An interesting article by the Occidental Observer a website that promotes “white identity and culture”. Of course, this is regarded as “right-wing” or even “far right”. However, the existence of such websites is the result of the fracturing of society wrought by cultural Marxism. The walls go up and everyone retreats to their enclaves. Politics becomes tribal (the old divide and rule tactic). I have included this article for reasons of balance. The websites Ace, Front Page Magazine, Breitbart, American Thinker, Drudge, Gateway Pundit (among others) are Jewish-owned “conservative” sites that exist to propel the Jew-as-victim narrative. Celebrity activists such as (among others) Paul Joseph Watson, Alex Jones, Pat Condell and Tommy Robinson are Zionists and they often promote anti-Islamic tropes. That does not mean that none of those websites have anything to contribute….but they all have an agenda, whether on the left or the right, whether pro or anti-Zionist.
We are so sorry, we repent
This article – Jews, White Guilt, and the Death of the Church of England is informative because it demonstrates the inroads that Judaism has made into the thinking of the Anglican Church. This should not come as a surprise when one considers the sycophancy of the Christian-Zionists. Guilt and victim-hood are powerful weapons. There is no doubt that “Christians” have at times behaved appallingly and unconscionably towards the Jews. However, Judaism feels no guilt in its own behavior towards Christianity. It seems that self-examination is only something that Christians are required to do, whereas the Talmud has for centuries preached the inferiority and worthlessness of the goyim. From its very inception the Christian Church was persecuted by the Jews and infiltrated by a fifth column who sought to subvert early Christianity.
Of course, some would like to rewrite the New Testament particularly the Fourth Gospel which is regarded as anti-Semitic. The Pope explains that the term “Jews” in the Fourth Gospel refers to the corrupt temple aristocracy. The Pope is actually correct in this observation as the term is used 71 times to denote the Sanhedrin (= the seventy) and the high priest. However, this does not mean that the general populace was without guilt particularly during the persecutions wrought against Jewish-Christians by the false messiah Bar Kochba during his revolt against Rome. This helps explain the hostility of the early church towards Judaism. If you are being killed, tortured and ex-communicated it usually does not foster good inter-faith relations. Context is everything and every action provokes a reaction. The apostle Paul means what he says when he declares his fellow Jews as hateful and contrary to all men. Jesus means it when he calls the Jews the “synagogue of Satan” and declares that their father was a liar and a murderer from the beginning.
Judaism does not repent
In contrast with Christianity the Jews do not see the necessity to repent or feel sorry. They have done nothing wrong and if they have killed Gentiles so what? They deserved it anyway. Gentiles are inferior and meant to serve the Jews and their death is nothing to feel bad about. There are many occasions when Jews have “genocided” goyim. Perhaps we need laws against anti-goyism? The only objection I would have about the above article is the term “white guilt”. Christianity is universal. Many early Christians were Jews. It is still the fastest growing religion in Africa. The article would have been better served with the title “Christian guilt” because this is not about race or color.