Tag: the 1%

Covid and Vaxx fairy-tales

Posted on

Covid and Vaxx fairy-tales

We are now seeing the dreaded second wave or should I say the second wave predicted by Bill Gates.  Of course the fact that the second wave coincides with increased testing is purely coincidental.  So, we are testing more and therefore we are finding more cases. 

The fact that those cases are asymptomatic and that the PCR test gives false positive results has of course nothing to do with the promised and eagerly awaited second wave. For those who may have forgotten or may not be aware let me state the facts one more time before posting some good articles.

The CFR =0.26%  the survival rate is 99.74% in fact, if you are under 70 years of age and healthy your survival is 99.99%. Yes, you heard that correctly 99.99%.  You have more chance of harming yourself by wearing a mask than you have of dying from covid.  Global mortality is in the region of 0.004% but is difficult to calculate because the birth rate far outpaces CFR.   So, they are lying to you.  The second wave is a media fabrication.  Moreover, what has happened to normal influenza? Why has the flu suddenly disappeared? Has the ordinary flu bug been killed by covid?   Why are people so stupid?

Murder

Not only are they lying to you in some countries they murdered the elderly by sending the sick back to nursing homes. Various other illness were completely neglected resulting in excess deaths from cancer, heart problems etc. The elderly were pressured to  agree to DNR (Do Not Resuscitate)  orders etc.  So, a deliberate policy of euthanasia by neglect was followed. Moreover, the trials of HCQ were performed at four times the normal dosage resulting in deaths by overdose. This was done so that they could discredit HCQ as a prophylactic treatment.  The Lancet even had to withdraw a study when it was asked questions about the data. This demonstrates that we are dealing with psychopathic monsters.  It is these people who are making vaccines and scaling them up for mass vaccination before they have even been tested.   The UK is now passing laws that will amending clinical trial laws without proper oversight.  They are going to inject people with stuff that has not been properly tested.  Too bad if it kills or paralyzes you…or makes you sterile ……or gives you cancer years later.

Conditioning

In the sate of Victoria (in Australia) they have engaged 1,000 soldiers to “help” because we have had a “huge spike” in cases (20) after increased testing.  The use of the army in voluntary testing stations is a tactic to get the public conditioned to accepting the military for medical safety.  More meat factory workers are testing positive (in NZ I think) and the Canadian government is investing in plant based proteins.  They obviously want to close farms and produce everything through monopolies like Monsanto etc.   One farm to rule the all, one bank to rule them all and one shop to rule them all.  This is coordinated action across the world and people will die. The rest will end up in a smart city panopticon.  A technocracy run by the 1% is emerging.  At the very heart of the elite are the Jews who have utterly corrupted the governments and institutions as well as their faith.

Articles

 

Dutch courage

Posted on

Dutch courage

People make jokes about taking some “Dutch courage” but it was actually the Anglo’s that needed “Dutch courage” to face the Dutch:

Dutch courage, also known as pot-valiance (or potvaliancy), refers to courage gained from intoxication with alcohol. The popular story dates the etymology of the term Dutch courage to English soldiers fighting in the Anglo-Dutch Wars (1652–1674) and perhaps as early as the Thirty Years’ War (1618–1648).

Looks like the Dutch are fighting the Anglo-Zionists again. Perhaps the police (government tools) should get drunk so that they can face the brave Dutch volk.   This time the whole government has been corrupted by Anglo-Zionist ideals – just look at the sham MH 17 trial.

I am Dutch Australian and I have lived, worked and studied in Holland.  The Dutch are a tolerant, law abiding and sometimes a bit too “progressive” but they are now waking up. Even they can see that Covid is being used as a mask for tyranny.  It makes me proud to see ordinary men, women and children resisting.

Here is a letter that came into my possession. I translated it using Google chrome and will link to the original. It demonstrates that world wide more and more health professionals are really worried.

Here is the original document Noodwet (Emergency Legislation) the translation is belowPDF download

 

========================================

19/06/2020

Dear Colleagues,

I would like to express my serious concern and draw your attention to the bill that would be submitted on 1 July (Annex 1 Bill), which lays down the current emergency regulations in the name of / supposedly for the protection of public health.

In addition to the fact that this law entails extreme punitive measures, every fine is accompanied by a criminal record and both enforcement and interpretation are left to a great deal of arbitrariness (Appendix 2, reaction of the Bar Association), this also does not lead to the aim of what it actually should be. serve to improve public health.

Health is a diffuse concept in which the past few years have switched to a more comprehensive definition of the definition (M. Huber 2011), “The ability to adapt and to direct, in the light of the physical, emotional and social challenges in life.” This definition is not based on illness, but on functioning, quality of life and a holistic view of man. Physical, mental and social state form one whole in this. This definition has been adopted by WHO.Current global measures taken to combat SARS-CoV-2 largely violate this definition.

At the time of the peak and uncertainty of the pandemic, this may have been defensible, but there is no scientific basis for continuing the emergency measures, in fact there may be more evidence against the current measures than before. The measures include compulsory social distance, (semi-) compulsory isolation, hygiene measures and mandatory personal protection measures.

Damage in the area of ​​the pychosocial domain, economic damage and damage to the non-covid health care is unparalleled and many times greater than the profit of the life years of corona patients. 1

The measures would have resulted in anywhere between 13,000 and 21,000 healthy life years in corona patients, in addition to 10,000 to 15,000 life years it cost. Due to the permanent measures, the hospital capacity will be so limited in the near future that there will be no question of overtaking care. Gupta Strategists estimates that the non-delivered regular care cost 100,000 to 400,000 healthy life years. In addition to the loss of healthy life years, this is also a major loss financially. 2 1, 2 million referrals via healthcare domain have been postponed, 40% of which are still waiting for an appointment. 3 The fact that this cannot be completed faster is largely due to the current 1.5 meter distance requirement, which leads to major logistics challenges in hospitals and also jeopardizes good outpatient care.

There is little to no evidence for the usefulness of social distance 1 to 2 meters away. There is growing evidence for aerosols and super-spreader dispersion with potential roles in humidity and ventilation. In the open air, distance seems to make little difference and people become little infected, while in insufficiently ventilated spaces people seem to be easily infected outside 1.5m. 4

On the other hand, social distancing does have a clear negative effect on public health. Infectiologists indicate that the measures have worked too well, as there is still very little antibody formation in society at the moment. Viruses and other communicable diseases are part of natural human existence. Covid-19 also mainly affected the elderly and of the affected persons, more than 85% experienced it mildly. These data, which have recently become known, necessitate reconsideration of the measures taken. For example, reverse isolation of the sick and vulnerable groups, whereby measures must always take into account the incidental damage to the entire society.

All in all too much uncertainty to lay down the current measures in a law. Taking all this into account, I am very surprised by the current bill to give the measures an official character with the possibility of extension for an indefinite period. The government relies on ‘the importance of public health’.

I find the government’s justification that this happens in the light of public health shocking and I think that as a professional group we can create clarity in the debate and we must express ourselves more about the proportionality and subsidiarity of the measures.

Below I will further substantiate my opinion and explain why I think these measures go too far and go beyond their goal.

I would like to make a public appeal to my professional associations and fellow health care providers to comment on the current measures and the proposed legislation. I want to draw attention to and call for an open discussion in which caregivers can and dare to speak out without fear of repercussions.

Urgency

On 2 June 2020, summary proceedings were brought against the Dutch State (Appendix 3 – summary proceedings 5), which called into question the measures that are currently under assessment as a law. These summary proceedings serve since

 '... the law provides for the positive and governmental obligations to protect the Dutch population against the effects of the epidemic. However, these positive obligations also have an emphatic mirror side. The government can also be held under these positive obligations to prevent certain violations of fundamental rights or to enable the exercise of fundamental rights. The law devotes only limited attention to this and does not provide for measures to fulfill this positive obligation, even during an epidemic. After all, prohibitions will suffice. This requires further consideration of the law and the measures laid down therein. Provision must be made for a 'fair balance' in line with the case law. ' ".. On 22 and 23 January 2020, following the outbreak of COVID-19, an Emergency Committee meeting was held in China led by the Director General. At this meeting, there was insufficient support to qualify the outbreak as a PHEIC. According to data from China, the virus would cause serious complications in 25% of infections with a 4% fatality rate. The human-to-human transmissibility of the virus and an estimated transfer rate R0 of 1.4 to 2.5 is considered to be of concern. However, the countries of the European Union thought it was too early to scale up the case to a PHEIC. During a follow-up meeting on January 30 of the Emergency Committee, these countries still agree to the proposal to scale up COVID-19 to a PHEIC. " In a news conference on March 11, 2020, the Director General of WHO qualified COVID-19 as a pandemic. According to the Director General, 4,291 people worldwide had died with COVID-19 at the time. In unprecedented firm terms, Director General calls on the Member States to 'urgent and aggressive action'. In accordance with Article 49 of the IHL, recommendations have been made to Member States as to the measures to be taken. According to the definition changed for unclear reasons in 2009, a pandemic is “the worldwide spread of a new disease”. The harmfulness of a virus is therefore no longer a criterion for declaring a pandemic. ' (Appendix 3)

Up to and including 14 June 10:00 a total of 48 783 COVID-19 patients were reported to RIVM in the Netherlands. To date, 11,828 of reported patients have been hospitalized and 6,059 have died. Half of the patients admitted were 69 years or older, half of the deceased patients were 83 years or older. (RIVM, epidemiological situation COVID-19 Netherlands 14-06-2020)

Perspective

If daily death and infection numbers are reported, it is not surprising that fear and panic are felt among the population. People are not used to that and have no perspective with regard to the figures. However, there is a perspective behind these figures and I think it is the joint responsibility of doctors to make this perspective known. To illustrate, a (shortened) quote from RIVM;

 “In the winter of (2017/2018), mortality was increased for 15 weeks, during the flu epidemic from week 50 2017 through week 15 2018. The mortality rate during the 18 week flu epidemic was estimated at 9,444. This was the highest mortality rate ever measured since the start of monitoring in 2009. The excess mortality mainly concerned people aged 75 years and older, but there were also several weeks in which the mortality was increased in people aged 55-64 and 65-74 years. 

In the winter of (2016/2017), mortality was increased for 12 weeks and coincided with the 15-week flu epidemic. The excess mortality mainly concerned people aged 75 years and older. The excess mortality was estimated at 7,503 (8,890 for the entire winter period, weeks 40 to 20). In the previous 5 years, the mortality rate was only higher in 2014/2015, when the longest flu epidemic ever recorded in the Netherlands (mortality rate of 8,600 in 21 weeks). 

In winter 2014/2015, the peak was higher than the peaks in the past 5 years. More than 65,000 people died, which is more than 8,600 more than expected in these 21 weeks (mainly among the over-75s). The excess mortality was higher than in the previous 4 influenza seasons. ” 6

The numbers mentioned here could have been communicated in the same way as the current numbers (except that in recent years there have been more deaths from seasonal viruses). Of course, the measures have contributed to a flattening of the number of sick and deceased persons to the new corona virus, but the question is whether the under-mortality will not lead to a comparable total mortality in the next 2 years as in recent years. And of course it was very important to secure hospital capacity and this required scaling-up of care, but the question is to what extent this necessitates a ‘new-normal / social distance’ and the present law.

The current measures are supposedly taken from ‘public health concerns’. If the government were really concerned about public health, it should have been evident in recent years from measures that really matter for public health. Currently, a law is being introduced that removes the “breach of the peace”, penalizes social contact with a criminal record, and violates the right to self-determination through the ability to prohibit someone from moving or visiting loved ones. In contrast, despite overwhelming evidence, no ban has been imposed on smoking or alcohol in the past 50 years. No sugar and no salt tax has been set. Healthy lifestyle promotion measures are only introduced sporadically and are financially supported, there is no emphasis on one’s own recovery capacity with regard to medication use and social services are being stripped down at a rapid pace.

This causes more than 73,730 deaths annually, year after year. Every day in the Netherlands, for example, there are 104 deaths from cardiovascular diseases (myocardial / cerebral infarction), 28 deaths from lung cancer, 8 per day from diabetes mellitus, 1 from alcoholic liver diseases and 61 deaths per day from mental illness. And so countless. 7

All chronic, daily causes of death of which we have never been presented in the current way in the mainstream media. And all causes of which the number would decrease due to stronger government actions. Not to mention damage to people and the environment due to insufficient legislation on, for example, over-medication, poisons and agricultural substances.

Proportionality

At the moment it also seems in the media that we no longer accept natural death. Fortunately, the proportion of over-70s who die compared to younger people has increased from 30 to almost 50% in the past 30 years. 8 Where death belongs to life, but especially to older life.

More than 85% of all people who have tested Covid-19 positive have experienced it mild to very mild (read unnoticed). Half of the covid-19 patients who died were 82 years of age and 80% were 70 years of age or older. 70% of all hospitalized patients were 70 years of age or older. Of the 30% aged 70 years and younger, 43% had cardiovascular disease, 26.9% diabetes mellitus, 24% had chronic lung disease, and many other underlying conditions. (see the agreement with the groups in the previous paragraph). And without downplaying the sick and dead, the proportionality of measures does determine the life expectancy and wish of those who became ill and / or died. 9

In light of the damage that other common (infectious) diseases cause annually, worldwide, conditions for which there is life-saving medication or where proven meaningful social measures could be taken, the current global measures are in response to the SARS CoV-2 outbreak all the more indefensible. There are currently over 8 million proven cases, of which there are 3.8 million active cases and a total of 453000 people who have died from the virus, the majority of whom are aged 70 or older.

Every year, about 1 million people worldwide (especially young adults and children) die of AIDS, while it has been financially feasible for years to provide HAART medication, information and condoms free of charge to large vulnerable groups (women). 10 Every year, more than 500,000 people (mainly children, the main reason for child mortality) die from malaria, which can be largely reduced by cheap mosquito nets, information and protective clothing. Chronic diseases are the cause of 71% of all deaths per year (41 million deaths per year, of which 80% are cardiovascular diseases, COPD, Diabetes mellitus and cancer) 11 where lifestyle (exercise, diet, mental health) these numbers could drastically decrease.

The fact that such measures have never been implemented with current strength and steadfastness makes the current situation incomprehensible to me.

I think care providers are needed to make this perspective clear, in between the violence of all the panic and distracting reports of the moment.

Alternatives

There are more than 10 different forms of treatment that are currently used in the world and are being tested against SARS-Co V-2. Including a lot of promising things that are being researched at a rapid pace. 12

If effective treatment is found here, the importance of ‘vaccinating the entire population’ with a hastily manufactured and insufficiently tested vaccine will disappear. It is therefore incomprehensible to me that the government so strongly states that the current measures could only be lifted if the population can be vaccinated. In addition, a large proportion of the above seasonal flu deaths have been vaccinated with the same year’s flu vaccine. For the time being, a vaccine can never be 100% protective for single-strand RNA viruses. A treatment that could cure the 5% of people who experience serious complaints from a Covid-19 infection, seems to me to be more effective on mortality and morbidity and much safer for public health.

Conclusion

Taking all this into account, I am very surprised by the current bill to give the measures an official character with the possibility of an extension for an indefinite period. The government relies on ‘the importance of public health’. I find the government’s justification that this happens in the light of public health shocking and I think that as a professional group we can create clarity in the debate and we must express ourselves more about the proportionality and subsidiarity of the measures.

Perhaps part of the profession already thinks that way, for a large part of the population this is not clearly visible now. As long as it is not clear that within our profession there is also doubt about the necessity of the current measures, this can give a distorted picture to society in which critical discussion is avoided or weakened. This can further damage public health.

As a doctor, we all took our oath or vow, which was adapted in 2003 to the current time and, among other things, states’ … I recognize the limits of my possibilities. I will be open and verifiable. I know my responsibility to society and will promote the availability and accessibility of health care. I don’t abuse my medical knowledge, even under pressure. … ‘13 In this light, I find the current’ shaming and blaming ‘of doctors who give an opposition to government policy and RIVM, who illuminate other than a vaccine route or ask critical questions about the state of affairs, extremely worrying. I don’t understand this but would like to understand. In addition, for me it emphasizes the double side of the current situation, because if we really had the goal to ‘save’ as many people as possible from this new corona virus, we would seem to seize all possibilities and ideas to achieve this. Instead, we exclude the first line and integrative views, in fact, they are almost demonized, while thorough scientific research in these areas is just as feasible as in a hospital setting. Certainly if even a fraction of the research funding that now flows into the academic centers would go there. 14

Again, I would like to make a public appeal to my professional associations and fellow health care providers to comment on current measures and proposed legislation. I want to draw attention to and call for an open discussion in which caregivers can and dare to speak out without fear of repercussions.

I would like to ask the professional associations to pay attention to current developments and to offer and support space for discussion.

With concern, hope and in a personal capacity,

Evelien Peeters

Internist

Sources

1. BMJ 2020;369:m2466, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.048 /
https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/06/15/covid-19-will-be-followed-by-a-deconditioning-pandemic/
2. https://gupta-strategists.nl/studies/het-koekoeksjong-dat-covid-heet
3. https://www.skipr.nl/nieuws/aantal-uitgestelde-verwijzingen-huisarts-stijgt-naar-12-miljoen/
4. zie artikelen van dr. Streeck. Prof. S. Miller, koor repetities zoals in LA, dr. Drosten en
https://smartexit.nu/logische-vragen-bij-de-15-meter-maatregel/
5. http://viruswaanzin.nl
6. https://www.rivm.nl/monitoring-sterftecijfers-nederland
7. https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/dataset/82899NED/table?fromstatweb
8. https://ourworldindata.org/causes-of-death#breakdown-of-deaths-by-age
9. RIVM, epidemiologische situatie COVID-19 Nederland 08-05-2020 en juni 2020
10. https://ourworldindata.org/hiv-aids
11. https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases
12. PMCID: PMC7162768, o.a. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.11.987958v1
13. https://www.knmg.nl/advies-richtlijnen/knmg-publicaties/artseneed.htm
14. https://www.skipr.nl/nieuws/miljoenensubsidie-voor-armband-die-covid-19-detecteert/,
https://www.umcutrecht.nl/nl/over-ons/nieuws/centrum-voor-immuunziekten/4-mei-zes-miljoen-euro-voor-internationaal-bcg-onderzoek-tegen-covid-19-bij-10-000-zorgmedewerkers,
etcetera

  The Dutch resist tyranny

Final Conclusion

This is not about a virus…..it never was.   The riots are not about black lives either. The Climate change agenda has nothing to do with climate.  This is a global mechanism to force change that has accelerated since 9/11.   Fear is the key.  They use fear to stop you thinking. They want you back in your box.  They are building your matrix pod.  They create chaos so that they can impose a new order. All the governments around the world are run by the 1% and they have a vision for your future which you are not going to like.  They will not suffer. They will not go without or lack anything.  Their mask is slipping. Make them show their face.  Make them show the face of true evil. Do not be deceived because at heart they are tyrants. People need to realize that this is a spiritual war.

Good on the Dutch for showing courage….you make me proud.

Goed voor de Nederlanders voor het tonen van moed … je maakt me trots.

Agenda 21 on Steroids

Posted on

Agenda 21 on Steroids

There are a lot of people out there who fail to connect the dots.  They have been stupefied and programmed by the media.  Even when presented with evidence they are still in denial. It is not as though the evidence is “hidden” it is out there in your face.  They are extremely confident of incrementally achieving their goals and they will succeed as long as people remain asleep. They stick the label “conspiracy” on any investigative work and double down on the propaganda.  Most people care so little about the truth and are so self absorbed that they do not care until it is too late.

 

 

The climate change hoax was failing -people were starting to wake up. Even Michael Moore turned against them by exposing the fraud of so called renewable energy.  Basically they lost the climate change argument (even with the left) and their “secret weapon” Greta failed…..but now she is suddenly a Covid expert (lol).

They need to destroy the world economy in order to usher in the new era. You won’t like the new era.  It will be like living in prison. This has nothing to do with left-right politics that is a distraction for the stupid masses. The 1% like to divide and rule.  They love using the Hegelian Dialectic. Last but not least the Jews are over represented in the 1%.  After all they are the ones who invented communism as a stepping stone to the NWO.  They believe that Zionism is destined to rule the world and therefore they are helping the 1% achieve their goals.

 

 The above video was initially a streaming video and I have not been able to back it up.  This is the link (from the tweet)

 

Covid Platform

I could have embedded the platform on this blog but I would rather not.  I have an image of the platform below and a link.  By all means register with the WEF and explore. They have got plans for me and thee.

 

One Virus to Rule them all

https://widget.intelligence.weforum.org/embedding-our-covid-19-widget.html

 

 

 

The Corporation

Posted on

The Corporation

The Corporation is a nickname for the CIA just as the Firm is sometimes used for the Mafia.  Both of those “institutions” are referred to in business terms because they are actually very profitable enterprises.  Although the CIA is mostly involved with coups, rebellions, arms dealing and intelligence,  their operations often overlap with organized crime (mafia) drug running, money laundering etc.  The Mafia is a bit of a catch all term for Italian, Jewish, Albanian etc, etc,  gangs.  In essence the CIA and the Mafia are business rivals who often cooperate.  This ties in with the interview of Whitney Webb who pointed out the supra-national connections between intelligence agencies and organized crime forming an over arching global syndicate.  It is these people who hold the real power not elected politicians. It is the 1% super rich, the heads of multi national corporations and banks and syndicated crime together with intelligence agencies that hold the reins of real power.  The left-right paradigm is a mere distraction.

Democracy

Jeff Thomas says, “And, in a country where the illusion of democracy has become refined, the rulers come to understand that elections should not result in an overwhelming victory for one party or the other. Quite the opposite. If it can be arranged effectively, the best election is one that results in a 51% to 49% split.This ensures that the 49% will not lose hope — that they’ll be both frustrated and angry at their near-miss, and redouble their efforts in the next election in order to have a win. And the 51% will wipe their collective brow in relief at having won, but will fear losing their slim advantage next time around. Both parties must remain both hopeful and fearful. Keep them focused on each other — hating each other — and they’ll never figure out that you control both candidates like marionettes. The focus should never be on you, the real ruling class” (https://www.serendipity.li/democracy-as-distraction.htm).

The Specialists

What many fail to understand is that  we are already living under fascism.  Monopolistic corporations and banks control the government.  The government represents their interests not the peoples interests. That is why nothing much changes when you vote.  In this huge global business enterprise you are merely a resource to be exploited.

Every business needs its specialists and we are going to examine one. By specialists I mean accountants and consultants. The big four accounting firms — Deloitte, Price Waterhouse Coopers, Ernst & Young and KPMG  do the accounting (money laundering) for the super wealthy and corporate tax (tax havens). They also “audit” government accounts. See how that works?  Poacher and gamekeeper in the same package. The top consulting firms are McKinsey, BCG, and Bain. We are going to focus on McKinsey.

McKinsey Consulting

Just like the accounting/auditing companies  McKinsey works for Governments and for the private sector.  All these auditors and consultants help set up Philanthropic organizations that do such good work such as Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Clinton Foundation etc., that benefit from government subsidies and generous tax regimes. As well as that we have the NGO’s, many with charity status.

In 1993, Fortune magazine put it this way: “These fellows from McKinsey sincerely do believe they are better than everybody else. Like several less purposeful organizations—Mensa, Bohemian Grove, Skull and Bones, the Banquet of the Golden Plate—McKinsey is elitist by design.” 

The firm has produced at least 70 Fortune 500 CEOs. Buttigieg’s three-year stint is par for the course at an organization that takes pride in “counseling out” 4 in 5 hires before they become partner. They then proudly join what McKinsey calls its “alumni network,” and what Duff McDonald, author of The Firm: The Story of McKinsey and Its Secret Influence on American Business, calls “the McKinsey Mafia.” As they fan out among the world’s C-suites and B-suites, they remain McKinsey loyalists. “There is no McKinsey boneyard, in other words; you’re still McKinsey after you’ve left,” McDonald writes. “Perhaps the only alumni network with more reach and lifelong relevance to its members is that of Harvard University.”

McKinsey’s internal churn fits perfectly with the company’s consulting philosophy. McKinsey, which in 2003 advised 100 of the world’s top 150 firms, “may be the single greatest legitimizer of mass layoffs,” writes McDonald. “Its advice: Identify your bottom 10 percent or 25 percent or 33 percent, and get rid of them as soon as possible.”

McKinsey is also an infamous mercenary for the world’s most unethical corporations and authoritarian governments, from China to Saudi Arabia. McKinsey allegedly advised Purdue Pharma, the progenitor of today’s opioid crisis, on how to “turbocharge” OxyContin sales and keep users hooked.

“We are now living with the consequences of the world McKinsey created,” writes a former McKinsey consultant in an exposé for Current Affairs. “Market fundamentalism is the default mode for businesses and governments the world over.”

So what kind of presidency would the McKinsey mindset produce? Former McKinsey consultant Anand Giridharadas observes, in Winners Take All: The Elite Charade of Changing the World, business consultants ignore how political and economic power actually works. “These elites believe and promote the idea that social change should be pursued principally through the free market and voluntary action,” Giridharadas writes. “And that the biggest beneficiaries of the status quo should play a leading role in the status quo’s reform.”[1]

In McKinsey’s Rules: When Consultants Work for Governments[2] shows (among other things) the consultancy firm work for a corruption-plagued regime.[3]  In 2014 US Secretary of State John Kerry promoted a plan to kickstart Gaza’s economy with sweatshops making zippers and buttons for Israeli designers. This “Initiative for the Palestinian Economy” was drafted by consulting firm McKinsey for Tony Blair.[4]

In 1999 the New Yorker said working for McKinsey was the present-day equivalent of working for the C.I.A.[5]  In fact in 2015 the CIA paid McKinsey to help with reorganization [6]  and was also involved in streamlining expenditure for the Israeli, British and US military.[7]  Yaron Savory is the Director of McKinsey Center for Government Europe. His core focus in on clients in Israel, where he leads McKinsey’s Public sector activity.[8] Even Trump has paid McKinsey to hone his coronavirus response.[9]

McKinsey’s role in creating the Corona Crisis

The Coronavirus Didn’t Cause This Crisis by Itself. McKinsey Helped.Thanks, McKinsey, for encouraging U.S. companies to cut wage costs by offshoring essential medicine and medical gear production from the U.S. to China. What could possibly go wrong?[10]

Well, a lot went wrong, especially in Italy: CoronaVirus: Italy Emergency in the Claws of McKinsey’s Lobby with Bilderberg, BCG, Gates & CIA

The new head of the Italian Covid-19 Emergency Task Force can therefore be considered a foreign manager as he resides with his wife and two children in South Kensington, Greater London (UK). And it is precisely in the notorious world management group McKinsey & Company of New York (also based in Rome and all over the world) that he made his career from 1986 to 1996. The scandals concerning this company are such and so many that as soon as possible we will dedicate a complete report to them for now we focus on some recent reports from the webmedia Politico and Vox in which the imprinting promoted inside was highlighted of national and international bodies.
https://www.gospanews.net/en/2020/04/17/coronavirus-italy-emergency-task-force-with-mckinseys-lobby-gates-cia-bilderberg-soros/

Tucker shreds former McKinsey partner over China’s human rights violations

 

The moral of the story

We have only scratched the surface and taken a brief look at the workings of one of the global consulting firms and found a vast interconnected web of relationships between governments, intelligence networks and private corporations. This is how the real world is ruled -by vast interconnected networks controlled by the 1% not by electorates. If they decide to bleed you dry they will. If they decide they want 5G they will implement it.  If they want eugenics and the Fourth Industrial Revolution they will bring it about.  Their future does not need a large population because it will be maintained by robots and AI. They only require a small population.

 

 

 

Notes

[1] McKinsey and Company Is an Elitist Cult. Why Is Buttigieg Defending It? The management consultancy firm is “the single greatest legitimizer of mass layoffs.” And its alumni are loyal for life. https://inthesetimes.com/article/21945/pete-buttigieg-McKinsey-consulting-firm-2020-election-elitism

[2] https://www.propublica.org/series/mckinseys-rules

[3] https://www.propublica.org/article/the-country-that-exiled-mckinsey

[4] https://thegrayzone.com/2014/10/16/us-tony-blair-mckinsey-rebuild-gaza-sweatshops/

[5] https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1999/10/18/the-kids-in-the-conference-room

[6] https://www.washingtonpost.com/

[7] https://www.jpost.com/israel/defense-prize-crowns-mossad-team-and-rafaels-spice-bomb

[8] https://www.portfolio.hu/rendezvenyek/eloado/yaron-savoray/8965 Check Wikipedia: List of current and former McKinsey & Company consultants

[9] https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-world-health-organization-china-kushner-mckinsey-coronavirus-task-force-984437/

[10] https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/the-coronavirus-didnt-cause-this-crisis-by-itself-mckinsey-helped