In this video, Richard and Tony delve into the little-known story of Solomon de Rothschild and his pivotal role during the Civil War. They connect the dots between his actions and the founding of Israel, offering insights into the current political climate.
He mentioned an agreement in the 1840-41 which I am unaware off. Apparently Britain agreed that Palestine could be a place for Jewish refugees?? But the Balfour declaration was in 1917. Can’t find any info on an 1840/1 agreement?
Max Igan who used to be in Queensland is now in Mexico. He was always a bit of a grifter with covid and 5G etc but this video has some decent clips. What is happening is terrible.
The = sign does not mean that they are equivalent but that links exist between these different movements/people.
The Darbyite interpretation of the Crimean war in the 1850s as the “end times” Russia=Gog depicting the “tsar of Russia” (autocrat) as the “bad guy” of end time prophecy. Of course this did not happen therefore the tsar had to be overthrown (hence the 1917 Bolshevik or Communist (Jewish) revolution supported by Western oligarchs. Still not working? Well then we break Russia up after 70 years of Communism. Still not working? Well then we provoke a Crimean war redux. Still not working? Well then we will expand to WW3 Armageddon. Of course this is an oversimplification but there can be no doubt that religion (eschatology) is a tool that is being used by elite power structures and their intelligence agencies for geopolitical reasons. The post-World War II era witnessed the creation in Palestine of a homeland for the Jews. Thus, Scofield’s premillennialism seemed prophetic. “At the popular level, especially, many people came to regard the dispensationalist scheme as completely vindicated.”
In the end, it seems to me that the Anglos and the Zionists made an agreement to cooperate in dismantling the Ottoman Empire and keeping Russia (and Germany) weak in exchange for a homeland. The Anglo-Zionist want another global empire. The British Empire never died just took on a different form that now has competition (or does it?) with globo-homo. We are all being played and the fourth Industrial Revolution is upon us.
I don’t normally feature Alex Jones because he is such a PsyOp despite him often telling the truth. He has a big right-wing (often Zionist) audience. When even he starts to call them out you know something has changed. I get the feeling that people have had enough and the dam has broken. They will not be threatened or cowed into silence.
This could be interesting (not watched it yet)
EMERGENCY BROADCAST MUST WATCH: Alex Jones Reveals the Secrets on Collapsing Markets, WW3 and More! – MONDAY FULL SHOW 10/16/23 (2:04 min)
Nikki Haley’s Completely UNHINGED Interview on GAZA (14 min)
Brother Nathanael: DO TO JEW WHAT THEY DO TO YOU. Say “This is New Normal, Science Did That”
If you hover over the biblical citations they will appear in a pop-up box and extra resources are in the greyed out boxes should you wish to do further research.
Abrahamic cage match is a reference to the end time eschatological fight between Muslim and Jews that we are being manipulated and nudged into, by using Western Christianity as a tool to further Jewish power.
The live stream arranged by Dr McCairn with Adam Green and Albert Bishai addressed serious issues that I find myself largely in agreement with. The Abrahamic religions are being employed either as a broom (Islam) or a Trojan horse (Christianity) to usher in the utopia (sic) of Jewish global hegemony and full spectrum dominance.
I find myself in agreement with the hypotheses that eschatology is being manipulated and abused by the Jews and that Christian-Zionism is captured by Jewish interests. Where I diverge is that I believe that God is able to use the intransigence and perversity of the Jewish people to achieve his own ends. After all, if you know the beginning from the end you are able to stack the deck (as it were) to achieve your purpose. It is the age old dichotomy between manifest destiny and freewill. As is decried in Romans, “Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will?”(Rom 9:19). In the end no one can resist his will even those who oppose him. The Jews believe that they can run a Psyop against God himself and wrestle God to a standstill as Jacob (the deceiver) attempted. The story tells us that despite a Herculean effort Jacob is found weeping and begging, a broken man, which event Scripture refers to as the day of Jacob’s trouble (Jer 30:5-7).
Adam would counter that it makes no difference whether I am a Christian-Zionist or if I am an apologist for Jewish power, because the outcome is the same, namely, you still end up with a Jew in charge, and Jews ruling the world. However, that runs counter to the scriptural depiction because the apostle Paul calls gentiles fellowheirs (Eph 3:6) and the Apocalypse goes so far to call all the faithful as fellowservants with the angels.(Rev 22:8-9). The gentiles are not second class citizens and they are not the collective servants of the Jews.
The passage in Zech 8:23 where it portrays ten men grasping a Jew because God is with him is a reference to the messianic Immanuel title first employed in Isa 7: 14 where the name means God with us. In the first instance Immanuel was King Hezekiah who was also the initial fulfillment of the Suffering Servant of Isaiah 53. The central portion of the book of Isaiah (chapters 36-38) describe the death bed recovery on the third day of Hezekiah and the victory over the Assyrian invasion and siege by Sennacherib. Hezekiah was about to die childless which would have been a dis-annulment of the Davidic covenant and he was betrayed by his counselors and Sanhedrin during his illness. The prophet Isaiah told Hezekiah that he would be reprieved and receive a fifteen year extension on his life which is reflected in Isa 53:10-11 where his life is prolonged and he sees a descendant that inherits his throne. Of course the Jews believe that the suffering servant is a collective servant representing the Jewish nation who suffered a holocaust and they completely ignore the original contextual setting of Isaiah. The suffering servant of Isaiah 53 becomes the philosophical/parabolic story of Job’s suffering. The identity of the ten men in Zech 8:23 harks back to the ten nations of Gen 15:19-21 which in end time eschatology become the ten kings that burn and destroy the Great Harlot (Rev 17:16-17) who had seduced the nations with her sorcery (pharmakeia) in Rev 18:23.
The same prophet Zechariah warned that his fellow Jews would set up a base in Shinar (Babylon) where “wickedness” (lawlesness) would thrive. The prophetic vision in Zech 5 is a parody of the Ark of the Covenant and the Hebrew word for base (Zech 5:11) is related to the bases of the two brass temple pillars (1 kgs 7:21) which carried the meaning “established in strength” being cut in pieces and transported to Babylon by Nebuchadnezzar who melted them down (2 Kings 25:13). It is there that the Babylonian Talmud was written and the “law schools” established that would determine the direction or Rabbinical Judaism for the next two millennia. Interestingly (and I don’t know if it is linked or an in-joke) but Al–Qaeda was set up in the same Levant region, and the word is Arabic for, the base (coincidence?)
I pointed out that the Jews had coded the numeric value of 72 into the FCS (Furin Cleavage Site) as well as developing a quick formula (The rule of 72) for calculating compound interest. This indicated to me that the 72 gentile nations would be conquered by means of disease and debt as the number 72 is related to the 72 nations in Genesis 10 (LXX). The number 72 holds particular significance to Chabad as in Kabbalistic lore (not the Torah) it comes to represent 72 names of God, 72 demons (cf. the key of Solomon etc). The number 70/72 is ubiquitous in ANE mythology and it is my contention that it is related to ancient cosmogony and the Great Precession Year (more on this anon).
The Jews tend to call all gentiles “Edom” (Esau the progenitor) just as they called Rome “Edom” which is of course a misnomer because the Edomites or Idumeans were according to the Jacob cycle a blood brother and therefore Semitic. Herod the Great an Idumean was immensely wealthy and even lent money to Mark Antony. Whenever the word Red is used in the Apocalypse that is a key for the Herod Dynasty. A red dragon tried to swallow the man child (Herod the Great and the slaughter of the innocents see Rev 12:3 and Matt 2:16 ) and James is killed by the sword of the red horse (Rev 6:4 and Acts 12:1-2). Herod was a paranoid psychopath. He killed his favorite wife, Mariamne (he had 10 wives), because he suspected infidelity. Herod also killed his uncle, his mother-in-law, and three of his sons causing Caesar Augustus to quip, “Yeah, I’d rather be Herod’s pig than his son!” The Herod family married into the priestly Cohen (Sadducees) and they formed a faction referred to as the Herodian party in the Bible. Although the Herodian dynasty was wealthy and married into foreign royalty the Herods disappear from the pages of history after the first century. It is my belief that the wealth was conserved and the Edomites reappeared in the form of Rothschild (Red Shield) to launch their campaign of world domination. They are behind the Balfour declaration and they were already buying tracts of land in Palestine in the 1930s. In the land covenant of Gen 15:1 God promised to be Abraham’s shield but we find that Zionist Israel has substituted that protection for that provided by Red Shield.
In The Antiquities of the Jews (Book 18:116-19), Josephus confirmed that Herod Antipas “slew” John the Baptist after imprisoning him at Machaerus, because he feared John’s influence might enable him to start a rebellion. According to the synoptic Gospels, Herod, who was tetrarch, or sub-king, of Galilee under the Roman Empire, had imprisoned John the Baptist because he reproved Herod for divorcing his wife (Phasaelis, daughter of King Aretas of Nabataea) and unlawfully taking Herodias, the wife of his brother Herod Philip I. The references to adultery and murder etc in the book of Malachi and the condemnation of Edom/Esau are prophetic of John the Baptist and the denouncement not just of the Herod dynasty but also of the Hasmonean priesthood (Sadducees) who had become corrupt.
Zoroastrian dualism is rejected in the book of Isaiah (who was a contemporary with the rise of Zoroastrianism); “I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things” (Isaiah 45:7). Unlike the Persian religion the Hebrew God takes responsibility for both good and evil circumstances. Satan (The enemy) or the Devil (False accuser) does not operate independently.
The Jews have an established pattern of using the goy as proxies. The Nero persecution was encouraged and suggested to Nero by his mistress/wife Poppaea Sabina. Tacitus and Suetonius portray Poppaea as an ambitious and ruthless schemer. The Jewish historian Josephus paints a different picture.She had a certain predilection for Judaism, and is characterized by Josephus (“Ant.” xx. 8, § 11; “Vita,” § 3) as θεοσεβής (“religious”). Some Jews, such as the actor Alityros, were well received at court, and Poppæa was always ready to second Jewish petitions before the emperor. It is my belief that Poppæa suggested that Nero blame the great fire of Rome on the Christians who were a minority sect. Nero wanted to rebuild Rome and I am very suspicious that the fire was deliberate. In any case, by blaming the Christians Poppæa would be doing both Nero and the Jews a favor.
Just as they flatter Trump as Cyrus who (supposedly) restored their fortunes so also they read Koresh (Cyrus) instead of Karash (workman) and flatterd the Persian king that he was mentioned in their prophecies. The Cyrus restoration amounted to nothing because they attempted to force the issue. So, they are employing the same- tactics and attempting to take the kingdom of God by violence (Matt 11:12).
They also have an established pattern of False Messiah’s the most prominent being, Bar Kochba (134-136), Sabbatai Zevi (1626-1676) who declared himself Messiah in 1666 (the year of the Fire of London) and Jacob Franks who ended his life living in the same region as the Rothschild clan..
Finally we have the Great Precession Year, where each tick (degree) of the cosmic clock represents 72 years in a 360 degree Babylonian circle giving a cycle time (calculated by Newton) of 25,920 years (=360×72). There are prophecies pointing to a solar flare (Isa 30:26, Zech 14:12 , Rev 16:8) followed by a gigantic earth quake (Rev 16:18-19). It just so happens that this video came out today from “Diamond” who is a PhD Paleo-geologist and his partner who is also a scientist:
The Younger Dryas Cosmic Catastrophe Impact Event – What Is The Evidence – What Are The Implications (57 min)
In conclusion, you cannot prove a negative. The building of a third temple would be an abomination. If the Jews did establish a third temple, not only does it become a “self-fulfilling” prophecy, but God will use their own stubbornness and intransigence against them as he knows the beginning from the end. Some would argue that nothing supernatural is happening, discounting the fact that God removed the nation from the land twice before (a repeat pattern). If God manifests himself through the medium of history, then we should see the hand of God in events and I believe that we do.. On the other hand the counter is that the Jews are following a clever eschatological plan and everything from their expulsion from the land, their persecution and their subsequent capture of the system accords with their master-plan. I think that we have to be careful not to be too one-dimensional in our thinking because all time lines converge in the end and God is able to reverse what seems impossible to man.
“For if the casting away of them be the reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead?” (Rom 11:15 )
Countering Glow-Op Goy-Slop with Adam Green (Know More News) & Albert Bishai (4:31)
I am going to have to do a situation report (SitRep) soon. A Great Game is being played and my advice is to trust no one. Before I do another SitRep it is important to refresh everyone’s memory on the role that Perfidious Albion has played in the guise of the Old East India Company, the square mile of London and the deal that was struck with Rothschild that birthed the Anglo-Zionist monster.
We have neoconservative imperialists and neoliberal imperialists of a Malthusian/Green New Deal. The goals of a neoliberal Rhodes Scholar imperialist and a neoconservative Straussian imperialist are essentially the same. Both types ultimately seek a post-nation state world order governed by a financial oligarchy and their technocratic alpha managers, and both define “power” in absolutely Nietzschean terms of “force”.
https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/the-british-imperial-hand-behind
This is what Maurice Strong said in an interview wherein he described a “fiction book” he was fantasizing about writing which he described in the following manner:
“What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? The group’s conclusion is ‘no’. The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”
The goals of a neoliberal Rhodes Scholar imperialist and a neoconservative Straussian imperialist are essentially the same.How could an admirer of Plato and Nietzsche be a liberal democrat? The ancient philosophers whom Strauss most cherished believed that the unwashed masses were not fit for either truth or liberty, and that giving them these sublime treasures would be like throwing pearls before swine.
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/article_1542jsp/
From Trotsky and Bandera to the Maidan: A Century of Color Revolutions (1:52)
Of course it is all the fault of those commies, those Marxists agitators:
Marxists Making The West Stink
However, you have to stop thinking of left and right. You are dealing with Organized Crime. The Government and the oligarchs do not care about left or right. There is no left or right only power. You have to stop thinking in terms of left and right. They are all fascists. Both the Anglo-Zionists and the Globalists. The West (Wall Street and the bankers) funded the Communist revolution just like they are funding the war in Ukraine.
What’s The Difference Between Organized Crime And Government? (11 min)
They always fund both sides. The bankers always win. They funded Hitler and they funded the Bolshevik revolution. They don’t care how many people have to suffer and die. They don’t care whether the dead are Russian or Ukrainian or American for that matter. The World is a business and you are not a stakeholder. It is a big club and you ain’t in it. Now go and sequester your carbon.