This video really hit the mark especially as I was called an NPC yesterday and told that the goy have a lower “soul”. The soul, according to the Bible, is the combination of the physical body and the life-giving spirit of God that makes up a human being. When we die that spirit (breath) goes back to God. In some ways (but not entirely) that spirit can be equated with consciousness.
NPC is a dehumanizing cultic notion that goes together with regarding others as not having a human soul but an animal soul. Where have I heard that before? Dovid are you there? (lolz). Gnosticism and Kabbalah. Dehumanizing the other is always the first step towards genocide. Having no empathy for your fellow neighbor is a sign of psychopathy. We are dealing with a class of “higher-ups” (as Dovid would call them) that use their theology to justify slaughter and full spectrum dominance. After-all, if you think that you are dealing with empty vessels you can do whatever you want to them.
Barbara Marx Hubbard is a Jewish futurist who attended the school where Epstein taught and had an affair with chief vaccinator Jonas Salk (the Jew responsible for the Polio Vaccine) and who was writing about us “becoming the messenger” (mRNA protein) in 1982. See my older article:
This is a very interesting video and it interweaves myth with historical fact as it examines the Templar connections and bloodlines. I have independently reached similar conclusions but from a different direction.
My conclusion is based on the fact that the Edomite family of Herod married into the priestly Hasmonean dynasty. Hasmoneans (the Maccabeans) held the office of High Priest continuously until 37 BC. The Edomite line of Herod intermarried with the priestly line.
The 24 elders are based on the Priestly division in 1 Chronicles 24 for the priestly temple service. In Chronicles, one priest (Zadok) from Eleazar’s descendants, and another priest (Ahimelech) from Ithamar’s descendants, were designated by King David to help create the various priestly work groups. Both Eleazar and Ithamar were sons of Aaron (Nadab and Abihu were killed for profaning the sanctuary). After the captivity, the sons of Zadok or Sadoc became the Sadducees, the priesthood in the time of Christ. The Sadducees grew out of the Judean religious elite in the early Hasmonean period, under rulers such as John Hyrcanus. In my video Red 3 (See below Sepher’s video) the disappearance of the Herod Dynasty is explored. I do not believe that such wealth (the richest man in the ancient world) and lineages just vanish. The Herod dynasty interbred with other royal bloodlines and I believe that the Rothschild (Red shield) is related to Edom (red). The Edomites intermarried with the Canaanite (Baal worshipers) and the name Phoenician, used to describe these people in the first millennium B.C., is a Greek invention, from the word phoinix, possibly signifying the color Red and perhaps an allusion to their production of a highly prized purple dye. It is quite plausible that descendants could trace their lineage via Herod to a royal-priesthood (there was a Herodian party in the first century) and therefore maintain that they were the “24 elders”. The original priest Aaron also had roots going back to Egypt from which the half Egyptian tribe Ephraim had emerged.
Whatever the case might be, this knowledge was used by the Templars, Theosophists and Masons to construct a secret history (real or mythological) to explain their superiority and possession of ancient esoteric knowledge tracing its roots back to Egyptian Hermeticism and Gnosticism. According to them the Kabbalah (the inheritor of Gnosticism) is far more ancient that the 13c AD when it was written.
The mention of Hebrew cryptographic method called Atbash is fascinating. It was used to encode Babylon in Jeremiah. Sheshach (Hebrew: ששך), whose king is mentioned in the Hebrew Bible in Jeremiah 25:26, is supposed to be equivalent to Babel (Babylon), according to a secret mode of writing practiced among the Jews of unknown antiquity, which consisted in substituting the last letter of the Hebrew alphabet for the first, the next to last one for the second, and so on. Thus the letters sh, sh, ch become b, b, l (forming the word Babel).
Reading right to left: baphomet in Hebrew בפומת(t-m-o-ph-b) becomes Sophia in Hebrew שופיא (a-i-ph-o-s) Baphomet is a deity allegedly worshiped by the Knights Templar that subsequently became incorporated into various occult and Western esoteric traditions.Note that the devil is supposedly red and hairy (like Esau the progenitor of Edom) and depicted as a goat (the scapegoat sent to Azazel=the strong one).
We even have video games. The devil is supposedly red and hairy (like Esau the progenitor of Edom) and depicted as a goat (the scapegoat sent to Azazel=the strong one). pic.twitter.com/0GfwOdxfBP
0.00 destruction of the first and second Temples 3.55 Edomites woshiped Baal the storm god
male =Yahweh sky earth=female 4.44 24 elders (Rev 4:4) -bloodlines -hide kabbalah etc
Jewish elders migrate into Europe marry into royal families
patriarchs of Rex Deus (god kings) star families sons of gods
messianic line,flood,Atlantis 6:00 Knights Templar (bring back Gnostic secrets from the crusades)
1307 AD Sinclair Family Rex Deus star family 7:00 Secret knowledge hidden by alchemist and other secret societies (Free masons etc) 8:00 Baphomet, Sophia Wisdom 9:00 Black Sun Saturn 9.42 Edomite at the root of.. Red occult lineage at the root of the Templars
uses the red cross as its emblem. Ethiopian churches swastikas, Templar cross and star of David,double headed eagle
disseminated globally by the Phonecians -phonos meaning red. Also star of David in seal of Solomon. Esoteric star red shield – from the Rothschid. 13:00 Jesus came not to save us from sin but to reveal secrets -Gnostic Nonsense 14:44 Nazareth did not exist at the time of Jesus Not true
Theosophists-New Age religion- lost tribes 15:00 Kabbalah originated among the Aryans lived on Atlantis blah ….Scottish rite (so called
Aryan origins) 20:00 Protestant Templar originated with Lutheranism (German) expelled from Lutheran church because of belief in millennialism. 24:00 Nazi Thousand Year Reich- millenniaism, Bahia, J.W, Theosophists
Morals and Dogma reading from Albert Pike 33 degree Mason
I was late joining the debate at 45 mins into this four-hour stream.
Classical vs Gnostic Christianity With John Brisson & Robert Ferrell (4:00 hrs)
Robert Ferrell’s area of expertise is the the Gospel of Thomas from the Nag Hammadi find in 1945. John Brisson is an Evangelical Christian who used to be a Gnostic and recently made a video demonstrating Rockefeller connections with the funding of Gnostic research and publications.
My first point is that in addressing Gnosticism we face an epistemological challenge as claims of hidden knowledge and expertise closes any debate as does any claim of special revelation. The difference with Christianity is that any truth claims are not hidden but open to examination and can be tested with regards to prophetic and historic veracity. Jesus makes a point about transparency: “I have spoken openly to the world, I always taught in synagogues or at the temple, where all the Jews come together. I said nothing in secret” (John 8:20). On the surface this may seem to contradict his penchant for speaking in parables so that, seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand (Matt 13:13) but the parables acted as a filter because anyone who did not understand (like his disciples) could come to him afterwards and ask and he would willingly explain. So, the idea of secret knowledge only available to initiates (which was practiced in many occult religions) was contrary the gospel teachings. There was no special “in-group”.
Robert focused on the similarity of language and concepts found in the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas, but this should not come as a surprise as it comes from a similar milieu as the synoptic traditions, but it has not developed the complex theology and intertextual as scripture. Intertextuality is a hermeneutical strand of poststructuralism whereby texts imbed, reuse, allude to or echo precursor materials so that innovation is grounded in established tradition. Gnostic writings can make no claim to this complex development. In fact, the Nag Hammadi library is an eclectic collection that includes a Gnostic Redaction of Plato’s republic (Coptic translation) and the words of the pagan text “Eugnostos the Blessed” put into the mouth of Jesus as “The Sophia of Jesus Christ”. The Gnostic text is trying to gain legitimacy by attributing the pagan text to Christ. I would suggest that this is the Gnostic modus operandi, namely parasitizing and infiltrating established religions a tactic which was familiar to Judaism who in later centuries syncretized and adopted some of the Gnostic teachings such as the divine sparks found in the Kabbalah. In the complex Gnostic cosmogony Sophia or Wisdom is one of the various emanations of God but in this theology, it is “Wisdom” who rebels against the spirit and creates Yaltabaoth or the demiurge Yahweh of the Bible. That does not sound very wise to me but rather stupid. Thus, the material creation or “prison” is the result of Sophia rebelling. Of course, the opposite is the case in Biblical literature were wisdom is personified or a hypostatization such as in the poem of Proverbs eight and where (Prov 9:10) the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom (the first use of the word afraid is when Adam hid himself from Yahweh in Gen 3:10). The stream Egypt Redux has a transcript and video in which I discuss James Dunn’s research on wisdom in Christology in the Making.
What is referred to as the “Book of Enoch” is actually a collection of three different parts (1, 2 and 3 Enoch) with only 1 Enoch being dated before the New Testament, with a range of 2nd BC – 1st AD according to Charlesworth (The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha (2 vols), Charlesworth, James, (ed). Doubleday: 1983). but more probably close to the Maccabee period ca.167 BC (middle of the range) as the first 36 chapters seem to be pre-Maccabean. The other sections are dated after the NT; 2 Enoch (late 1st AD) and 3 Enoch (5-6th AD). Borger suggests that Enoch could be the 7th king in the Sumerian King list. First, let’s note that the Sumerian version is more elaborate, more ‘spectacular’, more miraculous, and more complex than the biblical version. The surprisingly long-life spans in the bible (i.e. hundreds of years) are DWARFED by the tens of thousands of years in the Sumerian list! The Sumerian heroes of each period are twofold–a king AND a sage–instead of a single leadership figure as in the OT. (Borger in “I Studied Inscriptions from Before the Flood”: Ancient Near Eastern, Literary, and Linguistic Approaches to Genesis 1-11., Hess, Richard, and David Tsumura (eds.), Eisenbrauns: 1994). The function of ascribing a later document to an ancient Israelite hero such as Moses, Enoch, and Joshua is known as pseudepigrapha (or, more properly, pseudonymity), and scholars today are still unsure of exactly why the authors did this…It is not at all clear that they actually intended their audience to believe that, in the case of Jubilees, that Moses actually contradicted himself or omitted portions of his ‘earlier’ work the Pentateuch. A basic methodological principle of comparative studies in the ANE, stated by noted Assyriologist Kitchen is that in the Ancient Near East, the rule is that simple accounts or traditions give rise (by accretion and embellishment) to elaborate legends, but not vice versa. In the Ancient Orient, legends were not simplified or turned into pseudo-history (historicized)… (Ancient Orient and Old Testament., Kitchen, KA, IntervarsityPress: 1966.)
The book of 1 Enoch shares many terms with the OT book of Daniel begging the question if it is dependent (or vice versa). J. Goldingay comments as follows on the Similitudes; “The Parables are uninstanced at Qumran, and current opinion regards them as belonging to the Roman period. Their most interesting parallel to Daniel (more likely suggesting dependence on Daniel than on a common source) is their taking up the humanlike figure and the one advanced in days of 7:13. “That Son of Man” (1Enoch) 46-48, alongside the “head of days” with hair white like wool; see also chaps.62; 69), God’s elect and righteous one, is eventually identified with Enoch (71.14). Thus Daniel 7 is one of the texts that is used to interpret the significance of Enoch and his translation, reported with such tantalizing brevity in Gen 5; and it leads to or justifies a belief in Enoch’s functioning as eschatological judge”. J. Goldingay, Daniel, (Word Biblical Commentary, ed., D.A. Hubbard, G.W. Barker, J.D.W. Watts, R.P. Martin; Nelson Reference & Electronic, 1989), Intro, xxviii. Jude but Peter reference Enoch in a polemical fashion not because they were promoting the pseudepigrapha but because they were countering an antinomian subversion (on this see my article on Fallen Angels).
The priestly and cultic background of 1 Enoch is also increasingly recognised, particularly the role of the Day of Atonement ritual in the “Watchers Cycle” where scholarship understands the story of the “Fallen angels” as a mythological satire against the Samaritan schismatic’s – who (joined by some of the Jerusalem priests) established their own priesthood and form of worship. Moreover, the sending away of the scapegoat to Azazel (= the strong one) on the day of Atonement (Yom Kippur) reflects sending the nation into Babylonian exile (dry places= the wilderness). The only place the word is found in the Hebrew bible is in Leviticus 16: 8-10 as a proper name but it does appear in 1 Enoch where it is embellished into a story about fallen angels and demons. The Expositor’s Bible Commentary (vol 2) suggest that the Aramaic forms point to dependence on Leviticus (Gabelein, Frank E. (1990). The Expositor’s Bible Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan. pp. 590). Be that as it may, Jesus references the Atonement ritual and the Passover ritual and explicitly mentions Azazel (strong one):
Luke 11:21-26: When a *strong [man] armed keepeth his palace, his goods are in peace: 22 But when a stronger than he shall come upon him, and overcome him, he taketh from him all his armour wherein he trusted, and divideth his spoils. 23 He that is not with me is against me: and he that gathereth not with me scattereth. 24 When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places, seeking rest; and finding none, he saith, I will return unto my house whence I came out. 25 And when he cometh, he findeth it swept and garnished. 26 Then goeth he, and taketh to him seven other spirits more wicked than himself; and they enter in, and dwell there: and the last state of that man is worse than the first.
* the word [man] is not in the original Greek
The context of the discussion is the accusation that Jesus is casting out demons by the power of the chief demon Beelzebub. Jesus had cast out the unclean spirt with the miraculous healing of Legion and placed the unclean spirit in the swine that drowned in the “abyss” (Luke). Legion was found healed and sitting at Jesus’ feet listening to the gospel. That is an acted atonement ritual but the unclean spirit is not ritually placed by the priest on a goat and then sent away (into the wilderness) but on an unclean animal (pig) that drowns. The nation had returned from Babylonian exile and found the “house” clean because Jesus had swept the temple and removed the money-changers in imitation of the pre-Passover feast of unleavened bread where Israelites spring cleaned their homes and “removed the leaven” (corruption) in preparation for the Passover sacrifice of the Lamb. Moreover, in the parable, after having gone through the cleansing ritual (exile) the man takes in seven more demons and becomes completely possessed. This is obviously a reference to the dynasty of the high priest Caiaphas and his relatives seven of whom controlled the priesthood until its destruction in AD 70. The “house” was removed because they had gone completely insane. In Jewish lore (probably under Hellenistic influence) Azazel becomes the red, hairy goat like devil. This is a conflation of the biblical story of Edom the brother of Jacob who is described as red and hairy combined with the scapegoat that “bears the iniquity of the nation”and was sent into the wilderness (dry places). Thus, another myth is born. The story of Cain and Able is also based on the Day of Atonement Ritual with Abel being slain (at the entrance to the Sanctuary of Eden) and Cain being sent away into exile (representing the Jewish nation) and being called a vagabond, which term is picked up in Acts 19 when Paul speaks about the “vagabond” Jews and the exorcist Sceva and his “seven sons” which flee the house naked and wounded.
This brings us to Ephesus which was a very important city in Asia Minor (Turkey) and a center of Jewish and Christian interaction. In Church tradition John (the brother of James and disciple of Jesus) took the mother of Jesus (Mary) to Ephesus and looked after her. It is off the coast of Ephesus on the island of Patmos that John is said to have been banished and received the Apocalypse delivered to seven churches in Asia Minor. It is where Paul (in Acts 19) discovers disciples of John the Baptist who had never heard of Jesus (Paul re-baptises them into Jesus). It is also where Paul encounters the “sorcerer” Sceva. It is in my view the destination not only of the Epistle to the Ephesians, but of the Fourth Gospel and the Epistle to the Hebrews (probably written by Barnabas). It is notable that the epistle to the Ephesians contains (in polemical fashion) references to Gnostic theology cf. Ephesians 2:2; “ Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince (archon) of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience” (Eph 2:2) which is juxtaposed with “the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself” (Eph 1:5) and what then of Kosmokrator (see my article) which is the counterpart to the angel of death. These are polemical texts addressing the attack on the church by gnostic and Judaistic elements. The Fourth Gospel should also be understood against this background particularly with reference to the Prologue which de-mythologizes and reuses Platonic, gnostic and Philonic terms in a masterpiece of bringing out new meaning. The gap between the Greek philosophic understanding of form and pure reason was bridged by the essence or LOGOS becoming material in the person of Jesus Christ which Christians refer to as incarnation (I prefer manifestation) this is why Christians rejected the docetic/gnostic teaching that Jesus was not real (he was just a ghost or spirt) and not flesh or blood which becomes a litmus test in the first century (1 John 4:1-3). Gnosticism was rejected by the early church. However, “Gnostic language” is encountered (Proarkhe (“before the beginning”, Greek: προαρχή), Arkhe (“the beginning”, Greek: ἀρχή)) with John the Baptist explicitly stating (though using different Greek): “This (Christ) is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man which is preferred before me: for he was before me”. (John 1:30). One of the reasons for writing the gospel of John was to demonstrate the superiority of Christ over the patriarchs and John the Baptist. The synoptic gospels and the Fourth Gospels are not “history” (but they contain history) they are not biographies (but they contain biographical material) they are not theology (but they contain theology) they are sacred history, and each gospel is different because they were written to counter specific problems in the church using Jesu’s ministry as an example and were sent to different churches (audiences). And they all concentrate (focal point) on the Passion narrative (last week). The Fourth Gospel is enigmatic because its style is so different and is seen as late and therefore unhistorical. However, the scholar John A.T. Robinson (Redating the New Testament/The Priority of John) following his mentor Dodd argues the case that the writer had access to very early material. This would make the gospel both early and late (do you see the problem?). The Rylands Library Papyrus P52, also known as the St John’s fragment, was discovered in Alexandria and has been dated by different scholars in a range from 100-150 AD and 125-175 AD. My own investigations (especially the story of Nathaniel) show connections with the Bar Kochba revolt (ca.132-135 AD) where the false messiah was recognised by the chief Rabbi (Akiva), but this does not mean that it is ex-eventu (John 5:43 I am come in my Father’s name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.) I can recommend Andersons’ book The Fourth Gospel and the Quest for Jesus: Modern Foundations Reconsidered although I am not in complete agreement with his historical outline of Johannine Christianity (pp. 196-199). As to Hebrews, it demonstrates (in my view) awareness of the problem in Ephesus; Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God (Hebrews 6:1), this is the Baptism of Repentance (of John the Baptist): “If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame” (Hebrews 6:6). In other words, you cannot progress from the Baptism of Repentance (John) to the baptism of Jesus and then revert to John. It is my view that the Gnostic Mandeans who revere John the Baptist and who now live in Australia (as Iraqi refugees) and practice multiple washing and Baptisms originated with the movement in Ephesus that Paul discovered. Moreover, the message to the Hebrews (Jews at Ephesus) corresponds with the message given by Christ to Ephesus in the Apocalypse.
Note that the message in Revelation 2:1-7 to Ephesus is based on the garden of Eden and with the seven branched candlestick (menorah design is based on a tree) symbolizing the tree of life (v.7).
And the Correspondence between Hebrews and Ephesians:
The Gnostics at Ephesus claimed superiority of “illumination” (compare the Illuminati) or special knowledge brought by the serpent in Eden. Not illumination by God’s spirit. Then there were the Judaists who claimed superiority via the Law. At some historical point Judaists and Gnostics syncretized certain doctrines in the Kabbalah which together with the Kybalion became the New Age teaching of the technocrats (full title: The Kybalion: A Study of the Hermetic Philosophy of Ancient Egypt and Greece) is a book originally published in 1908. And so we have gone full circle from Egypt the home of Hermetics, alchemy, magic and illumination. It was Egypt were Moses challenged the Hermetic “magicians” Jannes and Jambres by casting down a serpent (2 Tim 3:8). Paul warns Timothy to avoid profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science (gnosis) falsely so called (1 Timothy 6:20). It is ironic that the KJV should translate gnosis as “science” almost as if they are pointing towards ancient Hermetic alchemy and transformation as practiced by the transhumanist science in their quest for immortality. The serpent and the Eden mythology is key to Gnostic theology which points to ancient pre-Sumerian origins. From the Serpent, Nawcash, in the Garden of Eden; Atum, the Egyptian snake-man; and Quetzalcotl, the feathered serpent god of the Mayans to the double-helix snake symbol of Enki/Ea in ancient Sumerian literature, the serpent has been the omnipresent link between humans and the gods in every culture.
Do the “Lizard people” represent a priestly class that practiced head binding (as among the Peruvian elite)? When it says that the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made (Gen 3:1) is the beast a reference to an empire (like they are in Daniel) eg. the Ubaid. (??). The symbol of cyclical destruction is the ouroborus (snake eating its own tail) with reference to the 25,920-year “Precession Year” when creation is unmade and “reset” (The Great Reset). It seems to me (still examining the idea) that the serpent story represents two different ways of overcoming the existential threat, namely, to transcend and become gods through knowledge and science (Gnosticism-transhumanism-technology) or through faith in the promise delivered to Eve and the Abrahamic Revelation which rejects both the Hermetic/Gnostic approach and the superstitious approach of sacrificing children to a “solar deity” to appease wrath. If I am correct, then the ancients were aware of cyclical destruction and solar flaring, and this seems likely as our ancestors must have survived previous catastrophes. Someday I must write a book about the subjects that I have only briefly touched upon here, but I feel we are running out of time. I chose to follow the path of faith, believing that life has purpose and meaning and that the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom. Here are more resources which include links to my articles on Ephesus (three articles)
Search the Gnostic tab on my blog for further resources.
13 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. 14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. 15 Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works. (2 Corinthians 11:13-15)
3 But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. 4 For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted....(2 Corinthians 11:3-4 )
It is not coincidental, nor is it incidental that Rockefeller is behind the propagation of Gnosticism because they are also behind the scientific funding that supports transhumanism. I have an upcoming debate with a Gnostic (possibly Saturday) and this should put me in good stead (not watched the video yet).
Propagation of Gnosticism is Rockefeller Funded (30 min)
The Beast is now emerging from the abyss and many of the players are starting to show their true colors. The enemy hates Christianity and wants to destroy it. The enemy holds the ancient beliefs of the Gnostics (those who claim secret knowledge) who were thrown out of the church two millinnea ago and who trace their origins back to the Hermetic founder known as Hermes Trismegistus a Greek bastardization of the Egyptian god Thoth. This is the “religion” of transhumanism, a cult that uses science to transcend what it means to be human and become “gods” (Elohim). For this reason they elevate the serpent in Eden as the “light-bringer” (illumination) and YHWH as the demiurge.
So far, Randall Carlson, Joe Rogan, Alex Jones, Graham Hancock and now the Ethical Skeptic have shown themselves as adherents of the ancient cult but there are many more and there is a drive in the alt media space to push this worldview.
Coming together
If you watched any of the Alison McDowell videos that I posted (particularly the last one) then you will see that in the new paradigm will be impact financing with the commoditization of human behavior using ledger technology (the blockchain) and tokenism. In other words you will “earn” tokens (social credits) by doing (or not doing) certain things and “investors” will make money by betting on your behavior (buying shares, trading etc on the outcomes). The idea is that they can micro-manage you and change how you think and who you are to “save the world” this is what ESG is about:
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing is used to screen investments based on corporate policies and to encourage companies to act responsibly. Many mutual funds, brokerage firms, and robo-advisors now offer investment products that employ ESG principles.
Alison has demonstrated links between Scientology, Nation of Islam and JFK Jr. Moreover, she has previously demonstrated links between LDS (Mormons). These cults are all involved in this space. Scientology used its applied scholastic program schools in 72 countries (lolz). Scientology promotes group mind consciousness and ego death. We are witnessing the convergence of all these cults (and many main stream religious denominations) like the Moonies (Trump spoke at their conference). We also see the rise of “prophetic” movements and supposedly “revivalist” Christian movements which are promoting Christ consciousness or Christian nationalism (or both). These are all false. I believe the key words in this new doctrine is unity and together because they need to create the hive mind. They need to completely dispel the idea of sovereignty and agency (freewill) and reduce humanity to learned helplessness with their psyops and jabs. Just look at the maps that Alison made and the myriad of connections (I have highlighted Hubbard the founder of Scientology). Look at the connection to Jack Parsons the occultist rocket scientist (I made the connection with Madonna after watching Alison’s video…click on the tweet and look at the pictures of the whore of Babylon).
Then there is this even more extensive map by Alison (which also includes Hubbard) concentrating on impact financing but my point is that it will all be mediated to us as a one world New Age Religion.
Parsons was into Thelmea and UK Prime Minister Sunak ‘s hedge fund was ThélèmeHis father in law is an Indian billionaire surveillance capitalist. For decades these people have subverted and penetrated the institutes:
2./ He was a military officer in charge of psychological warfare. Here with wife Lillith (the demon lolz). pic.twitter.com/1v3dWfrcS3
I discovered the sub-stack by Matthew Ehret(Canadian Patriot) which led me to the following interesting video. Although my view on China is more nuanced, I know the Jews were instrumental in the rise of Chinese communism and before that opioid enslavement by the British East India Company via the Jewish-Iranian Sassoon family, so any critique of China must be balanced against a century of shame and colonial imperialism. In this video Ehret refers to the promotion of the use of psychedelics (something Alison McDowell also mentions regarding the death of ego).
Some 73 years ago Albert Hofmann (not Jewish lolz) discovered LSD-25. Isolating, naming and synthesizing psilocybin and psilocin, as well as synthesizing various analogs thereof but it took Timothy Leary (October 22, 1920 – May 31, 1996) to popularize it which led to the free love hippie era. Leary was an American psychologist and author known for his strong advocacy of psychedelic drugs.He remained in the non-commissioned officer track while enrolled in the psychology subsection of the Army Specialized Training Program, including three months of study at Georgetown University which is a top Jesuit University in the US and a CIA finishing school.
The idea is that a psychedelic drug culture coupled with a simulacrum (VR) will replace Christianity. How else will you distract and entertain and pacify an increasingly neurologically disabled and injured population of mouth breathers that are not allowed to travel or eat real food? Christianity will be replaced with the hive mind. We are all in this together (lolz).
Healing or escapism? First give them SSRIs that cause depression the give them Special K and Window Pane.🤣 Hegelian Dialectic in action. Find a dealer near you.https://t.co/0QHvnaCIeL
Ehert has a number of very interesting things to say one of them being the mention of the book The Immortality Key: Uncovering the Secret History of the Religion with No Name by Brian C. Muraresku.
The book has a Forward by Graham Hancock who I have dubbed Hermetic Hancock as they purged my comment under the video on the YT channel Future Unity. No thanks. I don’t want your future unity. This is the spiel for selling the book:
A groundbreaking, controversial dive into the role psychedelics have played in the human experience of the Divine throughout Western history, and the answer to a 2,000 year old mystery that could shake the Church to its foundations.The Immortality Key connects the lost, psychedelic sacrament of Greek religion to early Christianity—exposing the true origins of Western Civilization. In the tradition of unsolved historical mysteries like David Grann's Killers of the Flower Moon and Douglas Preston's The Lost City of the Monkey God, Brian Muraresku’s 10-year investigation takes the reader through Greece, Germany, Spain, France and Italy, offering unprecedented access to the hidden archives of the Louvre and the Vatican along the way.
In The Immortality Key, Muraresku explores a little-known connection between the best-kept secret in Ancient Greece and Christianity. This is the real story of the most famous human being who ever lived (Jesus) and the biggest religion the world has ever known. Today, 2.4 billion people are Christian. That's one third of the planet. But do any of them really know how it all started?
Before Jerusalem, before Rome, before Mecca—there was Eleusis: the spiritual capital of the ancient world. It promised immortality to Plato and the rest of Athens's greatest minds with a very simple formula: drink this potion, see God. Shrouded in secrecy for millennia, the Ancient Greek sacrament was buried when the newly Christianized Roman Empire obliterated Eleusis in the fourth century AD.
Renegade scholars in the 1970s claimed the Greek potion was psychedelic, just like the original Christian Eucharist that replaced it. In recent years, vindication for the disgraced theory has been quietly mounting in the laboratory. The rapidly growing field of archaeological chemistry has proven the ancient use of visionary drugs. And with a single dose of psilocybin, the psycho-pharmacologists at Johns Hopkins and NYU are now turning self-proclaimed atheists into instant believers. No one has ever found hard, scientific evidence of drugs connected to Eleusis, let alone early Christianity. Until now.
Armed with key documents never before translated into English, convincing analysis, and a captivating spirit of quest, Muraresku mines science, classical literature, biblical scholarship and art to deliver the hidden key to eternal life, bringing us to what clinical psychologist William Richards calls "the edge of an awesomely vast frontier."
Featuring a Foreword by Graham Hancock, the New York Times bestselling author of America Before: The Key to Earth's Lost Civilization.
The Multipolar Reality: Synthetic Virtual Reality Drug Cults vs Natural Law
Matt Ehert is also on Rumbleand I intend to explore his historical videos on the USA. So much that we have been told about history is a lie. We must keep pulling at the threads till we reveal the truth. For example, I was intrigued by the suggestion that Hitler may have been treated for his WWI injuries by a Tavistock agent/clinic. Much of history is planned. Wars don’t just happen.They are not random events.
Exposure
In the end they will all expose themselves. Very disappointed to find out that the Ethical Skeptic who did such sterling work on the statistics is posing as a Christian. He (or she?) is a Gnostic and controlled opposition laying breadcrumbs to lead you into dystopia. Naval intelligence? I should have guessed.
Gnostic heretics. That ancient serpent the devil. False brethren crept in unawares.https://t.co/WXSouadXzU
Even history is being given a Gnostic “spin” and scripture is being discredited:
“It’s important to remember that the Sumerian authors didn’t believe they were the earliest human civilization. They claimed to have received all this from an earlier civilization that had, by their time, become extinct”.https://t.co/AkGjO6OVGA
We are in the matrix. They have prepared the architecture for their New Age and all the institutes are ready to launch their trap on the sheep population. They believe that they can hide away and reemerge as gods after the uroboros eats its tail. They may well be “gods” but they will die like men (Psalm 82:7).
I will not fear the failure of the magnetic shield nor will I put my trust in the shield of man (Adam/Edom or Red Shield=Rothschild), for God is my shield and very great reward (Gen 15:1). Though I walk through the valley of death (Ps 23:4) and though I be in perils among false brethren (2 Cor 11:26) I will fear no evil.
And if you can reincarnate as the Whore of Babylon then I and my brethren can reincarnate in the Spirit of Moses and Elijah the Tishbite the two witness of the Apocalypse out of whose mouths proceeds fire (Rev 11:5) as we burn you with words of truth. Jesus Christ the King of Kings is returning and his reward is with him. We reject you lies and the future that you want to impose with the SOMA of your brave new world. You have already lost and are dead men walking.
Note: I just checked and all my comments have been purged. Even my replies to other people. I cleared my cache and re-posted, and they were purged again. If I had not saved them they would be gone. Hancock is often hosted by Joe Rogan. Can you see it yet? Do you see it yet?
He might as well bow down and worship Thoth. Transhumanist spreading lies about the Bible so they can usher in their New Age. See the comment that I posted below this video.
Graham Hancock Reveals The TERRIFYING Truth About Jesus & Bible (20 min)
Graham Hancock is a Hermetic/Gnostic and this is an attack on the Old Testament and indirectly on the New Testament. I have parsed the OT language using PCA (Principle Component Analysis) and LDA (Linear Discriminant Analysis) and the text is ancient and reliable. Furthermore, there is a layer of gematria that is unfalsifiable and that confirms the reliability of the text. Further the idea of a relationship between early Christianity and the cultus of Mithras is based on a remark in the 2nd century Christian writer Justin Martyr, who accused the initiates of Mithras of imitating the Christian communion rite. (https://www.tertullian.org/rpearse/mithras/display.php?page=mithras_and_christianity). The OT and NT has been attacked for thousands of years and stood its ground and the test of time, Graham Hancock has "discovered" nothing new he is merely leveraging syncretism and the public lack of knowledge. Why does he do this? He does this because he is a Gnostic (those who claim secret knowledge) who were thrown out of the church two millinnea ago and who trace their origins back to the Hermetic founder known as Hermes Trismegistus a Greek bastardization of the Egyptian god Thoth. This is the "religion" of transhumanism, a cult that uses science to transcend what it means to be human and become "gods" (Elohim). For this reason they elevate the serpent in Eden as the "light-bringer" (illumination) and YHWH as the demiurge. Understand this, it is YWHW that abolished human sacrifice which was still practiced up to as recently as 500 years ago. Human sacrifice was prominnet in all cultures until Abraham was taught that God would provide and there was no need for humans to sacrifice children. So Graham Hancock is untruthful and deceptive, twisting texts and deliberately taking them out of context. Transhumanists abolish all boundaries hence the transgender movement which abolishes the male/female difference in its quest for "unity" followed by the abolishing of borders (nation state) and the abolishing of sovereignty (according to them you have no free will) all in the quest to become the monad. The final frontier is digital, human convergence. In order to do this they must discredit and destroy Christianity and introduce a New Age religion. They will be transformed into Elohim through mRNA injections and brain computer interface which is why they are experimenting on you (hermetic alchemy or transformation). This is a dangerous, rebellious cult perpetrating the same sin as in the Genesis myth. Last but not least is their secret knowledge is that this natural cycle is ending as we progress through the Great Precession Year of 25,920 solar years. We are due a reset (the ouroboros) which they have obfuscated with the man-made climate change lie. We are undergoing a magnetic excursion and an extinction/rebirth event and afterwards they want to emerge as the gods of the new age and build back better. God knows the beginning from the end and is initiating another reset in order to prevent them from turning the earth into an abomination. As for Hancock and his ilk.If any man love not the Lord Jesus Christ, let him be Anathema Maranatha. (1 Corinthians 16:22) My commentaries: http://www.biblaridion.info my blog: https://www.biblaridion.info/blog/
