Beware the Nanobots
Campbell is still pushing the Nanobots, Chimera, hydra, self-assembling transformers. This is fifth generation warfare and well-poisoning. Dr Kevin MCairn used Rahmen Spectrography during a live stream to show that there was no self assembling bots and no graphene…..
I understand this research’s credibility is debatable – fair enough, DYOR, and here’s the removed video: pic.twitter.com/hYQnN3MaeZ
— Efrat Fenigson (@efenigson) September 8, 2024
Kevin is correct it was an acid test for those that are acting honestly in this space.
Here is proper breakdown of the manuscript, and those that pushed the nanobot nonsense should just be dropped from your feeds.https://t.co/MjKJX9Mp5m
How to examine the vials properly, with… https://t.co/b4aiVYEm59
— Kevin W. McCairn PhD (@NestCommander) September 7, 2024
I have stayed away from commenting on this paper as I continually get accused of being a DNA contam myopic person who must shoot down any alternative theory of harm…
Kevin McKernan
But this paper is a scientific competency test that many people in our medical freedom movement failed miserably.
It has been informative to just shut up and watch who falls for it.
It’s a well poisoning trick.
Circulate semi-believable flat-earth like work and watch the large channels echo it for engagement and views. Much of this movement has limited revenue and is clutching to social media metrics to survive. That lowers their guard and they circulate sometimes laughable papers and then their entire valuable contributions to this field are now tainted with circulating shoddy work.
Talk to people in the microscopy space. All kinds of things self assembly as liquids dry out under excitation heat and evaporative forces.
Jessica Rose
The layers of wtf are almost too much to process here. That paper is riddled with oopsies (I am being nice) and besides John backing it’s ‘authenticity’, it’s shocking that the meat grinder we call media is prompting others to “call him out” for backing this ‘story’ now, and not 4 years ago.
I don’t even know where to start. I like John. But he’s being deceived.
I intuit, have extensive background and years of research under my belt to support a claim that this is a red herring.
KNOW IT FOR YOURSELF. BY SEEKING.
The shots are dangerous, YES. But seek to discover WHY IN ACTUALITY THAT THEY DANGEROUS.
Think amyloids. Think LNP chaos. Think membrane potential disruption. Think immune dysfunction. Think metabolic collapse of cells. Think lack of CQAs and potency assays. Think assholes trying to gain financially.
Don’t give up your common sense and rationality for a sensationalized version of the truth.
My response to Dr John Campbell’s video yesterday about the Japanese research paper which proves the vaccines contain self assembling nano tech technology. pic.twitter.com/oNJQkcFNXX
— Mark Attwood (@MarkAttwood) September 7, 2024
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche
Here’s what Geert said when I asked him about it:
“Be careful with these interpretations. Stereomicroscopy has limitations when it comes to observing structures in solution/ suspension. It is not typically used for observing small, nanometer-scale structures in their native form within solutions.
Back in the days where I was heading up the Biophysical lab at GSK, I could observe plenty of artefactual structures in vaccine compositions (especially in those containing adjuvants). This has to do with the sample preparation where you typically mount the sample on a microscope slide or in a holder. This often causes phase transitions that lead to all kinds of weird conformational changes of certain vaccine component. There is no doubt that in the case of lipid nanoparticles (mRNA vaccines), sample preparation for stereomicrocopy causes phase transitions at the lipid-aqueous interface.
One can only trust microscopic methods that enable visualization of mRNA vaccine components in their native form (e.g., cryo-EM, scanning transmission EM, ..)”