The Lab Chronicles (Part One)

The Lab Chronicles (Part One)

I decided to create a separate tag called LAB CHRONICLES for analysis done by Dr Kevin McCairn the systems neuroscientist. I thought it was good to have a chronological record of the work done collected under a single tab. Unlike other alt-media “scientists” Dr. Kevin McCairn does the work live on camera so no sleight of hand is involved. One of the objectives is to debunk much of the false science that is promoted as “click bait” or even worse as psychological operations by pharma and intel services to sow confusion and discredit “anti-vaxxers”. We have seen people promote “hydras” in the vaccine, “chips” in the vaccine, nanbots, graphene blades blah, blah. Self-assembling graphene (or with the help of 5G?) seems to be a favorite.We have also seen “magnetic vaccines”. Everything bar the kitchen sink has been found in the vaccines by someone or other.

Now it is true that Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (SPIONs) are being researched to deliver DNA vaccine genes via magnetofection and Graphene Oxide is being researched for smart drug delivery and as a potential vaccine carrier. Some of these claims have a basis in reality but are exaggerated.

So the vaccines need to be analyzed properly if only to debunk the many theories out there. There are legitimate concerns about the vaccines especially about the quality control process. We know that people died in Japan and contaminated vaccine batches were withdrawn.

NZ doctors call for halt of vaccine rollout while quality control issues are investigated

Having worked as an industrial chemist I know the difficulty of scaling products up for production and the difficulty of producing uncontaminated cosmetic thickeners (polymers) for face creams. I can only imagine the difficulty involved of producing sterile vaccines in such huge quantities so speedily (warp speed). It is a recipe for disaster and that is if it even works (which it doesn’t).

Pfizer vaccine

In the past Dr McKairn examined Pfizer vaccine live on camera and drawn his own blood in which a drop of vaccine was placed. This showed that the vaccine destroys heme in the following blood samples. Of course we are not mixing vaccine and blood in the concentrations shown below, nevertheless this should not happen. Deprivation of oxygen is one of the symptoms of covid as is clotting. Something is badly wrong. The blood looks bleached out… eventually it is no longer red but loses all color. These are the key slides from the previous lab-work stream.
Your web browser doesn’t have a PDF Plug-in. Click to download Covid articles


Moderna Vaccine

Dr Kevin McCairn places Moderna vaccine under the dark-field microscope and compares it with saline solution and Graphene Oxide. This is an edited version of a 2:17 min video.

Live streaming the Murderna vaccine under the dark-field microscope (1 hour)

Here is the running order of my edited version:

00:00 Setting up a clean slide with saline solution (some micro cloth fibers)
14:06 Moderna covid vaccine shown to camera
14:51 Moderna vial opened on camera
16:40 Drop of Moderna vaccine added to the saline
19:04 Cleaner than Pfizer (first impression)
25:00 Particulates moving (heat of the lamp causes movement)
26:00 Saline with streaks of vaccine (no free floating particulates)
27:00 Salt crystals drying saline
28:00 Drying meniscus
31:00 Large artifact-saline drying?
34:00 Glowing particles
35:27 Plain glass
38.31 Edge of saline
39:00 Vaccine – full of particulates
40:53 Edge
41:50 Saline dropped next to edge
42:00 New slide
43:05 Edge -glass-saline -under darkfield
43:42 Imperfections in the glass thru ultrasound cleaning
46:07 Vaccine
46:25 Lots of particles
47:50 Injectables should not contain particulate matter
49:40 Saline comparison
53:00 Vaccine
53:49 Wow
54:38 Moderna all sorts of particulate matter
55:39 Debris in the solution outrageous
56:15 Graphene Oxide solution tested by way of comparison
59:00 Moderna
01:01 This needs explaining (at 100X magnification second lowest power)

The two minute tweet version of the above one hour video:

Particulate Matter Testing

Particulate Matter Testing is required on all pharmaceutical products that come in contact with human blood or tissue. The standard is USP 788 for blood and tissue and USP 789 for contact with the human eye.

Testing Vaccines final dose form to USP 787 Subvisible Particulate Matter (23 min)


Raman Spectroscopy

Dr Kevin McCairn’s next step is to test the Moderna vaccine  with his blood and he has also booked lab time to do Raman Spectroscopy.

Support the lab work

Please support the lab work and make a donation.  No one else is doing this work and it costs money to book lab work or buy equipment.  Here is the Dojo link:


Gigaohm Biological (12 April)

Gigaohm Biological (12 April)

Another great show. We have to keep pushing because we will see an inundation of disease. First come the heart attacks and strokes, then the autoimmune diseases and inflammation, the cancers etc. Then comes the neurotropic -amyloidosis giving rise to Alzheimer,dementia,CJD, Parkinson etc., etc.   Not to mention infertility and miscarriages.

Whether the disease was caused by the virus or the “vaccine” (transfection) matters little.  They are guilty.  I earnestly believe that they have more in store for us.  We must not comply.




I think it is perhaps time to look at Pfizer’s post marketing report again especially as it is now penetrating the public consciousness.  The context is that Pfizer was forced to release  documents under a FOIA judgement and we can be sure they released the least damaging documents first.


The argument is that the 42,000 odd cases have been picked from among millions of people who were jabbed. Apparently they collected data from existing data bases (like VAERS etc?) and added them to their own database:

Among adverse event reports received into the Pfizer safety database during the cumulative period, only those having a complete workflow cycle in the safety database (meaning they progressed to Distribution or Closed workflow status) are included in the 
monthly SMSR. This approach prevents the inclusion of cases that are not fully processed hence not accurately reflecting final information.  (page 6)

Pfizer had to employ more people to process the information – “Pfizer has also taken a multiple actions to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports”. However, they don’t tell us how many?

To date, Pfizer has onboarded approximately (b)(4) additional full-time employees (FTEs). More are joining each month with an expected total of more than additional resources by the end of June 2021.
3.1. Safety Database
3.1.1. General Overview
It is estimated that approximately (b)(4) doses of BNT162b2 were shipped worldwide from the receipt of the first temporary authorisation for emergency supply on 01 December 2020 through 28 February 2021. Cumulatively, through 28 February 2021, there was a total of 42,086 case reports (25,379 medically confirmed and 16,707 non-medically confirmed) containing 158,893 events. Most cases (34,762) were received from United States (13,739), United Kingdom (13,404) Italy (2,578), Germany (1913), France (1506), Portugal (866) and Spain (756); the remaining 7,324 were distributed among 56 other countries.  [page 6]

The enigmatic (b) (4)

Nowhere in the document does it tell us what (b)(4) represents.   This is then used as an argument to place the 42,000 odd cases within the context of millions jabbed within the 3 month period of Dec 1 to Feb28 2021.

There are lies, damn lies and statistics (as the saying goes) but even a cursory glance at the above comparison shows anomalies.  For example the US and the UK have the same number of adverse case reports even though only 11 million doses were (supposedly) delivered to the UK at this time.  Was the UK vaccine more deadly?  Was UK reporting better?  Who knows.  If we scale the Portuguese cases up to 38 million doses that would be the equivalent 41,568 cases in the USA. So we see that the “fix” of applying a typical reporting rate is nonsense.  There is no typical rate and there were no typical batches.

However, taking these figures as correct (and we are really just dealing with estimates) then a total of 88.1 million doses = 1,200 deaths = 1,200/88.1 m x 100 =0.0013% died = 102,156 deaths when scaled up to a population of 7.5 billion.  According to the WHO the cumulative deaths by 23 Feb 2021 from covid was 2.4 million.  Therefore 0.032% died from covid globally = 0.032% x 7.5 billion = 2.4 million died.  On the face of it the vaccines when projected globally only cause 100k deaths (over 3 months) verses 2.4 million deaths from covid  (over a year).

We can already see that we are not comparing like with like and we know the covid death numbers were initially exaggerated to induce fear and panic.  We also know that any deaths within 14 days of receiving the first dose is ambiguous because it is often reckoned as unvaccinated and there has been under-reporting and in some instances active discouragement of reporting adverse events.  Finally (as we shall see) a three month reporting period is far too short for longer term adverse events and deaths.  This report from Pfizer is disingenuous and alarming.

No-vax bears fruit

No-vax bears fruit

We told you No-vax was a psyop:

The No-Vax Psyop…

Here is where they turn the narrative around. We assume the report is true but it makes sense.  What does it do?   It breaks people psychologically because it offers them a “hero” then takes the hopium away.  So people see resistance as futile, you cannot fight it.  Even No-vax got the jab.   The Djoke is on you.


How Bad is my Batch ?

How Bad is my Batch ?

I came across this and thought that it would be handy for anyone who is vaccinated.  There seems to be a big difference between batches. Possibly quality control issues and the pressure of rushing out new technology.  Japanese studies found steel, heavy metals, crystals and graphene residue in batches that killed people and were withdrawn.  That was contamination from the production process.

How Bad is my Batch ? [Search domain] No one currently knows the reason why some batches/lots are associated with excessive deaths, disabilities and adverse reactions (up to 50 x). Until we do know, it is best to be cautious * “How Bad is my Batch” – by Robert W Malone MD, MS [Search domain] › p › how-bad-is-my-batch 5% of the batches appear to have produced 90% of the adverse reactions Some Moderna batches are associated with 50 x the number of deaths and disabilities compared to other batches. [Search domain] › background-html How Bad is my Batch ? Data Source All data is sourced from VAERS, a public database of over 700,000 adverse reaction reports for Moderna, Pfizer and Janssen Covid 19 vaccines in the USA. [Search domain] › 2021 › 12 › 16 › how-bad-is-my-covid-19-vaccine-batch Search the ‘How bad is my batch’ app now. How Bad Is My Batch? « Aletho News [Search domain] › 2022 › 01 › 01 › how-bad-is-my-batch How Bad Is My Batch? By Craig Paardekooper | 2021 Displays number of deaths and disabilities associated with each batch/lot number = indication of relative toxicity of one batch/lot compared to another [Search domain] › single-post › how-bad-is-my-covid-vaccine-batch **No one currently knows the reason why some batches/lots are associated with excessive deaths, disabilities and adverse reactions (up to 50 x). Until we do know, it is best to be cautious [Search domain] › states-html Safety Signal. Some states, in particular Kentucky, Montana, Alaska, Tennessee, North Dakota and South Dakota are experiencing 4 x, 5 x, 6 x or even 11 x the number of deaths per 100,000

Bar Wunder

Bar Wunder

Maybe Australia has some fight left after all. Bar Wunder in Toowoomba Saturday 15th of January 2022 police attend to try and shut down the premises. Gazcam Rah, TPR legends and the people were there to push back against Globali$$t Tyranny.


Australian emergency department doctor exposes the truth of what is happening with the vaccinated (7 min)

Australia publicly has authorized military officers to poison own people by “vaccination” (9 min)

The COVID vaccine has been classified as a Schedule 4 poison. This classification includes all drugs that could be harmful if abused and normally requires a prescription. This document just authorizes certain people to supply and administer it without a prescription. That said it is being abused ,seeing the millions of harmful side effects it already has shown and deaths world wide .





Negative Efficacy

Negative Efficacy

This article based on UK govt figures has two charts at the end showing vaxx and unvaxx death (in numbers) but also “adjusted rates” (per 100k) which seems to establish the opposite. Whereas the first chart shows more vaxx numbers  dying the second chart show the unvaxx have a higher death rate?  How is that possible?

These were my calculations

These charts are based on the numbers on page 39 and the adjusted rates on page 40

Rate of death vaccinated per 100k =50 (80+)

1,500 vaxx died (how big the vaxx population?)

3,000,000 (3 million vaccinated) 1,500 deaths

therefore 1,500/ 3,000,000 x 100,000 = 50 deaths

50 people per 100,000 die
Rate of death unvaccinated per 100k = 250 (80+)

250 people died

…therefore 100k people unvaccinated?

1. Is my reasoning correct?
2. There are 100 k people over 80+ unvaxx and 250 died but did they die of covid?
** number of deaths of people who had had a positive test result for COVID-19 and either died within 60 days of the first positive test or have COVID-19 mentioned on their death certificate.

If this rate of death applied to everyone over 80+ (3 million)
then we would expect 7,500 deaths (instead of 1,500) so vaccination saved 6,000 (80+) lives but…
….nearly half a million of this cohort die every year anyway (see under)..
as far as I can see this is statistical slight of hand..

For context:
Death in people aged 75 years and older in England in 2017

Amongst those aged 75 years and older in England in 2017, 1.8 million (40.0%) were aged 75 to 79, 1.4 million (30.2%) were aged 80 to 84, 856,812 (18.9%) were aged 85 to 89, and 495,244 (10.9%) were aged 90 years and older.

In 2017, there were 498,882 deaths amongst people of all ages in England. In general, death is an event that occurs in old age. In 2017, 341,620 (68.5%) of all deaths occurred in people aged 75 years and older, of which 17.6% were amongst people aged 75 to 79, 23.5% were amongst people aged 80 to 84, 27.0% were amongst people aged 85 to 90, and 32.0% were amongst people older than 90 years.



  • 117,237 deaths (80-84) in 1.4m population = 8.4% of 80-84 year olds died of natural causes in 2017


  • 134,698 deaths (85-90) in 856,812 population = 15.7% of 85-90 year olds died of natural causes in 2017


  • 159,642 deaths (90+) in 495,244 population = 32% of 90+ died of natural causes in 2017


  • Total population 80+ = 2,752,056 (2.7 m in 2017) total natural death pre-covid = 411,577 = 15%


White Hats

White Hats

I am seeing more and more articles by qualified people stating that Omicron was also made in a lab and released. They declare that Omicron is a LAV (Live Attenuated Virus) and that the release was intentional, not accidental.  What does that mean?  It means that the virus was deliberately weakened and then released.  They intentionally wanted a mild version to go endemic. It would then act like a “vaccine” giving everyone immunity (herd immunity). When you look at the evidence that seems like a plausible theory.

What to expect next?

A time frame of two months seems to be cropping up. Riccardo Bossi also indicated storing food for a few months and keeping our heads down.


So, are we to believe that  a group of good guys out there (white hats) is coming to the rescue?  I very much doubt it. What we are seeing is rival gangs struggling for position. Whoever wins (or loses) the bankers always win in the end.