5G Fact Check
I thought that I would give this article an official sounding title as FACT CHECK carries the stamp of authority and verity. After all the BBC uses it all the time and we all know that Auntie always tells the truth. In fact Auntie has got her knickers in a knot or more like the government and telecommunications corporations have their hand stuck up her skirts. Apparently someone has been setting 5G cell towers on fire and this has provoked a censorship call and a fact check article by the BBC.
When they use the words “crackpot” and “conspiracy theory” in the same headline you know you are getting close to the truth and upsetting some very powerful interests. The only pejorative they did not use was “tin foil hat” (lol). The second headline uses the generic term “Scientists” (lol) so straight away you know that it was written by a journalist and not by a scientist. This is confirmed because it does not quote any scientists or scientific papers. It is therefore an opinion piece and a poor one at that.
Firstly, it is wrong to damage and destroy property but it is also not right to impose health risks on people without consulting them. People should be able to live in a healthy environment. Perhaps (and I am just guessing here) people are upset because they feel threatened. Secondly, this article neglects to address a problem that is just as concerning that is the introduction of the surveillance state which also has health issues (mental health). People do not want to be monitored and tracked all the time.
I seriously ask myself what is supposed to happen? Are we meant to read an article like this and think “scientists” say that there is no link so that is OK then? What do you want us to think? That microwaves are good for us? Before we present some actual scientific evidence let us exercise some common sense. We use our Microwaves every day to heat food. Of course we know that is far higher energy in an enclosed space but it proves what microwaves can do. It can cook meat by exciting the water molecules. Also, we know that we are already surrounded by a fog of electronic radiation…..what is the cumulative effect? Is this the straw that broke the camels back? What are the long term effects? What will it do over ten years or over a twenty year period? If it is “harmless” why do the military have microwave weapons for dispersing crowds? Before looking at some scientific papers look what senator Blumenthal had to say:
Is Senator Blumenthal a crackpot?
Is the Senator a crackpot? Are the thousands of people who are concerned and who have signed petitions “conspiracy theorists”? Are the scientists who have done preliminary studies “tin foil hat” academics because their results do not fit the corporate narrative? Really? When health and environmental concerns are completely ignored can you call that a democracy? The reason conspiracy theories thrive is because you lie all the time.
Scientific studies have been done and the ones that have emerged thus far are concerning. One small section is cited below:
COX [cytochrome c oxidase] is embedded in the mitochondrial inner membrane and is the terminal complex of the mitochondrial electron transport chain. As another one of the key enzymes of mitochondrial energy metabolism, COX is the only enzyme to transport electrons to oxygen to produce H2O and ATP [30,31]. It is believed that 90% of intracellular molecular oxygen is utilized by COX .
Certain doses of MW radiation negatively impact the activity of COX. Wang et al.  exposed primary cultures of cerebral cortical neurons of Wistar rats to continuous MW radiation of 900 MHz, with SARs of 0.38, 0.76, 1.15, 2.23 and 3.22 W/kg, respectively, for 2 h/d for 4 to 6 d. The results showed that the toxic effects of MW radiation on COX activity accumulated and that there was a dose-dependent relationship. Xiong et al.  used MW radiation of 30 mW/cm2 to irradiate male Wistar rats. The decreased COX activity and the reduced expression of COX I/IV mRNA and COX I protein were found after MW radiation, illustrating that MW radiation impacted COX activity at multiple levels.
The problem we may have as more digital technology is rolled out and 5G is established globally, is we may not be able to remove ourselves from exposure to it, which doesn’t bode well for our mitochondria.
Now the above study was done on rats (BBC Journalists?) and linked the enzyme with oxygen transportation (it had a toxic effect). One of the main problems with COVID 19 is severe respiratory problems. That is why they need ventilators. Now I cannot vouch for the provenance of the video below but it more or less says the same thing as this article: Explainer: What happens to the lungs after coronavirus infection?
Then there’s this. From a New York doctor working in the Intensive Care Unit – it’s only 6 minutes https://t.co/E5OgsQKWkw— ★ julie ★ (@bookofoursjulie) April 5, 2020
A few more links:
Every time more electromagnetism is rolled out we have an outbreak of disease. Now we know that correlation does not imply causation but at the very least it requires more study.
The government and the BBC and the Powers that be have no right to criticize anyone because they have not presented any credible independent scientific evidence. If I want I could say that Covid-19 is linked to blue veined cheese. I can say anything I want because you cannot produce any counter evidence.
Now, I ask myself why you have produced no evidence. I suspect the reason you have no evidence is because you KNOW it is harmful. You cannot just declare something by dictat and expect us to believe it. We do not trust you. We know you lie. You lie all the time. You lie about lying.
So, you can harm us, you can lie to us, you can steal from us but we draw the line when you insult our intelligence (lol).