The Talmud

The Talmud

And he said, This is wickedness. And he cast it into the midst of the ephah; and he cast the weight of lead upon the mouth thereof.  Then lifted I up mine eyes, and looked, and, behold, there came out two women, and the wind was in their wings; for they had wings like the wings of a stork: and they lifted up the ephah between the earth and the heaven.  Then said I to the angel that talked with me, Whither do these bear the ephah?  And he said unto me, To build it an house in the land of Shinar: and it shall be established, and set there upon her own base.

Zechariah 5:8-11

See the article: Wickedness in Shinar Rabbinic Judaism established in Babylon

 

What the Jewish Talmud says about Babies, Jesus, Blacks, and Christians (12 min)

 

Thought I would place some Sumerian/Babylonian music here.  This was top of the pops in ancient Shinar (lolz):

The EPIC OF GILGAMESH is the earliest great work of literature that we know of, and was first written down by the Sumerians around 2100 B.C. Ancient Sumer was the land that lay between the two rivers, the Tigris and Euphrates, in Mesopotamia. The language that the Sumerians spoke was unrelated to the Semitic languages of their neighbors the Akkadians and Babylonians, and it was written in a syllabary (a kind of alphabet) called "cuneiform". By 2000 B.C., the language of Sumer had almost completely died out and was used only by scholars (like Latin is today). No one knows how it was pronounced because it has not been heard in 4000 years. What you hear in this video are a few of the opening lines of part of the epic poem, accompanied only by a long-neck, three-string, Sumerian lute known as a "gish-gu-di". The instrument is tuned to G - G - D, and although it is similar to other long neck lutes still in use today (the tar, the setar, the saz, etc.) the modern instruments are low tension and strung with fine steel wire. The ancient long neck lutes (such as the Egyptian "nefer") were strung with gut and behaved slightly differently. The short-neck lute known as the "oud" is strung with gut/nylon, and its sound has much in common with the ancient long-neck lute although the oud is not a fretted instrument and its strings are much shorter (about 25 inches or 63 cm) as compared to 32 inches (82 cm) on a long-neck instrument. For anyone interested in these lutes, I highly recommend THE ARCHAEOMUSICOLOGY OF THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST by Professor Richard Dumbrill. The location for this performance is the courtyard of Nebuchadnezzar's palace in Babylon. The piece is four minutes long and is intended only as a taste of what the music of ancient Sumer might have sounded like.

 

 

THE UGLY TRUTH ABOUT NFTs

THE UGLY TRUTH ABOUT NFTs

Warning

Posted under the tag antisemitism.  Here are some people saying some naughty things that you should not listen to.

Dirty Harry at his best.  Warning lots of swearing, ranting, cussing and antisemitism. Dirty Harry at his best. Very funny (and true).  Another Jewish ponzi scheme.

 

You have been warned (lolz)

THE UGLY TRUTH ABOUT NFTS – HARRY VOX

Might as well add another “antisemitic” rant by controlled opposition “Brother Nathaniel” about another Jewish tech tyranny invented by a gay Jew (who would have thought). Wasn’t there another “polyamorous” Jew who recently laundered money for Ukraine/Democrats (same thing) and collapsed a bit coin exchange (ponzi)?   I don’t know…I can’t keep up.  I think that there is some kind of pattern emerging. If only I could put my finger on it. Now go and be a good goy and get your jab and stay in your 15 minute playpen.

 

This page would not be complete without a bit of Talmud bashing (lolz).

Talmud and The Pharisees are disgusting (3 min)

 

I upset ChatGTP when I asked it a question about the Talmud and pedophilia. After thinking for ten minutes it came back with this answer:

It is important to clarify that the Talmud, which is a central text in Jewish law and tradition, does not condone or allow pedophilia. In fact, the Talmud strongly condemns any form of sexual abuse, including sexual activity with minors.

There may be some misunderstanding or confusion regarding a specific passage in the Talmud that has been misinterpreted as condoning pedophilia. This passage, found in the tractate Sanhedrin 54b, refers to a discussion about the age of consent for marriage, and mentions the age of three for a girl and nine for a boy. However, this passage is not advocating for sexual activity with minors, but rather discussing the legal requirements for marriage in Jewish law, which in that time and culture allowed for early arranged marriages.

It is important to note that Jewish law has evolved and adapted over time, and today, the Jewish community strongly opposes any form of sexual abuse, including abuse of minors. There are various Jewish organizations and resources dedicated to supporting and protecting survivors of abuse, and promoting education and awareness to prevent such abuse from occurring.

In summary, the Talmud does not allow or condone pedophilia, and any interpretation or claim to the contrary is not accurate or in accordance with Jewish values and ethics.

The passages in question do however talk about the virginity of a three year old female and suggests it is like the poke of an eye (it sheds tears and then the hymen heals).  In other words the child can still be considered a virgin for marriage purposes.   With language such as this don’t tell me it has nothing to do with pedophilia but is about arranged marriages.  They taught chatGTP to spew Jewish pilpul (lolz).

 

Are you listening to a pied piper?

Are you listening to a pied piper?

This video is a rebuttal of the after analysis of the debate with Christopher Bjerkness moderated by Dr Kevin McCairn.   I was rather disappointed at the assessment with phrases like “Christopher won the debate” and “Paul was trounced” and the charge that I was not polite.  I believe that whereas Christopher resented  John Brisson sarcastic tone he actually thanked me and said he would look into some of the things I suggested because they were interesting.

Do I sometimes go on?   Yes, because that is necessary when people make sweeping claims about things they do not understand.  Kevin complained about the back and forth over the academic  minutiae because it is about pointing out who is the enemy and who is the useful idiots. Well you can’t do that unless you understand the the academic  minutiae otherwise you are at a disadvantage when false claims are made. If the foundation is built on sand the house collapses.

Christopher presents a deluge of information that he strings together but they come from different sources and different contexts on which he places equal weight.  How can you place the same weight on the Old Testament as on the Zohar that appeared in 13th century Spain?  He makes sweeping claims (without evidence) that the Greek Bible (LXX) is not a translation but that it is the original Old Testament (which they presumably translated back into Hebrew scrolls some even written in paleo-Hebrew and scattered around everywhere.)   He even points to the Massoretic Text (MT)  being written about 1000 AD as a “gotcha” moment (lolz).

This demonstrates to me that he has no understanding of textual transmission and his Biblical knowledge (inter-textual hermeneutics) is poor.  I think I remained very polite and I had to bite my tongue and show restraint on numerous occasions.   The problem is that there is some truth to what he is saying and it needs to be honestly examined but we cannot throw the baby out with the bath water.

I do not have to answer for other Christians nor do I carry the same burdens.  Just because Tertullian and Origen misunderstood the typology of the scapegoat does not mean that I do.  Just because some Christians may believe in Ransom theory and a bet with the devil does not mean that I carry that burden and it does not mean that Scripture even teaches it.  As to burning in hell Christians would do well to remember that Jesus went to hell and came back on the third day.  Moreover, who are we to judge another man’s servant?  The Lord makes one vessel to honor and another to dishonor.   The clay cannot cry out to the potter..why have you made me thus?   Understand the meaning of the Lord’s name:

"And he said, I will make all my goodness pass before thee, and I will proclaim the name of the LORD before thee; and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will shew mercy on whom I will shew mercy" (Exodus 33:19).

Some men’s hearts will be hardened, other will fall by the wayside and yet others will bring forth tares. Some will die in ignorance and some will be as if they had never existed.  Your lot is not to judge but to do what is right towards your neighbor and love the Lord they God with all they heart, soul and mind. Amen.

Are you listening to a pied piper? (1:10)

Resources:

Psalm 82 in the Fourth Gospel

Soteriology and Atonement Theory

The Language of Atonement

See the original debate for more links:

Are You Being Punked?

Are You Being Punked?

Are You Being Punked?

This stream is 5hrs 16 min in which I join Dr Kevin McCairn, Christopher Jon Bjerknes,  and John Brisson to discuss metaphysics.  Christopher Jon Bjerknes advocates for the position that the current circumstances that we are facing is a result of self-fulfilling Jewish prophesy.  According to this view the Old Testament and therefore Christianity owes its grounding in platonic and Gnostic thought. We are being trained by the Bible (both the OT and the NT) to extinguish ourselves and destroy our earth.   We have been punked.  Oy, Vey!    I have probably oversimplified Christopher’s position. Christopher has a Jewish Grandfather on his mothers side (https://www.bitchute.com/video/dATWlHyqN3t3/) so he is not antisemitic but I find it amusing that so many dissidents who are critical of Judaism also want to destroy Christianity and replace it with scientific rationalism.  I can imagine that working out real well (lolz).

I believe that faith and science are not in opposition but that true scientific inquiry should be ethically guided.  Finally, I find myself in agreement with Christopher’s assessment of the Talmud and the Zohar as they are basically a rewriting and supplementary “interpretation” of the Old Testament, what Jesus calls, the traditions of men.   The Jews have turned pilpul into a fine art and can argue that black is white.  So, while  I agree that the Jews are using the basis of their holy book (the Torah) as an agent to dominate the world….as a playbook, I reject the notion that the outcome is inevitable or that the OT is somehow presenting a different malevolent God.  The NT cannot be divorced from the OT and this can be demonstrated by proper intertextual reading.  Any perceived contradictions is a failure in hermeneutics.   I have placed links to some of the subjects that we touched upon underneath the video (more can be found on the main website).

In the final analysis the enemy of the primitive first century church (which was predominately Jewish) were fellow Jews.  They persecuted Jewish Christians and killed them. The  same pattern holds for the Bar Kochba rebellion. Talmudic  Jews killing Christian Jews.  Through the centuries Jews have subverted the Christian church.  The Jews perceived the church as their enemy.  Why do you think that the Bolsheviks tried to exterminate Christianity?   Western democracy and sovereignty is rooted in Christian principles. After the 2-3rd centuries Jewish Christianity virtually disappeared and Christianity became a (predominately) a Gentile religion as the apostle Paul indicated;

"And David saith, Let their table be made a snare, and a trap, and a stumblingblock, and a recompence unto them: Let their eyes be darkened, that they may not see, and bow down their back alway. I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy. Now if the fall of them be the riches of the world, and the diminishing of them the riches of the Gentiles; how much more their fulness?" (Rom 11:9-12)

It certainly did provoke them to jealousy because they lost their special position. The inclusion of the Gentiles into the predominantly Jewish church was a major problem in the first century and many Jewish believers resented the fact that Gentiles should have equal status. In many circles the apostle Paul is hated even more than Jesus.  (Paul was a rabbi….for goodness sake…a self hating Jew who let those scummy goy into the tent).The story in the Gospel of Mark demonstrates that even Jesus had to adjust his opinion of the Gentiles who were considered dogs.   

 "And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil. But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us.  But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.  Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me.  But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.  And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table.  Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour".  (Matthew 15:22-28)

On this see Food for Thought  http://www.biblaridion.info/Anthology/food_for_thought.pdf

Jesus certainly extended the Gospel to the Gentiles  when he declared that he had other sheep:

"And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd"(John 10:16).

And he declared that he would draw all men (Jew and Gentile) denoting the universality of his sacrifice:

"And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me" (John 12:32).

 

This stresses the human nature of Christ as a litmus test for Christianity contra Gnosticism which views material existence as flawed or evil, Gnostic cosmogony generally presents a distinction between a supreme, hidden God and a malevolent lesser divinity Yahweh of the Old Testament) who is responsible for creating the material universe. Jesus is therefore not material (flesh) which in their view is intrinsically evil.  Scripture depicts flesh as weak and fallen and estranged from God.   Jesus bore the Yahweh name – Yah saves.

( The spirits here are prophets who proclaim to testify through the spirit the figure of speech is  a synecdoche i.e. it stands for teachers who profess what they claim is a divine, inspired message they emphasised personal spiritual knowledge (gnosis) above the orthodox teachings).

"Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world" (John 4:1).

The quote in Deuteronomy is not a plan to dominate the world but an ethical guide on how to treat strangers. The Hebrew word used here is for foreigners or aliens (nekar) outside the land (usually hostile) not a stranger (ger) dwelling among them.

"Unto a stranger (nekar) thou mayest lend upon usury; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon usury: that the LORD thy God may bless thee in all that thou settest thine hand to in the land whither thou goest to possess it" (Deuteronomy 23:20 )

The above quote has to be balanced with this from the same book:

"He doth execute the judgment of the fatherless and widow, and loveth the stranger(ger), in giving him food and raiment. Love ye therefore the stranger (ger): for ye were strangers(ger) in the land of Egypt" (Deuteronomy 10:18-19).

The Israelite had themselves been strangers living in Egypt and were never to forget that lesson.  The Palestinians are “strangers” (some would argue the original inhabitants) dwelling amongst them and they are extorted to love the stranger.  So, it is selective quoting to go to one passage and refer to it as a plan for world domination of the goy.  I do not see any divine instructions for establishing a central bank or the divine imprimatur to rob, steal and cheat.   The fact that the Jews would use such a text to justify their wrong doing is just more pilpul. In the eschatological vision of Isaiah foreigners are given a positive relationship (56:3,6) and role (60:10,61:5), when God has reversed the old orders.

Dark Sayings
Stylometrics on the Hebrew etc a summary of 7th-8th century writings and the book of Proverbs. https://www.biblaridion.info/html/dark.html

Scapegoat

The  Scapegoat
https://www.biblaridion.info/Anthology/Jewish_goat1.pdf

Cain as the scapegoat sent away bearing his sins
http://www.biblaridion.info/Anthology/cain.pdf

Zodiac and the tribes: cosmogony
https://www.biblaridion.info/Digressions/zodiac.pdf

Jacob the cheater and deceiver:Wrestling with God; Jacob as a paradigm for the nation of Israel  http://www.biblaridion.info/resources/jacob.pdf

Wickedness in Shinar: The Babylonian Talmud
https://www.biblaridion.info/resources/shinar.pdf

Witnessing prototypes (Apocalypse) based on Moses and Elijah
https://www.biblaridion.info/html/ch11.html#P219

The LXX (Septuagint or SEVENTY) Greek version of the OT

Christopher maintains that there was no OT prior to the Greek version and that the Greek version was influenced by Greek philosophy etc. In other words, the Greek version was not a translation it was the first version.  Modern scholarship holds that the Septuagint was written from the 3rd through the 1st centuries BC, but nearly all attempts at dating specific books (except for the Pentateuch, early- to mid-3rd century BC) are tentative. The Dead Sea Scrolls have been dated to a range from the third century BC to the first century AD. That means that the oldest scrolls in the collection might have been as old as the Septuagint, which dates to the third century BC. A big, big part of what the Dead Sea Scrolls showed us is that both the LXX and the MT trace back to very old Hebrew sources which must be related at some point in the distant past prior to the composition of the LXX.

The position presented by Christopher is a gross oversimplification of a very complex field. Very skilled scholars can reconstruct from word choice that they are mistranslated from original Hebrew Aramaic sources.  It is a misconception to think that scribes were translating from a set canon. Only the Pentateuch was a stabilized text the prophets etc were still in flux and all on different scrolls in different parts of the empire.  The next  links should give some idea of the complexity that we are dealing with:

Septuagint

 

https://academic.logos.com/the-origin-of-the-lxx/

 

 

 

PRITA (Part 3)

PRITA (Part 3)

Here is our next video in the series Pattern Recognition In The Apocalypse (PRITA).  

Although the last 2,000 years is referred to as the “Times of the Gentiles” that does not mean that the Apocalypse is a continuous account of Christianity or Gentile history. The Kingdom of God could have been established in the first or second centuries if the nation had repented.  Instead the Jews were cast off until the times of the Gentiles were fulfilled.  The Apocalypse does not tell us about the intervening period. After all, the Gentiles are a branch that has been grafted into the Jewish tree of covenant hope.  The focus of the Apocalypse is on events immediately proceeding the  second advent and those events were interrupted by stubborn disobedience.  As we approach the end we have a repeat of the patterns that  occurred in the first and second centuries.

What can we then say about the long intervening period?   The intermission or parenthesis was an opportunity for the gospel to be preached to the Gentiles  but it also provoked the Jews to jealousy (Rom 11:11).   If God had abandoned them then they would achieve their own deliverance and greatness.  Remember that Satan promised Jesus the kingdoms of the world if only Jesus would bow down and worship him?   Of, course we know that Jesus refused to worship his own fleshly desires.  Jesus refused to snatch at power and glory but the Jews feel like God has betrayed them because they were the chosen race.  It is their world and the Gentiles (especially white Christians) are usurpers.  So, the Apocalypse tells us nothing about the intermission because the Apocalypse is not a history book.  

However, it is important to understand the parenthesis from the Jewish perspective. They came to the conclusion that they needed to repossess their homeland. The Jewish nation had collectivized the messianic attributes as they had (in their view) been offered up (holocaust) for the sins of the Gentiles (Isaiah 53).  Of course, they expected a messianic leader to emerge once they possessed the land at which point they would rule the world and heal it (Tikkun Olam).  So far their obsession has brought nothing but bloodshed and ideologies like communism on the one side and mercantilism and super charged capitalism on the other.

Even though the times of the Gentiles is an interlude that does not feature per se in the symbolism of the Apocalypse it is nevertheless important to understand the period from a historical  perspective because the times of the Gentiles was the period where the Jews came to the conclusion that they had to take matters into their own hands.   Ironically the times of the Gentiles was shaped by the Jews. The prophetic clock could only start ticking again once the Jews took possession of their homeland.   The following video relates to this interim period….

 

 

PRITA (Part 3) The Times of the Gentiles (40 min)

See here for part 1 and 2:

Bar Kochba the ultimate muscular Jewish hero: from false messiah to Zionist icon

 

Resources

19th century timeline:

thumbnail

 

Your web browser doesn’t have a PDF Plug-in. Click to download Covid articles

Babylon the Great

Babylon was the place where the nation was exiled and the place where their law schools were established.

Your web browser doesn’t have a PDF Plug-in. Click to download Covid articles

The Babylonian Talmud (7 min)

The mother of Harlots

It should come as no shock that the Rabbis prefer Islam because it is an offshoot of Rabbinical Judaism. [i] Jewish Law (halakha) means “the way of walking” and Islamic Law (sharia) in Arabic means “the way.” The Islamic obsession with “Law” comes from the Jewish obsession with Law as Parthia (Babylonia or Shinar) was the centre of Jewish Law Schools and the place (Zech 5.11) where the Babylonian Talmud was written for centuries before Muḥammad appeared. Moreover many Jewish tribes lived in the Arabian Peninsula where Muḥammad (an illiterate but well travelled merchant) received his visions. Muslims believe that the Quran was orally revealed by God to the final Prophet, Muḥammad, through the archangel Gabriel (Jibril), incrementally over a period of some 23 years concluding in 632, the year of his death.

According to tradition, several of Muḥammad’s companions served as scribes and recorded the revelations. In 1896 Rabbi Abraham Geiger highlighted the similarities between Rabbinic Judaism and Islam. [ii]  Jews are allowed to pray in a mosque and Muslims in a synagogue but neither will pray in a church. Christians are considered “idolaters” [iii] by Jews and Muslims but as we have seen even when Christians reject the Trinity and vicarious atonement it makes little difference to the rabbis as Islam is preferred above the monotheistic “version” of Christianity. There is therefore no version of Christianity that is palatable to the Rabbis. So Jews and Muslims eat the same clean food, practice male circumcision (which is also widespread in Islam and accepted as established practice by all Islamic schools of jurisprudence) and we must not forget ostentatious prayers etc and the giving of alms and the pilgrimage to Mecca (based on the historical pilgrimage to the Jewish temple cf. the Wailing Wall). In 1976 the historians Patricia Crone and Michael Cook wrote the book Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World is a 1977 book about the early history of Islam. According to the authors, 7th century Syriac, Armenian and Hebrew sources depict the formation of Islam as a Jewish messianic movement known as Hagarism,[iv] which migrated into the Fertile Crescent. It drew considerable influences from the Samaritans and Babylonian Judaism. Around 690 AD the movement shed its Judaic identity to develop into what would later become Arab Islam.[v] Although the theory was subsequently universally rejected for its methodology [vi] it did open up new avenues of research. Hagarism built on the work of Joseph Schacht (d. 1969), a towering figure in the history and study of Islamic law; and before Schacht, to Ignaz Goldziher (d. 1921), a man who in many way stands as the godfather of modern Islamic studies in the West. Both Goldziher and Schacht showed that many of the oral traditions which had been attributed to Muḥammad and regarded with canonical authority by Muslims were actually late fabrications which reflected the cultural and political situation in the Middle East long after the Prophet had died. [vii]  Apart from casual allusions in the Qur’an, most of what is reported about Muḥammad’s life is based on oral traditions of his followers later collected and written down in biographical works of the A.D. 8th and 9th centuries. Suffice to say that the truth lays somewhere in-between full blown Hagarism and a conservative Islamic view as it is quite obvious that Islam owes much to Rabbinic Judaism but probably not to the extent that Hagarism suggests. One might say that Judaism is the mother religion (rather t

[i] See David Steinberg, Islam and Judiasm Influences Contrasts and Parallels

[ii] The Talmud and Islam and Abraham Geiger, Judaism and Islam, (Translated by F.M. Young, 1896).

[iii] For Maimonides, Christianity and Islam are related to Judaism. Maimonides’s practical view of Christianity was usually assumed to be negative, and he regarded Christianity as a form of proscribed polytheism, even for gentiles. In his code of Jewish law, Mishneh Torah, Maimonides basically restated his judgment about the idolatrous status of Christianity without repeating the reasons he gave in his earlier works. As a theologian, he took regularly strong exemption to Christian Trinitarianism. Maimonides ranked Islam superior than Christianity on theological grounds. For him, Christianity is the prime example of the error of such anthropomorphism in its original doctrine of the Incarnation and in its associated doctrine of the Trinity. See,Oxford Scholarship

[iv] Named Hagarism after Hagar, the Egyptian wife of Abraham

[v] SeeWikipedia: Hagarism

[vi] Stephen Humphreys observes, “Unsurprisingly, the Crone-Cook interpretation has failed to win general acceptance among Western Orientalists, let alone Muslim scholars … The rhetoric of these authors may be an obstacle for many readers, for their argument is conveyed through a dizzying and unrelenting array of allusions, metaphors, and analogies. More substantively, their use (or abuse) of the Greek and Syriac sources has been sharply criticised. In the end, perhaps we ought to use Hagarism more as a ‘what-if’ exercise than as a research monograph.” Stephen Humphreys, Islamic History, (Princeton, 1991) pp. 84–85.

[vii] Donner, Fred M, Muhammad and the Believers: At the Origins of Islam (2010), Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. p. 126.

The Birth of Islam: Muhammad and the Jews | The Jewish Story | Unpacked (5 min)

Jews and Jesuits

What is Kabbalah? (20 min)

Kabbalah Tree of Death (8 min)

Sabbatai Zevi: The “Messiah” who almost brought down Judaism (7 min)

Theodore Herzl’s diary (3 min)

Red shield

Brendon Premiere video 72

Brendon Premiere video 72

Recommended

This video is a Premiere and is not (yet) available on YouTube.  I have already viewed it on Patreon and it is very good.  Brendon starts with an analysis on the difference between the  the Torah,Tanakh and Talmud and takes Pharisaical Rabbinic Judaism to task. The second part of the video talks about the coming death of crypto. Click Watch on YouTube for show notes etc.

At time of writing 35 hours until premiere on YT. St your reminder on YT.

72. IS NOVEMBER A MONTH TO WORRY ABOUT? CENTRAL BANK DIGITAL CURRENCY ON THE WAY (34 min)

https://youtu.be/uzM56lhDB-c

Spiritual War

Spiritual War

This is a very good broadcast.  We are at war and Christians have to be very careful not to be deceived or deluded.   Nohaide Laws are Talmudic not Biblical.  While it is true that the council of Jerusalem in Acts 15 adopted certain prohibitions that was done to placate the Judaisers:

"But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood". (Acts 15:20)

The Gentiles were instructed to refrain from ritualistic slaughtered meat often dedicated to the “gods” and from fornication which was also frequently associated with temple prostitution and pagan worship.  Converts to Christianity already eschewed such things and were warned by Paul to avoid their old way of life.  The Christian is under no obligation to Jewish law or Noahide law because we are under the perfect law of liberty (James 2:25;Rom 8:21) there is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit (Rom 8:1).  

The more things change the more they stay the same.  In the first century the Jews tried to use the food laws (kosher) to drive a wedge between Jewish Christians and Gentile Christians.  At the basis of all this is the innate belief that the Jews are somehow a superior race because God chose them out.  They want to force Gentiles to keep laws that they could not keep themselves.

 

Your web browser doesn’t have a PDF Plug-in. Click to download Covid articles

This is just the trailer:

The full show is here:

Who is this Coming Messiah

https://iconnectfx.com/view/b8999112-976a-eb11-9979-00505682f257

Who is the coming Messiah? There is a lot of talk over the last year that Israel long awaited Messiah has arrived and only waiting to be revealed to the world. But who is this Messiah figure and how will he be received? More importantly to Christians is who is this Messiah when Christians hold to the fact that the coming of Israel's Messiah was fulfilled in Jesus Christ.

Jana’s Bitchute Channel https://www.bitchute.com/video/NRCF4SakZTx8/

 https://i.ibb.co/48TSmV7/Flyer-ENGLISH-Mashiach-Prayer.jpg

 https://www.facebook.com/AllJewsAsOne/posts/2074267842704835

https://www.israel365news.com/145395/israels-top-rabbi-im-currently-in-discussions-with-the-messiah-himself/

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUtWwtlMt_s&ab_channel=ElShaddaiMinistries

 https://www.chabad.org/parshah/article_cdo/aid/725002/jewish/Perspectives-on-Authority.htm

 https://www.chabad.org/kabbalah/article_cdo/aid/380332/jewish/The-Mitzvot-of-Non-Jews.htm

 https://ia802805.us.archive.org/19/items/TheJewishUtiopia/Higger.-.The.Jewish.Utopia.authentic.Zionist.Mein.Kampf.1932.pdf

 

 

 

Know More News

Know More News

This is worth viewing.  Adam Green has had his channel removed from YouTube.  He has his own website and alternative channels.  I have embedded the BitChute video below this tweet.

Forbidden to Mock the Sages

Antisemitism

Antisemitism

I thought it was timely to talk about the charge of antisemitism which has been weaponized.  It is a tool that is used whenever the Jews are criticized.  They play the antisemitism card along with the victim card. The have turned it into an art form.  You should not allow it to stop you from speaking the truth no matter how harsh that truth is.  Before we progress further allow me to state that there are many “righteous Jews” who take no part in this behavior.  I often feature their work and recently referred to Dr Zelenko who stands against the medical tyranny.  Later in this article I will feature a piece by Gilad Atzmon (a Jew)  writing for the Unz review (a Jewish millionaire media entrepreneur).  These “righteous Jews” are not even necessarily converts to Christianity…..they simply tell the truth.  You can have an intelligent discourse with someone who tells the truth.  You cannot get anywhere with someone who lies and deceives and who wants to destroy you.  Against such people you do not give an inch.  You call them out for what they are….liars.  Jesus did and he was a Jew and Paul did and he was also a Jew.   Of course, any Jew that tells the truth is described as a “self-hating”  or antisemitic which is of course ridiculous.  The point is not to be deterred from telling the truth and calling out the lies.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nazi  headshrinkers

Someone directed me to this link and I had to feature it.  I didn’t believe it was true at first. Absolutely incredible how gullible people are.  You must make up your own mind. I did not agree with the good-evil oversimplification of the Bible narrative although it is true that many Christians can be manipulated if their worldview is too narrow.  These are the notes from under the video:

In this documentary, Dean Irebodd exposes the nonsensical lies told about phony evidence submitted during the Nuremberg trials. A person's high regard for the Nuremberg Trial tends to be taken down a peg or two upon learning that the American prosecution team offered a shrunken head into evidence, blaming the Nazis for what obviously came from a South American rain forest tribe many years prior.Toward the end of World War II, U.S. armed forces entered the German wartime concentration camp at Buchenwald. The first Americans to become active there were officers of the Psychological Warfare Division. They had a plan: to plant "evidence" in the camp that suggests the German SS had committed atrocious war crimes against the Buchenwald inmates. Much of this "evidence" was later used during the Nuremberg trials and other similar legal mockeries as evidence against German defendants. From there, this atrocity propaganda entered the history books of the world, and the world believed it, and it still does. To play 'Nazi Concentration Camps', the actual propaganda film from the Nuremberg trials that depicted much of the fake evidence contained in this film, click here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/uywfvIe6H86W/

 

 

Pilpul

Jesus warned the Jews against the “traditions of men” which was already manifesting itself in his day. They “reinterpreted ” the law at the hand of Rabbinical “sages”. However, what happened in Jesus’ day was just the start of a long process of redefinition that came to fruition in the law schools of Babylon.  The prophet Zechariah warned that lawlessness (wickedness) would set up its base in Shinar (Zech 5:11).   The Babylonian Talmud emerged from this process and it supersedes the Torah.  However, we have moved on since then and now the Jews use Pilpul.  My definition – more word twisting and redefinition but this time of the Talmud (lol).  It is “adjusted” so that it fits the situation.  It is all doublethink and hypocrisy. The traditions of men on steroids.  They have gone from Torah to Talmud to Pilpul.  No wonder so many Jews are lawyers in the USA.  I bet a lot of them have the surname Cohen as well! (there I go again being antisemitic!).

 

 

 

Group Evolutionary Strategy

Kevin MacDonald argues that a suite of genetic and cultural adaptations among Jews constitutes a “group evolutionary strategy.” Their supposed genetic adaptations include, most notably, high intelligence, conscientiousness, and ethnocentrism. According to this thesis, several major intellectual and political movements, such as Boasian anthropology, Freudian psychoanalysis, and multiculturalism, were consciously or unconsciously designed by Jews to (a) promote collectivism and group continuity among themselves in Israel and the diaspora and (b) undermine the cohesion of gentile populations, thus increasing the competitive advantage of Jews and weakening organized gentile resistance (i.e., anti-Semitism). By developing and promoting these movements, Jews supposedly played a necessary role in the ascendancy of liberalism and multiculturalism in the West.

Of course, a whole load of academics (encouraged by the Jewish education system and media) line up to “debunk’ this “theory”.    However, you don’t have to be an academic to see that he is correct.  Even your bible tells you that the strategy that Jacob used was deception.   Jesus says that their father (talking about the serpent here) was a liar and murder from the beginning.  A “murderer” because lies lead to the death of humanity. Also, how many wars have been launched based on lies (propaganda)?   

The truth is not some abstract -relative post-modern philosophy as it is embodied in the person of Jesus Christ.   He is the truth.  He is the the fulfillment of the covenants  which was the truth that God swore (Micah 7:20).   All that reject truth in its metaphorical and absolute sense are lovers of the lie.  The ultimate lie….was the original lie….that man himself can become God.  This is the whole purpose of the NWO – to elevate man through Artificial Intelligence to God like status.  They need surveillance and tracking because they want to be omnipresent and omniscient.   They may well be Elohim but they will die like men (Ps 82:7). A new world will not be built based on oppression and lies. God forbid.

  Gas-lighting

What better way to finish this article than with the words of another (self-hating) Jew. 

 

 

Playlist

I cannot vouch for all of these as I simply have not had time to view them all. I place it here as a resource. As always use your discretion, think critically and make up your own mind. That is what adults do.