Beast War

Beast War

 

 

False prophets

Alice Bailey the mother of the NEW AGE and her plans to “revitalize” the church – remaster edit (38 min)

What is the Role of the Land of Israel in Eschatology? (9 min)

My answer is that it is promised to the descendants of Abraham.  Jesus said that the descendants of Abraham do the works of Abraham.   So inheritance is not after the flesh because flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God.  The works of Abraham are works of faith not works of the law and the true Israel of God is not after the flesh.  Will there be some sort of national presence?  Yes, because God keeps covenant but it will not be the Zionist nation that we now find.  The nation will be purged through the fire and sifted.

Antisemitism Laws

Antisemitism Laws

They are getting desperate and the only route left to them now is censorship. That is always a losing move. Of course, it is a precursor to banning the Gospel or “rewriting it” using Artificial Intelligence.  What can they do with passages like this:

Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.(John 8:44)

Or how about the “blood libel”….

Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.  Then released he Barabbas unto them: and when he had scourged Jesus, he delivered him to be crucified.(Matthew 27:25-26)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The next section looks at Antisemitic laws drafted by Christian countries to keep Jewish power in check.    I have only sampled a section out of each video but they look interesting.  The analysis that he presents is that the Royal blood lines and courts were infiltrated by Jews and the Antisemitic laws were drawn up to benefit the Jews by ensuring that they remained a separate class etc. even-though some of the laws caused hardship for lower class Jews who  the elite were willing to sacrifice.  The laws ensured that the Jews would remain a separate class and not integrate. They actually maintained Jewish power.  I will have to listen to all three videos properly.

 

The Truth Behind so called Anti-Semitic Laws Through the Ages Part 1
 

 
The Truth Behind So-called Anti-Semitic Laws Through the Ages Part 2
 

 
The Truth Behind So-called Anti-Semitic Laws Through the Ages Part 3
 

 
  

Red Cow Apocalypse

Red Cow Apocalypse

Apparently the red cow was secretly sacrificed in Jerusalem and yet we have all survived.   Whether or not it has been sacrificed is moot because at some point in the future they do intend to sacrifice the red cow and they may have already done it.  According to the video below  the arrival of the red heifer is “prophesied in Christianity”.  That is untrue and many of the statements in the video are tendentious and decontextualized and will be debunked anon.

 


Red Heifers Secretly SACRIFICED in JERUSALEM TODAY! – Is This The Ultimate Warning? (23 min)

 

The arrival of the red heifer is not “prophesied in Christianity”. The Christian “temple” is not one made with hands (Acts 7:48). In fact the saints are living temple stones (1 Pet 2:5) and Jesus is both the temple (John 2:19) and the sacrifice (Heb 10:10). There is no more any need for sacrifice. Any Christians who tell you otherwise for whatever reason are perverting the gospel. Not only are we explicitly told in the Apocalypse that there is no temple in the New Jerusalem (Rev 21:22) but David was told by God that he did not want a temple (see my article here) and instead God would build a house (dynasty) for David and he was given the Messianic promise (2 Sam 7:12-14) nevertheless, God conceded and allowed David’s son Solomon to build a temple. As such Solomon became the initial fulfillment (placeholder) of the prophecy but he soon apostatized and as a consequence the kingdom was divided in the days of his son.

The video offers Matthew 24:14-16 and 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4 as “proof” of an end time temple with scant effort to contextualize the quotes within the history of the period as the citations refer to the first and second Roman Wars. The First Jewish–Roman War was in 66–73 AD and resulted in the destruction of Herod’s Temple the Second Jewish-Roman war (132–136 AD) was the Bar Kokhba revolt. Both wars were nationalist rebellions, striving to restore an independent Judean state. In Matthew Jesus draws on the seventy weeks prophecy by Daniel, which among other things describes the defilement of the temple by Antiochus Epiphenes in the Hasmonean period. This is a complex prophecy poorly understood by Christians, moreover, the Rabbi’s deliberately omitted about 166 years from the Persian period in their Seder Olam Calendar to ensure a period of exactly 490 years between the first and second Temple destruction (586BC+70AD=656 years not 490 years) thus making it impossible of any application of the prophecy to Christ. The end of the temple and animal sacrifice occurred in 70 AD and before that happens the apostles and Paul had already preached the gospel to all the nations of the ancient world. The second Jewish-Roman war saw the chief Rabbi Akiva declare Bar Kochba as the Messiah which he said fulfilled Numbers 24:17. There can be no doubt that Kochba erected a place for sacrifice and worship (if only temporary) on the Temple Mount. Kochba was therefore the initial prototype of the “man of lawlessness” even though he saw himself as the embodiment of the law (cf. the law made flesh). On his coins he depicted himself as a star rising above the Torah Ark.

He persecuted Christians who refused to buy and sell with his coins and his soldiers took a test of loyalty by cutting of their little finger and wearing tefillin on the forehead (Rev 13:16-17). The destruction of the temple in 70 occurred after 3.5 years of desecration as did the Kochba rebellion (the Seleucid desecration under Antiochus also lasted 3.5 years) moreover the first temple and second temple fell on the 9th Ab and Kochba’s fortress of Betar fell on the same date. History does not repeat but it rhymes and the first and second century outworking of the prophesy form eschatological patterns (but not blueprints) of future events.

Therefore the two citations in this video speak of the destruction of the temple in AD 70 and the annihilation and dispersion of the nation in AD136 which both form a pattern of the final 3.5 year tribulation and witnessing in Rev 11: 1-3 which also speaks of a temple (though not literal).

Suffice to say that God told Abraham that He would provide the sacrifice (Gen 22:14) and He told David that He did not want a temple. Although the ashes of the heifer could make the priestly recipient ritually pure , the ashes could not purge the conscience of dead works (Heb 9:13-14). The Jews do not tell you that the reason behind the necessity of the red heifer ritual is because the priests had been struck down dead by God in the Tabernacle (Lev 10:1-2) thus making the tent ritually impure. The Aaronic priesthood had effectively blocked access to God by introducing rebellion and death into the sanctuary. It was from its very instigation a flawed and rotten priesthood with Aaron making the golden calf and his sons being struck dead for burning strange incense (getting high while drunk) in the sanctuary. It was therefore necessary to introduce another way (work around) outside the camp (law) to reconsecrate the defiled priesthood. Most of the Rabbis don’t understand their own Torah because they spend all their time debating and pilpulling ways to get around the commands and pontificating in the Talmud (which Jesus calls the traditions of men). The ritual of the red heifer is closely associated with the Day Of Atonement (DOA) Scapegoat ritual which is also connected with this incident.

The Scapegoat and the Jews

The video cites Amos (9:14-15) as a proof that they would return to the land and that they would never be uprooted, but again that vision is clearly utopian and eschatological as both the Old and New Testaments speak of further trouble and even exile (Ezek 21:27, Zech 14:2, Rev 17:16)

The indwelling of Yahweh among his people is not in the form of a building but in his son, who could say that whoever had seen him had seen the Father (John 14:9). The Jews understand the presence (Shakan Exod 25:8) of God as happening through the “Shekhinah” a word not found in the Bible. It appears in the Mishnah, the Talmud, and Midrash. Kabbalah associates the shekhinah with the divine feminine as Gnosticism does with Sophia (wisdom) with the roots of these unscriptural ideas tracing back to Canaanite gods having a female consort (Asherah). The practice of Jewish male worshipers rocking back and forth and thrusting the hips is thought to linked to engaging with the divine feminine. These ideas should be rejected by Christians because the tabernacling or indwelling (skenoo) presence of God is Jesus Christ (John 1:14).

All the references to Ezekiel’s visionary temple should be understood as allegorical and/or an attempt to stimulate the people to action by making them ashamed of their apathy (Ezek 43:10-11). The temple when it was built was nothing like the vision vouched safe to Ezekiel and was so disappointing that the old men who had known the glory of the former temple wept when they saw the foundation was laid (Ezra 3: 12). The temple vision of Ezekiel was never meant to be understood literally and any attempt to regard it as such creates many problems.

Finally, it is quite obvious that many Jews as well as many Christians do not understand Scripture and that Christian-Zionists are the result of subversion by the Synagogue of Satan forming an unholy alliance with the British Empire and its Commonwealth resulting in such strange phenomenon as British Israelitism and the demonizing of Russia (Gog) as the end time enemy. They are running a “controlled opposition” play against God himself by using the eschatology of the Apocalypse as a game plan. The Gnostics and Kabbalists are attempting to wrestle God to a halt and claim the victory for themselves. God will not be mocked. This will not end well as no one can force the hand of the Almighty.

 

Extra resources:

Anglo-Zionist Temple Mount Plot

Bless Israel

Amalek Propaganda

The Return of the Jews to Israel

 

My Commentary on the Apocalypse PRITA and on Daniel  GIJ

Bless Israel

Bless Israel

It is not enough to claim descent from Abraham in order to lay claim to the blessing accorded to Abraham:

"They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham" (John 8:39).

If that is not enough the apostle Paul makes it abundantly clear that the promise comes through the “seed” singular which is Christ; “Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ” (Galatians 3:16) and both Jew and Gentile inherit the blessings through Christ: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise” (Galatians 3:28-29).

Therefore this is not explicitly about Israel after the flesh. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed (Romans 9:6-8).

 

I prefer the explanation given by this Jewish man who used to be a Zionist and I endorse his explanation….

 

It is not that God has no purpose with Israel as a nation or that the Church somehow replaces Israel but the nation finds its true fulfillment in Christ.  The “New Jerusalem” comes down from heaven and the former things pass away.

Amalek Propaganda

Amalek Propaganda

See the video below…

The irony is that Amalek propaganda is used by Zionists to justify their genocidal mania and it is used by their opponents to discredit the Old Testament (the Torah, not the Talmud which is Judaism) to portray God as homicidal and morally flawed. Both the Zionists and ther opponents are wrong and both demonstrate errors in thinking and  of understanding systematic theology. Firstly it should be obvious even to the theologically obtuse that the Amalekites are not Palestinians and that God has not commanded Jews to kill Palestinians (whether they are Palestinian Christians or Palestinian Muslims). Secondly it should be obvious to Christians that Jesus manifested the character of Yahweh and even bore the Yahweh name to such an extent that he could declare that whoever had seen him (in action) had seen the Father (John 14:9). His mission was one of healing and compassion and preaching the kingdom and the immanence of God not organizing genocide or revolution. When Jesus was confronted with a Canaanite woman crying for mercy (Matt 15:21-28) he did not command his disciples to kill her. He did not say….it says in Deut 7:2, ” …shew them no mercy”….therefore….kill her. No, instead he healed her daughter. In fact, contrary the command in Deuteronomy to kill every Canaanite and not to marry them (make a covenant) the first Canaanite woman that is encountered during Joshua’s (=Jesus) conquest is SAVED and she marries into the messianic line via the prince of Judah. A prostitute and a Canaanite woman becomes the ancestor of Jesus (Rahab m.Salmon Matt 1:5). People need to rethink their preconceptions. J.A. T Robinson refers to the origins of Christ as “the scandal of divine love”.  Canaanite is a word derived from acquiring or merchant and merchandise. They were merchants. Jesus condemned the Jews of his day for practicing money lending in the temple, “make not my Father’s house an house of merchandise’ (John 2:16 ). No merchants in the temple. No Canaanite in God’s house. The prophet Hosea called the Jews (Ephraim the Northern Tribes) merchants (Kenan cf. Canaan): He is a merchant, the balances of deceit are in his hand: he loveth to oppress (Hosea 12:7 ). They had turned God’s house into a den of thieves (Matt 2:13, Jer 7:11). So perhaps the antisemitic trope portraying Jews as the happy merchant (Canaanite) rubbing his hands in anticipation of all the shekels he stands to make is actually a biblical meme (lolz).

As for the injunction concerning Amalek. The name Amalek is etymologised in Rabbinic literature as “a people who lick blood” (am lak) but since when do the Rabbis get anything right (lolz). The linguists and etymologists regard the origins as unknown. Is Amalek (עֲמָלֵק) or Ămālēq a cognate from amal (עָמָל) and ḥê-leq (חֵ֖לֶק)? Ămālēq would then be the concatenated compound of the morphmes amal and [ḥê]-leq. The semantic range of amal covers; wearing effort or weariness (hence, worry, whether of body or mind — grievance(-vousness), iniquity, labour, mischief, miserable(-sery), pain(-ful), perverseness, sorrow, toil, travail, trouble, wearisome, wickedness). The morpheme ḥê-leq denotes a portion or part (as inheritance often with refrence to land). Note that the Deuteronmist (Deut 25:16-18) makes a point that Amalek attacked the stragglers and those that were feeble and weary during the wilderness wanderings. The ones who fell behind. The Israelites were admonished not to forget this when they recieved their ineritance (portion). Althought the Hebrew passage employs different words for weary and portion the meanining is similar. Amalek would have no portion or inheritance (be blotted out) because they preyed on the weary. Amalek becomes therefore a metaphore for sin as it targets human weakness and whose portion (wages) is death. Note the phrase in Joshua 22:27; “Ye have (lā-ḵem) no part (ḥê-leq) in the LORD” and the poetic assosciation (reversal and alliteration) of lā-ḵem ḥê-leq with amaleq. It certainly resonates phonetically.

The incident where Israel went to battle with Amalek is recorded in Exodus 17 and the war was won when Moses held his outsteched arms up to heaven in imitation of the crucifiction. There was therefore a supernatural element as with the lifting up of the serpent by Moses (Num 21:8-9) when everyone who looked upon it in faith (identified with it) was saved. The Hebrew Gematria for serpent has the same value as the word messiah hence Jesus reference to being lifted up (John 12:32-33). The serpent is archtypical for sin which demonstrates that the motif in Exodus and Numbers is similar, namely sin could only be defeated through crucifying the flesh.

Hence the idea of herem (חרם) from two similar semitic roots Ḥ-R-M meaning either to consecarte (dedicate) or destroy (annihilate). I would argue that there is little difference between the meanings as a sacrifice (cf. burnt offering) that was consecrated to God was completely annihilated or consumed (as in Jesus saying in John 2:17, “The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up”). The word is often used in the 6th and 7th chapters of the Book of Joshua, where Jericho came under herem. This meant it had to be completely destroyed, except for “the silver and gold and the articles of bronze and iron” which were to go into “YHWH’s treasury” (Joshua 6:19). However, we noted earlier that Rahab and her family were spared. In Deut 20 six races are subject to ḥērem and yet we find a faithful Hittite serving in David’s army and a Jebusite who is willing to transfer the ownership of the threshing floor to David. Paul Copan argues that the herem commands were hyperbolic since the passages contain merisms such as “man and woman”. [1] The war against Amalek was perpetual until the end of time, because Amalek was “the first of nations”:

"And when he looked on Amalek, he took up his parable, and said, Amalek was the first of the nations; but his latter end shall be that he perish for ever" (Numbers 24:20).

It clearly states that it is a “parable”(mashal) and Amalek and his king Agag (cf. 1 Sam 15:8) that was high and exalted (Num 24:7) whose descendant became the Agagite Haman (Esther 3:1) during the Persian period, who was hung on an exceeding high gallows (Esther 7:9). Gog is derivative from Agag (the king) which becomes the eschatological enemy deceiving “the nations”in Rev 20:8. Therefore Agag/Gog (not Russia) represents the first and the last or the Alpha and Omega of sin, the first nation and the last nations that rebel against God and attempt to destroy the camp of the saints (as Amalek attempted to destroy the camp in the wilderness). During the monarchy Saul failed to destroy Agag as he was commanded to do (1 Sam 15:11) , instead (later in his reign) Saul ended up destroying the priestly camp at Nob by sending an Edomite (progenitor of Amalek) to commit genocide (1 Sam 22:18) .

Finally, I have heard it stated that all the Jewish feasts celebrate genocides (lolz) for example the killing of the Egyptians and their armies at Passover and the death of Haman and 75,000 Persian subjects at Purim but both stories actually celebrate deliverance from genocide and a reversal of fortunes. The tables were turned on the enemy.

Much more can be said and I refer the reader to my articles. [2] How then do we understand these Old Testament narratives? Are they to be understood as history or mythology? Are the narratives to be allegorically or literally comprehended? The problem is that they refuse  neat categorization. The text employs literary conventions , paronomasia, mythopoetic devices, chiasmus, gematria, rhetoric, history and intertextuality in a rich and seamless kaleidoscope that defies systematization. The reader is forced to either look for deeper meaning or dismiss it all as fiction. Jesus himself always spoke in parables. Any approach must therefore of necessity be poly-valent. Anyone who rejects the God of the Old Testament must reject Jesus  and anyone who wants to use the conquest of Canaan as a template for genocide has neither the Father nor the Son.  The only one who has won the War is Jesus.

Notes

[1] Copan, Paul (2011). Is God a Moral Monster? Making Sense of the Old Testament God. Baker Books. pp. 175–176).

[2] Further reading on Agag/Gog etc An Intertextual Analysis of Ezekiel 38 (Part 1) Part 2:Russia in Ezekiel 38 (Part 2) Part 3: Ezekiel 38-39, Stylometric Analysis (Part 3)

 

SHOCKER! Guess Who Has Won The War? (19 min)

 

 

 

 

 

Haman’s Ear

Haman’s Ear

The opinions out there is that the Moscow attack is attributed to:

  • Putin false  flag
  • Ukraine
  • CIA/Mossad
  • ISIS

The Chechens cut off the ear of one of the terrorists and apparently (so the story goes) “fed it to him”.  Why would they do that?  According to Adam Green (full marks for noticing) the attack happened on the Jewish feast of Purim when Jews celebrate the genocide of their enemies.  Among other celebratory activities they bake cookies in the shape of an ear (Haman’s ear) and eat them.  In my view this is a message from Putin and the FSB to Israel/Mossad that they know who is behind the so called ISIS attack.

To sum up…. Putin was betrayed by a Jew (Prigozhin) is fighting a Jew (Zelensky) backed by Jews (American neocons). Is it so hard to believe that Israel/Mossad is behind the “ISIS” attack?

 

Putin Says U.S. & CIA Did It! (18 min)

I have included Adam Greens stream below because the first half is about Trump, Rabbi Shmuley and the Moscow attack is actually very good, however he then goes off the reservation again with a full on attack against Christianity which is suspect and easily refuted. Christian-Zionism is not Christianity and Judeo-Christianity is an oxymoron. He makes a lot of noise about Isaiah 45 and “The Christ is King” meme….

Look unto me, and be ye saved, all the ends of the earth: for I am God, and there is none else. I have sworn by myself, the word is gone out of my mouth in righteousness, and shall not return, That unto me every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear. Surely, shall one say, in the LORD have I righteousness and strength: even to him shall men come; and all that are incensed against him shall be ashamed. (Isaiah 45:22-24)

His main vectors of attack are that Jesus is not real but a mythological figure (not a historical figure see: Adam Green is not real) and that Christianity is a Jewish PsyOp. The problem with Adam is that he does not understand scripture, or more likely he is paid not to understand…

Note that, In the Lord (Yahweh) have I righteousness and strength  is similar (different root) to Hezekiah (Yah Strengthens). Hezekiah bears the Yahweh name after the defeat of the Assyrians and his resurrection from his death bed on the third day. He acts as the divine proxy receiving tribute and honor.

Like Adam Green many Christians think this is a prophecy about Cyrus and/or Trump because they fail to understand the context and the history of the period. They need to check out my commentary…

The Cyrus Problem

Addendum

2 min clip….

 

The apostle Paul paraphrases this text and applies it to Jesus:

But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross. Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. (Philippians 2:7-11 )

Paul mentions the “form (likeness) of a servant” because the reference is to the suffering servant of Isaiah 53 a role foreshadowed by King Hezekiah but typical of Jesus Christ crucified as King of the Jews. This is not just about “Jews” ruling the world but about acknowledging God as the creator of all humanity and the conquer of the enemy of all mankind, namely, death.

At one point Adam stops himself half way a quote (trying to prove that Jesus/God is Jewish)… He came into his own {here Adam ends the quote}. How about you complete the quote Adam?  Never mind I will do it for you:

He came unto his own, and his own received him not. But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: (John 1:11-12)

Oops….no wonder you stopped short (lolz). The Gospel was Universal:

And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me.
(John 12:32)

All men means men from all races (not just Jews) on equal footing….

 

 

 

 

 

Therefore his rhetoric about the Jews “loving Christianity” is just nonsense. They have attempted to subvert Christianity since its inception. The early history of Christianity is one of constant Jewish persecution. They undermine Christian societies with Porn, destruction of the family, debt etc etc. It is what Michael E. Jones calls the “Revolutionary Spirit” which they fully embraced after crucifying the Logos. As Bro Nathanael told Adam regarding Byzantine Christianity, in the centuries where Christianity was strong the Jews were restricted in the functions and roles they were allowed to perform in society and they were heavily regulated curtailing their malign influence. Do you think they “loved” Christianity back then? (lolz) Do you think Christianity was somehow to their advantage or somehow a psyop? Answer from Adam. Crickets. He is a grifter who runs a lucrative Psyop. He wants to destroy all Abrahamic religions but especially Christianity. What does he want to replace them with? He won’t tell you but you can bet it is some sort of New Age techno-Gnosticism.

Trump on Israel, Moscow Attack, Rabbi Shmuley, Christ is King | Know More News

The Savior of the World Trump

The Savior of the World Trump

This video by Adam Green on Trump and his messianic aspirations was pretty good up to about 47 minutes when he started his attack on Christianity. He always uses the same strategy as he commences by debunking Judaism and Christian Zionism and then switches to attacking Christianity in general.  The tactic is called bait and switch.  That said, the first half of the show was good and towards the end he brought up the topic of the Kuzari which was broached by Rabbi Yaron Rueven, who, as coincidence would have, I just mercilessly trolled  in the chat during his last live stream (lolz).

As for Green his presentation of the Kuzari question at 1:34 is simplistic and he makes the same basic errors that he does when trying to polemicize against Christianity.  Halevi was a Sephardic Jewish poet, physician and philosopher (c. 1075AD-1141 AD) considered one of the greatest Hebrew poets, celebrated both for his secular and religious poems, many of which appear in present-day liturgy. His most famous philosophical work is the Sefer ha-Kuzari which he wrote in Arabic. He completed the book Kuzari about 2 years before he died at the age of 66. It does indeed look like a philosophical and or polemical work but that does not mean that it has no historical validity. About the same time the tenth-century Muslim Persian explorer and geographer Ibn Rustah explained how the royalty converted to Judaism sometime in the 8th century, while the rest, according to the Persian traveler Ahmad ibn Rustah, probably followed the old Tūrkic religion (Adam does not tell you that does he?). Although legendary, a tale regarding the Kazar ruler having his throne placed with equal status among the other royal thrones of the two superpowers (China and Byzantium) reflects the importance and status of the Kazar empire as a buffer and a bridge (think here of the belt and road) for merchants traveling from China all the way to Europe. This was probably the period of the Radhanite Jewish Merchants who traded all the way from China to Germany (Ruhr valley) and France (Rhone valley). The activities of the Radhanites appear to cease during the 10th century. The causes may have been the fall of Tang China in 908, followed by the collapse of the Khazarian state at the hands of the Rus’ some sixty years later (circa 968–969). If Russia caused the fall of the Kazar empire and the lucrative trade routes, this may explain the centuries old Jewish animosity towards the Rus. The Radhanites were multilingual and aklso spoke Frank the Germanic language originally spoken by the Franks, called Old Frankish by linguists. I find it interesting that Frankfurt was the home town of Rothschild and then there is always Jacob Frank the supposed reincarnation of Shabbetai Tzevi. The story of the Kazahrs and their conversion is therefore probably true but probably only the aristocratic and ruling class. It sounds entirely plausible that Jewish merchants wanted an independent trading hub with no affiliation to either Christianity or Islam. As to the Qtards comparing Trump to the “anointed” (=Cyrus) that does no hold because:

  1. Cyrus never rebuilt the temple Darius did.
  2. Cyrus (koresh) is a corruption (deliberate) of karash (workman/artificer)
  3. Anointed is not a term used for gentile kings
  4. The “workman” in Isaiah was King Hezekiah

This is extensively treated in my commentary, God is Judge (also check out the addendum) but it rules out Cyrus as the temple builder.  Just a reminder that I have debated Adam Green:

And I have also debunked some of his main polemical talking points:

Here is a very good comparison between the Genesis flood and other Ancient Near Eastern flood myths.  The accusation of “borrowing” is often made without weighing the evidence carefully. Look at all thirteen pages with academic references.  Green has chosen the easy way out which is ridicule and mockery but all he is doing is demonstrating his ignorance. Here is  the full video from Adam Green and Know More News.

The Savior of the World Trump, Ark of the Covenant, God’s Humble Chosen | Know More News (1:47 min)