{"id":69468,"date":"2024-08-16T13:39:48","date_gmt":"2024-08-16T13:39:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblaridion.info\/blog\/?p=69468"},"modified":"2024-08-16T14:29:28","modified_gmt":"2024-08-16T14:29:28","slug":"they-all-expose-themselves-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblaridion.info\/blog\/they-all-expose-themselves-2\/","title":{"rendered":"They all expose themselves"},"content":{"rendered":"

They all expose themselves<\/h1>\n

In the end they all expose themselves.\u00a0 By that I mean that they end up<\/span><\/strong> (metaphorically) naked<\/span><\/strong>\u00a0 which is ironic when we are talking about Ammon Hillman who uses the text about a naked young man fleeing<\/strong> to “prove” that Jesus is a pederast and drug user.\u00a0 This is the “shocking” verses:<\/p>\n

Mark 14:51-52 NKJV<\/strong><\/p>\n

Now a certain young man followed Him, having a linen cloth thrown around his<\/i> naked body.<\/i> And the young men laid hold of him,and he left the linen cloth and fled from them naked.\r\n<\/pre>\n
The Greek:<\/strong><\/p>\n
\"\"<\/p>\n
 <\/p>\n
Apparently every single translator through history, from time immemorial was wrong (except Hillman) and\u00a0 Jesus was actually a pederast and drug user. It is all in the translation you see. It has been covered up for thousands of years. And Yahweh is a demon. All you have to do is look at how Israel is behaving to know that what they say is true.\ud83d\ude02 I have got to say that this is a fantastic psychological operation<\/strong> and has taken more than a hundred years of planning.<\/p>\n
They purposefully planted a Rothschild colony in the Middle East and brainwashed the Zionist settlers. Turned them into monsters. This is ontological spiritual warfare.<\/strong> These lies cannot stand. But it is good to know who your enemy is and I am finally seeing through the clever charade. Yes the Zionists are bad (very bad) but they are just useful idiots for these slime-balls. The strategy is destroy the Jews and you destroy Yahweh (and therefore you destroy Jesus and Christianity). That leaves the way open to complete collectivist enslavement by the tenochracy. Disappointing that Ken from Theoria Apophasis<\/strong><\/a> Channel supports this nonsense without even expounding the Greek.\u00a0 It is the argument from authority. They are the “experts” (where have we heard that before?) and despite having failed his dissertation Hillman the Satanist is going to tell you how this should be understood.<\/p>\n
Leaving aside arguments about Greek words the allegorical intention of this passage is clear.\u00a0 Jesus is in a garden<\/strong> being tempted (like Adam) as to whether he will be obedient and follow the path of suffering or grasp power. In fact, in the fourth gospel (John 20:15), Jesus is mistaken for the gardener<\/strong> (Adam). Adam is found naked<\/strong> (vulnerable)\u00a0 after<\/em> the temptation in the garden<\/strong> he was afraid<\/strong> and hid himself (Gen 2v7-11).\u00a0\u00a0 This young man<\/strong>\u00a0 is also afraid<\/strong> and flees naked<\/strong> and his garment is snatched off his body as he flees.\u00a0 The parallels with Genesis are obvious.<\/p>\n
I have previously pointed out that Church tradition has it that the young man was John Mark<\/strong> (the writer of the gospel and biographer of Peter) and this is his signature as he inserts himself into the narrative as a sort of mea culpa.\u00a0\u00a0 <\/strong>In other words, John Mark is admitting that he failed Jesus and fled….just like Peter failed Jesus….and it is this John Mark who Paul refused to take with him on his missionary journey because of his attitude to the gentiles. \u00a0 So now, in his gospel account, Mark demonstrates how miserably he failed (not just Jesus but he failed Paul also).\u00a0 Now let us look at the word in question:<\/p>\n
\"\"<\/p>\n
 <\/p>\n
The same word is used in a different book (Acts 7:58) to describe the apostle Paul<\/em> who as a young man witnessed the trial of Stephen. But seeing as Hillman is a “classicist” let us use the  Perseus search engine<\/a><\/strong> to search for contemporary use of \u03bd\u03b5\u03b1\u03bd\u03af\u03c3\u03ba\u03bf\u03c2<\/strong> (neaniskos)\u00a0 outside the Bible and in colloquial or Koine\/Attic Greek.\u00a0 Here are two references from Josephus:<\/strong><\/p>\n
Flavius Josephus, Antiquitates Judaicae book 5, section 191:<\/strong> \u03b4\u03bf\u1f7a\u03c2 \u03bf\u1f56\u03bd \u03c4\u1f70 \u03b4\u1ff6\u03c1\u03b1 \u03c4\u1ff7 \u1f18\u03b3\u03bb\u1ff6\u03bd\u03b9 \u1f41 \u03bd\u03b5\u03b1\u03bd\u03af\u03c3\u03ba\u03bf\u03c2<\/strong>, \u03b4\u03b9\u03ad\u03c4\u03c1\u03b9\u03b2\u03b5 \u03b4\u1fbd \u1f14\u03bd \u03c4\u03b9\u03bd\u03b9 \u03b4\u03c9\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03af\u1ff3 \u03b4\u03b5\u03be\u03b9\u1ff6\u03c2 \u03c0\u03c1\u1f78\u03c2 \u03b8\u03ad\u03c1\u03bf\u03c2 \u1f14\u03c7\u03bf\u03bd\u03c4\u03b9, Translation here:<\/a><\/strong> 191 So the young man<\/strong>, having offered his gifts to Eglon, who was staying in a special chamber to avoid the heat, got into private conversation with him, as the king had sent his attendants away in order to talk with Judes.<\/pre>\n
 <\/p>\n
Flavius Josephus, De bello Judaico libri vii (ed. B. Niese) book 1, section 55:<\/strong> \u03c0\u03c1\u03bf\u03b3\u03bd\u03bf\u1f7a\u03c2 \u03b4\u1f72 \u03c4\u1f74\u03bd \u1f14\u03c6\u03bf\u03b4\u03bf\u03bd \u1f41 \u03bd\u03b5\u03b1\u03bd\u03af\u03c3\u03ba\u03bf\u03c2 \u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03b1\u03b3\u03b5\u03bd\u03ad\u03c3\u03b8\u03b1\u03b9 \u03b5\u1f30\u03c2 \u03c4\u1f74\u03bd \u03c0\u03cc\u03bb\u03b9\u03bd \u1f20\u03c0\u03b5\u03af\u03b3\u03b5\u03c4\u03bf, \u03c0\u03bb\u03b5\u1fd6\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u03bd \u03c4\u1ff7 \u03bb\u03b1\u1ff7 \u03c0\u03b5\u03c0\u03bf\u03b9\u03b8\u1f7c\u03c2 Translation here:<\/strong><\/a> 055 But as the young man<\/strong> was forewarned of their coming, he hurried to the city, having great confidence in the people ...<\/pre>\n
There are dozens of other references from classical Greek<\/strong><\/a> so knock yourself out, but the above examples should suffice. These were young men.<\/strong>\u00a0 They were not boy toys or sex slaves.\u00a0 Hillman suggests that a young man mentioned in Mark 14:51, was wearing a medicated bandage<\/strong>, may have been a child assigned to Jesus. \ud83d\ude02 (this is cited directly from…Summary of\u00a0Ancient Language Expert: Jesus Christ Used Children as Drugs | Ammon Hillman<\/strong><\/a>)<\/p>\n
Once again we turn to Josephus for contemporary usage of \u03c3\u03b9\u03bd\u03b4\u03cc\u03bd\u03b1<\/strong> (sindonain) using the Perseus search engine<\/a><\/strong> we find Flavius Josephus, Antiquitates Judaicae<\/strong> (ed. B. Niese) book 3, section 129: ... \u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03ad\u03bc\u03b5\u03b9\u03bd\u03b5 \u03c4\u1f78 \u1f14\u03b8\u03bf\u03c2 \u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u03c4\u1f78\u03bd \u03bd\u03b1\u1f78\u03bd \u03bf\u1f30\u03ba\u03bf\u03b4\u03bf\u03bc\u03b7\u03c3\u03b1\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03c9\u03bd \u1f21\u03bc\u1ff6\u03bd, \u1f65\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5 \u03c4\u1f74\u03bd \u03c3\u03b9\u03bd\u03b4\u03cc\u03bd\u03b1 \u03c4\u03bf\u03b9\u03bf\u03c5\u03c4\u03cc\u03c4\u03c1\u03bf\u03c0\u03bf\u03bd \u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u03b9\u03ba\u03b5\u1fd6\u03c3\u03b8\u03b1\u03b9 \u03c4\u03b1\u1fd6\u03c2 \u03b5\u1f30\u03c3\u03cc\u03b4\u03bf\u03b9\u03c2. Translation here<\/strong>: <\/a>From this comes our custom, once the temple was built, of having a fine linen veil<\/strong> drawn over the entrances.<\/pre>\n
Now it is quite possible that fine linen was sometimes soaked by ancient Greeks in drugs to form a bandage but what Hilman is suggesting is absurd and dishonest.\u00a0 It was a fine linen cloth wrapped around his body. The same word is used only five times<\/strong> in the New Testament Matt. 27:59; Mk. 14:51;14:52; 15:46; Lk. 23:53 twice for the linen garment of the young man and three times for the linen garment in which the body of Christ was wrapped for burial.\u00a0\u00a0 <\/strong>This could well be the\u00a0 Turin shroud.\u00a0 <\/strong>The lesson is clear, if you are not wrapped in the burial cloth of Christ you are naked. If you are not buried together with him in baptism you have no garment.<\/strong><\/p>\n
Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked<\/strong>, and they see his shame.(Revelation 16:15)<\/pre>\n
So, you foul Satanist, keep your filthy blasphemous mouth off of my Lord.\u00a0<\/em> You project the practices of the pagan Elysian mysteries with their orgies and drugs onto Jesus even suggesting that when he complained that he thirsted (on the cross) he was referring to the serpent king Ericthonius\u00a0 and given drugs.\u00a0 Your ignorance is astounding. Jesus recited Psalm 22 on the cross, “My strength is dried up like a potsherd; and my tongue cleaveth to my jaws<\/strong>” (v.15). \u00a0 The Romans handed him a sponge with vinegar to stop him passing out (not out of kindness).<\/p>\n
Further, on the nonsense that the Greek Old Testament was prior to the Hebrew and not a translation I have demonstrated comprehensively that he is wrong\u00a0 by using gematria but that is not even necessary because any half decent Bible student who has the slightest inkling of the Hebrew\/Aramaic and Greek can easily demonstrate it as does this lady Chrissy in the article with the brilliant title:\u00a0 THE LXX IS A TRANSLATION AND DAVID HILLMAN NEEDS TO SHUT UP<\/a><\/strong> \ud83d\ude02<\/p>\n
Here are my previous debunks of over the hillman\u00a0 <\/strong>and his exaggerated pronunciation (and twisting) of the Greek.<\/p>\n
Babylon is Fallen<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n