Did the apostle Paul invent Christianity?

Did the apostle Paul invent Christianity?

The idea is being promoted that the Apostle Paul invented Christianity and that virtually nothing can be known about the historical Christ around which Paul developed a Christology.  Scholars like Bart Ehrman point to the book of James with its argument about faith and works being in contradiction with Pauline teachings about justification by faith.  The James of the Epistle of James is thought by these scholars to be James the brother of Jesus and he is thought to be a Judaizer and stickler for the Law of Moses. They are wrong on both counts. Paul (Saul) met James the brother of Jesus in Jerusalem to sort out the problem of table fellowship etc between Jews and Gentiles (Acts 15). James the brother of Jesus was not a Judaizer and he was also not the writer of the Epistle of James.   It was James the brother of John and the sons of Zebedee who wrote the epistle.  James was beheaded by Herod Antipas in AD 44 (see Acts 12) and his brother John received the Apocalypse at Patmos.  There is scarcely ten years between the crucifixion of Jesus and the death of James Zebedee. Most scholars regard this as too early for an Epistle like James to be written even though they admit it has all the hallmarks of an early writing.  It does not mention Gentiles or the fall of Jerusalem and the problems in the epistle are those faced by the early church described in Acts 1-9.  Our argument is that the epistle is about that persecution and the death of Stephen who the Jews envied.  The “rich man” and judge in the epistle was the apostle Paul and the “murderers and adulterers” were the Herod dynasty who had intermarried into the priestly clan. They were Edomites and they beheaded John the Baptist, the beloved mentor of John and James because John the Baptist pointed out their murder and adultery. Therefore, the epistle of James is very early, probably written before the Gospel accounts.  It has many connections with the Gospel of Matthew, particularly the beatitudes (but not verbatim quotes) which we would expect from John and James who became disciples of Christ and heard him preach and were in every sense “eye witnesses”.

Discussion With Brother Paul – In Defense Of The Apostle Paul Part 1 (1:39 min)

 Note that James alludes to Malachi in his Epistle and that is important because so does John the Baptist

 

James Malachi
5.1 Weep and Howl 2.13 Tears,weeping, crying out..he regardeth not the offering anymore.
4.7 Draw night unto God, and he will draw nigh unto you 3.7 Return unto me, and I will return unto you
5.4 The Lord of Sabaoth 3.7 saith the Lord of Hosts
5.3 Eat your flesh as it were fire 3.2 Like a refiner’s fire
5.3 Your gold and silver is cankered 3.3 Purge them as gold and silver
5.3 A witness against you 3.5 A swift witness against
4.4 Adulterers 3.5 Adulterers
5.4 The hire of the labourers kept back by fraud 3.5 Those that oppress the hireling in his wages
1.27 The fatherless and the widows in their affliction 3.5 The widow and the fatherless
1.17 No variableness 3.6 I am the Lord, I change not
5.18 The coming of the Lord draweth nigh 3.1 The Lord shall suddenly come to his temple

The book of Malachi was directed against the corrupt priesthood and against Esau/Edom (=Herod the Edomite and his dynasty). It predicted the appearance of the forerunner (Elijah figure) John the Baptist and of Jesus to cleanse the Temple.

https://www.biblaridion.info/Prita_Malachi.png

The book of Malachi can probably be dated sometime in the reign of Antipater (died 36/37 BC) anticipating the rise to power of the Edomite Kings, with Herod the Great appearing about 33 years before the birth of John the Baptist. The suggested dating range of Malachi is therefore 100- 30 BC. Here is my analysis of Malachi.

** my PDF has errata 100-30CE but Malachi was written before or during the time that Herod the Great took the throne. Herod died ca. 4 BC and Jesus was born ca. 6 BC-4BC (not in the year zero). This would have made Jesus a toddler (less than 2 years old) when Herod slaughtered the innocents in Bethlehem.

https://www.biblaridion.info/Digressions/malachi.pdf

 

So, it is fitting that the erstwhile disciple of John the Baptist should allude to the same prophecy that predicted the coming of John the Baptist, a book that John the Baptist also quoted.

Psalm 62

James Zebedee also alludes to Psalm 62, a Davidic Psalm ascribed to the rebellion of Absalom with David forced to flee Jerusalem.  A fitting Psalm in connection with Christian-jews fleeing to places like Damascus because of rebellion against the true king of Israel -Jesus the greater son of David.

 

Absalom’s rebellion — David’s flight from Jerusalem: my rock… salvation… defence… expectation… rock… salvation… defence… salvation… glory… rock… strength… refuge… mercy.

 

Janes Psalm 62
5.6 Ye have condemned and killed the just one (Stephen) 3. Mischief against a man that ye may slay him
5.7 Be patient therefore, brethren 5. My soul, wait thou only upon God
5.2,4 Riches…fraud 10. Oppression…riches
5.9 The judge standeth before the door 12. Thou renderest to ever man
4.14 Your life a vapour 9. They are lighter than a breath
4.12 one lawgiver who is able to save 1. My salvation
4.7 Submit yourself to God 5. (LXX) Submit yourself unto God
3.10 Out of the same mouth…blessing and cursing 4. They bless with their mouth, but curse inwardly
2.24 faith vs. works 8. trust in him at all times
12. According to his work
2.2 A man in goodly apparel…in vile raiment 9. Men of low degree…or high degree

 Psalm 62 also has a Messianic application:

Messianic fulfilment

1. My soul waiteth (is silent) was specially true of Jesus in his trial, when he did not answer the charges being brought against him (Matt. 27:12,14). Here is the explanation of those silences before his adversaries: he was praying (cp. Psa. 37:7)! Verse 2 now applies very readily: “He is my defence; I shall not be moved” (cp. 37:24).
3. A bowing wall… a tottering fence. Apt figures for the fate of Jerusalem and its people:
Therefore this iniquity shall be to you as a breach ready to fall, swelling out in a high wall, whose breaking cometh suddenly at an instant” (Isa. 30:13, and see the whole section; cp. Job 24:16; Matt. 6:19; 24:43).
4. They only consult.
Then assembled together the chief priests, and the scribes, and the elders of the people, unto the palace of the high priest, who was called Caiaphas, and consulted that they might take Jesus by subtilty, and kill him. But they said, Not on the feast day, lest there be an uproar among the people” (Matt. 26:3-5; also see vv. 59,60).
To cast him down from his excellency. Matt. 26:53,68; 27:26.
They bless with their mouth. Matt. 22:16.
8. God is a refuge for us. Bewildered and grief-stricken disciples associated with Christ in his suffering.
11. God hath spoken once… twice. It may be taken as certain that the Father spoke thus to His Son many times, but on two occasions He spoke to him especially for the benefit of others: Matt. 17:5; John 12:28.
12. For thou renderest to every man according to his work. Consider the appropriateness of this verse with reference to (a) Christ; (b) those in Christ; and (c) those rejecting him.

 

Isaiah 58

Like his erstwhile mentor John the Baptist, whose favourite book was Isaiah, James Zebedee also refers to the Day of Atonement in Isaiah 58. It is an appeal for national repentance lest they be sent away into exile like the scapegoat AND like Absalom who was banished by David after his rebellion. The message is…stop rebelling.  Humble yourself and repent.

James 4 Isaiah 58
8. Draw nigh unto God 2. Approaching to God
10. Humble yourselves 3. We have afflicted our soul
1. Your pleasures 3. Ye find pleasure
1.      Wars and fighting’s 4. Strife and debate
9. be afflicted 5. a day for a man to afflict his soul

Peter’s use of the epistle

And we find Peter quoting James Zebedee.  After all, Peter and James spent time in jail together and then James was beheaded.

1 Peter 5.5-9 James 4.6-10
1. God resisteth the proud, and giveth grace to the humble Quote from Prov 3.34 LXX
Humble yourself therefore under the mighty hand of God Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord
That he might exalt you in due time And he shall exalt you
Your adversary the devil…whom resist steadfast in the faith Resist the devil, and he will flee from you

As I mentioned in the video, the faith vs works argument is a false one.  James is talking about Works of faith not ritualistic works of law keeping.  The phrase “show me” your works is a reference to Yahweh-Yireh (Yah will be seen) in Gen 22:14 and this places the sacrifice of Isaac as a work of faith.  The faith of Abraham was animated by works.  This epistle that so excoriates Saul (Paul) before his conversion is where Paul drew on the lesson that James had taught him.  It became fundamental to justification by faith. We are told that Abraham obeyed the full law (Gen 26:5) 430 years before it was even given!  Jesus accused those same priests (who claimed Abraham as father) as not doing the works of Abraham. They were faithless and unlike Abraham they did not believe in the appointed messiah. Their works of law would not save them and could only lead to death…not because (as Paul said) that the law of Moses was bad (it was an excellent law), but because of human nature.  Those who live under the Law will die by the Law because they are in bondage to but those who live under grace are alive to Christ and will have life everlasting because they are truly free.    I will make the bold statement that the seeds of Pauline Christology came from this exposition by James Zebedee. Paul must have pondered the implications of James’ Epistle as he sat in Damascene blindness.  He was a Pharisee of the Pharisees and a fantastic rhetorician and a rabbi with an analytical mind.  The truth of James’s words must have hit him like a brick.

 

 

 

The Luciferian Doctrine Explained

The Luciferian Doctrine Explained

This was interesting especially the comments about Red Shield.  In the past I suggested that red is associated with Esau (the brother of Jacob)  and progenitor of the Edomites.  Herod the Great was an Idumean who married into the aristocratic Jewish priestly family.  He is depicted as the great red dragon in Revelation 12.  Esau was red and hairy and Jacob wore an animal pelt to trick his blind father into thinking he was dealing with his brother.  I suspect that Rabbinic mythologizing conflated the scapegoat (Azazel) with the hairy red goat (Esau/Edom) and this became the devil or the Baphomet of later Templar mythology.  In any case it is my contention that the Herod dynasty and bloodline did not disappear in the first and early second century as historians believe but went underground. Herod the Great was probably the richest man of the ancient world, even lending money to Rome.  The Edomites or Idumeans were a branch of the Jews the black sheep (red sheep) of the family and I think they reemerged as the banking dynasty of Rothschild (Red shield).

The Luciferian Doctrine Explained – ROBERT SEPEHR (35 min)

Debunking Bjerknes

Debunking Bjerknes

If you hover over the biblical citations they will appear in a pop-up box

Mossad Kabbalah “By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War” (32 min)

My problem with Christopher Jon Bjerknes (CJB) is that although he delivers some good information (similar to Adam Green) he conflates all his sources. All sources are not equal and it is poor hermeneutics to use a secondary source to explain a primary source (especially using a rabbincal source that is biased or has an agenda). Therefore, conflating occult texts with Biblical texts is bad practice. He does this when he quotes Prov 24:6 completely out of context😂 but why should that matter? He tells a good story and tells the audience what they want to hear. Here is a snapshot of the verse from my 600 page commentary (page 286).

 

 

Mossad do fight war by deception and it is their motto and they have probably based it on a Rabbinic/ Talmudic interpretation of Prov 24:6 but the Rabbis understanding of scripture is often wrong but this does not stop CJB adopting Rabbinic wrong speak. 😂

One point of contention (which I corrected him on extensively during a live stream) was his understanding of the Scapegoat. I told him that the Scapegoat was released and sent into exile (sent to Azazel) and the other goat (the one for Yahweh) was slaughtered. This obviously has overtones of the Cain and Abel story with Cain representing the Jews. It is also reflected in the release of Barabbas and the death of Jesus. After being shown the analogy CJB still insists on misinterpreting the ritual. He is so busy conflating everything and trying to discredit Christianity that truth falls by the wayside.

Lastly something must be said about the term EDOM used to describe gentiles. That is a rabbinic affectation and people like CJB and Adam Green should know better than adopting rabbinic terminology. I challenged Dovid about calling gentiles EDOM because genetically ESAU (the progenitor of EDOM) is Jewish. Therefore EDOM is genetically Semitic (according to the Bible story) and therefore EDOM is a Jew and not a gentile. Furthermore, Edom/Esau in the prophecy of Malachi is a reference to the cruel Herod Dynasty which married into the Jewish priestly class (though Herod the Great later murdered his wife Mariamme and three of his sons) and Herod Antipas the adulterer (who married his brother’s wife) had John the Baptist murdered. The Herod dynasty was therefore Jewish or at least half Jewish. Once again I leave my comparison table here:

http://www.biblaridion.info/Prita_Malachi.png

So Edom is not a gentile, Edom is a Jew. The Rabbis will Pillpul their way out of the problem by asserting that the gentiles are “spiritually” EDOM which is also not true. Edom/Esau despised the inheritance and the covenant blessing concerning messiah vouched safe to Abraham and Jacob (Heb 12:16-17) in this EDOM/ESAU represents Jews who turned their back on Christ and  hence on their forefathers. Edom/Esau is so named because he sold out his birthright for a bowl of red lentils (Gen 25:30). His name means RED. When God made the land covenant He promised to be Abraham’s shield and his great reward (Gen 15:1) but many Jews swapped their birthright (Christ) for the Zionist state established by Rothschild (=RED Shield). The Jews sold their birthright in Christ for a mess of red beans that will make them fart and bring forth wind (Isa 26:18). Faithless Jews are Edomites. Christians are not Edomites. Debunking the constant stream of garbage and misinterpretation is tiresome but necessary. Christianity is under attack but many Christians have neglected to put enough oil in their lamps to withstand the onslaught (Jer 5:31).

 

Some one please place a link from this article under one of CJBs videos as YT tends to scrub my comments and send my last few articles to Dooooovid 😂

RED (Part 3)

RED (Part 3)

I finally got around to completing Part 3. The first two parts can be found here:

Wrestling God

I hope to get part 4 done soon.

Red (Part 3)     1:13 min

NOTES AND LINKS

Flavius Josephus & Flavian Rome, Daniel Schwarz (Chapter 3) “Herodians and Ioudaioi in Flavian Rome”

https://books.google.com.au/books/about/Flavius_Josephus_and_Flavian_Rome.html?id=hqkUDAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Herodian Marriage and the Construction of Identity, James Windsor Donaldson. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.864.27&rep=rep1&type=pdf

https://www.biblaridion.info/html/Last_Things.html

The Truth about Ashkenazi Jews | Unpacked (5 min)

https://youtu.be/cw0G9COpeMY

The time and place of European admixture in Ashkenazi Jewish history https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006644

Genetic markers cannot determine Jewish descent

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2014.00462/full

The Biggest Jewish Genetic Myths of All Time

https://momentmag.com/the-biggest-jewish-genetic-myths-of-all-time/

Khazars: History of the Jewish Turkic Nomads (20 min)

https://youtu.be/Xr2CtmpKU6A

The Radhanites or Radanites

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radhanite

O. Szemerényi, “Four Old Iranian Ethnic Names: Scythian – Skudra – Sogdian – Saka” (Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1980), p. 7 @ https://www.azargoshnasp.net/history/Scythians/fouroldiranianethnicnames.pdf

Guangzhou Massacre

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guangzhou_massacre

Frankfurt School

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School

I See Red (Part 2)

I See Red (Part 2)

Part 1 and the video on Jacob can be found here:

RED

And here:

Wrestling God

I SEE RED (Part 2)

Part 3 coming soon.

Notes and Links

 

Ginger Jews


https://forward.com/culture/434304/on-national-redhead-day-explore-the-history-of-ginger-jews/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_hair
Red hair is also found amongst the Ashkenazi Jewish populations. In 1903, 5.6% of Polish Jews had red hair. Other studies have found that 3.69% of Jewish women overall were found to have red hair, but around 10.9% of all Jewish men have red beards. The stereotype that red hair is Jewish remains in parts of Eastern Europe and Russia.


https://www.uni-frankfurt.de/43183254/Rebekka_Vo%C3%9F___Red_Jews__A_Wandering_Image_of_the_Jewish_Self_in_Yiddish_Popular_Culture

http://biblicalanthropology.blogspot.com/2011/09/edomites-and-color-red.html


Who Was The Real King Herod? | Biblical Tyrant | Timeline (48 min)
https://youtu.be/i_eJqsnPknM

Was Herod Really So GREAT?? | The Jewish Story | Unpacked (11 min)
https://youtu.be/gI7VzkKkJ_o

The Macedonian Conquest, Maccabees, and the Menorah | The Jewish Story | Unpacked (13 min)
https://youtu.be/0CBZgo7GXoA

 

Herod and the Epistle of James:

http://www.biblaridion.info/resources/james.pdf


Argument for the dating of Malachi in the Hasmonean period. The prophet condemns the corrupt Hasmonean priests. Dated sometime in the reign of Antipater (died 36/37 BCE) anticipating the rise to power of the Edomite Kings. Herod, the Idumean killed the “messenger of the covenant” (John the Baptist)

http://www.biblaridion.info/Digressions/malachi.pdf


http://www.biblaridion.info/Prita_Malachi.png

Herod’s Temple:

https://www.biblaridion.info/html/downloads.html

Mammon
https://www.biblaridion.info/html/ch18.html#P393


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antigonus_II_Mattathias