Synthesis
Jonathan Couey and Charles Rixey are approaching this from different angles and we need to synthesize their discoveries rather than dismiss or disregard.
Is the Defuse proposal and the FOIA requests theater? (Johnathan’s theory) then we have nothing with which to hold them accountable. What mitigates against this is that they were already working on these concepts long before any FOIA requests.
For this reason I post both videos on this page. The interview between Kevin (now back from the USA) and Charles is excellent (been listening to it) and I am embedding it while it was still running live.
Latest SARS FOIA With Charles Rixey
Version on YT (https://youtu.be/Cna8mK8XZW4)
Some of Johnathan’s ideas have caused tensions but that is OK if it leads to new insights. We will keep digging and exposing. Here are some comments (from different people) on the Discord sever.
He just said at about 1:46:00 that ralph baric observes 20-30% recombinant virus gene mixing with natural swarms. these systems can find more than one steady-state in the multivariate environment they live in. jay still hasnt justified his assertion about interfering non-replication competent particles or the error rate of CoV genome replication, or the fidelity of CoV protein synthesis Jay's new theory is this (please correct me if I've been unfair): 1) the process of replication of rna creates a lot of dud copies called "replication incompetents" 2) the imperfect copying process causes the original "alpha predominant" and infectious swarm to rapidly revert to the relatively harmless "normal" quasi species swarm of coronaviruses 3) therefore, since it is impossible for a viral swarm to long remain infectious, the only way to get a significant number of infected people is to have a huge intentional release of a clone-predominant swarm. 4) then a few hundred people die, and the rest of the damage is fabricated by the complicit media 5) probably 3 big initial releases - Wuhan, Teheran, Lombardi (Italy), and potentially some other smaller releases, to keep the narrative rolling until the vaccines came out. 1) a. I'll take him at his word that there are a certain number of replication incompetents. I was not able to find on his Twitch where he substantiated that, and I have not been able to come up with any numbers on the percent of replication error. b. The cell machinery hijacked by RNA viruses is the same machinery for generating your body's proteins. How likely is it that this machinery is largely generating incompetent proteins? c. Be careful listening to Jay and Mark - viruses don't reproduce sexually, and there is precious little recombination or mixing done amongst virions. Thus the mixing is mostly just mixing of populations, and the virus that causes the most coughing is going to get spread the most. 2) As Kevin said, clinical presentation of symptoms was stable for over a year. Implying the swarm was plenty infectious, all over the world. 3,4,5) Just listen to those guys hypothesize "gushers of infectious clone" and many intentional releases. The probability of a conspiracy theory being true is inversely proportional to the number of necessary silent conspirators. I can't find the paper, but if I remember correctly PRRAR.S is meant to signify TMPRSS2 cleavage between R & S. However, there are other enzymes that would cleave at PRRA.RS which would leave the MSH3 class oncology gene for Hermansky Pulak Syndrome exposed He is still trying to find a correlation to pathogenicity without spike. That limitation in his hypothesis is tainting his biological analysis In essence he is only looking for confirmation and is trying to discount reality in order to prove it The full spike protein is not as pathogenic as S1 by itself. That biological reality itself should give pause to the certainty of his analysis of transfection The generalization of pathogenicity caused soley by peptide synthesis, irrespective of what is being synthesized is a novel hypothesis, unfortunately he really needs to get into the physics of biology in order to explain what LNPs are doing and how they mirror what is seen with S1 https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-020-01673-z https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7417663/
Medical Doctors for Covid Ethics International: Gigaohm Biological Presents (2:32)