Anyone who thinks digital ID and Basic Income is a good idea has a hole in their head. If you can’t see where this is going or the kind of slavery that is being forced on you and your children then you need help.
‘Accepting Digital ID is slapping handcuffs on yourself’ | Neil Oliver & Bev Turner (11 min)
The UK’s New “Digital ID” Explained (9 min)
With AI threatening jobs, is it time for a universal basic income? | The Business | ABC NEWS (5 min)
10,000 Foot View – The Epstein Binder Debacle Exposes the Narrative Network (35 min)
Just watch the masses worship Trump and the the technocrats as they usher in pseudo-Christianity which is really Chabad-Gnosticism. Toldaso. This was always going to be the outcome. This is not the Beast-system (that is dying) but this is the image of the beast. Just as God created man in his image so also the Anglo-Zionist beast creates an image and breathes life into it. The Theosophists have planned this for a long time. Centuries in fact. And Chabad have a big role to play. I hope you are enjoying it. They put on a damn good show.
There are going to be a lot of unemployed Porn stars and Only Fans in the bright new future. The argument goes that al least real people won’t be exploited in order to make this material. Just your mind. Wait till we get haptic suits with vibro-tactile motors, lag-free wireless connectivity to bring the best possible haptics experience and VR headsets. This is the end of reality and the end of humanity.
This was a good interview (with a caveat). At about 6 mins the interviewer says something like, that is the old Gnostic heresy that we are spiritual beings trapped in a material body.
It was a good interview but her solution (which is to introduce an age limit to access the internet) is a trojan horse to introduce centralized digital ID for everyone and enslave us all. There are better solutions. She gave the Amish example where they discuss the impact of technology communally and decide whether to adopt it or not. If children need to be protected simply ban the phones from school. Fine companies who sell phones to children. Parents need to do their damn job not Governments.
The Extinction of Experience: Christine Rosen on the Impact of Technology on Society (50 min)
Will We Get AGI In 2025? (10 min)
Musk Building X Into MASSIVE Surveillance Tool! w/ Whitney Webb
The Six Epochs Of The Singularity… (Remastered)-1:30 min
If you have trouble understanding that watch this excellent video (already featured on this website, here is the YT link: https://youtu.be/klIrQkV1kX8)
The age amendment bill has been passed (rammed through) and they already passed the digital legislation. The age restriction bill is set to be implemented in 2026. The idea is that parents etc will not be punished but “platforms” such as Twitter will be fined 50 million or banned for allowing youngsters to join without being vetted.
This will mean that everyone will need to be verified. Everyone will need digital ID or facial recognition to use the internet. That is what Twitter wants. It is what FaceBook wants. It is what Instagram wants. It is what Trump wants. It is what all Governments want. It is what the WEF wants.
Do you see it yet? You are being manipulated and nudged into New Age Slavery. There is no left or right because they all want the same things. They want to control what you are allowed to see and what you are allowed to say.
They create the problem and offer the solution. SUCKERS.
Australians vs. The Agenda appears in the Senate & Sky News Australia (2 min)
Suckers. They rammed the legislation through despite the objections and concerns. Democracy (lolz).
We need a recall/impeachment policy for rogue government and individual members. This is a turning point for Australia hopefully it’s the demise of the uni-party. pic.twitter.com/Ec6mvIvZ4p
Apparently Andrew Hastings MP informed his constituents that it was necessary in order to protect the mental health of young girls as there had been an alarming increase in depression blah, blah. Could that have anything to do with the psychological warfare conducted against all of us but especial directed at children? A campaign run by the military and intelligence services. Create the problem offer the solution. You all disgust me with your MK Ultra type trauma programming, lockdowns, body-dismorphic propaganda etc. etc. A reckoning is coming for all your cowardly manipulation and all the harm you did to our children. Don’t you dare tell me about your concern for children.
I don’t support any political party nor do I vote but I am finding that the Australian Citizens Party makes a lot of sense. Here is there latest video and also two videos from their conference. I gather that that they are throwing their hat into the ring and will field candidates to stand for Parliament.
CITIZENS REPORT 21/11/2024 – ACP sounds the charge for the next election / War on cash / Biden & WW3 (55 min)
Australia is not sovereign without an independent foreign policy – John Lander (22 min)
Subservience to a foreign power damages Australia’s most important trade relationship – Richard Yuan (22 min)
These people are truly despicable, they mask changes in property rights and access as concern for the indigenous and they mask censorship and the introduction of ID as concern for the safety of children. I am sure that the people who injected your kids with experimental vaccines and caused mental health issues with lockdowns care about your children.
This legislation is being rammed through with indecent haste. People have been lulled into complacency because the MAD bill has been defeated but they added an age amendment which is a way to get digital ID through. Moreover, they will throw this back to the digital platforms who will have to comply or be blocked. Exactly the same as the “vaccine mandates” which they can then blame on the employer. Not our fault. It is the employer who demanded you get vaccinated.
Finally….parents decide what their children do not the state.
The Australian Government is using children to test facial recognition technology. (1 min)
Kendrick Lamar ft. the Australian Senate – Wacced Out Social Media Ban. (5 min)
Take action now…………
Australian Citizens Party
Media Release Monday, 25 November 2024
Craig Isherwood‚ National Secretary
PO Box 376‚ COBURG‚ VIC 3058
Phone: 1800 636 432
Email: info@citizensparty.org.au
Website: https://citizensparty.org.au Dutton wants all Aussies to hand over their biometrics to Big Brother, to ‘save the children’
Two days to hammer the Liberals to drop their support for the Under 16s social media ban, which will destroy online privacy.
When the two major parties collude to ram a new law through Parliament as rapidly as they can with no time for scrutiny, you can bet they have something bad to hide.
That’s what they’re doing this week with their new electoral reforms to rig the voting system to block alternatives to the major parties, and with the bill to ban under 16s from social media.
And that’s what they would have done with the MAD social media censorship bill too, except the backlash from Australians was so fierce the Liberals saw the writing on the wall and bailed, and now, with the Greens last Friday declaring their opposition, the MAD bill is dead.
No doubt that’s why Labor and the Liberals are ganging up to force through the under 16s social media ban so quickly—they know it was scrutiny that killed the MAD bill.
To pretend they are being democratic, on Thursday the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024 was referred to a Senate inquiry with—wait for it—one day to make a submission, and two days to produce a report!
This joke of a process shows the two major parties really are the “uniparty”, and have nothing but towering contempt for democracy and engagement with the Australian people.
Big Brother
Nobody is denying there are problems with teenagers’ experiences on social media, but that has been true for 21 years ever since MySpace started in 2003.
So why is the government rushing through a response like this?
The government claims it has consulted widely on the problem, but that’s not the same as consulting on the proposed law, and how it would work.
The major parties don’t want to consult on how the law would work, because the bill they are ramming through does not include specific provisions that transparently show how the ban would be implemented; rather, it requires social media companies to devise ways to implement “age verification” systems to comply with the ban.
This opens the door to digital systems that would destroy online privacy, and expose Australians to identity risks, including theft.
On 13 June, when Opposition Leader Peter Dutton first called for a social media ban for under 16s, Natalie Barr on Channel 7’s Sunrise asked him if it would work, given other countries have tried and failed to implement a workable system.
Dutton answered: “Facial recognition to determine somebody’s age is appropriate.”
Be clear that what Dutton proposed is facial recognition for everyone, which means all Australians having to hand over biometrics to foreign-owned tech giants just to access social media.
If tech giants have it, they can monetise it, governments can get it, and hackers can steal it.
On Sky News on 18 October, Communications Minister Michelle Rowland confirmed the Labor government also proposes that age verification will involve facial recognition.
Evidence, please?
The worst part of these measures is the government has no evidence it will fix the problem, and in fact the government admits the law won’t work very well, knowing that teenagers will find numerous ways around it.
In her Sky News interview, Michelle Rowland admitted that “this won’t protect every child from every harm, every minute that they are online”, before adding, without evidence: “But it’s going to make a difference.”
One of Australia’s leading Constitutional legal experts, Professor Emerita Anne Twomey, pointed out in a post that the government’s proposed exemptions contradict their claimed objectives.
If, as the government says, one of the objectives is to reduce exposure to addictive online habits, why are online video games exempted, which are the most addictive?
If the objective is to reduce online bullying, why are messaging apps like WhatsApp exempt?
Reject the process
The internet is still in its formative stage, and the laws that are made now will be far-reaching.
That’s why stopping the MAD social media censorship bill was so important, to draw a line in the sand for free speech, which the Australian people have done—emphatically.
However sympathetic people are to addressing social media problems for teenagers, nobody should accept the bipartisan backroom dealing that is ramming this bill into law using cries of “think of the children”.
The only chance to stop this bill is if the Liberal Party drops its own Big Brother tendencies and opposes the bill alongside the Independents and Greens.
The Liberals will only do that if they get bombarded with calls and emails today and tomorrow demanding they oppose it.
This is what that global puppet grub Albo-sleazy is saying:
Australian PM says world leaders ‘looking at’ and ‘applauding’ social media legislation (2 min)
Even the Greens don’t like it….
‘We’ve got to do better’: Greens oppose social media ban | Insiders | ABC News (16 min)
Musk does not like it either…but he has different ways of censorship….limiting reach and “verification” supposedly to stop bots and adverts etc. They all want the same thing. To limit your access to information and to SHUT YOU UP.
Elon Musk Criticized Australia’s Proposed Law To Ban Social Media For Children Under-16 (4 min)
And finally, this is an excellent video explaining how it all works:
Institutionalized Mind Control, Run by the Idiots (Who Think They are Intellectuals)-25 min
One reason for the internet Censorship Bill is because the Voice Campaign failed. The was ostensibly to help the indigenous people but was really about property rights and land access connected to SMART city urbanization and driven by the WEF and UN and supported by Jewish “Tikkun Olam” oligarchs like Mark Leibler et al. That campaign failed miserably and the internet memes flew fast and thick, upsetting the fragile ego of stooge Albo-sleazy. Social media, for all its faults and “disinformation” has proved a powerful weapon and memes are an important tool for getting a point across using mockery and humor and they hate it. If it were possible Albo-sleazy would ban the social media altogether.
Do you remember that time in August 2023 when Albo was asked what he would do if he was a dictator?
“Well I’d ban social media”
Today, Albo confirmed he’s almost half way there, rolling out new laws “to protect kids” which will ban VPNs to Social media and require Digital ID pic.twitter.com/YmsVv9CyEy
Labor’s misinformation bill is ‘censoring the internet’ (6 min)
This is of course fascism in the name of “safety” and the “collective good” and it will mean everyone will need a digital ID to access the internet. Once we reach that stage it will be easy to silence anyone or de-bank them if they do not comply. They can make you a non-person quite easily.
Australia’s controversial misinformation bill has been branded ‘the biggest attack on freedom of speech in peacetime Australia’.
NEWS: Australia wants to fine internet platforms up to 5% of their global revenue for failing to prevent the spread of so-called misinformation online.
Opposition James Paterson said: “Australians’ legitimately-held political beliefs should not be censored by either the… pic.twitter.com/SUcjBKtzYk
We warned that Digital ID was coming, and Labor rammed that through Parliament, and nobody cared because it was “voluntary”. We also predicted that Censorship Laws were coming, and Labor is right now ramming these through Parliament, and people think it’s OK “just tell the truth”.
But notice 14(f) – it is about to be illegal to harm public confidence in a banking system.
Why do you think that is? Because the next Bill will be the CBDC Bill we all told you was coming – and it’ll be illegal to criticize it! And guess what, that voluntary Digital ID will be mandatory to access your money in the CBDC!
This Misinformation Bill is something else.
Fancy trying to censor criticism of the banking system and the financial markets.
What’s so concerning is how on earth did that clause even get into the bill.
You don’t need to be a rocket scientist to realise that the Misinformation Bill is about shutting down people who go against the government narrative.
To exclude governments, media and universities just goes to show how belligerent and unashamed the authorities have become in… pic.twitter.com/DkgQ1qejHE
There is obviously a global censorship push. Brazil recently banned Twitter and Starmer the dictator is emptying prisons of murders and rapists to make room for meme offenders and those who use hurty words. The EU has also gone full Stalin.
The reaction to this might well be more and more people switching to Starlink so that they can circumvent any terrestrial systems. That might be the intention. A space-based hive mind controlled by Musk and Thiel etc. From the frying pan into the fire. Who knows?
The biggest perpetrators of dis and mis-information is Government. This is being rammed through without debate. They are frightened and determined. It is designed to defend “our democracy” and done for the chilrun because they care (lolz).
🚨𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: The ‘Combatting Misinformation & Disinformation’ Bill has officially been introduced in the House of Representatives. pic.twitter.com/0rBMZLuwpA
Some say that the suppression order does not exist…and that the list is false. They would say that though wouldn’t they? The same sort of thing has happened in the US, the UK and every other country.