Gigaohm Biological (April 2)
Another informative video by Dr Jonathan Couey. He starts the show by expressing support for Russell Brand who draws nearly half a million viewers on his videos. Russel Brand is popular and says all the right things, but he is a Free Mason with a 33 tattoo on his wrist and conducting a 33 tour around the UK. He is the Pied Piper and has produced a children’s book of that title (let the implications of that sink in). A little investigation will reveal that he is controlled opposition and not to be trusted.
Dr Jonathan Couey discusses the same two scientific papers as Dr Kevin McCairn and finds them methodologically flawed but that opens the question of what your study is aiming to achieve. Is it trying to establish the route of infection or the lethal dosage or the clinical pathology? In the mouse study they used antibiotics together with spike protein and injected it directly into the hippocampus and compared it with a saline placebo. Jonathan observes that the “saline solution” used as a placebo in the mouse study (SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces cognitive deficit and anxiety-like behavior in mouse via non-cell autonomous hippocampal neuronal death) does not contain the antibiotic. If it is true, then it could be an oversight or perhaps they did use it and the text is ambiguous. Nevertheless, discussing this with Kevin it is common to use antibiotics in brain interventions and it does not cause lesions but is done to prevent secondary infections.
Jonathan objects to the amount of viral material used and the multiple infection routes employed in the monkey study (Neuropathology and virus in brain of SARS-CoV-2 infected non-human primates). That would be a fair point if you were trying to establish infective doses (concentrations) and infection routes (eyes, throat, nose etc) but not if you just want to get the monkeys sick. If the goal of your study is to mimic clinical pathology (the sort you that might find in an autopsied human brain) then you need to induce the illness. It does not matter how you induce it. It would be to your advantage to use middle aged or elderly monkeys because they are more likely to get sick and display clinical pathology. With monkeys (and humans) there will always be some who never get sick and others who get very sick. if you are trying to establish a pathology there is no point giving sub-optimal dosages.
What both these studies show even using artificially high doses (monkey study) and direct brain infection routes (mouse study) is that once the Blood Brain Barrier is crossed all bets are off. That means that some (susceptible) people will end up with brain damage. The higher the viral load (constant boosters) the more likely a negative outcome. That is common sense. Other people will not be affected at all. However, this is just one of the side-effects. The vaccines (transfections) are dangerous.
Recent article in the Advertiserhttps://t.co/biHiiLcymN
— The Tishbite (@Tishbite_redux) April 3, 2022
The video ends with a compilation of clips on Homo Deus transhumanist author Yuval Noah Harari pushing the transhumanist agenda whereby surveillance is so intrusive that it is literally pushed “under the skin” and using AI tracks our very thoughts. According to this Jew who lives with his transgender “husband” the story of Jesus and the resurrection is fake news. Where have I heard that before? Was it Caiaphas? According to the gay god-man they will be able to read our thoughts and free will no longer exist. The mind of the flesh will NEVER be able to read the mind of the Spirit. Artificial Intelligence is a creation of the mind of the flesh and is therefore intrinsically flawed. The destiny of the flesh is death but the Spirit springs up to newness of life for, the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom (2 Cor 3:17).
Been saying he’s Controlled Opposition all along, but no one is listening….👇 https://t.co/cflNy3l5Nf
— 𝙍𝙄𝙎𝙀𝙈𝙀𝙇𝘽𝙊𝙐𝙍𝙉𝙀 (@risemelbourne) March 26, 2022