tsunami. As Diamond indicates, crustal slip happens every 104 k years (every four precession cycles) the precession cycle is about 26 k and we are experiencing magnetic-shift at the half-cycle which is about 12-13 k.
Toward a New Theory of Earth Crustal Displacement, Charles Hutchins Hapgood, Crustal Slip Hypothesis (14 min)
Suspicious Observers do believe that there will be a global tsunami caused by crustal slip. I don’t think so, but they are correct on the micro-nova, electric plasma Universe and solar forcing. This is true science. It allows for discussion, debate and…sometimes doubt. We don’t know everything.
My scientific view is balanced by my biblical understanding and faith. The earth will not be destroyed but civilization as we know it will. According to scripture there will be a solar micro nova and a huge earthquake and no doubt this will cause local tsunamis but continents will not be submerged by 2 miles of sea.
Magnetic Fish, Ancient City Discovered, Disaster Vehicle | S0 News Jun.3.2022
Solar Eruption & Eruption Watch, New Nova, Dixie Fire | S0 News Jun.2.2022 (4 min)
The deception that has been perpetrated is on such a grand scale as to be almost inconceivable. The climate lies and covid lies go hand in hand. Most people refuse to believe because it would mean that all our institutions are corrupt or colluding. However that is not necessarily the case as it only takes a handful of key people to shape policy, administer grants and promote supporters and ideologues. As with all these narratives the truth (reality) will eventually reveal itself but by then the damage will have been done. For example, if we destroy the fossil fuel industry and it suddenly gets much colder what then?
SNOW AND LOW TEMPERATURE RECORDS SLAIN ACROSS THE U.S. — 300,000 HOMES WITHOUT POWER, AND RISING, AS POLAR COLD SWEEPS IN
SOLAR CYCLE 25–A DIFFERENT POINT OF VIEW: For much of the past year, the space weather community has been buzzing about the strong performance of young Solar Cycle 25 (SC25). Every month, sunspot numbers seem to blow past official predictions. This means we’re about to have a strong Solar Maximum, right?
“Not so fast,” cautions Dr. Ron Turner, an analyst at the ANSER research institute in Virginia. “It may be too early to anticipate a strong solar cycle.”
Solar Cycle 25 is doing something interesting. It is mimicking old Solar Cycle 24 (SC24). “I took sunspot numbers from the early years of SC24 (the red dashed line) and overlaid them on SC25,” says Turner. “They’re an almost perfect match.”
This is significant because Solar Cycle 24 went on to become the weakest solar cycle in a century. Its hot start did not lead to a strong maximum. Turner isn’t saying that Solar Cycle 25 will likewise be a dud. But, rather, “these early sunspot numbers are not enough to guarantee a strong cycle.”
Solar Eruption, Animals Where They Shouldn’t Be, Electric Forcing | S0 News Feb.5.2022 (3 min)