Triple Helix DNA
Drop the Knowledge-Triple Helix DNA Mix by Nicholson1968 (6 min)
Drop the Knowledge-Triple Helix DNA Mix by Nicholson1968 (6 min)
This was a very interesting interview with Bruce MacDonald who is living somewhere in the Jungles of South America. His background is from a very devout Catholic family and he ended up rejecting the ritualistic traditions and dogma to seek a more transcendental way by researching various philosophies practicing meditation etc.
His take on black magic is interesting and his information that Jimmy Saville was a Jew is shocking. Saville was a degenerate and a “wizard” with connections to the monarchy. See the videos on the page Pedos, murderers and Psycho’s.
This is what I wrote to Bruce:
Hello, I am the guy that you saw debating Doovid. I am not an evangelical by the way even though Doovid tried to classify me that way because I believe in Scriptural interpretation. I think labels are unhelpful. My paternal grandparents and many relatives were RC and I spent time in a very RC region of Holland (Maastricht). My observations is that RC is very into ritual and tradition (unlike other Christian streams) but then the RC church was subverted by Judaists early on. I have three commentaries and numerous articles on my website. I have done stylometric analysis on Parts Of Speech of the Hebrew using PCA and LDA on function words. As you noted I am busy with Gematria which is a new area for me but already bearing fruit. You mentioned African Gematria palimyome (?) from the Congo. I can find no information on this. African slaves (from Central Africa Congo) combined the bible with hoodo in a syncretic adaptation to their superstition. In this view God is a conjurer as is Moses. In the twentieth century a spell book based on Kaballah called The Sixth and Seventh books of Moses (you mentioned the "sixth book of Moses" but there are only five according to tradition) was sold to African Americans containing numerous signs, seals, and passages in Hebrew related to the prophet Moses' ability to work wonders. Obviously the book was a fraud. I differ in my opinion about Moses and the temple etc. The characters and events are based on historical events. Moses withstood the "magicians" of Egypt obviously worshipers of Thoth forerunner to Hermeticism. This is the "black magic" Kabbalah that you mentioned. The Jews creation of money (debt) ex-nihlo and their casting of spells (propaganda) is indeed manipulation of consciousness and very dark. The revelation of Yhvh was meant to counter that. The name is linked to existence itself and to manifestation. The Genesis story counters the idea that man can become God through knowledge (Illumination or gnosis/Hermetic) and the Genesis story also counters the idea of sacrifice in the sense that man must appease God by literally sacrificing their children. These two measures (1) knowledge (2) sacrifice were coping mechanisms of humanity because they realized that they were vulnerable (naked and ashamed) in a world that brought sudden catastrophes. The history of Israel is schematized, and their calendar only goes back some 6,000 years which takes us to the Time of Taurus (bull=golden calf) followed by Aires (ram caught in a thicket) followed by Pieces (Christianity 153 mega fish) followed by the water pourer Aquarius (Num 24:7). We are at the end of the Great Year Precession cycle and things are about to get crazy.
A few things that I need to mention. The northern tribes of Israel (called Ephraim collectively) were half Egyptian. Joseph was married into the Egyptian priestly aristocracy and it was through him that the aristocracy centralized their power base during the famine caused by natural disaster as they exchanged their land for food (sound familiar, at least he didn’t make them eat bugs). That said, the nation and the people survived because of his actions. Moses name is similar to the Egyptian “Meses” as in Rameses (=the son of Ra). The daughter of Pharaoh called him MY SON because she found him. Often Moses is mistakenly thought to mean “drawn out” because she drew him out the water.:
” And the child grew, and she brought him unto Pharaoh’s daughter, and he became her son. And she called his name Moses: and she said, Because I drew him out of the water” (Exodus 2:10).
Of course, this finds theological parallels in God drawing the nation through the waters of the red sea (baptism) and calling them “my son” (Hos 11:1) and Jesus being baptized (Mark 1:11) and the midrash in Matthew 2:15.
The Legend of Sargon of Akkad (c. 2300 BE) is similar to the origin story of Moses, namely found in a basket in the river (Euphrates?). This was a mechanism so that Sargon could distance himself from the kings of the past (who claimed divine right) and aligned himself with the common people of the region rather than the ruling elite. Moses on the other hand was a commoner elevated to royalty by adoption. The following translation of the Legend comes from J. B. Pritchard’s The Ancient Near East, Volume I, pages 85-86:
Sargon, the mighty king, king of Agade, am I. My mother was a changeling, my father I knew not. The brother(s) of my father loved the hills. My city is Azupiranu, which is situated on the banks of the Euphrates. My changeling mother conceived me, in secret she bore me. She set me in a basket of rushes, with bitumen she sealed My lid. She cast me into the river which rose not (over) me, The river bore me up and carried me to Akki, the drawer of water. Akki, the drawer of water lifted me out as he dipped his e[w]er. Akki, the drawer of water, [took me] as his son (and) reared me. Akki, the drawer of water, appointed me as his gardener, While I was a gardener, Ishtar granted me (her) love, And for four and [ ... ] years I exercised kingship, The black-headed [people] I ruled, I gov[erned]; Mighty [moun]tains with chip-axes of bronze I con- quered, The upper ranges I scaled, The lower ranges I [trav]ersed, The sea [lan]ds three times I circled. Dilmun my [hand] cap[tured], [To] the great Der I [went up], I [...], [...] I altered and [...]. Whatever king may come up after me, [...] Let him r[ule, let him govern] the black-headed [peo]ple; [Let him conquer] mighty [mountains] with chip-axe[s of bronze], [Let] him scale the upper ranges, [Let him traverse the lower ranges], Let him circle the sea [lan]ds three times! [Dilmun let his hand capture], Let him go up [to] the great Der and [...]! [...] from my city, Aga[de ... ] [...] ... [...].
I already hear the cries of Jewish plagiarism but if this was a common origin motif circulating at the time it may well have given Moses’ mother the idea to put her son in a basket. Pharaoh’s daughter would have regarded him as a gift from the Nile god Hapi. It was no accident that he was left where the princess bathed and where his sister could guard him.
Moses’s history is supposedly around 1500 BC but this is still controversial as the dates range from the “traditional” 18th dynasty date (ca. 1450 BC) and the current “consensus” 19th dynasty date (ca. 1250 BC), but touching also on other Exodus dates advocated from ca. 2100 BC through ca. 650 BC (See Exodus Dates and Theories).
The Taurus (bull) age range extends to 2150 BC (ca. 4300-2150 BC) would coincide with a very early date and Thera the eruption (c.1600 BC) with a later date and Exodus phenomenon. The bronze age collapse of many ancient civilizations (12th century BC, between c. 1200 and 1150) is still largely unexplained.
Circumcision was originally Egyptian and adopted by the Hebrews as a sign of the covenant which is probably why the Hebrew word for covenant means “cut” because a covenant (agreement) is cut. The member is cut as a sign that the covenant (agreement) is not just with the covenant maker but with his seed (offspring). As to the neurological effects I cannot say but ritual male circumcision is known to have been practiced by South Sea Islanders, Australian Aborigines, Sumatrans,Incas, Aztecs, Mayans as well as the Ancient Egyptians. Today it is still practiced by Jews, Muslims and many tribes in East and Southern Africa.
In an enigmatic fragment of text (that warns of the death of Pharaoh’s firstborn) Moses himself was nearly killed because he neglected to circumcise his sons (Exod 4:22-26) which may be a reflection of later history (Josh 5:2-9). Under the new covenant circumcision is not necessary because the promised seed has arrived and the covenant is reformulated in him.
As to the temple Bruce readily admits (along with just about everyone) that the temple of Herod existed as it is acknowledged by other Roman historians including Josephus. Herod did not actually build a new temple he renovated the existing temple that had been rebuilt after the exile (Zerubbabel’s temple) but the remodeling and reconstruction was that extensive that it was almost a complete rebuild (John 2:20).
The fact is that Hezekiah reformed the cult and cleansed Solomon’s temple (the first temple). There is ample evidence of Hezekiah (a direct Davidic descendant) existing and reforming the cult and cleansing Solomon’s temple. Not just from Scripture but archeological evidence and evidence from the Assyrian records (Taylor Prism). Hezekiah (c 700 BC) did not build the temple he reformed it. So it was already standing and was destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar in 586 BC.
So the charge that no temple existed in the time of Solomon is not true. Solomon gained his wealth from the copper trade mined by the Edomites (who had been conquered by his father David) in the Negev wilderness in the Timna valley near Eilat. There was a huge smelting complex and Solomon supplied all the food water etc and acted as the middleman. The ancient world craved copper (together with 12% Phoenician tin to make bronze). Solomon was buddies with Hiram I the Phoenician king of Tyre who supplied the workforce and some of the materials for building the temple and so between them they corned the global metals market (kerching). The Egyptians had copper mines in the Sinai. Solomon married an Egyptian princess because the marriage covenant was a way of consolidating power and gaining international influence. Hence he had a 1,000 wives (poor bloke the nagging lolz) and they turned his heart away from God. All his wisdom and wealth did not save him even though his revenue was 666 talents of gold annually. He apostatized but to say he consulted 72 demons to help build the temple is Kabbalah and masonic nonsense. Yes, we know the stories are sacred history and make theological points but they are based on truth.
Moreover, the Dome the Rock is the threshing floor of Araunah the Jebusite one of the original inhabitants of Jerusalem before it was conquered by David. It is a stone floor for threshing the harvest and separating the wheat from the chaff. It was purchased legally by David for building an altar (2 Sam 24:21) and Ritmejier has found the the level carving where the Ark stood. It is the place where according to tradition Abraham went up to sacrifice Issac (Gen 22:2). It is the place where the plague caused by the Numbering (see my article) in (2 Sam 24:1) was halted (cf. numbering of the transgressors Isa 53:12). It was co-opted by the Muslims in recognition of its holiness as the place of Mohamed’s night journey. Therefore, Jerusalem (city of peace) is called the foundation stone and a rock of offense and a stumbling block (Isa 8:14), the irony is exquisite for the same epithet (cf. 1 Pet 2:8) is applied to Christ who is the Prince of Peace King of Salem. Whoever meddles with the stone that is Christ will be crushed (Matt 21:42-46 Jesus is alluding to the Hezekiah Psalm 118:22-24 note the day=Passover day deliverance from Assyria in Hezekiah’s time).
The original “foundation stone” was the altar-rock of Zion — which was probably the site where Abraham prepared to offer Isaac (Gen. 22: cp. v. 9 there with v. 27 here), and which was probably also the threshing-floor of Araunah the Jebusite on mount Moriah (2 Sam. 24:18-25). The wicked Ahaz, infected with a zest for the worship of foreign gods, re-moved the altar of burnt-offering from its prominent place atop this foundation stone, and “hid” it away in a corner of the Temple enclosure (2 Kings 16:14). Yet whilst the true altar might be set aside, there was no way to shift the massive outcropping of rock on which it had stood (it is still there today, in the center of the Dome of the Rock). Thus, in Ahaz’s day it remained — quite literally — a “stone of stumbling” (Isa. 8:14,15) for priests walking across the temple court, and a “rock of offence” in a spiritual sense. It was only when Hezekiah came into full control of the kingdom that he could remedy this sacrilege, and restore the Temple worship to its rightful setting. And so the “stone” rejected by the new “builders” of Judah became, once again, a precious stone and a sure foundation for the true worship of the Lord (Isa. 28:16). It is easy, then, to see how this foundation stone symbolized Hezekiah himself (and his faith in the Lord), upon which all true worship in Judah depended. While sick unto death, he had been “set aside” by other would-be “builders” and rulers, but when miraculously healed he would stand forth again as the chief prince of his people. (See further on H.A. Whittaker, Bible Studies, pp. 111-116.)
This is recent video is great but argues that the threshing floor is separate from the Dome of the Rock (I don’t think so):
Amazing discoveries under the Dome of the Rock (26 min)
Glow-Op Goy-Slop Investigations: Abraham is Not Your Patriarch – With Bruce Macdonald (2:55 min)
A discussion hosted by Dr McCairn featuring Ryan Dawson and Doovid among others. Dawson has a reasonable geopolitical analysis but believes it is OK to insult 2.3 billion Christians as brainwashed morons. Not a very good strategy in my opinion. And as a historian he is very incurious and I have criticized his reductionist and unsophisticated approach in the article bronze age religion as far as Dovid is concerned it is difficult for any Jew who holds the views of Abraham Isaac Kook (the first Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi of British Mandatory Palestine) to stabilize the situation. In line with many orthodox interpreters of the Jewish religion, Kook believed that there was a fundamental difference between Jews and Gentiles. The difference between a Jewish and a Gentile soul was greater than the difference between the soul of a Gentile and an animal. If you believe that you are dealing with lesser animals you have a problem because no one is going to listen to you the same if you believe that 2.3 billion people are morons. My view all along is that the fundamental problem is one of unreformed human nature that we all share. Dawson’s comment on temple restoration as eschatological trigger was dismissive in the sense that absence of any consequences would be justified by Christians as a delay and this would be extended out indefinitely. This charge is not new and the scoffers and mockers said the same about Christ’s prophecy concerning the parousia (his coming in Judgement) in 2 Peter 3:4 which came to fruition 42 years (6×7) after his Passover crucifixion to the day (according to Josephus) with the destruction of the last fortress (Masada) the temple having been destroyed approximately three years previously as prophesied (Matt 24:2; Rev 6:13-17). To the early Hebrews, Taurus the Bull was the first constellation in their zodiac and consequently it was represented by the first letter in their alphabet, Aleph. Schematically we have already transitioned from Taurus (strength,fertility) to the Ram (Aires-sacrifice)…..
The Ram in a Thicket is a pair of figures excavated at Ur, in southern Iraq, which date from about 2600–2400 BC. Compare the ram caught in a plant of Sabec (LXX) in Gen 22:13 (cf. Sabbachthani in Matt 27:46) This was followed by the Fish (Pisces-Christianity) and now we are transitioning to the Water Pourer (Aquarius):
"He shall pour the water out of his buckets, and his seed shall be in many waters, and his king shall be higher than Agag, and his kingdom shall be exalted" (Num 24:7).
So we are at the end of this Precession Cycle.
Ryan Dawson: War From Hamas To Iran – The Next ZOG Forever War? (3:34 min)
If you hover over the quotes they should appear in a pop-up box.
Armageddon Glow-Op Goy-Slop: War Crimes, & A Peak into Jewish Entitlement & Mystic-Superstition 2 (2:34 min)
Paul Cottrel , A NYC Jew who has shared a platform with Dr McCairn in the past and who is jokingly referred to by the Raccoons as the “Silver Surfer” for making bank by promoting his silver solutions and other snake-oil products as a covid cure-all, has jumped onto the bandwagon as an apologist for divine retribution (in the form of HAMAS whose name means violence) falling on the head of liberal Jews who were partying and raving rather than adhering to the proscribed rituals that end the Atonement religious festival.
He is justifying the killing of fellow (liberal) Jews probably because they were not “Chabad enough” (lolz). Hamas (founded and funded by Israel) becomes the instrument of divine wrath against “bad” Jews. This is both disturbing and pathetic and smacks (in my view) of deliberate planning.
I identified 1973 as the start of the Trumpet blowing (repeat pattern) for the Day of Atonement (DOA) in my commentary. The DOA ritual is described as occurring in the heavenly sanctuary and is about national forgiveness. The nation was not forgiven hence the Yom Kippur war (or DOA war). If each trumpet blowing covers a seven year period then the fifth period (fifth trump or first woe) starts with the fall of twin towers in 2001.
Why are we left with a binary choice? Why do we have to chose between either supernatural events or man-made manipulation? Why can’t what is happening be a consequence of both? Is it not possible for God to use the manipulation and deceit of Jacob for his own ends? Is it not possible for God to allow Jacob to run with his madness until he boxes himself into a corner? That is exactly what happens in the patriarchal Jacob story. I prefer a more nuanced stance that recognizes both the supernatural and man-made deception dovetailing. In the end God prevails.
As far as the temple is concerned then have been three, or actually two temples. The first was Solomon’s temple destroyed in 586 BC by Nebuchadnezzar, then Zerubabbel’s temple rebuilt when they returned, completed in 516 BC and finally Herod’s temple which was a complete refurbishment of Zerubbabel’s temple, so actually still only the second temple (the temple platform was also expanded by the Hasmoneans). Construction by Herod began in 20 bc and lasted for 46 years.The minimalist view is that the only temple that existed was Zerubabbel’s (300 years after Solomon) and that Solomon was a minor tribal chief, however, this runs counter the fact that a huge copper mining and refining Industry was found in Edom (the Edomites were a vassal state subjected by David) and a virtual monopoly on the trade of this commodity formed the basis of Solomon’s great power and bronze age wealth. There is scant archeological evidence going back to the age of Solomon (which is understandable with the multiple destruction of the site that occurred) and some of the “evidence” has been identified by the Israel Antiquities Authority as forgeries (so it seems that a genuine effort is made to weed out fakes). With the amount of destruction and rebuilding that has occurred it is (in my opinion) a wonder that we can find anything. The archeologist Leen Ritmiyer (who I have met) believes that the Dome of the Rock (I have been inside to look it was built ca 690 AD) contains a carved out square where the Ark of The Covenant stood. I think this is likely (but it is disputed). According to Ritmeyer, a rectangular rock-cutting he discovered on the Foundation Stone marks the location where the Ark of the Covenant stood within the Holy of Holies. Ritmeier’s analysis was welcomed among biblical archeologists, however scholars stated that this theory cannot be actually verified. The rock was actually the “threshing floor” that David purchased as the place to build an altar after the plague was averted (2 Samuel 24:18-25) it is believed that Solomon (the son of David) built the temple on the same location. The carving in the rock (although it has the correct dimensions) is disputed because even the Romans built a temple there (to Jupiter).
The stone (threshing floor) is also known as the foundation stone, it has become a burdensome stone for all people (Zech12:3) in the same way that Christ the foundation of a new temple became rock of offence (Isaiah 8:14, Rom 9:33, 1 Pet 2:8)
Once again I state that God did not want a physical temple. He didn’t want David to build one in the first place. The vision in Ezekiel was exactly that. A vision. Ezekiel’s temple was never meant to be a blueprint for an end-time temple. It was a vision that was meant to make them ashamed and spur them on to greater things (Ezek 43:10-11) but the resulting temple that they did build (Zerubbabel’s) was a disappointment (Ezra 3:12). The Zadokite priests of the Ezekiel vision became the Sadducee priests who crucified Christ. Jesus Christ is presented as the true dwelling place of God (John 2:21, Rev 21:22, 1 Cor 3:16) and his saints are also depicted as a living temple. As Jesus said, God is not worshiped at a particular location or mountain but in Spirit and Truth (John 4:21-24). Furthermore the Gog-Magog confrontation that the Apocalyptic fetishist are itching to trigger is again based on complete ignorance of scripture. The Gog-Magog of the Apocalypse is a “true myth” whose armies are gathered for an attack against the camp of the saints from “the four quarters of the earth” (Rev 20:8) not an attack against Jerusalem by Russia.
The Jews (and many Christians) do not understand their own temple theology. All the things I warned about over the last forty-two years are coming to pass. The demonization of Russia as Gog and the elevation of Perfidious Albion and its US counterpart as the “good guys”ships of Tarshish in the Anglo-Zionist East India Company British Israelitism war for World Hegemony. To be honest I don’t care anymore. Go build a third temple to offer your sacrifices and see what happens (Isa 66:1-5). God has already told you thrice that he would overturn the nation and the temple (Ezek 21:27). Your enemy is not the Muslims or the Christians it is God himself. You can either repent or you can attempt to force your will through and be overturned a third and final time.
Amos and the Temple
Appendix on Amos 5.26-27 and Acts 7.43
A DAY OF ATONEMENT IN REVELATION 8 v 1-6
A study of other details in this introductory passage brings to light some more features of a similar character. Some of these spring out of a realization that this opening vision of the incense-offering angel is couched in terms which belong to the Day of Atonement ritual:
|“Silence in heaven.” The allusion is to “the whole multitude of the people praying without” at the time of the High Priest’s entering into the sanctuary. Cp. Psalm 65:1 (a Psalm for the Day of Atonement); Habakkuk 2:20.
|“Silence in heaven about the space of half an hour.” It is only with reference to the period the High Priest was in the sanctuary that this detail makes sense.
|“Another angel … having a golden censer.” According to some authorities, it was only on the Day of Atonement that a golden censer was used.
|“There was given unto him much incense.” It is also asserted that an extra large quantity of incense was used on the Day of Atonement – doubtless because of Leviticus 16:12, 13 which required that the High Priest enter into the Holy of Holies clothed (so to speak) in a dense cloud of incense.
|“That he should offer it … upon the golden altar which is before the throne.” That the altar of incense, normally separated from the Holy of Holies by the veil, should be spoken of as “before the throne” probably implies that the veil has been penetrated-which thing took place only on the Day of Atonement.
|The sounding of seven trumpets (v. 6) by specially appointed priests (cp. 1 Chronicles 15:24; 2 Chronicles 29:25-28) was an integral part of the recognized ceremonial for the Day of Atonement.
|On the day of Atonement the High Priest also read from the Law in the hearing of all the people, as he stood at the east gate of the priests’ court. To this might correspond the angel of Revelation 10:2 with the little book which he imparts to John.
|Ch. 7:3: “the sealing of God’s servants.” The Jews had a strange tradition, the meaning of which is not quite clear, that on the Day of Atonement every Jew is sealed in one of three Books – the Book of Life (Revelation 5: 1?), the Book of Death, or another Book which was to be opened on the following Day of Atonement.
If you hover over the biblical citations they will appear in a pop-up box and extra resources are in the greyed out boxes should you wish to do further research.
Abrahamic cage match is a reference to the end time eschatological fight between Muslim and Jews that we are being manipulated and nudged into, by using Western Christianity as a tool to further Jewish power.
The live stream arranged by Dr McCairn with Adam Green and Albert Bishai addressed serious issues that I find myself largely in agreement with. The Abrahamic religions are being employed either as a broom (Islam) or a Trojan horse (Christianity) to usher in the utopia (sic) of Jewish global hegemony and full spectrum dominance.
I find myself in agreement with the hypotheses that eschatology is being manipulated and abused by the Jews and that Christian-Zionism is captured by Jewish interests. Where I diverge is that I believe that God is able to use the intransigence and perversity of the Jewish people to achieve his own ends. After all, if you know the beginning from the end you are able to stack the deck (as it were) to achieve your purpose. It is the age old dichotomy between manifest destiny and freewill. As is decried in Romans, “Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will?”(Rom 9:19). In the end no one can resist his will even those who oppose him. The Jews believe that they can run a Psyop against God himself and wrestle God to a standstill as Jacob (the deceiver) attempted. The story tells us that despite a Herculean effort Jacob is found weeping and begging, a broken man, which event Scripture refers to as the day of Jacob’s trouble (Jer 30:5-7).
Adam would counter that it makes no difference whether I am a Christian-Zionist or if I am an apologist for Jewish power, because the outcome is the same, namely, you still end up with a Jew in charge, and Jews ruling the world. However, that runs counter to the scriptural depiction because the apostle Paul calls gentiles fellowheirs (Eph 3:6) and the Apocalypse goes so far to call all the faithful as fellowservants with the angels.(Rev 22:8-9). The gentiles are not second class citizens and they are not the collective servants of the Jews.
The passage in Zech 8:23 where it portrays ten men grasping a Jew because God is with him is a reference to the messianic Immanuel title first employed in Isa 7: 14 where the name means God with us. In the first instance Immanuel was King Hezekiah who was also the initial fulfillment of the Suffering Servant of Isaiah 53. The central portion of the book of Isaiah (chapters 36-38) describe the death bed recovery on the third day of Hezekiah and the victory over the Assyrian invasion and siege by Sennacherib. Hezekiah was about to die childless which would have been a dis-annulment of the Davidic covenant and he was betrayed by his counselors and Sanhedrin during his illness. The prophet Isaiah told Hezekiah that he would be reprieved and receive a fifteen year extension on his life which is reflected in Isa 53:10-11 where his life is prolonged and he sees a descendant that inherits his throne. Of course the Jews believe that the suffering servant is a collective servant representing the Jewish nation who suffered a holocaust and they completely ignore the original contextual setting of Isaiah. The suffering servant of Isaiah 53 becomes the philosophical/parabolic story of Job’s suffering. The identity of the ten men in Zech 8:23 harks back to the ten nations of Gen 15:19-21 which in end time eschatology become the ten kings that burn and destroy the Great Harlot (Rev 17:16-17) who had seduced the nations with her sorcery (pharmakeia) in Rev 18:23.
See page 33 (43 in the page box) of the Isaiah Commentary by H.A. Whittaker chapter 15, and for Job as parabolic of the Hezekiah situation see, Perry The Suffering Servant of Isaiah and the Suffering of Job also see my commentary Dark Sayings (scroll down to the embed pdf pages 437-515) for the contextualization of Wisdom Literature in the 7th and 8th Centuries to Hezekiah and the axial age.
The same prophet Zechariah warned that his fellow Jews would set up a base in Shinar (Babylon) where “wickedness” (lawlesness) would thrive. The prophetic vision in Zech 5 is a parody of the Ark of the Covenant and the Hebrew word for base (Zech 5:11) is related to the bases of the two brass temple pillars (1 kgs 7:21) which carried the meaning “established in strength” being cut in pieces and transported to Babylon by Nebuchadnezzar who melted them down (2 Kings 25:13). It is there that the Babylonian Talmud was written and the “law schools” established that would determine the direction or Rabbinical Judaism for the next two millennia. Interestingly (and I don’t know if it is linked or an in-joke) but Al–Qaeda was set up in the same Levant region, and the word is Arabic for, the base (coincidence?)
Further reading see my article Wickedness in Shinar
I pointed out that the Jews had coded the numeric value of 72 into the FCS (Furin Cleavage Site) as well as developing a quick formula (The rule of 72) for calculating compound interest. This indicated to me that the 72 gentile nations would be conquered by means of disease and debt as the number 72 is related to the 72 nations in Genesis 10 (LXX). The number 72 holds particular significance to Chabad as in Kabbalistic lore (not the Torah) it comes to represent 72 names of God, 72 demons (cf. the key of Solomon etc). The number 70/72 is ubiquitous in ANE mythology and it is my contention that it is related to ancient cosmogony and the Great Precession Year (more on this anon).
The Jews tend to call all gentiles “Edom” (Esau the progenitor) just as they called Rome “Edom” which is of course a misnomer because the Edomites or Idumeans were according to the Jacob cycle a blood brother and therefore Semitic. Herod the Great an Idumean was immensely wealthy and even lent money to Mark Antony. Whenever the word Red is used in the Apocalypse that is a key for the Herod Dynasty. A red dragon tried to swallow the man child (Herod the Great and the slaughter of the innocents see Rev 12:3 and Matt 2:16 ) and James is killed by the sword of the red horse (Rev 6:4 and Acts 12:1-2). Herod was a paranoid psychopath. He killed his favorite wife, Mariamne (he had 10 wives), because he suspected infidelity. Herod also killed his uncle, his mother-in-law, and three of his sons causing Caesar Augustus to quip, “Yeah, I’d rather be Herod’s pig than his son!” The Herod family married into the priestly Cohen (Sadducees) and they formed a faction referred to as the Herodian party in the Bible. Although the Herodian dynasty was wealthy and married into foreign royalty the Herods disappear from the pages of history after the first century. It is my belief that the wealth was conserved and the Edomites reappeared in the form of Rothschild (Red Shield) to launch their campaign of world domination. They are behind the Balfour declaration and they were already buying tracts of land in Palestine in the 1930s. In the land covenant of Gen 15:1 God promised to be Abraham’s shield but we find that Zionist Israel has substituted that protection for that provided by Red Shield.
In The Antiquities of the Jews (Book 18:116-19), Josephus confirmed that Herod Antipas “slew” John the Baptist after imprisoning him at Machaerus, because he feared John’s influence might enable him to start a rebellion. According to the synoptic Gospels, Herod, who was tetrarch, or sub-king, of Galilee under the Roman Empire, had imprisoned John the Baptist because he reproved Herod for divorcing his wife (Phasaelis, daughter of King Aretas of Nabataea) and unlawfully taking Herodias, the wife of his brother Herod Philip I. The references to adultery and murder etc in the book of Malachi and the condemnation of Edom/Esau are prophetic of John the Baptist and the denouncement not just of the Herod dynasty but also of the Hasmonean priesthood (Sadducees) who had become corrupt.
Further Resources: https://www.biblaridion.info/html/ch11.html#P221 https://www.biblaridion.info/Digressions/malachi.pdfPrita_Malachi
Zoroastrian dualism is rejected in the book of Isaiah (who was a contemporary with the rise of Zoroastrianism); “I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things” (Isaiah 45:7). Unlike the Persian religion the Hebrew God takes responsibility for both good and evil circumstances. Satan (The enemy) or the Devil (False accuser) does not operate independently.
The Jews have an established pattern of using the goy as proxies. The Nero persecution was encouraged and suggested to Nero by his mistress/wife Poppaea Sabina. Tacitus and Suetonius portray Poppaea as an ambitious and ruthless schemer. The Jewish historian Josephus paints a different picture.She had a certain predilection for Judaism, and is characterized by Josephus (“Ant.” xx. 8, § 11; “Vita,” § 3) as θεοσεβής (“religious”). Some Jews, such as the actor Alityros, were well received at court, and Poppæa was always ready to second Jewish petitions before the emperor. It is my belief that Poppæa suggested that Nero blame the great fire of Rome on the Christians who were a minority sect. Nero wanted to rebuild Rome and I am very suspicious that the fire was deliberate. In any case, by blaming the Christians Poppæa would be doing both Nero and the Jews a favor.
Just as they flatter Trump as Cyrus who (supposedly) restored their fortunes so also they read Koresh (Cyrus) instead of Karash (workman) and flatterd the Persian king that he was mentioned in their prophecies. The Cyrus restoration amounted to nothing because they attempted to force the issue. So, they are employing the same- tactics and attempting to take the kingdom of God by violence (Matt 11:12).
They also have an established pattern of False Messiah’s the most prominent being, Bar Kochba (134-136), Sabbatai Zevi (1626-1676) who declared himself Messiah in 1666 (the year of the Fire of London) and Jacob Franks who ended his life living in the same region as the Rothschild clan..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nero_Redivivus_legend http://www.biblaridion.info/resources/666.pdf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_beast https://www.biblaridion.info/daniel/danhtml/Dan_TOC.html#Ch32TOC
Finally we have the Great Precession Year, where each tick (degree) of the cosmic clock represents 72 years in a 360 degree Babylonian circle giving a cycle time (calculated by Newton) of 25,920 years (=360×72). There are prophecies pointing to a solar flare (Isa 30:26, Zech 14:12 , Rev 16:8) followed by a gigantic earth quake (Rev 16:18-19). It just so happens that this video came out today from “Diamond” who is a PhD Paleo-geologist and his partner who is also a scientist:
The Younger Dryas Cosmic Catastrophe Impact Event – What Is The Evidence – What Are The Implications (57 min)
In conclusion, you cannot prove a negative. The building of a third temple would be an abomination. If the Jews did establish a third temple, not only does it become a “self-fulfilling” prophecy, but God will use their own stubbornness and intransigence against them as he knows the beginning from the end. Some would argue that nothing supernatural is happening, discounting the fact that God removed the nation from the land twice before (a repeat pattern). If God manifests himself through the medium of history, then we should see the hand of God in events and I believe that we do.. On the other hand the counter is that the Jews are following a clever eschatological plan and everything from their expulsion from the land, their persecution and their subsequent capture of the system accords with their master-plan. I think that we have to be careful not to be too one-dimensional in our thinking because all time lines converge in the end and God is able to reverse what seems impossible to man.
“For if the casting away of them be the reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead?” (Rom 11:15 )
Countering Glow-Op Goy-Slop with Adam Green (Know More News) & Albert Bishai (4:31)
Part two of Glow Op – Goy Slop sequel (lolz). Unfortunately it is no laughing matter because people are dying but sometimes the black pills go down easier with some dark humor. Armageddon Fetishists? There is nothing new under the sun.
"And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force" (Matthew 11:12).
They have always tried to take the kingdom of God by force. They used two world wars and Bolshevism to get their way. They released Covid etc as part of this push.
I can understand that Dr McCairn can only see the human aspect and a century (or more) of Jewish manipulation (and nothing supernatural) in the historical events. It is fair to say that the Jews have hijacked the eschatology for their own ends, they have done it in the past and it always ended badly. They are using controlled opposition against God himself. It is the ultimate rebellion. The ultimate mockery and it will fail.
Unfortunately they will deceive many (with their supposed fulfillment of prophecy) and there will be others who take the position that the eschatology itself is all fake and Christianity a hoax.
Are they misusing end time prophecy? Yes, of course they are (quelle surprise). Are the end time prophecies fake? NO. The faithful always knew this time was coming. We always knew they would abuse and manipulate scripture. They always have (quelle surprise). They are not doing anything new but conforming to old patterns and old stereotypes.
The Jews have miscalculated. They will fail. In driving prophecy forward by force of their will, they are ironically fulfilling the very prophecy that will ensure their failure.
It is difficult to predict anything, but war against Iran is likely and in the ensuing chaos we might see the convenient destruction of the Dome of the Rock allowing the space to be cleared for the third temple (which would be an abomination to God).
Stinky Yom Kipper Glow-Op Goy-Slop For Armageddon Fetishists (pt.2) – War Drums & War Crimes (2:20 min)
God never wanted a temple and told David that he was perfectly happy with a tent. Why is that? Because a tent can be dissembled and then resurrected. The ark of the covenant (a resurrection box) traveled 3 days journey ahead of the people and sought out a new location. Stephen in his defense (Acts 7) made it clear that God did not want a temple built with hands and Jesus made it clear that his body was the temple and when it was destroyed it would be raised in three days. The return of blood sacrifice would be an abomination to God. The “church” of the firstborn is God’s temple and that church consists of faithful Jews and Gentiles. Many Christians have become clueless, Zionist cheerleaders who do not understand prophecies (like Ezekiel’s vision) concerning the temple.
Sound quality not very good even though I cleaned it.
Psalm 51v4 cited in Romans 3v4: “Let God be true and every man a liar….”
2 Sam 12v7: “Thou art the Man”
2 Sam 7v18: “Who am I….?
What did David See? Psalm 110
Rom 3v27: “What manner of Law”?
Rom 4v6: David
This is a review of the video On Earth as it is in Heaven which presents a postmillennial view of eschatology. The video is highly recommended whatever flavor of Christianity you profess. It is thoughtful, historically enlightening and will provoke you to examine eschatology critically which is something you should be doing anyway. This is the kind of definition that is usually given for postmillennialism:
In Christian eschatology (end-times theology), postmillennialism, or postmillenarianism, is an interpretation of chapter 20 of the Book of Revelation which sees Christ's second coming as occurring after (Latin post-) the "Millennium", a Golden Age in which Christian ethics prosper.
There are many beliefs held regarding the millennium, the rapture the tribulation etc. and supposedly they all come from the Bible (lolz).
If anything, this should tell us to cast aside dogma and take a more nuanced approach and a systematic (holistic) approach. For example, the “Kingdom” was typologically portrayed in the OT as the nation of Israel. It was a theocracy with Yahweh as King and with a human monarch appointed as the earthly divine representative. In this Israel was the “same” as the surrounding nations like Egypt who had a divine (god)-king in the institution of the Pharaoh’s (elohim/ruler-judge). The people of Israel rejected Yahweh as King just as in the time of Christ when they declared “We have no King but Caesar” (John 19:15). They wanted to be like the other nations (1 Sam 8:20) and after a period that saw the rise of tribal Judges (Ruth 1:1), they selected a monarch with the divine warning ringing in their ears that this would result in the abuse of power (I Sam 8: 10-22). The establishment of dynastic aristocracies always leads to corruption. Monarchy is probably the oldest form of government on earth and all monarchs claim divine authority to rule in the name of their “god(s)”.
From its very beginnings in the wilderness the nation had rebelled and apostatized against the rule of God and his in-dwelling tabernacling presence among them (Exod 32:1-6). They rejected his Kingship and Yahweh compromised by allowing them a human monarch. The monarch chosen by God to reflect the people’s desires (1 Sam 9:1-2) was a failure and Saul was replaced by David in whom the covenant promises vouched safe to Abraham concerning a messianic heir were invested. David was promised not just a dynasty, but a son who would rule forever (2 Sam 7:12–17).
David functioned as a king-priest in a Melchizedek role, and he wished to restore worship and centralize the cult in Jerusalem. On his own initiative he decided to build a house (temple) for God because all the other gods of the nations had temples didn’t, they? Why should the God of Israel live in a nomadic tent? The answer that David received via the prophet Nathan was that God did not want a temple and was perfectly happy with a tent (2 Sam.7:6–7). A tent is a temporal dwelling place that can be deconstructed and erected once the destination is reached.  Nevertheless, Yahweh conceded with David’s desire to build a temple (just like he compromised with the desire of the people to have a human monarch), however, Yahweh turned the temple building project on its head and basically told David….so, you are going to build a house for me? Nope…I am going to build a house (temple/dynasty) for you. I will give you a son who will sit on the throne forever (2 Sam 7:13). The Temple of God becomes an individual in which the Spirit of God dwells. The Temple is Jesus Christ who referred to himself as the temple (John 2:19) and whatever your understanding of the millennium might be, the millennial temple is Jesus Christ the Davidide (Rev. 21:22). The church becomes an extension of his body and therefore the saints become the building blocks and pillars of the temple (1 Cor. 3:16–17). John sees a temple-city (the New Jerusalem) consisting of people descending from heaven to earth (Rev.21:2). A temple-city that not only has twelve apostolic foundations but twelve tribal gates (Rev 21:14-15). It is the perfect merging of the old covenant and the new covenants.
When David’s son Solomon built the temple the stones where hewed and shaped to size away from the building location (1 kings 6:7). When ready the stones were transported to the build location and slotted together in a perfect fit. Likewise, the saints are being chipped and shaped off-site and prepared to slot together when the final temple-city is revealed.
To build a literal temple now and re-commence animal blood-sacrifice would be an abomination to God. It would be like a dog going back to lick up its vomit (2 Pet.2:22). We already have a memorial (a better covenant, Heb.12:24). To understand the vision of Ezekiel’s temple as a “millennial temple” is a complete misreading of temple theology. The vision vouched safe to Ezekiel was meant to make them ashamed and spur them on to build a magnificent post-exile temple. Instead (after much cajoling) they built Zerubbabel’s temple (causing the old men to weep for the former glory, Ezra 3:12). Zerubbabel’s temple was later upgraded by the Edomite Herod and turned by the priestly sons of Zadok (Sadoc Ezek 48:11) of Ezekiel’s vision (the later Sadducee priests in Christ’s days) into a corrupt money-making machine. So much for the faithful Zadokites and the Jewish (Edomite) temple. Even so, Jesus still considered the temple as his Father’s house (John 2:16) while recognizing that he would replace the temple (John 4:21). To sum up, the video is correct. There will be no reintroduction of temple-worship and animal sacrifice.
1./ Rebuild the Temple pic.twitter.com/cyGpGeNltD
— The Tishbite (@Tishbite_redux) May 31, 2022
3./ “And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire”.
-Revelation 17:16 pic.twitter.com/PekL9nvNF6
— The Tishbite (@Tishbite_redux) May 31, 2022
The Church triumphant consists of one fold and one shepherd (John 10:16) without distinction between Jew and Gentile for all who do the “works of Abraham” are his children (John 8:39). Abraham was able to keep the whole law before it even was given (Gen 26:5) because he believed that God would keep his covenant despite Yahweh asking him to do the one thing that would destroy the promise – kill the precious seed (Gen 22:2). The works of Abraham are therefore not the keeping of the law (works of the law) they are the works of faith. In other words, all the law and prophets are fulfilled by faith in Christ. Abraham had faith in the character, trustworthiness, and mercy of God. He was willing to put everything on the line. He was obedient but it was not blind obedience. His faithfulness was counted as righteousness (Gen 15:6).
There is then no replacement of Israel by the church because the Church Triumphant is and always was Israel. There will be no more Zionist-state and there will be no more Jerusalem. Instead, there is the New Jerusalem (the city of the Great King). The old things have passed away because God makes all things new (Rev. 21:5). You do not put new wine in old skins (Matt 9:17). Similarly, the New Covenant (Jer 31:33) had new wine (1 Cor 11:25) making the old obsolete (Heb 8:7-9).
You do not resurrect a failed, rebellious nation-sate and an obsolete system of worship (which was meant to fulfil a pedagogical function) which taught the Jews nothing but instead highlighted their carnality and self-righteousness. If animal-sacrifice did not bring them to Christ it was pointless. Will there be a Jewish presence in the land? Of course, there will be. There will be a Jewish monarch and there will be descendants of natural descendants of Abraham and spiritual descendants of Abraham. Abraham becomes the father of the faithful (Rom 4:16). The video rightly points to Romans 11 and the relationship between Jew and Gentile and the conversion of the Jews being a pivotal moment. However, before conversion comes repentance. When the threat becomes existential, some (not all) will recognize Christ as the Messiah.
The mess that Christians make of eschatology is a failure to distinguish between the “already here/not yet”. The kingdom of God is “already here” it is “among you” it is “within” it is a mustard seed that grows into a great tree (Matt 13:31-32), a stone that grows to fill the whole earth (Dan 2:35). It is therefore a process. However, the Kingdom of God is “not yet” because we are still awaiting the return of the King. Does Jesus already reign? Of course, he sits on the throne already, he already has been given the gentiles as his inheritance (Ps 2:8). In the first century it was Jesus that opened the seals (Rev 5:2) which brought the persecutions, martyrdoms and fall of Jerusalem. The assurance the the saints was that no matter what happened Jesus was in control.
So, the Kingdom of God should be considered punctuated equilibrium. The normal stasis is broken when the sovereignty of God shatters the course of history and is openly revealed as it was in the Christ event. That was the in-breaking of the kingdom of God into the domain of man’s rule. It only lasted 3.5 years but was a world changing event. The citizens of the kingdom are being selected and shaped in the present time. Chipped and polished as temple stones ready to be assembled when the trump sounds.
The Apocalypse, indeed, the whole of scripture is repeat patterns. The Olivet prophecy is directed at the events of AD 70 and elements of Olivet are repeated in the Apocalyptic seals because they are foretelling the same event. Does that mean that it is all already fulfilled? Certainly not. Once again interpreters fall into the “already/not yet” trap failing to distinguish between primary and secondary meanings and the recursive nature of the patterns. The Apocalypse also had a fulfilment in the events of the Kochba rebellion and final realization will occur soon. The prophetic clock started ticking when Israel returned to the land and God rejected their prayers for national atonement in 1973 (Yom Kippur War). The trumpet blowing on the Day of Atonement saw the commencement of the trumpets.
The gospel (Good news) was preached to Abraham (Gal 3:8), was vouched safe as a preaching commission to the disciples (Mark 16:15) and is associated with martyrdom and triumph by the angel that proclaims the preaching of the everlasting Gospel to the nations which leads to the inevitable fall of Babylon (Rev 14:6).
The fact that the Bible has been translated (at least one book) into 3,312 languages and the NT itself into 1,551 languages is witness to the spread of the message and the video shows that (in season or out of season) many devout Christians risked danger and hardship to preach. Who are we to dismiss their efforts on the grounds of dogma? God is the judge and judgement begins first with the household, and we should not denigrate the efforts of fellow Christians for furthering the gospel however imperfect we might regard those efforts. Any purity test will be applied by God (not us) and it is God who draws once the seed is planted. As the apostle says, “Some indeed preach Christ even of envy and strife; and some also of good will… What then? notwithstanding, every way, whether in pretence, or in truth, Christ is preached; and I therein do rejoice, yea, and will rejoice” (Philip 1:15-18).
We are approaching the end of an age and the start of something new. With endings come new beginnings. The earth and humanity will not be destroyed but civilization and the old way of doing things will be gone. The question is what will it be replaced with? There are those who want to replace it with Noahide laws and temple worship controlled from Jerusalem. Nation states will still be allowed some autonomy if fealty is shown to the ruler (anti-Christ) but the gentiles will be subject nations and second class citizens with limited conditions under which they may practice their religion. There are others who want a globalist transhumanist secular utopia (dystopia) and probably some sort of Luciferian or New Age Gaia cult. The choice either way is bleak.
It seems to me that the end of things is known in certain circles and was probably carefully guarded knowledge passed down by a priestly class and or magician-astronomers in different cultures. This knowledge is reflected in ancient mythology which often worshiped the stars and was aware of the of 25,920-year precession cycle. Our lives are but a single day in the Babylonian 360-degree cycle of destruction and creation known as The Great Year.
Finally, Russia has been consigned the ultimate role of the end-time Gog bogeyman in eschatological prophecy by equating the Gog of Ezekiel with the Gog of Revelation. However, the Gog of Revelation does not come from the north but from,”The nations in the four corners of the earth” (Rev 20:8). It has become what G. B. Caird termed a “true myth” an eschatological rhetorical symbol of perpetual hostility against God. In reciprocation the LORD will be at war against Amalek (Agag/Gog) from generation to generation” (Exod. 17:16). In the first instance Amalek represents sin (hence the sign of the cross defeated Amalek in the wilderness) in the last instance Amalek (Agag/Gog) represents all human opposition (in the form of nation states) gathered against the Lord and his anointed.
 See: Why does God like camping?
 See: The Repentance of Israel and Turning away ungodliness from Jacob
 See my Commentary: Pattern Recognition in the Apocalypse (PRITA), Biblaridion Media, 2018, 695 pages or PRITA online
 See: Ezekiel 38-39, Inter-textual analysis (Part-I) and Ezekiel 38-39, Russia (Part-2) and Stylometric Analysis (Part 3)
Very interesting observations on the end time signs but a wrong interpretation. What a pity. This video is up less than a week and already has 200k views. You can bet that most of the viewers are Trump supporters (conservative Christians). I am lucky if I get a hundred views on a video. Well, you know what they say…the path to destruction is easy and broad… No one wants to hear the truth…not even Christians. See the comment that I sent (I expect I will get a lot of hate mail lolz)
Jimmy Evans is a long-time pastor, Bible teacher, and best-selling author. He is the Founder and President of XO Marriage, a ministry devoted to helping couples thrive in strong and fulfilling marriages. Along with his wife, Karen, he is the host of MarriageToday with Jimmy & Karen, a nationally syndicated broadcast television program, as well as a weekly podcast with the same name. For 30 years, Jimmy ministered as Senior Pastor of Trinity Fellowship Church in Amarillo, Texas, where he now serves as Apostolic Elder. He speaks at dozens of live events every year to tens of thousands of people.
A pity that you do not understand the Apocalypse. You are correct in saying that they are signs..... They are warnings to the nation of Israel because they have returned in unbelief and are helping set up the global Beast Empire. Truly Jesus Christ will return but first Israel will be smashed (as you just read in Zechariah). You are no doubt a Christian-Zionist (false prophet). If they build a Temple that will be an abomination to God. He removed the temple twice. Jesus Christ is the temple. Why is there antisemitism? Why? Why did God expel them out of the land? You just read that half the city will be taken captive. Why would God allow that? Go read my exposition on the Apocalypse on Daniel and Dark sayings on 7-8th century Literature.....and REPENT. Educate yourself and stop leading people astray. If you are following Israel...you are following the Beast System. You must REPENT and the nation of Israel must REPENT. You are right about one thing though. The blood moon is a sign. A sign of imminent judgement and divine displeasure. And you are right in saying that Jesus is coming back as king of kings....but.....
"Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity". (Matt 7:22-23)
Kervork is a Syrian Armenian Christian living in Berlin. He is often targeted by Jihadist trolls. This is an excellent explanation. Recommended viewing. Saudi Arabia losing Syria and Yemen and seeking detente but Israel (and US) has no interest in rapprochement between Saudi and Iran.
The head of Saudi General Intelligence Directorate Lieutenant-General Khalid Al-Humaidan visited Damascus today and met with President Assad and the head of National Security Bureau Major General Ali Mamlouk for talks about reopening the Saudi embassy after Eid Al-Fitr, per Rai al-Youm newspaper. (See his YouTube channel for reading links and in order to support him).
Given what’s happening in Jerusalem, I wanted to share an article series about why Al Aqsa mosque is such a flashpoint and why it is in grave danger.— Whitney Webb (@_whitneywebb) May 9, 2021
Extremists w VERY deep ties to Israel’s government actively want to destroy it for “prophetic” reasons:https://t.co/DgQ4gVkr7z
Part 4 of the series was going to be on Rebbe Schneerson, the last leader of Chabad Lubavitch. Schneerson was obsessed with taking concrete policy action to hasten the coming of the Jewish messianic era. Here’s Netanyahu and the Rebbe in the 1980s.https://t.co/hYlwdZbNX5— Whitney Webb (@_whitneywebb) May 9, 2021