Govern me harder Daddy
đ¤Łđ pic.twitter.com/L0ZtOLRZBn
â Elijah (@CherithElijah) December 6, 2022
— Moses Hopes (@MosesHopes) December 6, 2022
Lies, damn lies and statistics
— Elijah (@CherithElijah) December 6, 2022
đ¤Łđ pic.twitter.com/L0ZtOLRZBn
â Elijah (@CherithElijah) December 6, 2022
— Moses Hopes (@MosesHopes) December 6, 2022
Lies, damn lies and statistics
— Elijah (@CherithElijah) December 6, 2022
Utter disgrace. This is what they are trying to cover up (official stats) they will just stop reporting or massage the numbers (it is already happening) but soon it will no longer be possible. Even the dumb masses will wake up.
These numbers are going up h/t @JaggerAUS pic.twitter.com/O0h9fIpxNY
— roger brown (@dodgierogie68) June 12, 2022
Medical Cover Up in Australia – Albany Doctor Speaks Out (14 MIN)
đđđ https://t.co/wIYA0OAa3b
â Kat A đ¸ (@SaiKate108) June 11, 2022
More doctors speak out!! https://t.co/uDbnnbTyHN
â Kat A đ¸ (@SaiKate108) June 11, 2022
I heard ambulance sirens all this week when I was sat outside. In fact, I remarked to my wife that I heard a lot of sirens. Could this be why?
Only 6 days into the government sanctioned vaccination of children, there is a spike in emergency chest pain among children, some called ambulance while at playgrounds. Is this not worth investigating?
Snapshot of South Australian Ambulance call out log from Sat 15 Jan 2022 pic.twitter.com/GFBCyH6fdK
â Pastor Steve Cioccolanti (@cioccolanti) January 27, 2022
We are already seeing a disproportionate amount of miscarriages. And I know what this doctor is saying about the BMJ and Lancet and New England Journal are true.  The BMJ did call out the Lancet for publishing falsified data on HCQ and regarding the safety of these vaccines (transfections) for children the ABOG member on the FDA approval team did say “we won’t know until we roll it out”. In others words let us try it out and see what happens. These people are disgusting.
â Moses Eleftheria (@EleftheriaMoses) December 28, 2021
Dr Kevin McCairn has a look under the microscope at the Sputnik vaccine which he tests with his blood live on camera just as he did with Pfizer by taking his blood and putting a drop of the vaccine in it. At first the Sputnik reacts better than the Pfizer but (skip to about 7:34) you will see the blood cells staking like roulette chips and sticking together. Underneath I have placed the Running order from the Dojo (Go there if you want to use the timestamp links)
â bitcoinkid (@bitcoinkid1) December 23, 2021
Access to all of Chrisâs content, live webinars twice a month, and much much more is available to our paying members. Click this link for a special introductory offer: https://www.peakprosperity.com/produc… This episode reviews a previously hidden report by Pfizer to the FDA covering the first 90 days of âpost authorizationâ vaccine safety data. A judge ordered its release and, perhaps not surprisingly, no major news outlet has dared to cover the story. Within that first 90- day window, over 1,200 deaths were reported, with a significant number appearing to happen within the first 24 hours after vaccination. We canât say for sure because the report lacks critical details that would allow us to align the specific deaths with the reported observation that the median elapsed time between vaccination and the adverse event was âless than 24 hoursâ for many types of AEs. This report is a âsecond goâ by Pfizer after the first report was deemed wholly insufficient and lacking detail. This one isnât actually all that much better, as it is entirely passive (no active data collection undertaken â it relies entirely on âspontaneouslyâ reported events, and no inquiry into the adverse events is part of this version of the report), thereâs no attempt made to define the incidence of events, and there is no visible effort made to compare the levels of events to an expected baseline of such events. It is also impossible to determine first vs second vaccination injections (not reported) and the age brackets are not even age brackets (âchild, adult and elderlyâ). Besides the 1,223 spontaneously reported deaths, there is an overwhelming tilt towards women reporting AEâs often on the order of 4x or more. None of these were deemed to be worthy of modifying either the administration of the vaccines or the collection of new data in more useful detail. Further, I track down the actual state of knowledge of what is and is not known about pregnancy and the vaccines to uncover the fact that no providers can say, one way or the other, if the vaccines are safe. In the most current language available to vaccine and health care providers, Pfizer says âAvailable data on COMIRNATY administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform vaccine-associated risks in pregnancy.â Naturally, without being able to articulate the actual risk, true informed consent is not possible for pregnant women seeking to understand what the risks might be to their unborn child. All that can truthfully be said is âwe donât know.â If more robust data does exist, it is not yet been made public. We may have to wait up to 55 years for that. Report title: 5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021 Mattias Desmet interview https://youtu.be/CRo-ieBEw-8