The Book of Enoch (Part-1)

This is a discussion by John Brisson from We’ve read the Documents on the book of Enoch.  It is the first of a series that will follow and at some stage I hope to join the conversation.

Why The Book of Enoch Is Not And Should Not Be Canonical – Part 1 – Overview (22 min)

My Comment: An important and difficult theme to examine. I have recently connected some dots between the Enoch problem in the NT and Genesis. It is interesting to note that the Enochian heresy emerged in the early church and is now emerging again. Also not a coincidence that John Dee who coined the term British Empire stated that he had received knowledge from an angel which he wrote in a code he called the "Enochian Language" (Dee was the original 007 and an alchemist in the Tudor court of Elisabeth ca.1600). Add to that the expedition of Charles Warren the Free Mason and theosophist adjacent who surveyed under Solomon's Temple and Mount Hermon (the location of the "fallen angels" in Enoch). After the survey he was appointed as Chief police inspector of the occult ripper murders (sacrifice) in 1888. All a coincidence I am sure.🤣.

Here is my commentary on a screenshot from scholarly book titled Textual and Comparative Explorations in 1 & 2 Enoch, authored by Samuel Zinner.