Red Cow Apocalypse

Spread the love

Red Cow Apocalypse

Apparently the red cow was secretly sacrificed in Jerusalem and yet we have all survived.   Whether or not it has been sacrificed is moot because at some point in the future they do intend to sacrifice the red cow and they may have already done it.  According to the video below  the arrival of the red heifer is “prophesied in Christianity”.  That is untrue and many of the statements in the video are tendentious and decontextualized and will be debunked anon.

 


Red Heifers Secretly SACRIFICED in JERUSALEM TODAY! – Is This The Ultimate Warning? (23 min)

 

The arrival of the red heifer is not “prophesied in Christianity”. The Christian “temple” is not one made with hands (Acts 7:48). In fact the saints are living temple stones (1 Pet 2:5) and Jesus is both the temple (John 2:19) and the sacrifice (Heb 10:10). There is no more any need for sacrifice. Any Christians who tell you otherwise for whatever reason are perverting the gospel. Not only are we explicitly told in the Apocalypse that there is no temple in the New Jerusalem (Rev 21:22) but David was told by God that he did not want a temple (see my article here) and instead God would build a house (dynasty) for David and he was given the Messianic promise (2 Sam 7:12-14) nevertheless, God conceded and allowed David’s son Solomon to build a temple. As such Solomon became the initial fulfillment (placeholder) of the prophecy but he soon apostatized and as a consequence the kingdom was divided in the days of his son.

The video offers Matthew 24:14-16 and 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4 as “proof” of an end time temple with scant effort to contextualize the quotes within the history of the period as the citations refer to the first and second Roman Wars. The First Jewish–Roman War was in 66–73 AD and resulted in the destruction of Herod’s Temple the Second Jewish-Roman war (132–136 AD) was the Bar Kokhba revolt. Both wars were nationalist rebellions, striving to restore an independent Judean state. In Matthew Jesus draws on the seventy weeks prophecy by Daniel, which among other things describes the defilement of the temple by Antiochus Epiphenes in the Hasmonean period. This is a complex prophecy poorly understood by Christians, moreover, the Rabbi’s deliberately omitted about 166 years from the Persian period in their Seder Olam Calendar to ensure a period of exactly 490 years between the first and second Temple destruction (586BC+70AD=656 years not 490 years) thus making it impossible of any application of the prophecy to Christ. The end of the temple and animal sacrifice occurred in 70 AD and before that happens the apostles and Paul had already preached the gospel to all the nations of the ancient world. The second Jewish-Roman war saw the chief Rabbi Akiva declare Bar Kochba as the Messiah which he said fulfilled Numbers 24:17. There can be no doubt that Kochba erected a place for sacrifice and worship (if only temporary) on the Temple Mount. Kochba was therefore the initial prototype of the “man of lawlessness” even though he saw himself as the embodiment of the law (cf. the law made flesh). On his coins he depicted himself as a star rising above the Torah Ark.

He persecuted Christians who refused to buy and sell with his coins and his soldiers took a test of loyalty by cutting of their little finger and wearing tefillin on the forehead (Rev 13:16-17). The destruction of the temple in 70 occurred after 3.5 years of desecration as did the Kochba rebellion (the Seleucid desecration under Antiochus also lasted 3.5 years) moreover the first temple and second temple fell on the 9th Ab and Kochba’s fortress of Betar fell on the same date. History does not repeat but it rhymes and the first and second century outworking of the prophesy form eschatological patterns (but not blueprints) of future events.

Therefore the two citations in this video speak of the destruction of the temple in AD 70 and the annihilation and dispersion of the nation in AD136 which both form a pattern of the final 3.5 year tribulation and witnessing in Rev 11: 1-3 which also speaks of a temple (though not literal).

Suffice to say that God told Abraham that He would provide the sacrifice (Gen 22:14) and He told David that He did not want a temple. Although the ashes of the heifer could make the priestly recipient ritually pure , the ashes could not purge the conscience of dead works (Heb 9:13-14). The Jews do not tell you that the reason behind the necessity of the red heifer ritual is because the priests had been struck down dead by God in the Tabernacle (Lev 10:1-2) thus making the tent ritually impure. The Aaronic priesthood had effectively blocked access to God by introducing rebellion and death into the sanctuary. It was from its very instigation a flawed and rotten priesthood with Aaron making the golden calf and his sons being struck dead for burning strange incense (getting high while drunk) in the sanctuary. It was therefore necessary to introduce another way (work around) outside the camp (law) to reconsecrate the defiled priesthood. Most of the Rabbis don’t understand their own Torah because they spend all their time debating and pilpulling ways to get around the commands and pontificating in the Talmud (which Jesus calls the traditions of men). The ritual of the red heifer is closely associated with the Day Of Atonement (DOA) Scapegoat ritual which is also connected with this incident.

The Scapegoat and the Jews

The video cites Amos (9:14-15) as a proof that they would return to the land and that they would never be uprooted, but again that vision is clearly utopian and eschatological as both the Old and New Testaments speak of further trouble and even exile (Ezek 21:27, Zech 14:2, Rev 17:16)

The indwelling of Yahweh among his people is not in the form of a building but in his son, who could say that whoever had seen him had seen the Father (John 14:9). The Jews understand the presence (Shakan Exod 25:8) of God as happening through the “Shekhinah” a word not found in the Bible. It appears in the Mishnah, the Talmud, and Midrash. Kabbalah associates the shekhinah with the divine feminine as Gnosticism does with Sophia (wisdom) with the roots of these unscriptural ideas tracing back to Canaanite gods having a female consort (Asherah). The practice of Jewish male worshipers rocking back and forth and thrusting the hips is thought to linked to engaging with the divine feminine. These ideas should be rejected by Christians because the tabernacling or indwelling (skenoo) presence of God is Jesus Christ (John 1:14).

All the references to Ezekiel’s visionary temple should be understood as allegorical and/or an attempt to stimulate the people to action by making them ashamed of their apathy (Ezek 43:10-11). The temple when it was built was nothing like the vision vouched safe to Ezekiel and was so disappointing that the old men who had known the glory of the former temple wept when they saw the foundation was laid (Ezra 3: 12). The temple vision of Ezekiel was never meant to be understood literally and any attempt to regard it as such creates many problems.

Finally, it is quite obvious that many Jews as well as many Christians do not understand Scripture and that Christian-Zionists are the result of subversion by the Synagogue of Satan forming an unholy alliance with the British Empire and its Commonwealth resulting in such strange phenomenon as British Israelitism and the demonizing of Russia (Gog) as the end time enemy. They are running a “controlled opposition” play against God himself by using the eschatology of the Apocalypse as a game plan. The Gnostics and Kabbalists are attempting to wrestle God to a halt and claim the victory for themselves. God will not be mocked. This will not end well as no one can force the hand of the Almighty.

 

Extra resources:

Anglo-Zionist Temple Mount Plot

Bless Israel

Amalek Propaganda

The Return of the Jews to Israel

 

My Commentary on the Apocalypse PRITA and on Daniel  GIJ